sh.c (barrier_align): Don't ask for alignment when seeing a branch-around-a-jump from...
* sh.c (barrier_align): Don't ask for alignment when seeing a branch-around-a-jump from machine_dependent_reorg. From-SVN: r43474
This commit is contained in:
parent
5e93ca8698
commit
5d29121331
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
Wed Jun 20 17:02:50 2001 J"orn Rennecke <amylaar@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* sh.c (barrier_align): Don't ask for alignment when seeing a
|
||||
branch-around-a-jump from machine_dependent_reorg.
|
||||
|
||||
Wed Jun 20 08:35:02 2001 Jeffrey A Law (law@cygnus.com)
|
||||
|
||||
* ssa.c (rename_block): Update parameter to remove_phi_alternative
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2941,7 +2941,15 @@ barrier_align (barrier_or_label)
|
|||
/* If relax_delay_slots() decides NEXT was redundant
|
||||
with some previous instruction, it will have
|
||||
redirected PREV's jump to the following insn. */
|
||||
|| JUMP_LABEL (prev) == next_nonnote_insn (next)))
|
||||
|| JUMP_LABEL (prev) == next_nonnote_insn (next)
|
||||
/* There is no upper bound on redundant instructions that
|
||||
might have been skipped, but we must not put an alignment
|
||||
where none had been before. */
|
||||
|| (NEXT_INSN (PREV_INSN (prev)) != prev
|
||||
&& ((INSN_CODE (NEXT_INSN (NEXT_INSN (prev)))
|
||||
== CODE_FOR_block_branch_redirect)
|
||||
|| (INSN_CODE (NEXT_INSN (NEXT_INSN (prev)))
|
||||
== CODE_FOR_indirect_jump_scratch)))))
|
||||
{
|
||||
rtx pat = PATTERN (prev);
|
||||
if (GET_CODE (pat) == PARALLEL)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue