Make build_check_stmt accept an SSA_NAME for its base

This patch makes build_check_stmt accept its memory access parameter
to be an SSA name.  This is useful for a subsequent patch that will
re-use.

Tested by running cc1 -fasan on the program below with and without the
patch and inspecting the gimple output to see that there is no change.

void
foo ()
{
  char foo[1] = {0};

  foo[0] = 1;
}

gcc/
	* asan.c (build_check_stmt): Accept the memory access to be
	represented by an SSA_NAME.

From-SVN: r193438
This commit is contained in:
Dodji Seketeli 2012-11-12 15:52:56 +00:00 committed by Dodji Seketeli
parent 8240018b0c
commit dc29bf1eef
2 changed files with 28 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2012-11-12 Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
* asan.c (build_check_stmt): Accept the memory access to be
represented by an SSA_NAME.
2012-11-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Wei Mi <wmi@google.com>

View File

@ -520,16 +520,18 @@ asan_init_func (void)
#define PROB_VERY_UNLIKELY (REG_BR_PROB_BASE / 2000 - 1)
#define PROB_ALWAYS (REG_BR_PROB_BASE)
/* Instrument the memory access instruction BASE.
Insert new statements before ITER.
LOCATION is source code location.
IS_STORE is either 1 (for a store) or 0 (for a load).
/* Instrument the memory access instruction BASE. Insert new
statements before ITER.
Note that the memory access represented by BASE can be either an
SSA_NAME, or a non-SSA expression. LOCATION is the source code
location. IS_STORE is TRUE for a store, FALSE for a load.
SIZE_IN_BYTES is one of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16. */
static void
build_check_stmt (tree base,
gimple_stmt_iterator *iter,
location_t location, bool is_store, int size_in_bytes)
build_check_stmt (tree base, gimple_stmt_iterator *iter,
location_t location, bool is_store,
int size_in_bytes)
{
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
basic_block cond_bb, then_bb, else_bb;
@ -540,6 +542,7 @@ build_check_stmt (tree base,
tree shadow_type = TREE_TYPE (shadow_ptr_type);
tree uintptr_type
= build_nonstandard_integer_type (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (base)), 1);
tree base_ssa = base;
/* We first need to split the current basic block, and start altering
the CFG. This allows us to insert the statements we're about to
@ -585,15 +588,22 @@ build_check_stmt (tree base,
base = unshare_expr (base);
gsi = gsi_last_bb (cond_bb);
g = gimple_build_assign_with_ops (TREE_CODE (base),
make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE (base), NULL),
base, NULL_TREE);
gimple_set_location (g, location);
gsi_insert_after (&gsi, g, GSI_NEW_STMT);
/* BASE can already be an SSA_NAME; in that case, do not create a
new SSA_NAME for it. */
if (TREE_CODE (base) != SSA_NAME)
{
g = gimple_build_assign_with_ops (TREE_CODE (base),
make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE (base), NULL),
base, NULL_TREE);
gimple_set_location (g, location);
gsi_insert_after (&gsi, g, GSI_NEW_STMT);
base_ssa = gimple_assign_lhs (g);
}
g = gimple_build_assign_with_ops (NOP_EXPR,
make_ssa_name (uintptr_type, NULL),
gimple_assign_lhs (g), NULL_TREE);
base_ssa, NULL_TREE);
gimple_set_location (g, location);
gsi_insert_after (&gsi, g, GSI_NEW_STMT);
base_addr = gimple_assign_lhs (g);