(BYTE_LOAD_EXTEND, LOAD_EXTEND): New macros.

(subst, simplify_and_const_int, nonzero_bits, num_sign_bit_copies): Use them.
(subst, case SET): Make a SIGN_EXTEND instead of paradoxical SUBREG if
BYTE_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND; previously only made ZERO_EXTEND.

From-SVN: r3160
This commit is contained in:
Richard Kenner 1993-01-08 17:26:25 -05:00
parent f093e272e4
commit c6dc70d681
1 changed files with 23 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -92,6 +92,20 @@ the Free Software Foundation, 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. */
Use gen_lowpart_for_combine instead. See comments there. */
#define gen_lowpart dont_use_gen_lowpart_you_dummy
/* If byte loads either zero- or sign- extend, define BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
for cases when we don't care which is true. Define LOAD_EXTEND to
be ZERO_EXTEND or SIGN_EXTEND, depending on which was defined. */
#ifdef BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND
#define BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
#define LOAD_EXTEND ZERO_EXTEND
#endif
#ifdef BYTE_LOAD_SIGN_EXTEND
#define BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
#define LOAD_EXTEND SIGN_EXTEND
#endif
/* Number of attempts to combine instructions in this function. */
static int combine_attempts;
@ -3822,8 +3836,8 @@ subst (x, from, to, in_dest, unique_copy)
We can always do this if M1 is narrower than M2 because that
means that we only care about the low bits of the result.
However, on most machines (those with BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND
and BYTES_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND not defined), we cannot perform a
However, on most machines (those with neither BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND
nor BYTES_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND defined), we cannot perform a
narrower operation that requested since the high-order bits will
be undefined. On machine where BYTE_LOADS_*_EXTEND is defined,
however, this transformation is safe as long as M1 and M2 have
@ -3836,7 +3850,7 @@ subst (x, from, to, in_dest, unique_copy)
/ UNITS_PER_WORD)
== ((GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (x))))
+ (UNITS_PER_WORD - 1)) / UNITS_PER_WORD))
#if ! defined(BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND) && ! defined (BYTE_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND)
#ifndef BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
&& (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SET_SRC (x)))
< GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (x)))))
#endif
@ -3850,18 +3864,19 @@ subst (x, from, to, in_dest, unique_copy)
SUBST (SET_SRC (x), SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (x)));
}
#ifdef BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND
#ifdef BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
/* If we have (set FOO (subreg:M (mem:N BAR) 0)) with
M wider than N, this would require a paradoxical subreg.
Replace the subreg with a zero_extend to avoid the reload that
would otherwise be required. */
if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (x)) == SUBREG
&& subreg_lowpart_p (SET_SRC (x))
&& SUBREG_WORD (SET_SRC (x)) == 0
&& (GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SET_SRC (x)))
> GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (x)))))
&& GET_CODE (SUBREG_REG (SET_SRC (x))) == MEM)
SUBST (SET_SRC (x), gen_rtx_combine (ZERO_EXTEND,
SUBST (SET_SRC (x), gen_rtx_combine (LOAD_EXTEND,
GET_MODE (SET_SRC (x)),
XEXP (SET_SRC (x), 0)));
#endif
@ -5675,7 +5690,7 @@ simplify_and_const_int (x, mode, varop, constop)
constant masks to zero all the bits the mode doesn't have. */
&& ((GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (varop))
< GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (varop))))
#if defined(BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND) || defined(BYTE_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND)
#ifdef BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
|| (0 == (constop
& GET_MODE_MASK (GET_MODE (varop))
& ~ GET_MODE_MASK (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (varop)))))
@ -6144,7 +6159,7 @@ nonzero_bits (x, mode)
<= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT))
{
nonzero &= nonzero_bits (SUBREG_REG (x), mode);
#if ! defined(BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND) && ! defined(BYTE_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND)
#ifndef BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
/* On many CISC machines, accessing an object in a wider mode
causes the high-order bits to become undefined. So they are
not known to be zero. */
@ -6290,7 +6305,7 @@ num_sign_bit_copies (x, mode)
- bitwidth)));
}
#if defined(BYTE_LOADS_ZERO_EXTEND) || defined(BYTE_LOADS_SIGN_EXTEND)
#ifdef BYTE_LOADS_EXTEND
/* For paradoxical SUBREGs, just look inside since, on machines with
one of these defined, we assume that operations are actually
performed on the full register. Note that we are passing MODE