re PR tree-optimization/77975 (Missed optimization for some small constants)

PR tree-optimization/77975
	* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (get_base_for): Allow phi argument from latch
	edge to be constant.
	(get_val_for): For constant x return it.  Formatting fix.
	(loop_niter_by_eval): Avoid pointless looping if the next iteration
	would use the same bases as the current one.

	* gcc.dg/pr77975.c: New test.

From-SVN: r246021
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek 2017-03-10 08:53:57 +01:00
parent e837554452
commit 5558f089e3
4 changed files with 63 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
2017-03-10 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/77975
* tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (get_base_for): Allow phi argument from latch
edge to be constant.
(get_val_for): For constant x return it. Formatting fix.
(loop_niter_by_eval): Avoid pointless looping if the next iteration
would use the same bases as the current one.
2017-03-09 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_gen_le_vsx_permute): Use rotate

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2017-03-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/77975
* gcc.dg/pr77975.c: New test.
2017-03-09 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/79962

View File

@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/77975 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ivcanon-details" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Proved that loop 1 iterates 1 times using brute force" 1 "ivcanon" } } */
unsigned int
foo (unsigned int *b)
{
unsigned int a = 3;
while (a)
{
a >>= 1;
*b += a;
}
return a;
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Proved that loop 1 iterates 2 times using brute force" 1 "ivcanon" } } */
unsigned int
bar (unsigned int *b)
{
unsigned int a = 7;
while (a)
{
a >>= 1;
*b += a;
}
return a;
}

View File

@ -2521,7 +2521,8 @@ chain_of_csts_start (struct loop *loop, tree x)
* the derivation of X consists only from operations with constants
* the initial value of the phi node is constant
* the value of the phi node in the next iteration can be derived from the
value in the current iteration by a chain of operations with constants.
value in the current iteration by a chain of operations with constants,
or is also a constant
If such phi node exists, it is returned, otherwise NULL is returned. */
@ -2541,13 +2542,11 @@ get_base_for (struct loop *loop, tree x)
init = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_preheader_edge (loop));
next = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop));
if (TREE_CODE (next) != SSA_NAME)
return NULL;
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (init))
return NULL;
if (chain_of_csts_start (loop, next) != phi)
if (TREE_CODE (next) == SSA_NAME
&& chain_of_csts_start (loop, next) != phi)
return NULL;
return phi;
@ -2556,6 +2555,7 @@ get_base_for (struct loop *loop, tree x)
/* Given an expression X, then
* if X is NULL_TREE, we return the constant BASE.
* if X is a constant, we return the constant X.
* otherwise X is a SSA name, whose value in the considered loop is derived
by a chain of operations with constant from a result of a phi node in
the header of the loop. Then we return value of X when the value of the
@ -2570,6 +2570,8 @@ get_val_for (tree x, tree base)
if (!x)
return base;
else if (is_gimple_min_invariant (x))
return x;
stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (x);
if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
@ -2584,11 +2586,9 @@ get_val_for (tree x, tree base)
return get_val_for (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt), base);
else if (gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) == GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS
&& TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt)) == SSA_NAME)
{
return fold_build1 (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt),
gimple_expr_type (stmt),
get_val_for (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt), base));
}
return fold_build1 (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt),
gimple_expr_type (stmt),
get_val_for (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt), base));
else if (gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) == GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS)
{
tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
@ -2687,6 +2687,7 @@ loop_niter_by_eval (struct loop *loop, edge exit)
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
{
aval[j] = val[j];
val[j] = get_val_for (next[j], val[j]);
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (val[j]))
{
@ -2694,6 +2695,12 @@ loop_niter_by_eval (struct loop *loop, edge exit)
return chrec_dont_know;
}
}
/* If the next iteration would use the same base values
as the current one, there is no point looping further,
all following iterations will be the same as this one. */
if (val[0] == aval[0] && val[1] == aval[1])
break;
}
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();