(eliminate_regs_in_insn): Don't use a later elimination than
eliminate_regs would use. From-SVN: r4663
This commit is contained in:
parent
eda115ddc4
commit
922d9d40d1
|
@ -3107,8 +3107,13 @@ eliminate_regs_in_insn (insn, replace)
|
|||
for (ep = reg_eliminate; ep < ®_eliminate[NUM_ELIMINABLE_REGS];
|
||||
ep++)
|
||||
if (ep->from_rtx == XEXP (SET_SRC (old_body), 0)
|
||||
&& ep->can_eliminate
|
||||
&& ep->offset == - INTVAL (XEXP (SET_SRC (old_body), 1)))
|
||||
&& ep->can_eliminate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We must stop at the first elimination that will be used.
|
||||
If this one would replace the PLUS with a REG, do it
|
||||
now. Otherwise, quit the loop and let eliminate_regs
|
||||
do its normal replacement. */
|
||||
if (ep->offset == - INTVAL (XEXP (SET_SRC (old_body), 1)))
|
||||
{
|
||||
PATTERN (insn) = gen_rtx (SET, VOIDmode,
|
||||
SET_DEST (old_body), ep->to_rtx);
|
||||
|
@ -3116,6 +3121,9 @@ eliminate_regs_in_insn (insn, replace)
|
|||
val = 1;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
old_asm_operands_vec = 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue