The following patch (incremental to the makeucnid.c fix) regenerates
ucnid.h with https://www.unicode.org/Public/13.0.0/ucd/ files.
2021-08-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/100977
* ucnid.h: Regenerated using Unicode 13.0.0 files.
I've noticed in ucnid.h two adjacent lines that had all flags and combine
values identical and as such were supposed to be merged.
This is due to a bug in makeucnid.c, which records last_flag,
last_combine and really_safe of what has just been printed, but
because of a typo mishandles it for last_combine, always compares against
the combining_value[0] which is 0.
This has two effects on the table, one is that often the table is
unnecessarily large, as for non-zero .combine every character has its own
record instead of adjacent characters with the same flags and combine
being merged. This means larger tables.
The other is that sometimes the last char that has combine set doesn't
actually have it in the tables, because the code is printing entries only
upon seeing the next character and if that character does have
combining_value of 0 and flags are otherwise the same as previously printed,
it will not print anything.
The following patch fixes that, for clarity what exactly it affects
I've regenerated with the same Unicode files as last time it has
been regenerated.
2021-08-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/100977
* makeucnid.c (write_table): Fix computation of last_combine.
* ucnid.h: Regenerated using Unicode 6.3.0 files.
The patch for 96391 changed linemap_compare_locations to give up on
comparing locations from macro expansions if we don't have column
information. But in this testcase, the BOILERPLATE macro is multiple lines
long, so we do want to compare locations within the macro. So this patch
moves the LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS check inside the block, to use it
for failing gracefully.
PR c++/100796
PR preprocessor/96391
libcpp/ChangeLog:
* line-map.c (linemap_compare_locations): Only use comparison with
LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS to avoid abort.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/plugin/location-overflow-test-pr100796.c: New test.
* g++.dg/plugin/plugin.exp: Run it.
The toolchain provided by ST for stm32 has had support for
__FILENAME__ for a while, but clang/llvm has recently implemented
support for __FILE_NAME__, so it seems better to use the same macro
name in GCC.
It happens that the ST patch is similar to the one proposed in PR
c/42579.
Given these input files:
::::::::::::::
mydir/myinc.h
::::::::::::::
char* mystringh_file = __FILE__;
char* mystringh_filename = __FILE_NAME__;
char* mystringh_base_file = __BASE_FILE__;
::::::::::::::
mydir/mysrc.c
::::::::::::::
char* mystring_file = __FILE__;
char* mystring_filename = __FILE_NAME__;
char* mystring_base_file = __BASE_FILE__;
we produce:
$ gcc mydir/mysrc.c -I . -E
char* mystringh_file = "./mydir/myinc.h";
char* mystringh_filename = "myinc.h";
char* mystringh_base_file = "mydir/mysrc.c";
char* mystring_file = "mydir/mysrc.c";
char* mystring_filename = "mysrc.c";
char* mystring_base_file = "mydir/mysrc.c";
2021-05-20 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>
Torbjörn Svensson <torbjorn.svensson@st.com>
PR c/42579
libcpp/
* include/cpplib.h (cpp_builtin_type): Add BT_FILE_NAME entry.
* init.c (builtin_array): Likewise.
* macro.c (_cpp_builtin_macro_text): Add support for BT_FILE_NAME.
gcc/
* doc/cpp.texi (Common Predefined Macros): Document __FILE_NAME__.
gcc/testsuite/
* c-c++-common/spellcheck-reserved.c: Add tests for __FILE_NAME__.
* c-c++-common/cpp/file-name-1.c: New test.
As can be seen on the testcases, before the -fdirectives-only preprocessing
rewrite the preprocessor would assume // comments are terminated by the
end of file even when newline wasn't there, but now we error out.
The following patch restores the previous behavior.
2021-05-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR preprocessor/100646
* lex.c (cpp_directive_only_process): Treat end of file as termination
for !is_block comments.
* gcc.dg/cpp/pr100646-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/cpp/pr100646-2.c: New test.
If a header doesn't end with a new-line, with -fdirectives-only we right now
preprocess it as
int i = 1;# 2 "pr100392.c" 2
i.e. the line directive isn't on the next line, which means we fail to parse
it when compiling.
GCC 10 and earlier libcpp/directives-only.c had for this:
if (!pfile->state.skipping && cur != base)
{
/* If the file was not newline terminated, add rlimit, which is
guaranteed to point to a newline, to the end of our range. */
if (cur[-1] != '\n')
{
cur++;
CPP_INCREMENT_LINE (pfile, 0);
lines++;
}
cb->print_lines (lines, base, cur - base);
}
and we have the assertion
/* Files always end in a newline or carriage return. We rely on this for
character peeking safety. */
gcc_assert (buffer->rlimit[0] == '\n' || buffer->rlimit[0] == '\r');
So, this patch just does readd the more less same thing, so that we emit
a newline after the inline even when it wasn't there before.
2021-05-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR preprocessor/100392
* lex.c (cpp_directive_only_process): If buffer doesn't end with '\n',
add buffer->rlimit[0] character to the printed range and
CPP_INCREMENT_LINE and increment line_count.
* gcc.dg/cpp/pr100392.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/cpp/pr100392.h: New file.
C2X adds #elifdef and #elifndef preprocessor directives; these have
also been proposed for C++. Implement these directives in libcpp
accordingly.
In this implementation, #elifdef and #elifndef are treated as
non-directives for any language version other than c2x and gnu2x (if
the feature is accepted for C++, it can trivially be enabled for
relevant C++ versions). In strict conformance modes for prior
language versions, this is required, as illustrated by the
c11-elifdef-1.c test added.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
libcpp/
* include/cpplib.h (struct cpp_options): Add elifdef.
* init.c (struct lang_flags): Add elifdef.
(lang_defaults): Update to include elifdef initializers.
(cpp_set_lang): Set elifdef for pfile based on language.
* directives.c (STDC2X, ELIFDEF): New macros.
(EXTENSION): Increase value to 3.
(DIRECTIVE_TABLE): Add #elifdef and #elifndef.
(_cpp_handle_directive): Do not treat ELIFDEF directives as
directives for language versions without the #elifdef feature.
(do_elif): Handle #elifdef and #elifndef.
(do_elifdef, do_elifndef): New functions.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/cpp/c11-elifdef-1.c, gcc.dg/cpp/c2x-elifdef-1.c,
gcc.dg/cpp/c2x-elifdef-2.c: New tests.
The libcpp function cpp_avoid_paste is used to insert whitespace in
preprocessed output where needed to avoid two consecutive
preprocessing tokens, that logically (e.g. when stringized) do not
have whitespace between them, from being incorrectly lexed as one when
the preprocessed input is reread by a compiler.
This fails to allow for digit separators, so meaning that invalid
code, that has a CPP_NUMBER (from a macro expansion) followed by a
character literal, can result in preprocessed output with a valid use
of digit separators, so that required syntax errors do not occur when
compiling with -save-temps. Fix this by handling that case in
cpp_avoid_paste (as with other cases in cpp_avoid_paste, this doesn't
try to check whether the language version in use supports digit
separators; it's always OK to have unnecessary whitespace in
preprocessed output).
Note: there are other cases, with various kinds of wide character or
string literal following a CPP_NUMBER, where spurious pasting of
preprocessing tokens can occur but the sequence of tokens remains
invalid both before and after that pasting. Maybe cpp_avoid_paste
should also handle those cases (and similar cases after a CPP_NAME),
to ensure the sequence of preprocessing tokens in preprocessed output
is exactly right, whether or not it affects whether syntax errors
occur. This patch only addresses the case with digit separators where
invalid code can fail to be diagnosed without the space inserted.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
libcpp/
* lex.c (cpp_avoid_paste): Do not allow pasting CPP_NUMBER with
CPP_CHAR.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-paste.C, gcc.dg/c2x-digit-separators-3.c:
New tests.
C2X adds digit separators, as in C++. Enable them accordingly in
libcpp and c-lex.c. Some basic tests are added that digit separators
behave as expected for C2X and are properly disabled for C11; further
test coverage is included in the existing g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep*.C
tests.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
gcc/c-family/
* c-lex.c (interpret_float): Handle digit separators for C2X.
libcpp/
* init.c (lang_defaults): Enable digit separators for GNUC2X and
STDC2X.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/c11-digit-separators-1.c,
gcc.dg/c2x-digit-separators-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-digit-separators-2.c:
New tests.
