Some MVE tests explicitly test a -mfloat-abi=hard option, but we need
to check that the toolchain actually supports it (which may not be the
case for arm-linux-gnueabi* targets). We can thus remove the related
dg-skip directives.
We also make use of dg-add-options arm_v8_1m_mve_fp and arm_v8_1m_mve
instead of duplicating the corresponding options in
dg-additional-options where we keep only -mfloat-abi to override the
option selected by arm_v8_1m_mve_fp.
2020-04-22 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/mve/intrinsics/mve_fp_fpu1.c: Use arm_hard_ok
effective target and arm_v8_1m_mve_fp options.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/intrinsics/mve_fp_fpu2.c: Use arm_softfp_ok
effective target and arm_v8_1m_mve_fp options.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/intrinsics/mve_fpu1.c: Use arm_hard_ok
effective target and arm_v8_1m_mve options.
* gcc.target/arm/mve/intrinsics/mve_fpu2.c: Use arm_softfp_ok
effective target and arm_v8_1m_mve options.
For arm-linux-gnueabi* targets, a toolchain cannot support the
float-abi opposite to the one it has been configured for: since glibc
does not support such multilibs, we end up lacking gnu/stubs-*.h when
including stdint.h for instance.
This patch introduces two new effective targets to detect whether we
can compile tests with -mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard.
This enables to make such tests unsupported rather than fail.
2020-04-22 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp (arm_softfp_ok): New effective target.
(arm_hard_ok): Likewise.
gcc/
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_softfp_ok, arm_hard_ok): Document.
This patch adds initial -mcpu support for the Arm Cortex-M55 CPU.
This CPU is an Armv8.1-M Mainline CPU supporting MVE.
An option to disable floating-point (and MVE) is provided with the +nofp.
For GCC 11 I'd like to add further fine-grained options to enable integer-only MVE
but that needs a bit more elaborate surgery in arm-cpus.in that I don't want to do
in GCC 10 at this stage.
As this CPU is not supported in gas and I don't want to couple GCC 10 to the very
latest binutils anyway, this CPU emits the cpu string in the assembly file as a build attribute
rather than a .cpu directive, thus sparing us the need to support .cpu cortex-m55 in gas.
The .cpu directive in gas isn't used for anything besides setting the Tag_CPU_name
build attribute anyway (which itself is not used by any tools I'm aware of).
All the architecture information used for target detection is already emitted using .arch_extension
directives and similar.
Bootstrapped and tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Also tested on arm-none-eabi.
2020-04-22 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
Mihail Ionescu <mihail.ionescu@arm.com>
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_file_start): Handle isa_bit_quirk_no_asmcpu.
* config/arm/arm-cpus.in (quirk_no_asmcpu): Define.
(ALL_QUIRKS): Add quirk_no_asmcpu.
(cortex-m55): Define new cpu.
* config/arm/arm-tables.opt: Regenerate.
* config/arm/arm-tune.md: Likewise.
* doc/invoke.texi (Arm Options): Document -mcpu=cortex-m55.
While '!$' with -fopenmp unsets too often load_line's seen_comment flag,
this only affects <tab> warnings; for trunction warnings, gfc_next_char_literal
re-handles the directives correctly. In terms of missed warnings, a directive
that is completely in the truncated part is not diagnosted (as it starts
with a '!').
PR fortran/94709
* scanner.c (load_line): In fixed form, also treat 'C' as comment and
'D'/'d' only with -fd-lines-as-comments. Treat '!$' with -fopenmp,
'!$acc' with -fopenacc and '!GCC$' as non-comment to permit <tab>
and truncation warnings.
PR fortran/94709
* gfortran.dg/gomp/warn_truncated.f: New.
* gfortran.dg/gomp/warn_truncated.f90: New.
This is really PR94683 part 2, handling the case in which the vector is
an identity and so doesn't need a VEC_PERM_EXPR. I should have realised
at the time that the other arm of the "if" would need the same fix.
2020-04-22 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/94700
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_vector_constructor): When processing
an identity constructor, use a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to handle mixtures
of similarly-structured but distinct vector types.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/94700
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/pr94700.c: New test.
As reported in the PR, per [dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/4 we should
be passing a reference to the object to the promise parameter
preview, and we are currently passing a pointer (this). Amend to
pass the reference.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-04-22 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94682
* coroutines.cc (struct param_info): Add a field to note that
the param is 'this'.
(morph_fn_to_coro): Convert this to a reference before using it
in the promise parameter preview.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-04-22 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94682
* g++.dg/coroutines/pr94682-preview-this.C: New test.
