* c-parser.c (c_parser_objc_methodprotolist): Handle CPP_PRAGMA.

From-SVN: r109388

gcc/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2006-01-05  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
+	* c-parser.c (c_parser_objc_methodprotolist): Handle CPP_PRAGMA.
+
 2006-01-05  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@codesourcery.com>
 
 	* c-typeck.c: Update copyright date.

gcc/c-parser.c

@@ -5866,6 +5866,9 @@ c_parser_objc_methodprotolist (c_parser *parser)
 	case CPP_MINUS:
 	  c_parser_objc_methodproto (parser);
 	  break;
+	case CPP_PRAGMA:
+	  c_parser_pragma (parser, pragma_external);
+	  break;
 	case CPP_EOF:
 	  return;
 	default:

gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/pragma-1.m

@@ -1,23 +1,7 @@
-/* It is OK to use #pragma inside @implementation body. This test checks that.  */
-/* Ziemowit Laski  <zlaski@apple.com>.  */
+/* { dg-do compile { target *-*-darwin* } } */
+/* ??? Is there a better pragma that is handled for all targets, not
+   handled by the preprocessor, that would be better for testing here?  */
 
-@interface A
-{
-   int p;
-}
-+(int) foo;
--(int) bar;
-@end
-
-@implementation A
-#pragma mark -
-#pragma mark init / dealloc
-+ (int)foo {
-  return 1;
-}
-#pragma mark -
-#pragma mark Private Functions
-- (int)bar {
-  return 2;
-}
+@interface a {}
+#pragma mark --- Output ---
 @end