Fix mistake in my previous commit (n_of_executions_at_least should be

named n_of_executions_at_most).

From-SVN: r113461
This commit is contained in:
Zdenek Dvorak 2006-05-02 13:16:37 +00:00
parent d541888b0f
commit 7aa20a86fe
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1757,9 +1757,9 @@ stmt_dominates_stmt_p (tree s1, tree s2)
NITER_BOUND->bound times. */
static bool
n_of_executions_at_least (tree stmt,
struct nb_iter_bound *niter_bound,
tree niter)
n_of_executions_at_most (tree stmt,
struct nb_iter_bound *niter_bound,
tree niter)
{
tree cond;
tree bound = niter_bound->bound;
@ -1863,7 +1863,7 @@ convert_step_widening (struct loop *loop, tree new_type, tree base, tree step,
estimate_numbers_of_iterations_loop (loop);
for (bound = loop->bounds; bound; bound = bound->next)
if (n_of_executions_at_least (at_stmt, bound, valid_niter))
if (n_of_executions_at_most (at_stmt, bound, valid_niter))
return step_in_new_type;
/* Fail when the loop has no bound estimations, or when no bound can
@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ scev_probably_wraps_p (tree type, tree base, tree step,
estimate_numbers_of_iterations_loop (loop);
for (bound = loop->bounds; bound; bound = bound->next)
if (n_of_executions_at_least (at_stmt, bound, valid_niter))
if (n_of_executions_at_most (at_stmt, bound, valid_niter))
return false;
/* At this point we still don't have a proof that the iv does not