From 9aeadd8c319d5d940fa4dc91a393fc2959d27719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:42:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Improve error recovery with constexpr [PR92193]

The compiler tries to limit error cascades in limit_bad_template_recursion
by avoiding triggering a new instantiation from one that has caused errors.
We were exempting constexpr functions from this because they can be needed
for constant evaluation, but as more and more functions get marked
constexpr, this becomes an over-broad category.  So as suggested on IRC,
this patch only exempts functions that are needed for mandatory constant
evaluation.

As noted in the comment, this flag doesn't particularly need to use a bit in
the FUNCTION_DECL, but there were still some free.

	PR c++/92193

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* cp-tree.h (FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED): New.
	* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_call_expression): Set it.
	* pt.c (neglectable_inst_p): Check it.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.c                            |  2 ++
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  8 +++++
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                   |  3 +-
 .../g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C        | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
index e78fdf021b2..8be88dcfc24 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
@@ -2572,6 +2572,8 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
       location_t save_loc = input_location;
       input_location = loc;
       ++function_depth;
+      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
+	FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED (fun) = true;
       instantiate_decl (fun, /*defer_ok*/false, /*expl_inst*/false);
       --function_depth;
       input_location = save_loc;
diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index ce7ca53a113..f0a7bd24df7 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ extern GTY(()) tree cp_global_trees[CPTI_MAX];
       FUNCTION_REF_QUALIFIED (in FUNCTION_TYPE, METHOD_TYPE)
       OVL_LOOKUP_P (in OVERLOAD)
       LOOKUP_FOUND_P (in RECORD_TYPE, UNION_TYPE, ENUMERAL_TYPE, NAMESPACE_DECL)
+      FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED (in FUNCTION_DECL)
    5: IDENTIFIER_VIRTUAL_P (in IDENTIFIER_NODE)
       FUNCTION_RVALUE_QUALIFIED (in FUNCTION_TYPE, METHOD_TYPE)
       CALL_EXPR_REVERSE_ARGS (in CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)
@@ -4213,6 +4214,13 @@ more_aggr_init_expr_args_p (const aggr_init_expr_arg_iterator *iter)
 #define FNDECL_USED_AUTO(NODE) \
   TREE_LANG_FLAG_2 (FUNCTION_DECL_CHECK (NODE))
 
+/* True if NODE is needed for a manifestly constant-evaluated expression.
+   This doesn't especially need to be a flag, since currently it's only
+   used for error recovery; if we run out of function flags it could move
+   to an attribute.  */
+#define FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED(NODE) \
+  TREE_LANG_FLAG_4 (FUNCTION_DECL_CHECK (NODE))
+
 /* True for artificial decls added for OpenMP privatized non-static
    data members.  */
 #define DECL_OMP_PRIVATIZED_MEMBER(NODE) \
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index fcf3ac31b25..72b22d8c487 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -10873,7 +10873,8 @@ neglectable_inst_p (tree d)
 {
   return (d && DECL_P (d)
 	  && !undeduced_auto_decl (d)
-	  && !(TREE_CODE (d) == FUNCTION_DECL ? DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (d)
+	  && !(TREE_CODE (d) == FUNCTION_DECL
+	       ? FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED (d)
 	       : decl_maybe_constant_var_p (d)));
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c539016e526
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/static_assert4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// PR c++/92193
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename T>
+  struct has_foo
+  { static constexpr bool value = false; };
+
+template<typename T>
+#ifndef NO_CONSTEXPR
+  constexpr
+#endif
+  bool
+  foo(T t) noexcept(noexcept(t.foo()))
+  { return t.foo(); }
+
+template<typename T>
+  void
+  maybe_foo(T t)
+  {
+    static_assert( has_foo<T>::value, "has foo" ); // { dg-error "has foo" }
+    foo(t);
+  }
+
+struct X { };
+
+int main()
+{
+  X x;
+  maybe_foo(x);
+}