waccess: Remove visited bitmap and stop on EDGE_ABNORMAL
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:58:37PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:08:30PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: > > > 1) shouldn't it give up for EDGE_ABNORMAL too? I mean, e.g. > > > following a non-local goto forced edge from a noreturn call > > > to a non-local label (if there is just one) doesn't seem > > > right to me > > > > Possibly yes. I can add it but I don't have a lot of experience with > > these bits so if you can suggest a test case to exercise this that > > would be helpful. > > Something like: > void > foo (void) > { > __label__ l; > __attribute__((noreturn)) void bar (int x) { if (x) goto l; __builtin_trap (); } > bar (0); > l:; > } > shows a single EDGE_ABNORMAL from the bar call. > But it would need tweaking for the ptr use and clobber. > > > > 2) if EDGE_DFS_BACK is computed and 1) is done, is there any > > > reason why you need 2 levels of protection, i.e. the EDGE_DFS_BACK > > > check as well as the visited bitmap (and having them use > > > very different answers, if EDGE_DFS_BACK is seen, the function > > > will return false, if visited bitmap has a bb, it will return true)? > > > Can't the visited bitmap go away? > > > > Possibly. As I said above, I don't have enough experience with these > > bits to make (and test) the changes quickly, or enough bandwidth to > > come up to speed on them. Please feel free to make these improvements. > > I'll change that if it passes testing. Here is a patch to do both. I don't think we really need to have a testcase for the EDGE_ABNORMAL case (Martin, feel free to add it later), abnormal edges simply aren't normal control flow and what exactly it means varies. 2022-03-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> * gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (pass_waccess::use_after_inval_p): Remove visited bitmap and its use. Also punt on EDGE_ABNORMAL edges.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8ea4a34bd0
commit
dab41c9d9f
@ -3812,20 +3812,15 @@ pass_waccess::use_after_inval_p (gimple *inval_stmt, gimple *use_stmt,
|
||||
/* Proceed only when looking for uses of dangling pointers. */
|
||||
auto gsi = gsi_for_stmt (use_stmt);
|
||||
|
||||
auto_bitmap visited;
|
||||
|
||||
/* A use statement in the last basic block in a function or one that
|
||||
falls through to it is after any other prior clobber of the used
|
||||
variable unless it's followed by a clobber of the same variable. */
|
||||
basic_block bb = use_bb;
|
||||
while (bb != inval_bb
|
||||
&& single_succ_p (bb)
|
||||
&& !(single_succ_edge (bb)->flags & (EDGE_EH|EDGE_DFS_BACK)))
|
||||
&& !(single_succ_edge (bb)->flags
|
||||
& (EDGE_EH | EDGE_ABNORMAL | EDGE_DFS_BACK)))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!bitmap_set_bit (visited, bb->index))
|
||||
/* Avoid cycles. */
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
for (; !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next_nondebug (&gsi))
|
||||
{
|
||||
gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user