Since the r0-85991-ga25a8f3be322fe0f838947b679f73d6efc2a412c
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01329.html
changes, so that we handle macros inside of pragmas that should expand
macros, during preprocessing we print those pragmas token by token,
with CPP_PRAGMA printed as
fputs ("#pragma ", print.outf);
if (space)
fprintf (print.outf, "%s %s", space, name);
else
fprintf (print.outf, "%s", name);
where name is some identifier (so e.g. print
#pragma omp parallel
or
#pragma omp for
etc.). Because it ends in an identifier, we need to handle it like
an identifier (i.e. CPP_NAME) for the decision whether a space needs
to be emitted in between that #pragma whatever or #pragma whatever whatever
and following token, otherwise the attached testcase is preprocessed as
#pragma omp forreduction(+:red)
rather than
#pragma omp for reduction(+:red)
The cpp_avoid_paste function is only called for this purpose.
2021-05-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c/100450
* lex.c (cpp_avoid_paste): Handle token1 CPP_PRAGMA like CPP_NAME.
* c-c++-common/gomp/pr100450.c: New test.
When the preprocessor lexes preprocessing numbers in lex_number, it
accepts digit separators in more cases than actually permitted in
pp-numbers by the standard syntax.
One thing this accepts is adjacent digit separators; there is some
code to reject those later, but as noted in bug 83873 it fails to
cover the case of adjacent digit separators within a floating-point
exponent. Accepting adjacent digit separators only results in a
missing diagnostic, not in valid code being rejected or being accepted
with incorrect semantics, because the correct lexing in such a case
would have '' start the following preprocessing tokens, and no valid
preprocessing token starts '' while ' isn't valid on its own as a
preprocessing token either. So this patch fixes that case by moving
the error for adjacent digit separators to lex_number (allowing a more
specific diagnostic than if '' were excluded from the pp-number
completely).
Other cases inappropriately accepted involve digit separators before
'.', 'e+', 'e-', 'p+' or 'p-' (or corresponding uppercase variants).
In those cases, as shown by the test digit-sep-pp-number.C added, this
can result in valid code being wrongly rejected as a result of too
many characters being included in the pp-number. So this case is
fixed by terminating the pp-number at the correct character according
to the standard. That test also covers the case where a digit
separator was followed by an identifier-nondigit that is not a
nondigit (e.g. a UCN); that case was already handled correctly.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
libcpp/
PR c++/83873
PR preprocessor/97604
* lex.c (lex_number): Reject adjacent digit separators here. Do
not allow digit separators before '.' or an exponent with sign.
* expr.c (cpp_classify_number): Do not check for adjacent digit
separators here.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c++/83873
PR preprocessor/97604
* g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-neg-2.C,
g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-pp-number.C: New tests.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-line-neg.C, g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-neg.C:
Adjust expected messages.
As reported in bug 82359, the preprocessor does not allow C++ digit
separators in the line number in a #line directive, despite the
standard syntax for that directive using digit-sequence which allows
digit separators.
There is some confusion in that bug about whether C++ is meant to
allow digit separators there or not, but the last comment there
suggests they are meant to be allowed, and the version of digit
separators accepted for C2X at the March meeting explicitly mentions
digit separators in the #line specification to avoid any ambiguity
there.
This patch thus adds code to handle digit separators in the line
number in #line, as part of the preparation for enabling digit
separators in C2X mode. The code changed does not contain any
conditionals for whether digit separators are supported in the chosen
language version, because that was handled earlier in pp-number lexing
and if they aren't supported they won't appear in the string passed to
that function. It does however make sure not to allow adjacent digit
separators because those are only handled at a later stage of lexing
at present. (Problems with how certain source character sequences
involving digit separators that don't actually match the pp-number
syntax get lexed as a pp-number and only diagnosed later, if at all,
are bugs 83873 and 97604, to be addressed separately.)
Making the change in this location will have the effect of allowing
digit separators in the "# <line-number> <file> <flags>" form of
directive as well as #line; I don't think that's a problem.
Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
libcpp/
PR preprocessor/82359
* directives.c (strtolinenum): Handle digit separators.
gcc/testsuite/
PR preprocessor/82359
* g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-line.C,
g++.dg/cpp1y/digit-sep-line-neg.C: New tests.
This reverts a s/column_offset/column/ change in the fix for PR99446.
2021-04-19 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR preprocessor/100142
libcpp/
* line-map.c (linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset): Revert
unintended s/column_offset/column/ change.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr100142.c: New testcase.
* g++.dg/diagnostic/pr72803.C: Revert last change.
This ICE was because when adjusting a column offset we could advance
into a linemap for a different file. We only checked the next line
map was not for a line further advanced in any file, forgetting that
it could be for an earlier line in a different file. The testcase
needed adjusting as column 512 was unrepresentable, once that was
taken into consideration.
PR preprocessor/99446
libcpp/
* line-map.c (line-map.c): Do not advance to linemaps for
different files.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/diagnostic/pr72803.C: Adjust expected column.
The problem is that the new IS_MACRO_LOC macro:
inline bool
IS_MACRO_LOC (location_t loc)
{
return !IS_ORDINARY_LOC (loc) && !IS_ADHOC_LOC (loc);
}
is not fully correct since the position of the macro lines is not fixed:
/* Returns the lowest location [of a token resulting from macro
expansion] encoded in this line table. */
inline location_t
LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION (const line_maps *set)
{
return LINEMAPS_MACRO_USED (set)
? MAP_START_LOCATION (LINEMAPS_LAST_MACRO_MAP (set))
: MAX_LOCATION_T + 1;
}
In Ada, LINEMAPS_MACRO_USED is false so LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION is
MAX_LOCATION_T + 1, but IS_MACRO_LOC nevertheless returns true for anything
in the range [LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION; MAX_LOCATION_T], thus yielding an ICE
in linemap_macro_map_lookup for very large files.
libcpp/
* include/line-map.h (IS_MACRO_LOC): Delete.
* line-map.c (linemap_location_from_macro_expansion_p): Test
LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION of the linemap.
gcc/cp/
* module.cc (ordinary_loc_of): Test LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION
of the linemap.
(module_state::write_location): Likewise.
PR c/99323 describes an ICE due to a failed assertion deep inside the
fix-it printing machinery, where the fix-it hints on one line have not
been properly sorted in layout's constructor.
The underlying issue occurs when multiple fix-it hints affect a line
wider that LINE_MAP_MAX_COLUMN_NUMBER, where the location_t values for
characters after that threshold fall back to having column zero.
It's not meaningful to try to handle fix-it hints without column
information, so this patch rejects them as they are added to the
rich_location, falling back to the "no fix-it hints on this diagnostic"
case, fixing the crash.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR c/99323
* diagnostic-show-locus.c
(selftest::test_one_liner_many_fixits_2): Fix accidental usage of
column 0.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c/99323
* gcc.dg/pr99323-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/pr99323-2.c: New test.
libcpp/ChangeLog:
PR c/99323
* line-map.c (rich_location::maybe_add_fixit): Reject fix-it hints
at column 0.
This fixes some issues with macro maps. We were incorrectly
calculating the number of macro expansions in a location span, and I
had a workaround that partially covered that up. Further, while macro
location spans are monotonic, that is not true of ordinary location
spans. Thus we need to insert an indirection array when binary
searching the latter. (We load ordinary locations before loading
imports, but macro locations afterwards. We make sure an import
location is de-macrofied, if needed.)
PR c++/98718
gcc/cp/
* module.cc (ool): New indirection vector.
(loc_spans::maybe_propagate): Location is not optional.
(loc_spans::open): Likewise. Assert monotonically advancing.
(module_for_ordinary_loc): Use ool indirection vector.
(module_state::write_prepare_maps): Do not count empty macro
expansions. Elide empty spans.
(module_state::write_macro_maps): Skip empty expansions.
(ool_cmp): New qsort comparator.
(module_state::write): Create and destroy ool vector.
(name_pending_imports): Fix dump push/pop.
(preprocess_module): Likewise. Add more dumping.
(preprocessed_module): Likewise.
libcpp/
* include/line-map.h
* line-map.c
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/modules/pr98718_a.C: New.
* g++.dg/modules/pr98718_b.C: New.
When we read preprocessed source, we deal with a couple of special
location lines at the start of the file. These provide information
about the original filename of the source and the current directory,
so we can process the source in the same manner. When updating that
code, I had a somewhat philosophical question: Should the line table
contain evidence of the filename the user provided to the compiler? I
figured to leave it there, as it did no harm. But this defect shows
an issue. It's in the line table and our (non optimizing) line table
serializer emits that filename. Which means if one re-preprocesses
the original source to a differently-named intermediate file, the
resultant CMI is different. Boo. That's a difference that doesn't
matter, except the CRC matching then fails. We should elide the
filename, so that one can preprocess to mktemp intermediate filenames
for whatever reason.
This patch takes the approach of expunging it from the line table --
so the line table will end up with exactly the same form. That seems
a better bet than trying to fix up mismatching line tables in CMI
emission.
PR c++/99072
libcpp/
* init.c (read_original_filename): Expunge all evidence of the
original filename.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/modules/pr99072.H: New.
This defect really required building header-units and include translation
of pieces of the standard library. This adds smarts to the modules
test harness to do that -- accept .X files as the source file, but
provide '-x c++-system-header $HDR' in the options. The .X file will
be considered by the driver to be a linker script and ignored (with a
warning).
Using this we can add 2 tests that end up building list_initializer
and iostream, along with a test that iostream's build
include-translates list_initializer's #include. That discovered a set
of issues with the -flang-info-include-translate=HDR handling, also
fixed and documented here.
PR c++/99023
gcc/cp/
* module.cc (canonicalize_header_name): Use
cpp_probe_header_unit.
(maybe_translate_include): Fix note_includes comparison.
(init_modules): Fix note_includes string termination.
libcpp/
* include/cpplib.h (cpp_find_header_unit): Rename to ...
(cpp_probe_header_unit): ... this.
* internal.h (_cp_find_header_unit): Declare.
* files.c (cpp_find_header_unit): Break apart to ..
(test_header_unit): ... this, and ...
(_cpp_find_header_unit): ... and, or and ...
(cpp_probe_header_unit): ... this.
* macro.c (cpp_get_token_1): Call _cpp_find_header_unit.
gcc/
* doc/invoke.texi (flang-info-include-translate): Document header
lookup behaviour.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/modules/modules.exp: Bail on cross-testing. Add support
for .X files.
* g++.dg/modules/pr99023_a.X: New.
* g++.dg/modules/pr99023_b.X: New.
We make sure files end in \n by placing one at the limit of the buffer
(just past the end of what is read). We need to do the same for
buffers generated via include-translation. Fortunately they have
space.
libcpp/
* files.c (_cpp_stack_file): Make buffers end in unread \n.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/modules/pr99050_a.H: New.
* g++.dg/modules/pr99050_b.C: New.
PR preprocessor/96391 describes an ICE in the C++ frontend on:
#define CONST const
#define VOID void
typedef CONST VOID *PCVOID;
where the typedef line occurs after enough code has been compiled
that location_t values are beyond LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS,
and hence no column numbers are available.
The issue occurs in linemap_compare_locations when comparing the
locations of the "const" and "void" tokens.
Upon resolving the LRK_MACRO_EXPANSION_POINT, both have the same
location_t, the line of the "typedef" (with no column), and so
the l0 == l1 clause is triggered, but they are not from the
same macro expansion, leading first_map_in_common to return NULL
and triggering the "abort" condition.
This patch fixes the issue by checking when the two macro expansion
point location_t values are equal that the value
<= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS and thus has column information,
fixing the issue.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR preprocessor/96391
* g++.dg/plugin/location-overflow-test-pr96391.c: New test.
* g++.dg/plugin/plugin.exp (plugin_test_list): Add it,
using the location_overflow_plugin.c from gcc.dg/plugin.
libcpp/ChangeLog:
PR preprocessor/96391
* line-map.c (linemap_compare_locations): Require that
the location be <= LINE_MAP_MAX_LOCATION_WITH_COLS when
treating locations as coming from the same macro expansion.
The following patch uses make_signed_t<size_t> instead of
make_signed<size_t>::type in the diagnostics, because the former is shorter.
It is true that one can't use make_signed<size_t>::type in C++11 code (which
is why I haven't changed it in the testcase which is c++11 effective
target), but the message talks about C++23 and make_signed_t is a C++14 and
later feature, so I think it is fine.
2021-02-04 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* expr.c (cpp_classify_number): Use make_signed_t<size_t> instead of
make_signed<size_t>::type in the diagnostics.
* g++.dg/warn/Wsize_t-literals.C: Expect make_signed_t<size_t> instead
of make_signed<size_t>::type in the diagnostics.
