re PR tree-optimization/53366 (wrong code generation by tree vectorizer using AVX)

PR tree-optimization/53366
	* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_supported_load_permutation_p): Don't shortcut
	tests if complex_numbers == 2, but there are non-complex number loads
	too.

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-2.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr53366-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/i386/pr53366-2.c: New test.

From-SVN: r187740
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21 23:03:42 +02:00 committed by Jakub Jelinek
parent ee0cbe0ab6
commit cec52b56e2
7 changed files with 136 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
2012-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/53366
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_supported_load_permutation_p): Don't shortcut
tests if complex_numbers == 2, but there are non-complex number loads
too.
PR tree-optimization/53409
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_operations): Don't check
vinfo_for_stmt (op_def_stmt) if op_def_stmt isn't inside loop.

View File

@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
2012-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/53366
* gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr53366-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/pr53366-2.c: New test.
PR tree-optimization/53409
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53409.c: New test.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/53366 */
/* { dg-do run } */
extern void abort (void);
struct S { double v[3]; };
struct T { struct S r, i; };
struct U { struct T j[5]; };
void
foo (struct U *__restrict p1, struct U *__restrict p2,
struct S l1, struct S l2, struct S l3, struct S l4,
const double _Complex * __restrict x, int y, int z)
{
int i, j;
while (y < z - 2)
{
for (j = 0; j < 5; ++j)
{
double a = __real__ x[5 * y + j];
double b = __imag__ x[5 * y + j];
double c = __real__ x[5 * (y + 2) + j];
double d = __imag__ x[5 * (y + 2) + j];
double e = __real__ x[5 * (y + 1) + j];
double f = __imag__ x[5 * (y + 1) + j];
double g = __real__ x[5 * (y + 3) + j];
double h = __imag__ x[5 * (y + 3) + j];
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
{
p1->j[j].r.v[i] += l2.v[i] * a;
p1->j[j].r.v[i] += l4.v[i] * c;
p1->j[j].i.v[i] += l2.v[i] * b;
p1->j[j].i.v[i] += l4.v[i] * d;
p2->j[j].r.v[i] += l3.v[i] * e;
p2->j[j].r.v[i] += l1.v[i] * g;
p2->j[j].i.v[i] += l3.v[i] * f;
p2->j[j].i.v[i] += l1.v[i] * h;
}
}
y += 4;
}
}
_Complex double x[5005];
struct U p1, p2;
int
main ()
{
int i, j;
struct S l1, l2, l3, l4;
for (i = 0; i < 5005; ++i)
x[i] = i + 1.0iF * (2 * i);
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
{
l1.v[i] = 1;
l2.v[i] = 2;
l3.v[i] = 3;
l4.v[i] = 4;
}
foo (&p1, &p2, l1, l2, l3, l4, x, 5, 1000);
for (j = 0; j < 5; ++j)
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
if (p1.j[j].r.v[i] != 3752430 + j * 1494.0
|| p1.j[j].i.v[i] != p1.j[j].r.v[i] * 2
|| p2.j[j].r.v[i] != 2502450 + j * 996.0
|| p2.j[j].i.v[i] != p2.j[j].r.v[i] * 2)
abort ();
return 0;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/53366 */
/* { dg-do run } */
extern void abort (void);
struct T { float r[3], i[3]; };
struct U { struct T j[2]; };
void __attribute__ ((noinline))
foo (struct U *__restrict y, const float _Complex *__restrict x)
{
int i, j;
for (j = 0; j < 2; ++j)
{
float a = __real__ x[j];
float b = __imag__ x[j];
float c = __real__ x[j + 2];
float d = __imag__ x[j + 2];
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
{
y->j[j].r[i] = y->j[j].r[i] + a + c;
y->j[j].i[i] = y->j[j].i[i] + b + d;
}
}
}
_Complex float x[4];
struct U y;
int
main ()
{
int i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
x[i] = i + 1.0iF * (2 * i);
foo (&y, x);
for (j = 0; j < 2; ++j)
for (i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
if (y.j[j].r[i] != __real__ (x[j] + x[j + 2])
|| y.j[j].i[i] != __imag__ (x[j] + x[j + 2]))
__builtin_abort ();
return 0;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/53366 */
/* { dg-do run { target avx_runtime } } */
/* { dg-options "-O3 -mavx" } */
#include "../../gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-1.c"

View File

@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/53366 */
/* { dg-do run { target avx_runtime } } */
/* { dg-options "-O3 -mavx" } */
#include "../../gcc.dg/torture/pr53366-2.c"

View File

@ -1197,7 +1197,8 @@ vect_supported_load_permutation_p (slp_instance slp_instn, int group_size,
/* We checked that this case ok, so there is no need to proceed with
permutation tests. */
if (complex_numbers == 2)
if (complex_numbers == 2
&& VEC_length (slp_tree, SLP_INSTANCE_LOADS (slp_instn)) == 2)
{
VEC_free (slp_tree, heap, SLP_INSTANCE_LOADS (slp_instn));
VEC_free (int, heap, SLP_INSTANCE_LOAD_PERMUTATION (slp_instn));