[DOC] Relocate list under Deprecated in options.texi to Var
gcc/doc 2018-10-25 Sam Tebbs <sam.tebbs@arm.com> * options.texi (Deprecated): Move list to Var section. From-SVN: r265480
This commit is contained in:
parent
37bc33f72c
commit
86f36311bc
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
2018-10-25 Sam Tebbs <sam.tebbs@arm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* options.texi (Deprecated): Move list to Var section.
|
||||
|
||||
2018-10-24 Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
|
||||
|
||||
PR rtl-optimization/87720
|
||||
|
@ -314,6 +314,15 @@ The way that the state is stored depends on the type of option:
|
||||
The option is deprecated and every usage of such option will
|
||||
result in a warning.
|
||||
|
||||
@item Var(@var{var}, @var{set})
|
||||
The option controls an integer variable @var{var} and is active when
|
||||
@var{var} equals @var{set}. The option parser will set @var{var} to
|
||||
@var{set} when the positive form of the option is used and @code{!@var{set}}
|
||||
when the ``no-'' form is used.
|
||||
|
||||
@var{var} is declared in the same way as for the single-argument form
|
||||
described above.
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize @bullet
|
||||
@item
|
||||
If the option uses the @code{Mask} or @code{InverseMask} properties,
|
||||
@ -351,15 +360,6 @@ and wasn't given.
|
||||
The option-processing script will usually zero-initialize @var{var}.
|
||||
You can modify this behavior using @code{Init}.
|
||||
|
||||
@item Var(@var{var}, @var{set})
|
||||
The option controls an integer variable @var{var} and is active when
|
||||
@var{var} equals @var{set}. The option parser will set @var{var} to
|
||||
@var{set} when the positive form of the option is used and @code{!@var{set}}
|
||||
when the ``no-'' form is used.
|
||||
|
||||
@var{var} is declared in the same way as for the single-argument form
|
||||
described above.
|
||||
|
||||
@item Init(@var{value})
|
||||
The variable specified by the @code{Var} property should be statically
|
||||
initialized to @var{value}. If more than one option using the same
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user