[Ada] Fix portability issues in access to subprograms

This patch improves the portability of the code generated by the
compiler for access to subprograms. Written by Richard Kenner.

2019-09-18  Javier Miranda  <miranda@adacore.com>

gcc/ada/

	* exp_ch4.adb (Expand_N_Op_Eq): The frontend assumes that we can
	do a bit-for-bit comparison of two access to protected
	subprogram pointers. However, there are two reasons why we may
	not be able to do that: (1) there may be padding bits for
	alignment before the access to subprogram, and (2) the access to
	subprogram itself may not be compared bit-for- bit because the
	activation record part is undefined: two pointers are equal iff
	the subprogram addresses are equal. This patch fixes it by
	forcing a field-by-field comparison.
	* bindgen.adb (Gen_Adainit): The type No_Param_Proc is defined
	in the library as having Favor_Top_Level, but when we create an
	object of that type in the binder file we don't have that
	pragma, so the types are different. This patch fixes this issue.
	* libgnarl/s-interr.adb, libgnarl/s-interr__hwint.adb,
	libgnarl/s-interr__sigaction.adb, libgnarl/s-interr__vxworks.adb
	(Is_Registered): This routine erroneously assumes that the
	access to protected subprogram is two addresses. We need to
	create the same record that the compiler makes to ensure that
	any padding is the same. Then we have to look at just the first
	word of the access to subprogram. This patch fixes this issue.

From-SVN: r275856
This commit is contained in:
Javier Miranda 2019-09-18 08:32:55 +00:00 committed by Pierre-Marie de Rodat
parent 0af1653524
commit 6bc08721d0
7 changed files with 80 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
2019-09-18 Javier Miranda <miranda@adacore.com>
* exp_ch4.adb (Expand_N_Op_Eq): The frontend assumes that we can
do a bit-for-bit comparison of two access to protected
subprogram pointers. However, there are two reasons why we may
not be able to do that: (1) there may be padding bits for
alignment before the access to subprogram, and (2) the access to
subprogram itself may not be compared bit-for- bit because the
activation record part is undefined: two pointers are equal iff
the subprogram addresses are equal. This patch fixes it by
forcing a field-by-field comparison.
* bindgen.adb (Gen_Adainit): The type No_Param_Proc is defined
in the library as having Favor_Top_Level, but when we create an
object of that type in the binder file we don't have that
pragma, so the types are different. This patch fixes this issue.
* libgnarl/s-interr.adb, libgnarl/s-interr__hwint.adb,
libgnarl/s-interr__sigaction.adb, libgnarl/s-interr__vxworks.adb
(Is_Registered): This routine erroneously assumes that the
access to protected subprogram is two addresses. We need to
create the same record that the compiler makes to ensure that
any padding is the same. Then we have to look at just the first
word of the access to subprogram. This patch fixes this issue.
2019-09-18 Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com>
* exp_ch5.adb (Expand_Assign_Array_Loop_Or_Bitfield): The call

View File

@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ package body Bindgen is
and then not Configurable_Run_Time_On_Target
then
WBI (" type No_Param_Proc is access procedure;");
WBI (" pragma Favor_Top_Level (No_Param_Proc);");
WBI ("");
end if;

View File

@ -8221,6 +8221,32 @@ package body Exp_Ch4 is
Insert_Actions (N, Bodies, Suppress => All_Checks);
Analyze_And_Resolve (N, Standard_Boolean, Suppress => All_Checks);
end if;
-- If unnesting, handle elementary types whose Equivalent_Types are
-- records because there may be padding or undefined fields.
elsif Unnest_Subprogram_Mode
and then Ekind_In (Typl, E_Class_Wide_Type,
E_Class_Wide_Subtype,
E_Access_Subprogram_Type,
E_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
E_Access_Subprogram_Type,
E_Exception_Type)
and then Present (Equivalent_Type (Typl))
and then Is_Record_Type (Equivalent_Type (Typl))
then
Typl := Equivalent_Type (Typl);
Remove_Side_Effects (Lhs);
Remove_Side_Effects (Rhs);
Rewrite (N,
Expand_Record_Equality (N, Typl,
Unchecked_Convert_To (Typl, Lhs),
Unchecked_Convert_To (Typl, Rhs),
Bodies));
Insert_Actions (N, Bodies, Suppress => All_Checks);
Analyze_And_Resolve (N, Standard_Boolean, Suppress => All_Checks);
end if;
-- Test if result is known at compile time
@ -9497,10 +9523,21 @@ package body Exp_Ch4 is
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Left_Opnd (N));
begin
-- Case of elementary type with standard operator
-- Case of elementary type with standard operator. But if
-- unnesting, handle elementary types whose Equivalent_Types are
-- records because there may be padding or undefined fields.
if Is_Elementary_Type (Typ)
and then Sloc (Entity (N)) = Standard_Location
and then not (Ekind_In (Typ, E_Class_Wide_Type,
E_Class_Wide_Subtype,
E_Access_Subprogram_Type,
E_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
E_Access_Subprogram_Type,
E_Exception_Type)
and then Present (Equivalent_Type (Typ))
and then Is_Record_Type (Equivalent_Type (Typ)))
then
Binary_Op_Validity_Checks (N);

View File

@ -545,9 +545,11 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
function Is_Registered (Handler : Parameterless_Handler) return Boolean is
type Acc_Proc is access procedure;
type Fat_Ptr is record
Object_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : Acc_Proc;
end record;
function To_Fat_Ptr is new Ada.Unchecked_Conversion
@ -565,7 +567,7 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
Ptr := Registered_Handler_Head;
while Ptr /= null loop
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr then
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr.all'Address then
return True;
end if;

View File

@ -561,9 +561,12 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
-------------------
function Is_Registered (Handler : Parameterless_Handler) return Boolean is
type Acc_Proc is access procedure;
type Fat_Ptr is record
Object_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : Acc_Proc;
end record;
function To_Fat_Ptr is new Ada.Unchecked_Conversion
@ -581,7 +584,7 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
Ptr := Registered_Handler_Head;
while Ptr /= null loop
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr then
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr.all'Address then
return True;
end if;

View File

@ -487,9 +487,11 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
function Is_Registered (Handler : Parameterless_Handler) return Boolean is
Ptr : R_Link := Registered_Handlers;
type Acc_Proc is access procedure;
type Fat_Ptr is record
Object_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : Acc_Proc;
end record;
function To_Fat_Ptr is new Ada.Unchecked_Conversion
@ -505,7 +507,7 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
Fat := To_Fat_Ptr (Handler);
while Ptr /= null loop
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr then
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr.all'Address then
return True;
end if;

View File

@ -578,9 +578,12 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
-------------------
function Is_Registered (Handler : Parameterless_Handler) return Boolean is
type Acc_Proc is access procedure;
type Fat_Ptr is record
Object_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : System.Address;
Handler_Addr : Acc_Proc;
end record;
function To_Fat_Ptr is new Ada.Unchecked_Conversion
@ -598,7 +601,7 @@ package body System.Interrupts is
Ptr := Registered_Handler_Head;
while Ptr /= null loop
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr then
if Ptr.H = Fat.Handler_Addr.all'Address then
return True;
end if;