OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and org.w3c.dom. 

2002-12-22  Anthony Green  <green@redhat.com>

	* gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and
	org.w3c.dom.

From-SVN: r60411
This commit is contained in:
Anthony Green 2002-12-22 16:46:02 +00:00 committed by Anthony Green
parent 5e0c4d1995
commit fba1caab66
2 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gcc/java/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2002-12-22 Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
* gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and
org.w3c.dom.
2002-12-20 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* jcf-write.c (generate_bytecode_insns) [SWITCH_EXPR]: Handle case

11
gcc/java/gcj.texi
View File

@ -515,6 +515,17 @@ Sometimes the @code{libgcj} implementation of a method or class differs
from the JDK implementation. This is not always a bug. Still, if it
affects you, it probably makes sense to report it so that we can discuss
the appropriate response.
@item
@command{gcj} does not currently allow for piecemeal replacement of
components within @code{libgcj}. Unfortunately, programmers often want
to use newer versions of certain packages, such as those provided by
the Apache Software Foundation's Jakarta project. This has forced us
to place the @code{org.w3c.dom} and @code{org.xml.sax} packages into
their own libraries, separate from @code{libgcj}. If you intend to
use these classes, you must link them explicitly with
@code{-l-org-w3c-dom} and @code{-l-org-xml-sax}. Future versions of
@command{gcj} may not have this restriction.
@end itemize
@node Extensions