re PR target/48142 (miscompilation with -Os -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fstack-check)

PR target/48142
	* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe): Differentiate
	frame-related from frame-unrelated adjustments to the stack pointer.

From-SVN: r171777
This commit is contained in:
Eric Botcazou 2011-03-31 11:10:59 +00:00
parent 178aa0f648
commit ace31bca4a
4 changed files with 49 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2011-03-31 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
PR target/48142
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe): Differentiate
frame-related from frame-unrelated adjustments to the stack pointer.
2011-03-31 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* common.opt (fdebug-types-section): Move earlier.

View File

@ -10006,7 +10006,7 @@ ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe (const HOST_WIDE_INT size)
probe that many bytes past the specified size to maintain a protection
area at the botton of the stack. */
const int dope = 4 * UNITS_PER_WORD;
rtx size_rtx = GEN_INT (size);
rtx size_rtx = GEN_INT (size), last;
/* See if we have a constant small number of probes to generate. If so,
that's the easy case. The run-time loop is made up of 11 insns in the
@ -10046,9 +10046,9 @@ ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe (const HOST_WIDE_INT size)
emit_stack_probe (stack_pointer_rtx);
/* Adjust back to account for the additional first interval. */
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
PROBE_INTERVAL + dope)));
last = emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
PROBE_INTERVAL + dope)));
}
/* Otherwise, do the same as above, but in a loop. Note that we must be
@ -10109,15 +10109,33 @@ ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe (const HOST_WIDE_INT size)
}
/* Adjust back to account for the additional first interval. */
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
PROBE_INTERVAL + dope)));
last = emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
PROBE_INTERVAL + dope)));
release_scratch_register_on_entry (&sr);
}
gcc_assert (cfun->machine->fs.cfa_reg != stack_pointer_rtx);
cfun->machine->fs.sp_offset += size;
/* Even if the stack pointer isn't the CFA register, we need to correctly
describe the adjustments made to it, in particular differentiate the
frame-related ones from the frame-unrelated ones. */
if (size > 0)
{
rtx expr = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (2));
XVECEXP (expr, 0, 0)
= gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx, -size));
XVECEXP (expr, 0, 1)
= gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
plus_constant (stack_pointer_rtx,
PROBE_INTERVAL + dope + size));
add_reg_note (last, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, expr);
RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (last) = 1;
cfun->machine->fs.sp_offset += size;
}
/* Make sure nothing is scheduled before we are done. */
emit_insn (gen_blockage ());

View File

@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
2011-03-31 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* g++.dg/other/i386-9.C: New test.
2011-03-30 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
* go.test/go-test.exp (go-set-goarch): Use sparc64 for 64-bit
SPARC.
* go.test/go-test.exp (go-set-goarch): Use sparc64 for 64-bit SPARC.
2011-03-30 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>

View File

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
// PR target/48142
// Testcase by Zdenek Sojka <zsojka@seznam.cz>
// { dg-do run { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
// { dg-options "-Os -mpreferred-stack-boundary=5 -fstack-check -fno-omit-frame-pointer" }
int main()
{
try { throw 0; }
catch (...) {}
return 0;
}