Revert last change.

From-SVN: r94291
This commit is contained in:
Richard Henderson 2005-01-26 15:21:45 -08:00 committed by Richard Henderson
parent 78ef1e3d9f
commit eec6bb06c6
4 changed files with 8 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2005-01-26 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
* c-decl.c, expmed.c, expr.c: Revert last change.
2005-01-26 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
PR middle-end/18008

View File

@ -5301,11 +5301,8 @@ finish_struct (tree t, tree fieldlist, tree attributes)
= tree_low_cst (DECL_INITIAL (*fieldlistp), 1);
tree type = TREE_TYPE (*fieldlistp);
if (width != TYPE_PRECISION (type))
{
TREE_TYPE (*fieldlistp)
= build_nonstandard_integer_type (width, TYPE_UNSIGNED (type));
DECL_MODE (*fieldlistp) = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (*fieldlistp));
}
DECL_INITIAL (*fieldlistp) = 0;
}
else

View File

@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ store_fixed_bit_field (rtx op0, unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT offset,
if (GET_MODE (value) != mode)
{
if ((REG_P (value) || GET_CODE (value) == SUBREG)
&& GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (value)) <= bitsize)
&& GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) < GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (value)))
value = gen_lowpart (mode, value);
else
value = convert_to_mode (mode, value, 1);

View File

@ -5215,21 +5215,7 @@ store_field (rtx target, HOST_WIDE_INT bitsize, HOST_WIDE_INT bitpos,
&& TREE_CODE (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (exp))) == INTEGER_CST
&& compare_tree_int (TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (exp)), bitsize) != 0))
{
rtx temp;
/* If EXP is a NOP_EXPR of precision less than its mode, then that
implies a mask operation. If the precision is the same size as
the field we're storing into, that mask is redundant. This is
particularly common with bit field assignments generated by the
C front end. */
if (TREE_CODE (exp) == NOP_EXPR
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (exp))
&& (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (exp))
< GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (exp))))
&& bitsize == TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (exp)))
exp = TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0);
temp = expand_expr (exp, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, 0);
rtx temp = expand_expr (exp, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, 0);
/* If BITSIZE is narrower than the size of the type of EXP
we will be narrowing TEMP. Normally, what's wanted are the