Some tests use --save-temps, but schedule-cleanups strictly matches
-save-temps, so we leave many temporary files after validation.
Instead of fixing every offending testcase, it's simpler and
future-proof to make schedule-cleanups handle both --save-temps and
-save-temps.
2020-04-22 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/gcc-dg.exp (schedule-cleanups): Accept --save-temps.
While instantiating test(Plot) we partially instantiate the generic lambda.
We look at forward<T>(rest)... and see that it's just replacing parameter
packs with new parameter packs and tries to do a direct substitution. But
because register_parameter_specializations had built up a
NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK around the new parameter pack, the substitution
failed. So let's not wrap it that way.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-04-22 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/94546
* pt.c (register_parameter_specializations): If the instantiation is
still a parameter pack, don't wrap it in a NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK.
(tsubst_pack_expansion, tsubst_expr): Adjust.
The change committed to GCC 9 to allow string literals as template arguments
caused the compiler to prune away, and thus miss diagnosing, conversion from
nullptr to int in an array initializer. After looking at various approaches
to improving the pruning, we realized that the only place the pruning is
necessary is in the mangler.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-04-22 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/94510
* decl.c (reshape_init_array_1): Avoid stripping redundant trailing
zero initializers...
* mangle.c (write_expression): ...and handle them here even for
pointers to members by calling zero_init_expr_p.
* cp-tree.h (zero_init_expr_p): Declare.
* tree.c (zero_init_expr_p): Define.
(type_initializer_zero_p): Remove.
* pt.c (tparm_obj_values): New hash_map.
(get_template_parm_object): Store to it.
(tparm_object_argument): New.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2020-04-22 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR c++/94510
* g++.dg/init/array58.C: New test.
* g++.dg/init/array59.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C: New test.
This updates diagnose_valid_expression to mirror the convert_to_void check added
to tsubst_valid_expression_requirement by r10-7554.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/67825
* constraint.cc (diagnose_valid_expression): Check convert_to_void here
as well as in tsubst_valid_expression_requirement.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/67825
* g++.dg/concepts/diagnostic10.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67178.C: Adjust dg-message.
This fixes a regression introduced when I replaced __normal_iterator's
relational operators with operator<=>. If the wrapped iterator type
doesn't define operator<=> then __normal_iterator doesdn't either, which
breaks any use of fancy pointers that don't define <=>. The regression
was found when trying to build cmcstl2.
The solution is to use synth-three-way to define __normal_iterator's
spaceship operator, so that it is still defined even if the wrapped type
only supports operator<.
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (__normal_iterator): Use synth-three-way
to define operator<=>.
* testsuite/24_iterators/normal_iterator/cmp_c++20.cc: New test.
A comment in satisfy_declaration_constraints says
/* For inherited constructors, consider the original declaration;
it has the correct template information attached. */
d = strip_inheriting_ctors (d);
but it looks like this comment is wrong when the inherited constructor is for an
instantiation of a constructor template. In that case, DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO is
correct and DECL_INHERITED_CTOR points to the constructor template of the base
class rather than to the particular instantiation of the constructor template
(and so the DECL_TI_ARGS of the DECL_INHERITED_CTOR are in their dependent
form).
So doing strip_inheriting_ctors in this case then eventually leads to
satisfy_associated_constraints returning true regardless of the constraints
themselves, due to the passed in 'args' being dependent.
An inherited constructor seems to have a non-empty DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO only when
it's for an instantiation of a constructor template, so this patch fixes this
issue by checking for empty DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO before calling
strip_inheriting_ctors.
There is another unguarded call to strip_inheriting_ctors in
get_normalized_constraints_from_decl, but this one seems to be safe to do
unconditionally because the rest of that function doesn't need/look at the
DECL_TI_ARGS of the decl.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94549
* constraint.cc (satisfy_declaration_constraints): Don't strip the
inherited constructor if it already has template information.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94549
* g++.dg/concepts/inherit-ctor3.C: Adjust expected diagnostics.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-inherit-ctor4.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-inherit-ctor8.C: New test.
This adds a full table of contents for the C++14 and C++17 standards,
with status for each part.
For C++14 the list of proposals is removed, as it adds little value now
that everything is supported. For C++17 the table of proposals is
retained, because it documents he feature test macros for the features.
* doc/Makefile.am (xml_sources_manual): Add missing XML files.
* doc/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx1998.xml: Refer to "this section" instead
of "this page".
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2011.xml: Formatting and other corrections
to the C++11 status table.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2014.xml: Replace list of C++14 feature
proposals with table matching contents of the C++14 standard.
* doc/xml/manual/status_cxx2017.xml: Add table matching contents of
the C++17 standard.
* doc/html/*: Regenerate.
The front end now supports parenthesized initialization for arrays in
C++20, so extend std::is_nothrow_constructible to support them too.
gcc/testsuite:
PR c++/94149
* g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init24.C: Fix FIXMEs.
libstdc++-v3:
PR c++/94149
* include/std/type_traits (__is_nt_constructible_impl): Add partial
specializations for bounded arrays with non-empty initializers.
* testsuite/20_util/is_nothrow_constructible/value_c++20.cc: New test.
Always run testsuite with same GDCFLAGS as used in build.
libphobos/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac: Remove GDCFLAGSX.
* libdruntime/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* src/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* testsuite/testsuite_flags.in: Use GDCFLAGS in --gdcflags.
* testsuite/libphobos.thread/fiber_guard_page.d: Test using -O0.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/94647
* gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c (builtin_access::builtin_access): Correct
the computation of the lower bound of the source access size.
(builtin_access::generic_overlap): Remove a hack for setting ranges
of overlap offsets.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/94647
* c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-2.c: Adjust a test case and add a new one.
* c-c++-common/Warray-bounds-3.c: Add tests for missing warnings.
* c-c++-common/Wrestrict.c: Invert bounds in printed ranges.
* gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-59.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/Wrestrict-10.c: Add a missing warning.
* gcc.dg/Wrestrict-5.c: Adjust text of expected warning.
* gcc.dg/Wrestrict-6.c: Expect to see a range of overlap offsets.
With -mbranch-protection=pac-ret the debug info toggles the
signedness state of the return address so the unwinder knows when
the return address needs pointer authentication.
The unwind context flags were not updated according to the dwarf
frame info.
This causes unwinding across frames that were built without pac-ret
to incorrectly authenticate the return address wich corrupts the
return address on a system where PAuth is enabled.
Note: This even affects systems where all code use pac-ret because
unwinding across a signal frame the return address is not signed.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/94514
* g++.target/aarch64/pr94514.C: New test.
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr94514.c: New test.
libgcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/94514
* config/aarch64/aarch64-unwind.h (aarch64_frob_update_context):
Update context->flags accroding to the frame state.
2020-04-21 John David Anglin <danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
* config/pa/som.h (ASM_WEAKEN_LABEL): Delete.
(ASM_WEAKEN_DECL): New define.
(HAVE_GAS_WEAKREF): Undefine.
The type compatibility handling in simplify_vector_constructor is
based on the number of elements and on element type compatibility,
but that's no longer enough to ensure that two vector types are
compatible. This patch uses a VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR if the permutation
type and result type are distinct.
2020-04-21 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/94683
* tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_vector_constructor): Use a
VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to handle mixtures of similarly-structured
but distinct vector types.
gcc/testsuite/
PR tree-optimization/94683
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/pr94683.c: New test.
Jonathan reported an ABI incompatibility between C++14 and C++17 in
passing some aggregates with empty bases on aarch64 (and apparently on arm
too).
The following patch adds 3000 (by default) tests for such interoperability,
using the struct-layout-1* framework. The current 3000 tests are generated
as is (so unchanged from previous ones), and afterwards there is another set
of 3000 ones, where always one of the tNNN_x.C and tNNN_y.C tests get added
-std=c++14 -DCXX14_VS_CXX17 and another one -std=c++17 -DCXX14_VS_CXX17
options (which one which is chosen pseudo-randomly), which causes the
structs to have an empty base.
I haven't added (yet) checks if the alternate compiler does support these
options (I think that can be done incrementally), so for now this testing is
done only if the alternate compiler is not used.
I had to fix a bug in the flexible array handling, because while we were
lucky in the 3000 generated tests not to have toplevel fields after field
with flexible array members, in the next 3000 we aren't lucky anymore.
But even with that change, diff -upr between old and new
testsuite/g++/g++.dg/g++.dg-struct-layout-1/ doesn't show any differences
except for the ^Only in... messages for the new tests in there.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux and additionally
tested on aarch64-linux, where
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t032 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t056 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t057 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t058 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t059 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
because of the backend bug, and with that bug fixed it succeeds.
Matthew has kindly tested it also on aarch64-linux and arm*-*.
The primary goal of the patch is catch if some targets other than aarch64 or
arm aren't affected too.
2020-04-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/94383
* g++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp: If !$use_alt, add -c to generator
args.
