privacy: reach: Rename ReachLevel enum
This commit is contained in:
parent
8bf037fede
commit
e01a814061
|
@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ namespace Privacy {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
enum ReachLevel
|
||||
{
|
||||
Private,
|
||||
Public,
|
||||
Unreachable,
|
||||
Reachable,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
class PrivacyContext
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,16 +56,19 @@ ReachabilityVisitor::visit (HIR::TypeAlias &type_alias)
|
|||
void
|
||||
ReachabilityVisitor::visit (HIR::StructStruct &struct_item)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto struct_reach = ReachLevel::Private;
|
||||
auto struct_reach = ReachLevel::Unreachable;
|
||||
// FIXME: This feels very wrong. Should we check for `has_visibility`
|
||||
// beforehand? Is it just private otherwise? Should the `HIR::Visibility` also
|
||||
// keep variants for private items?
|
||||
if (struct_item.get_visibility ().get_vis_type () == HIR::Visibility::NONE)
|
||||
struct_reach = ReachLevel::Public;
|
||||
struct_reach = ReachLevel::Reachable;
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Here we want to update only if the visibility is higher
|
||||
ctx.insert_reachability (struct_item.get_mappings (), struct_reach);
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We need to also visit the fields as they might have their own set
|
||||
// of reachability levels
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto &field : struct_item.get_fields ())
|
||||
ctx.insert_reachability (field.get_mappings (), struct_reach);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ class ReachabilityVisitor : public HIR::HIRVisItemVisitor
|
|||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
ReachabilityVisitor (PrivacyContext &ctx)
|
||||
: current_level (ReachLevel::Private), ctx (ctx)
|
||||
: current_level (ReachLevel::Unreachable), ctx (ctx)
|
||||
{}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual void visit (HIR::Module &mod);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue