diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog index d7768f24895..96050872192 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog +++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2001-02-11 Gabriel Dos Reis + + * src/valarray-inst.cc (gslice::_Indexer::_Indexer): Don't flip + lengths and strides. + (__gslice_to_index): Document. + 2001-02-11 Gabriel Dos Reis * include/bits/char_traits.h char_traits::int_type: Change diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/src/valarray-inst.cc b/libstdc++-v3/src/valarray-inst.cc index 05874848c02..9950fbadd0b 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/valarray-inst.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/valarray-inst.cc @@ -2,59 +2,83 @@ namespace std { - // Some explicit instanciations. - template void - __valarray_fill(size_t* __restrict__, size_t, const size_t&); - - template void - __valarray_copy(const size_t* __restrict__, size_t, size_t* __restrict__); - - template valarray::valarray(size_t); - template valarray::valarray(const valarray&); - template valarray::~valarray(); - template size_t valarray::size() const; - template size_t& valarray::operator[](size_t); + // Some explicit instanciations. + template void + __valarray_fill(size_t* __restrict__, size_t, const size_t&); + + template void + __valarray_copy(const size_t* __restrict__, size_t, size_t* __restrict__); + + template valarray::valarray(size_t); + template valarray::valarray(const valarray&); + template valarray::~valarray(); + template size_t valarray::size() const; + template size_t& valarray::operator[](size_t); - inline size_t - __valarray_product(const valarray& __a) - { - typedef const size_t* __restrict__ _Tp; - const size_t __n = __a.size(); - // XXX: This ugly cast is necessary because - // valarray::operator[]() const return a VALUE! - // Try to get the committee to correct that gross error. - valarray& __t = const_cast&>(__a); - return __valarray_product(&__t[0], &__t[0] + __n); - } + inline size_t + __valarray_product(const valarray& __a) + { + typedef const size_t* __restrict__ _Tp; + const size_t __n = __a.size(); + // XXX: This ugly cast is necessary because + // valarray::operator[]() const return a VALUE! + // Try to get the committee to correct that gross error. + valarray& __t = const_cast&>(__a); + return __valarray_product(&__t[0], &__t[0] + __n); + } + + // Map a gslice, described by its multidimensional LENGTHS + // and corresponding STRIDES, to a linear array of INDEXES + // for the purpose of indexing a flat, one-dimensional array + // representation of a gslice_array. + void + __gslice_to_index(size_t __o, const valarray& __l, + const valarray& __s, valarray& __i) + { + // There are as much as dimensions as there are strides. + size_t __n = __l.size(); + + // Get a buffer to hold current multi-index as we go through + // the gslice for the purpose of computing its linear-image. + size_t* const __t = static_cast + (__builtin_alloca(__n * sizeof (size_t))); + __valarray_fill(__t, __n, size_t(0)); + + // Note that this should match the product of all numbers appearing + // in __l which describes the multidimensional sizes of the + // the generalized slice. + const size_t __z = __i.size(); - void __gslice_to_index(size_t __o, const valarray& __l, - const valarray& __s, - valarray& __i) - { - size_t __n = __l.size(); - size_t* const __t = static_cast - (__builtin_alloca(__n*sizeof(size_t))); - __valarray_fill(__t, __n, size_t(0)); - const size_t __z = __i.size(); - __valarray_fill(&__i[0], __z, __o); - for (size_t __j=0; __j<__z; ++__j) { - for (size_t __k=0; __k<__n; ++__k) - __i[__j] += __s[__k]*__t[__k]; - ++__t[__n-1]; - for (size_t __k=__n-1; __k; --__k) { - if (__t[__k] >= __l[__k]) { - __t[__k] = 0; - ++__t[__k-1]; - } - } - } - } - - gslice::_Indexer::_Indexer(size_t __o, const valarray& __s, - const valarray& __l) - : _M_count(1), _M_start(__o), _M_size(__s), _M_stride(__l), - _M_index(__l.size() ? __valarray_product(__l) : 0) - { __gslice_to_index(__o, __l, __s, _M_index); } + for (size_t __j = 0; __j < __z; ++__j) + { + // Compute the linear-index image of (t_0, ... t_{n-1}). + // Normaly, we should use inner_product<>(), but we do it the + // the hard way here to avoid link-time can of worms. + size_t __a = __o; + for (size_t __k = 0; __k < __n; ++__k) + __a += __s[__k] * __t[__k]; + __i[__j] = __a; + + // Process the next multi-index. The loop ought to be + // backward since we're making a lexicagraphical visit. + ++__t[__n-1]; + for (size_t __k=__n-1; __k; --__k) + { + if (__t[__k] >= __l[__k]) + { + __t[__k] = 0; + ++__t[__k-1]; + } + } + } + } + + gslice::_Indexer::_Indexer(size_t __o, const valarray& __l, + const valarray& __s) + : _M_count(1), _M_start(__o), _M_size(__l), _M_stride(__s), + _M_index(__l.size() == 0 ? 0 : __valarray_product(__l)) + { __gslice_to_index(__o, __l, __s, _M_index); } + }