* g++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_generate.c (dg_options): Add another
%s to the start of dg-options arg.
(cxx14_vs_cxx17, do_cxx14_vs_cxx17): New variables.
(switchfiles): If cxx14_vs_cxx17, prepend -std=c++14 -DCXX14_VS_CXX17
or -std=c++17 -DCXX17_VS_CXX14 - randomly - to dg-options.
(output): Don't append further fields once one with flexible array
member is added.
(generate_random_tests): Don't use toplevel unions if cxx14_vs_cxx17.
(main): If -c, emit second set of tests for -std=c++14 vs. -std=c++17
testing.
* g++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_x1.h (empty_base): New type.
(EMPTY_BASE): Define.
(TX): Use EMPTY_BASE.
* g++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_y1.h (empty_base): New type.
(EMPTY_BASE): Define.
(TX): Use EMPTY_BASE.
When building the parameter mapping for an atomic constraint,
find_template_parameters does not spot the template parameter within the
conversion-type-id of a dependent conversion operator, which later leads to an
ICE during substitution when looking up the missing template argument for this
unnoticed template parameter.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94597
* pt.c (any_template_parm_r) <case IDENTIFIER_NODE>: New case. If this
is a conversion operator, visit its TREE_TYPE.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94597
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-conv2.C: New test.
The option -mabi=ilp32 should not be used in large code model. An error
message is added for the option conflict.
2020-04-21 Duan bo <duanbo3@huawei.com>
gcc/
PR target/94577
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c: Add an error message for option conflict.
* doc/invoke.texi (-mcmodel=large): Mention that -mcmodel=large is
incompatible with -fpic, -fPIC and -mabi=ilp32.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/94577
* gcc.target/aarch64/pr94577.c: New test.
An ICE on darwin, when a SFINAE-context substitution produced
error_mark_node foo an operand of a POINTER_PLUS_EXPR.
fold_build_pointer_plus is unprepared to deal with that, so we need to
check earlier. We had no luck reducing the testcase to something
manageable.
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) [POINTER_PLUS_EXPR]: Check for
error_mark_node.
The PR noticed that omp-low.c contains a self-assignment in the
function new_omp_context:
if (outer_ctx) {
...
ctx->outer_reduction_clauses = ctx->outer_reduction_clauses;
This is obviously useless. The original intention might have been
to copy the field from the outer_ctx to ctx. Since this is done
(properly) in the only function where this field is actually used
(in function scan_omp_for) and the field is being initialized to zero
during the struct allocation, there is no need to attempt to do
anything to this field in new_omp_context. Thus this commit
removes any assignment to the field from new_omp_context.
2020-04-21 Frederik Harwath <frederik@codesourcery.com>
PR other/94629
* gcc/omp-low.c (new_omp_context): Remove assignments to
ctx->outer_reduction_clauses and ctx->local_reduction_clauses.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
This has been fixed by the PR71311 r7-1170-g4618c453205f18
change.
2020-04-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/94686
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr94686.c: New test.
Coroutine ramp functions have synthesised return values (the
user-authored function body cannot have an explicit 'return').
The current implementation attempts to optimise by building
the return in-place, in the manner of C++17 code. Clearly,
that was too ambitious and the fix builds a target expr for
the constructed version and passes that to finish_return_stmt.
This also means that we now get the same error messages for
implicit use of deleted CTORs etc.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2020-04-21 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94661
* coroutines.cc (morph_fn_to_coro): Simplify return
value computation.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-04-21 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94661
* g++.dg/coroutines/ramp-return-a.C: New test.
* g++.dg/coroutines/ramp-return-b.C: New test.
* g++.dg/coroutines/ramp-return-c.C: New test.
* testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp: Add additional_flags=
-DTBB_SUPRESS_DEPRECATED_MESSAGES=1 to suppress warnings when
compiling with a newer Thread Building Blocks.
si_code in siginfo_t is a macro on NetBSD, not a member of the
struct itself, so add a C trampoline for receiving its value.
Also replace references to mos.waitsemacount with the replacement and
add some helpers from os_netbsd.go in the GC repository.
Update golang/go#38538.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/gofrontend/+/228918
As an extension (there should be a CWG about this though), we support
braced-init-list as a template argument, but convert_nontype_argument
had trouble digesting them. We ICEd because of the double coercion we
perform for template arguments: convert_nontype_argument called from
finish_template_type got a { }, and since a class type was involved and
we were in a template, convert_like created an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR. Then
the second conversion of the same argument crashed in constexpr.c
because the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR had gotten wrapped in a TARGET_EXPR.
Another issue was that an IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR leaked to constexpr.c when
building an aggregate init.
We should have instantiated the IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR in the first call to
convert_nontype_argument, but we didn't, because the call to
is_nondependent_constant_expression returned false because it checks
!BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P. Then non_dep was false even though the
expression didn't contain anything dependent and we didn't instantiate
it in convert_nontype_argument. To fix this, check
BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr rather
than in is_nondependent_*.
PR c++/94592
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): Return when T is
a BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.
(is_nondependent_constant_expression): Don't check
BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P.
(is_nondependent_static_init_expression): Likewise.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class34.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class35.C: New test.
This PR seems to be similar to PR c++/43382, except that the recursive call to
the variadic function with trailing return type in this testcase is additionally
given some explicit template arguments.
In the first testcase below, when resolving the recursive call to 'select',
fn_type_unification first substitutes in the call's explicit template arguments
before doing unification, and so during this substitution the template argument
pack for Args is incomplete.
Since the pack is incomplete, the substitution of 'args...' in the trailing
return type decltype(f(args...)) is handled by the unsubstituted_packs case of
tsubst_pack_expansion. But the handling of this case happens _before_ we reset
local_specializations, and so the substitution ends up reusing the old binding
for 'args' from local_specializations rather than building a new one.
This patch fixes this issue by setting up local_specializations sooner in
tsubst_pack_expansion, before the handling of the unsubstituted_packs case.
It also adds a new policy to local_specialization_stack so that we could use the
class here to conditionally replace local_specializations.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94628
* cp-tree.h (lss_policy::lss_nop): New enumerator.
* pt.c (local_specialization_stack::local_specialization_stack): Handle
an lss_nop policy.
(local_specialization_stack::~local_specialization_stack): Likewise.
(tsubst_pack_expansion): Use a local_specialization_stack instead of
manually saving and restoring local_specializations. Conditionally
replace local_specializations sooner, before the handling of the
unsubstituted_packs case.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94628
* g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic179.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic180.C: New test.
This test was supposed to be added two months ago as part of commit
120e873484 but was omitted by mistake.
* testsuite/24_iterators/istreambuf_iterator/sentinel.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/is_constructible/51185.cc: Make test class a
non-aggregate so that the test verifies the same thing in all -std
modes.
* testsuite/20_util/is_constructible/value-2.cc: Adjust expected
results for some types when paren-init for aggregates is supported.
We issue bogus -Wparentheses warnings (3 of them!) for this fold expression:
((B && true) || ...)
Firstly, issuing a warning for a compiler-generated expression is wrong
and secondly, B && true must be wrapped in ( ) otherwise you'll get
error: binary expression in operand of fold-expression.
PR c++/94505 - bogus -Wparentheses warning with fold-expression.
* pt.c (fold_expression): Add warning_sentinel for -Wparentheses
before calling build_x_binary_op.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/fold11.C: New test.
parm = STRIP_NOPS (parm); is unnecessary and generates
warning: operation on 'parm' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]
when cp/coroutines.cc is compiled with -std=c++11.
* coroutines.cc (captures_temporary): Don't assign the result of
STRIP_NOPS to the same variable.
The vector popcount expanders use a hardcoded subreg. This might lead
to double subregs being generated which then fail to match. With this
patch simplify_gen_subreg is used instead to fold the subregs.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-04-20 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
* config/s390/vector.md ("popcountv8hi2_vx", "popcountv4si2_vx")
("popcountv2di2_vx"): Use simplify_gen_subreg.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-04-20 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
* g++.dg/pr94666.C: New test.
The vsel instruction is a bit-wise select instruction. Using an
IF_THEN_ELSE to express it in RTL is wrong and leads to wrong code being
generated in the combine pass.
With the patch the pattern is written using bit operations. However,
I've just noticed that the manual still demands a fixed point mode for
AND/IOR and friends although several targets emit bit ops on floating
point vectors (including i386, Power, and s390). So I assume this is a
safe thing to do?!
gcc/ChangeLog:
2020-04-20 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
PR target/94613
* config/s390/s390-builtin-types.def: Add 3 new function modes.
* config/s390/s390-builtins.def: Add mode dependent low-level
builtin and map the overloaded builtins to these.
* config/s390/vx-builtins.md ("vec_selV_HW"): Rename to ...
("vsel<V_HW"): ... this and rewrite the pattern with bitops.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-04-20 Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
PR target/94613
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/pr94613.c: New test.
* gcc.target/s390/zvector/vec_sel-1.c: New test.
