parent
a1f300c0f1
commit
a338be441c
|
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
|||
2001-11-22 Kaveh R. Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
|
||||
|
||||
* cris.h: Revert thinko in last patch.
|
||||
|
||||
2001-11-23 Joseph S. Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
|
||||
|
||||
* ChangeLog.0, ChangeLog.2, ChangeLog.3, ChangeLog.4, ChangeLog,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ enum reg_class {NO_REGS, ALL_REGS, LIM_REG_CLASSES};
|
|||
TARGET_STACK_ALIGN and TARGET_ALIGN_BY_32. */
|
||||
#define DWARF_CIE_DATA_ALIGNMENT -1
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we would ever need an exact mapping between canonical register
|
||||
number and dwarf frame register, we would either need to include all
|
||||
registers in the gcc decription (with some marked fixed of course), or
|
||||
an inverse mapping from dwarf register to gcc register. There is one
|
||||
need in dwarf2out.c:expand_builtin_init_dwarf_reg_sizes. Right now, I
|
||||
don't see that we need exact correspondence between DWARF *frame*
|
||||
registers and DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER, so map them onto GCC registers. */
|
||||
#define DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM(REG) (REG)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Node: Stack Checking */
|
||||
/* (no definitions) FIXME: Check. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue