New test.

From-SVN: r16578
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Law 1997-11-19 09:20:12 -07:00
parent 4dff12bfa2
commit 8d31729fce

View File

@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
CCC g77 0.5.21 `Actual Bugs':
CCC * A code-generation bug afflicts Intel x86 targets when `-O2' is
CCC specified compiling, for example, an old version of the `DNRM2'
CCC routine. The x87 coprocessor stack is being somewhat mismanaged
CCC in cases where assigned `GOTO' and `ASSIGN' are involved.
CCC
CCC Version 0.5.21 of `g77' contains an initial effort to fix the
CCC problem, but this effort is incomplete, and a more complete fix is
CCC planned for the next release.
C Currently this test fails with (at least) `-O2 -funroll-loops' on
C i586-unknown-linux-gnulibc1.
C (This is actually an obsolete version of dnrm2 -- consult the
c current Netlib BLAS.)
integer i
double precision a(1:100)
do i=1,100
a(i)=0.D0
enddo
if (dnrm2(100,a,1) .ne. 0.0) call exit(1)
end
double precision function dnrm2 ( n, dx, incx)
integer i, incx, ix, j, n, next
double precision dx(1), cutlo, cuthi, hitest, sum, xmax,zero,one
data zero, one /0.0d0, 1.0d0/
if(n .gt. 0 .and. incx.gt.0) go to 10
dnrm2 = zero
go to 300
10 assign 30 to next
sum = zero
i = 1
ix = 1
20 go to next,(30, 50, 70, 110)
30 if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo) go to 85
assign 50 to next
xmax = zero
50 if( dx(i) .eq. zero) go to 200
if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo) go to 85
assign 70 to next
go to 105
100 continue
ix = j
assign 110 to next
sum = (sum / dx(i)) / dx(i)
105 xmax = dabs(dx(i))
go to 115
70 if( dabs(dx(i)) .gt. cutlo ) go to 75
110 if( dabs(dx(i)) .le. xmax ) go to 115
sum = one + sum * (xmax / dx(i))**2
xmax = dabs(dx(i))
go to 200
115 sum = sum + (dx(i)/xmax)**2
go to 200
75 sum = (sum * xmax) * xmax
85 hitest = cuthi/float( n )
do 95 j = ix,n
if(dabs(dx(i)) .ge. hitest) go to 100
sum = sum + dx(i)**2
i = i + incx
95 continue
dnrm2 = dsqrt( sum )
go to 300
200 continue
ix = ix + 1
i = i + incx
if( ix .le. n ) go to 20
dnrm2 = xmax * dsqrt(sum)
300 continue
end