xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210.
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210. From-SVN: r72283
This commit is contained in:
parent
64833be059
commit
b0c6e48ff6
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2003-10-09 Bob Wilson <bob.wilson@acm.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_dbx_register_number): Change first
|
||||
FP register number to 48 and MAC16 accumulator to 0x210.
|
||||
|
||||
2003-10-09 Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* config.gcc: Remove redundant thread_file setting clauses for
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ xtensa_emit_call (int callop, rtx *operands)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return the stabs register number to use for 'regno'. */
|
||||
/* Return the debugger register number to use for 'regno'. */
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
xtensa_dbx_register_number (int regno)
|
||||
|
@ -1666,17 +1666,12 @@ xtensa_dbx_register_number (int regno)
|
|||
else if (FP_REG_P (regno))
|
||||
{
|
||||
regno -= FP_REG_FIRST;
|
||||
/* The current numbering convention is that TIE registers are
|
||||
numbered in libcc order beginning with 256. We can't guarantee
|
||||
that the FP registers will come first, so the following is just
|
||||
a guess. It seems like we should make a special case for FP
|
||||
registers and give them fixed numbers < 256. */
|
||||
first = 256;
|
||||
first = 48;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (ACC_REG_P (regno))
|
||||
{
|
||||
first = 0;
|
||||
regno = -1;
|
||||
first = 0x200; /* Start of Xtensa special registers. */
|
||||
regno = 16; /* ACCLO is special register 16. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* When optimizing, we sometimes get asked about pseudo-registers
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue