* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.

From-SVN: r106533
This commit is contained in:
Kazu Hirata 2005-11-05 20:34:08 +00:00 committed by Kazu Hirata
parent c83eecadfd
commit dd36d4e1da
4 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2005-11-05 Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com>
* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.
2005-11-04 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR c++/22487

View File

@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ get_priority_info (int priority)
((!DECL_HAS_INIT_PRIORITY_P (decl) || DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl) == 0) \
? DEFAULT_INIT_PRIORITY : DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl))
/* Wether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
/* Whether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
initialization. */
#define NEEDS_GUARD_P(decl) (TREE_PUBLIC (decl) && (DECL_COMMON (decl) \

View File

@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool integral_p)
: (!TREE_CONSTANT (init)
/* Do not return an aggregate constant (of which
string literals are a special case), as we do not
want to make inadvertant copies of such entities,
want to make inadvertent copies of such entities,
and we must be sure that their addresses are the
same everywhere. */
|| TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR

View File

@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ check_template_keyword (tree decl)
DR 228 removed the restriction that the template be a member
template.
DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explcit
DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explicit
template arguments must be provided if the template keyword is
used, but, as of 2005-10-16, that DR is still in "drafting". If
this DR is accepted, then the semantic checks here can be