OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

howto.html: Correct nasting of XHTML elements. 

2002-10-12  Jonathan Wakely  <jw@kayari.org>
            Gabriel Dos Reis  <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>

	* docs/html/21_strings/howto.html#5:  Correct nasting of XHTML
	elements.  Correct allocator-related text.

Co-Authored-By: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>

From-SVN: r58080
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Wakely 2002-10-12 06:14:31 +00:00 committed by Phil Edwards
parent c0b80fecdf
commit b06a1ea51f
2 changed files with 14 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2002-10-12 Jonathan Wakely <jw@kayari.org>
Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
* docs/html/21_strings/howto.html#5: Correct nasting of XHTML
elements. Correct allocator-related text.
2002-10-11 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
* testsuite/22_locale/static_members.cc (test02): Fix.

14
libstdc++-v3/docs/html/21_strings/howto.html
View File

@ -350,26 +350,28 @@
<p>That's the theory. Remember however that basic_string has additional
type parameters, which take default arguments based on the character
type (called CharT here):
<pre>
</p>
<pre>
template &lt;typename CharT,
typename Traits = char_traits&lt;CharT&gt;,
typename Alloc = allocator&lt;CharT&gt; &gt;
class basic_string { .... };</pre>
Now, <code>allocator&lt;CharT&gt;</code> will probably Do The Right
Thing by default, unless you need to do something very strange with
memory allocation in your characters.
<p>Now, <code>allocator&lt;CharT&gt;</code> will probably Do The Right
Thing by default, unless you need to implement your own allocator
for your characters.
</p>
<p>But <code>char_traits</code> takes more work. The char_traits
template is <em>declared</em> but not <em>defined</em>.
That means there is only
<pre>
</p>
<pre>
template &lt;typename CharT&gt;
struct char_traits
{
static void foo (type1 x, type2 y);
...
};</pre>
and functions such as char_traits&lt;CharT&gt;::foo() are not
<p>and functions such as char_traits&lt;CharT&gt;::foo() are not
actually defined anywhere for the general case. The C++ standard
permits this, because writing such a definition to fit all possible
CharT's cannot be done. (For a time, in earlier versions of GCC,