init5.C: XFAIL if cxa-atexit is false.

* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C: XFAIL if cxa-atexit is false.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init19.C: Ditto.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init18.C: Ditto, plus change _Exit to _exit
	and add other platforms as expected failures.

From-SVN: r114327

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2006-06-02  Steve Ellcey  <sje@cup.hp.com>
+
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C: XFAIL if cxa-atexit is false.
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init19.C: Ditto.
+	* g++.old-deja/g++.other/init18.C: Ditto, plus change _Exit to _exit
+	and add other platforms as expected failures.
+
 2006-06-01  Steve Ellcey  <sje@cup.hp.com>
 	
 	* lib/target-supports.exp (is-effective-target): Add cxa_atexit.

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/init18.C

@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
-// { dg-do run }
+// Some targets (e.g. those with "set_board_info needs_status_wrapper 1"
+// in their dejagnu baseboard description) require that the status is
+// final when exit is entered (or main returns), and not "overruled" by a
+// destructor calling _exit.  It's not really worth it to handle that.
+//
+// Any platform that doesn't have proper __cxa_atexit support will also fail.
+//
+// { dg-do run { xfail { { mmix-knuth-mmixware xtensa-*-elf* arm*-*-elf arm*-*-eabi m68k-*-elf } || { ! cxa_atexit } } } }
 
 #include <stdlib.h>
+extern "C" void _exit (int);
 
 static int cnt = 0;
 
@@ -8,7 +16,7 @@ class Foo2
 {
 	public:
 		Foo2() {};
-		~Foo2() { if (++cnt == 2) _Exit (0); };
+		~Foo2() { if (++cnt == 2) _exit (0); };
 };
 
 static Foo2& GetFoo2()

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/init19.C

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-do run { xfail { ! cxa_atexit } } }
 #include <stdlib.h>
 
 #define assert(x) do { if (! (x)) abort(); } while (0)

gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-do run { xfail { ! cxa_atexit } } }
 // Objects must be destructed in decreasing cnt order
 // Original test attributed to James Kanze <jkanze@otelo.ibmmail.com>