OpenE2K/gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re PR libstdc++/47380 (concept checking and incomplete types)

Browse Source 
2011-01-20  Jonathan Wakely  <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>

        PR libstdc++/47380
	* doc/xml/manual/diagnostics.xml: Replace note about C++0x concepts.

From-SVN: r169064
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-20 20:18:29 +00:00 committed by Jonathan Wakely
parent 9b690d8cc3
commit f22ee6896d
2 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2011-01-20 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
* doc/xml/manual/diagnostics.xml: Replace note about C++0x concepts.
2011-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/36104 part three

12
libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/diagnostics.xml
View File

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
</para>
<para>
The primary author of the checking code, Jeremy Siek, had already
started work on a replacement implementation. The new code has been
started work on a replacement implementation. The new code was
formally reviewed and accepted into
<link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.boost.org/libs/concept_check/concept_check.htm">the
Boost libraries</link>, and we are pleased to incorporate it into the
@ -116,10 +116,12 @@
</para>
<para>
Please note that the upcoming C++ standard has first-class
support for template parameter constraints based on concepts in the core
language. This will obviate the need for the library-simulated concept
checking described above.
Please note that the checks are based on the requirements in the original
C++ standard, some of which have changed in the upcoming C++0x revision.
Additionally, some correct code might be rejected by the concept checks,
for example template argument types may need to be complete when used in
a template definition, rather than at the point of instantiation.
There are no plans to address these shortcomings.
</para>
</section>