# Fix misspellings in comments.

From-SVN: r3183
This commit is contained in:
Paul Eggert 1993-01-10 22:49:32 +00:00
parent a1c3776604
commit ac2a945455
5 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ regclass (f, nregs)
int noperands;
/* Show that an insn inside a loop is likely to be executed three
times more than insns outside a loop. This is much more agressive
times more than insns outside a loop. This is much more aggressive
than the assumptions made elsewhere and is being tried as an
experiment. */
@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ record_reg_classes (n_alts, n_ops, ops, modes, constraints, insn)
break;
case 'm': case 'o': case 'V':
/* It doesn't seem worth distingishing between offsettable
/* It doesn't seem worth distinguishing between offsettable
and non-offsettable addresses here. */
allows_mem = 1;
if (GET_CODE (op) == MEM)

View File

@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ push_reload (in, out, inloc, outloc, class,
if (in != 0)
class = PREFERRED_RELOAD_CLASS (in, class);
/* Output reloads may need analagous treatment, different in detail. */
/* Output reloads may need analogous treatment, different in detail. */
#ifdef PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS
if (out != 0)
class = PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS (out, class);

View File

@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ sdbout_record_type_name (type)
{
t = TYPE_NAME (type);
}
#if 1 /* As a temprary hack, use typedef names for C++ only. */
#if 1 /* As a temporary hack, use typedef names for C++ only. */
else if (TREE_CODE (TYPE_NAME (type)) == TYPE_DECL
&& TYPE_LANG_SPECIFIC (type))
{

View File

@ -3557,7 +3557,7 @@ check_for_full_enumeration_handling (type)
int all_values = 1;
/* The time complexity of this loop is currently O(N * M), with
N being the number of enumerals in the enumerated type, and
N being the number of members in the enumerated type, and
M being the number of case expressions in the switch. */
for (chain = TYPE_VALUES (type);
@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@ check_for_full_enumeration_handling (type)
{
/* Find a match between enumeral and case expression, if possible.
Quit looking when we've gone too far (since case expressions
are kept sorted in ascending order). Warn about enumerals not
are kept sorted in ascending order). Warn about enumerators not
handled in the switch statement case expression list. */
for (n = case_stack->data.case_stmt.case_list;
@ -3584,7 +3584,7 @@ check_for_full_enumeration_handling (type)
}
/* Now we go the other way around; we warn if there are case
expressions that don't correspond to enumerals. This can
expressions that don't correspond to enumerators. This can
occur since C and C++ don't enforce type-checking of
assignments to enumeration variables. */

View File

@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static int flag_rerun_cse_after_loop;
int flag_inline_functions;
/* Nonzero for -fkeep-inline-functions: even if we make a function
go inline everywhere, keep its defintion around for debugging
go inline everywhere, keep its definition around for debugging
purposes. */
int flag_keep_inline_functions;