re PR libgcj/5696 (natClass.cc run through superclasses of target if they exist while comparing variable types.)
Fix for PR libgcj/5696: * verify.cc (is_assignable_from_slow): Never call _Jv_IsAssignableFrom. (verify_instructions_0): Added new debug statement. (state::print): Print information about whether local has changed. (state::merge): Don't call note_variable when merging locals. (state::set_exception): Removed old FIXME comment. From-SVN: r49886
This commit is contained in:
parent
c964d90e21
commit
e4e35417f9
@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
|
||||
2002-02-19 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
Fix for PR libgcj/5696:
|
||||
* verify.cc (is_assignable_from_slow): Never call
|
||||
_Jv_IsAssignableFrom.
|
||||
(verify_instructions_0): Added new debug statement.
|
||||
(state::print): Print information about whether local has
|
||||
changed.
|
||||
(state::merge): Don't call note_variable when merging locals.
|
||||
(state::set_exception): Removed old FIXME comment.
|
||||
|
||||
2002-02-18 Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
|
||||
|
||||
* java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc (bind): Call setsockopt to
|
||||
|
@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ private:
|
||||
if (target->isPrimitive () || source->isPrimitive ())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check array case first because we can have an array whose
|
||||
// component type is not prepared; _Jv_IsAssignableFrom
|
||||
// doesn't handle this correctly.
|
||||
if (target->isArray ())
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (! source->isArray ())
|
||||
@ -241,11 +238,6 @@ private:
|
||||
target = target->getComponentType ();
|
||||
source = source->getComponentType ();
|
||||
}
|
||||
// _Jv_IsAssignableFrom can handle a target which is an
|
||||
// interface even if it hasn't been prepared.
|
||||
else if ((target->state > JV_STATE_LINKED || target->isInterface ())
|
||||
&& source->state > JV_STATE_LINKED)
|
||||
return _Jv_IsAssignableFrom (target, source);
|
||||
else if (target->isInterface ())
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < source->interface_count; ++i)
|
||||
@ -912,8 +904,6 @@ private:
|
||||
stack[0] = t;
|
||||
for (int i = stacktop; i < max_stack; ++i)
|
||||
stack[i] = unsuitable_type;
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: subroutine handling?
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Modify this state to reflect entry into a subroutine.
|
||||
@ -982,8 +972,14 @@ private:
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (locals[i].merge (state_old->locals[i], true, verifier))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Note that we don't call `note_variable' here.
|
||||
// This change doesn't represent a real change to a
|
||||
// local, but rather a merge artifact. If we're in
|
||||
// a subroutine which is called with two
|
||||
// incompatible types in a slot that is unused by
|
||||
// the subroutine, then we don't want to mark that
|
||||
// variable as having been modified.
|
||||
changed = true;
|
||||
note_variable (i);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1072,7 +1068,10 @@ private:
|
||||
debug_print (".");
|
||||
debug_print (" [local] ");
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < max_locals; ++i)
|
||||
locals[i].print ();
|
||||
{
|
||||
locals[i].print ();
|
||||
debug_print (local_changed[i] ? "+" : " ");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (subroutine == 0)
|
||||
debug_print (" | None");
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -2055,6 +2054,7 @@ private:
|
||||
verify_fail ("can't happen: saw state::INVALID");
|
||||
if (PC == state::NO_NEXT)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
debug_print ("== State pop from pending list\n");
|
||||
// Set up the current state.
|
||||
current_state->copy (states[PC], current_method->max_stack,
|
||||
current_method->max_locals);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user