[AArch64] Implement new intrinsics vabsd_s64 and vnegd_s64.

gcc/
2018-08-31  Vlad Lazar  <vlad.lazar@arm.com>

	* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vabsd_s64): New.
	(vnegd_s64): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/
2018-08-31  Vlad Lazar  <vlad.lazar@arm.com>

	* gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_intrinsics.c (test_vnegd_s64): New.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_s.c (RUN_TEST_SCALAR): New.
	(test_vnegd_s64): Likewise.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vnegd_64.c: New.
	* gcc.target/aarch64/vabsd_64.c: New.
	* gcc.tartget/aarch64/vabs_intrinsic_3.c: New

From-SVN: r264019
This commit is contained in:
Vlad Lazar 2018-08-31 15:00:54 +00:00 committed by Vlad Lazar
parent 7a4e1f7d63
commit 66da5b5310
8 changed files with 195 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2018-08-31 Vlad Lazar <vlad.lazar@arm.com>
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vabsd_s64): New.
(vnegd_s64): Likewise.
2018-08-31 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
* ipa-cp.c (estimate_local_effects): Replace wrong MAX with MIN.

View File

@ -11822,6 +11822,18 @@ vabsq_s64 (int64x2_t __a)
return __builtin_aarch64_absv2di (__a);
}
/* Try to avoid moving between integer and vector registers.
For why the cast to unsigned is needed check the vnegd_s64 intrinsic.
There is a testcase related to this issue:
gcc.target/aarch64/vabsd_s64.c. */
__extension__ extern __inline int64_t
__attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
vabsd_s64 (int64_t __a)
{
return __a < 0 ? - (uint64_t) __a : __a;
}
/* vadd */
__extension__ extern __inline int64_t
@ -22907,6 +22919,25 @@ vneg_s64 (int64x1_t __a)
return -__a;
}
/* According to the ACLE, the negative of the minimum (signed)
value is itself. This leads to a semantics mismatch, as this is
undefined behaviour in C. The value range predictor is not
aware that the negation of a negative number can still be negative
and it may try to fold the expression. See the test in
gcc.target/aarch64/vnegd_s64.c for an example.
The cast below tricks the value range predictor to include
INT64_MIN in the range it computes. So for x in the range
[INT64_MIN, y] the range prediction after vnegd_s64 (x) will
be ~[INT64_MIN + 1, y]. */
__extension__ extern __inline int64_t
__attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
vnegd_s64 (int64_t __a)
{
return - (uint64_t) __a;
}
__extension__ extern __inline float32x4_t
__attribute__ ((__always_inline__, __gnu_inline__, __artificial__))
vnegq_f32 (float32x4_t __a)

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2018-08-31 Vlad Lazar <vlad.lazar@arm.com>
* gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_intrinsics.c (test_vnegd_s64): New.
* gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_s.c (RUN_TEST_SCALAR): New.
(test_vnegd_s64): Likewise.
* gcc.target/aarch64/vnegd_64.c: New.
* gcc.target/aarch64/vabsd_64.c: New.
* gcc.tartget/aarch64/vabs_intrinsic_3.c: New.
2018-08-31 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
PR c++/87155

View File

@ -627,6 +627,14 @@ test_vqabss_s32 (int32_t a)
return vqabss_s32 (a);
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tneg\\tx\[0-9\]+" 1 } } */
int64_t
test_vnegd_s64 (int64_t a)
{
return vnegd_s64 (a);
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tsqneg\\tb\[0-9\]+" 1 } } */
int8_t

View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
/* Test the vabsd_s64 intrinsic. */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "--save-temps -O2" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>
#include <limits.h>
extern void abort (void);
#define force_simd(V1) asm volatile ("mov %d0, %1.d[0]" \
: "=w"(V1) \
: "w"(V1) \
: /* No clobbers */);
#define RUN_TEST(test, answ) \
{ \
force_simd (test); \
force_simd (answ); \
int64_t res = vabsd_s64 (test); \
force_simd (res); \
if (res != answ) \
abort (); \
}
int64_t input[] = {INT64_MAX, 10, 0, -10, INT64_MIN + 1, INT64_MIN};
int64_t expected[] = {INT64_MAX, 10, 0, 10, INT64_MAX, INT64_MIN};
int main (void)
{
RUN_TEST (input[0], expected[0]);
RUN_TEST (input[1], expected[1]);
RUN_TEST (input[2], expected[2]);
RUN_TEST (input[3], expected[3]);
RUN_TEST (input[4], expected[4]);
RUN_TEST (input[5], expected[5]);
return 0;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
/* Check that the compiler does not optimise the vabsd_s64 call out.
We need to check for this because there is a mismatch in semantics
between the ACLE, which states that he absolute value of the minimum
(signed) value is itself, and C, where this is undefined behaviour. */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "--save-temps -fno-inline -O2" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>
#include <limits.h>
extern void abort (void);
int
bar (int64_t x)
{
if (x < (int64_t) 0)
return vabsd_s64 (x) < (int64_t) 0;
else
return -1;
}
int
main (void)
{
int ans = 1;
int res_abs = bar (INT64_MIN);
if (res_abs != ans)
abort ();
return 0;
}

View File

@ -75,6 +75,18 @@ extern void abort (void);
} \
}
#define RUN_TEST_SCALAR(test_val, answ_val, a, b) \
{ \
int64_t res; \
INHIB_OPTIMIZATION; \
a = test_val; \
b = answ_val; \
force_simd (b); \
force_simd (a); \
res = vnegd_s64 (a); \
force_simd (res); \
}
int
test_vneg_s8 ()
{
@ -177,7 +189,24 @@ test_vneg_s64 ()
return 0;
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "neg\\td\[0-9\]+, d\[0-9\]+" 8 } } */
int
test_vnegd_s64 ()
{
int64_t a, b;
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST0, ANSW0, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST1, ANSW1, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST2, ANSW2, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST3, ANSW3, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST4, ANSW4, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (TEST5, ANSW5, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN + 1, a, b);
RUN_TEST_SCALAR (LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MIN, a, b);
return 0;
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "neg\\td\[0-9\]+, d\[0-9\]+" 16 } } */
int
test_vnegq_s8 ()
@ -283,6 +312,9 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
if (test_vneg_s64 ())
abort ();
if (test_vnegd_s64 ())
abort ();
if (test_vnegq_s8 ())
abort ();

View File

@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
/* Check that the compiler does not optimise the negation out.
We need to check for this because there is a mismatch in semantics
between the ACLE, which states that he negative of the minimum
(signed) value is itself and C, where this is undefined behaviour. */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "--save-temps -O2" } */
#include <arm_neon.h>
#include <limits.h>
extern void abort (void);
int
foo (int64_t x)
{
if (x < (int64_t) 0)
return vnegd_s64 (x) < (int64_t) 0;
else
return -1;
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {neg\tx[0-9]+, x[0-9]+} 1 } } */
int
main (void)
{
int ans = 1;
int res = foo (INT64_MIN);
if (res != ans)
abort ();
return 0;
}