re PR fortran/38657 (PUBLIC/PRIVATE Common blocks)

2009-01-17  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/38657
	* module.c (write_common_0): Revert patch of 2009-01-10.

2009-01-17  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/38657
	* gfortran.dg/module_commons_3.f90: Remove

From-SVN: r143459
This commit is contained in:
Paul Thomas 2009-01-17 09:43:57 +00:00
parent 7d4260a382
commit 6e7ff326cf
4 changed files with 12 additions and 63 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38657
* module.c (write_common_0): Revert patch of 2009-01-05.
2009-01-16 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38152

View File

@ -4337,7 +4337,6 @@ write_common_0 (gfc_symtree *st)
{
gfc_common_head *p;
const char * name;
const char * lname;
int flags;
const char *label;
struct written_common *w;
@ -4350,9 +4349,6 @@ write_common_0 (gfc_symtree *st)
/* We will write out the binding label, or the name if no label given. */
name = st->n.common->name;
/* Use the symtree(local)name to check if the common has been written. */
lname = st->name;
p = st->n.common;
label = p->is_bind_c ? p->binding_label : p->name;
@ -4360,7 +4356,7 @@ write_common_0 (gfc_symtree *st)
w = written_commons;
while (w)
{
int c = strcmp (lname, w->name);
int c = strcmp (name, w->name);
c = (c != 0 ? c : strcmp (label, w->label));
if (c == 0)
write_me = false;
@ -4388,7 +4384,7 @@ write_common_0 (gfc_symtree *st)
/* Record that we have written this common. */
w = XCNEW (struct written_common);
w->name = lname;
w->name = p->name;
w->label = label;
gfc_insert_bbt (&written_commons, w, compare_written_commons);
}

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2009-01-17 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/38657
* gfortran.dg/module_commons_3.f90: Remove
2009-01-16 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldaddr-1.c: Add the missing '}'.

View File

@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
! { dg-do run }
!
! PR fortran/38657, in which the mixture of PRIVATE and
! COMMON in TEST4, would mess up the association with
! TESTCHAR in TEST2.
!
! Contributed by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
! From a report in clf by Chris Bradley.
!
MODULE TEST4
PRIVATE
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: T1 = &
"Mary had a little lamb, Its fleece was white as snow;"
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: T2 = &
"And everywhere that Mary went, The lamb was sure to go."
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: TESTCHAR
COMMON /TESTCOMMON1/ TESTCHAR
PUBLIC T1, T2, FOOBAR
CONTAINS
subroutine FOOBAR (CHECK)
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: CHECK
IF (TESTCHAR .NE. CHECK) CALL ABORT
end subroutine
END MODULE TEST4
MODULE TEST3
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: TESTCHAR
COMMON /TESTCOMMON1/ TESTCHAR
END MODULE TEST3
MODULE TEST2
use TEST4
USE TEST3, chr => testchar
PRIVATE
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: TESTCHAR
COMMON /TESTCOMMON1/ TESTCHAR
PUBLIC TESTCHAR, FOO, BAR, CHR, T1, T2, FOOBAR
contains
subroutine FOO
TESTCHAR = T1
end subroutine
subroutine BAR (CHECK)
CHARACTER(LEN=80) :: CHECK
IF (TESTCHAR .NE. CHECK) CALL ABORT
IF (CHR .NE. CHECK) CALL ABORT
end subroutine
END MODULE TEST2
PROGRAM TEST1
USE TEST2
call FOO
call BAR (T1)
TESTCHAR = T2
call BAR (T2)
CALL FOOBAR (T2)
END PROGRAM TEST1
! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "TEST2 TEST3 TEST4" } }