c++: find_template_parameters and TEMPLATE_DECLs [PR101247]
r12-1989 fixed the testcase in the PR, but unfortunately the fix is buggy: it breaks the case where the common template between the TEMPLATE_DECL t and ctx_parms is the innermost template (as in concepts-memtmpl5.C below). This can be fixed by instead passing the TREE_TYPE of ctmpl to common_enclosing_class when ctmpl is a class template. But even after that's fixed, the analogous case where the innermost template is a partial specialization is still broken (as in concepts-memtmpl5a.C below), because ctmpl is always a primary template. So this patch instead takes a diferent approach that doesn't rely on ctx_parms at all: when looking for the template parameters of a TEMPLATE_DECL that are shared with the current template context, just walk its DECL_CONTEXT. As long as the template is not overly general (e.g. we didn't pass it through most_general_template), this should give us exactly what we want, since if a TEMPLATE_DECL can be referred to from some template context then the template parameters it uses must all be in-scope and contained in its DECL_CONTEXT. This effectively makes us treat TEMPLATE_DECLs more similarly to other _DECLs (whose DECL_CONTEXT we also walk). PR c++/101247 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.c (any_template_parm_r) <case TEMPLATE_DECL>: Just walk the DECL_CONTEXT. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memtmpl4.C: Uncomment the commented out example, which we now handle correctly. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memtmpl5.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memtmpl5a.C: New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e345e4ad6
commit
f53e66019d
12
gcc/cp/pt.c
12
gcc/cp/pt.c
|
@ -10728,15 +10728,11 @@ any_template_parm_r (tree t, void *data)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case TEMPLATE_DECL:
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* If T is a member template that shares template parameters with
|
||||
ctx_parms, we need to mark all those parameters for mapping. */
|
||||
if (tree ctmpl = TREE_TYPE (INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_PARMS (ftpi->ctx_parms)))
|
||||
if (tree com = common_enclosing_class (DECL_CONTEXT (t),
|
||||
DECL_CONTEXT (ctmpl)))
|
||||
if (tree ti = CLASSTYPE_TEMPLATE_INFO (com))
|
||||
WALK_SUBTREE (TI_ARGS (ti));
|
||||
}
|
||||
ctx_parms, we need to mark all those parameters for mapping.
|
||||
To that end, it should suffice to just walk the DECL_CONTEXT of
|
||||
the template (assuming the template is not overly general). */
|
||||
WALK_SUBTREE (DECL_CONTEXT (t));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case LAMBDA_EXPR:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -24,5 +24,5 @@ int main()
|
|||
{
|
||||
A<void>::B::f(0);
|
||||
A<void>::C<int>::f(0);
|
||||
// A<void>::C<int>::g();
|
||||
A<void>::C<int>::g();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|||
// PR c++/101247
|
||||
// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
|
||||
|
||||
template<class T, class U> struct A {
|
||||
template<class> static constexpr bool d = true;
|
||||
static void g() requires d<U>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int main() {
|
||||
A<int, char>::g();
|
||||
}
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
|||
// PR c++/101247
|
||||
// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
|
||||
// A variant of concepts-memtmpl5.C that uses a partial specialization
|
||||
// of A instead of the primary template.
|
||||
|
||||
template<class, class> struct A;
|
||||
|
||||
template<class T, class U> requires true struct A<T, U> {
|
||||
template<class V> static constexpr bool d = true;
|
||||
static void g() requires d<U>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int main() {
|
||||
A<int, char>::g();
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue