I keep forgetting that a constexpr function in C++11 has to be a single
return statement.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/99985
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()): Fix
to be a valid constexpr function in C++11.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/99985.cc: New test.
This puts the logic for the noexcept-specifier in one place, and then
reuses it elsewhere. This means checking whether the move constructor
can throw doesn't need to do overload resolution and then check whether
some other constructor can throw, we just get the answer directly.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::_S_nothrow_move()):
New function to determine noexcept-specifier for move
constructors.
(_Hashtable): Use _S_nothrow_move() on move constructors.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc:
Correct static assertion message.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/noexcept_move_construct.cc:
Likewise.
Add unordered containers heterogeneous lookup member functions find, count, contains and
equal_range in C++20. Those members are considered for overload resolution only if hash and
equal functors used to instantiate the container have a nested is_transparent type.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/stl_tree.h
(__has_is_transparent, __has_is_transparent_t): Move...
* include/bits/stl_function.h: ...here.
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Hash_code_base<>::_M_hash_code_tr): New..
(_Hashtable_base<>::_M_equals_tr): New.
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::_M_find_tr, _Hashtable<>::_M_count_tr,
_Hashtable<>::_M_equal_range_tr): New member function templates to perform
heterogeneous lookup.
(_Hashtable<>::_M_find_before_node_tr): New.
(_Hashtable<>::_M_find_node_tr): New.
* include/bits/unordered_map.h (unordered_map::find<>, unordered_map::count<>,
unordered_map::contains<>, unordered_map::equal_range<>): New member function
templates to perform heterogeneous lookup.
(unordered_multimap::find<>, unordered_multimap::count<>,
unordered_multimap::contains<>, unordered_multimap::equal_range<>): Likewise.
* include/bits/unordered_set.h (unordered_set::find<>, unordered_set::count<>,
unordered_set::contains<>, unordered_set::equal_range<>): Likewise.
(unordered_multiset::find<>, unordered_multiset::count<>,
unordered_multiset::contains<>, unordered_multiset::equal_range<>): Likewise.
* include/debug/unordered_map
(unordered_map::find<>, unordered_map::equal_range<>): Likewise.
(unordered_multimap::find<>, unordered_multimap::equal_range<>): Likewise.
* include/debug/unordered_set
(unordered_set::find<>, unordered_set::equal_range<>): Likewise.
(unordered_multiset::find<>, unordered_multiset::equal_range<>): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/operations/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/operations/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/operations/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/operations/1.cc: New test.
N3644 implies that operator- can be used on value-init iterators. We now return
0 if both iterators are value initialized. If only one is value initialized we
keep the UB by returning the result of a normal computation which is a meaningless
value.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/70303
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (std::deque<>::operator-(iterator, iterator)):
Return 0 if both iterators are value-initialized.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/70303.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/70303.cc: New test.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/23_containers/array/debug/back2_neg.cc: target c++14 because assertion
for constexpr is disabled in C++11.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/debug/front2_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/debug/square_brackets_operator2_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/debug/multithreaded_swap.cc: Include <memory>
for shared_ptr.
The recent changes to add assertions to std::array broke the functions
that need to be constexpr in C++11, because of the restrictive rules for
constexpr functions in C++11.
This simply disables the assertions for C++11 mode, so the functions can
be constexpr again.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/array (array::operator[](size_t) const, array::front() const)
(array::back() const) [__cplusplus == 201103]: Disable
assertions.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/element_access/constexpr_element_access.cc:
Check for correct values.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/tuple_interface/get_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line numbers.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/debug/constexpr_c++11.cc: New test.
Use new template parameters to replace usage of lambdas to move or not
tree values on copy.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/move.h (_GLIBCXX_FWDREF): New.
* include/bits/stl_tree.h: Adapt to use latter.
(_Rb_tree<>::_M_clone_node): Add _MoveValue template parameter.
(_Rb_tree<>::_M_mbegin): New.
(_Rb_tree<>::_M_begin): Use latter.
(_Rb_tree<>::_M_copy): Add _MoveValues template parameter.
* testsuite/23_containers/map/allocator/move_cons.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/multimap/allocator/move_cons.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/multiset/allocator/move_cons.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/allocator/move_cons.cc: New test.
This change reorders the data members of std::span so that span<byte> is
layout-compatible with common implementations of struct iovec. This will
allow span<byte> to be used directly in places that use a struct iovec
to do scatter-gather I/O.
It's important to note that POSIX doesn't specify the order of members
in iovec. Also the equivalent type on Windows has members in the other
order, and uses type ULONG (which is always 32-bit whereas size_t is
64-bit for Win64). So this change will only help for certain targets and
an indirection between std::span and I/O system calls will still be
needed for the general case.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/95609
* include/std/span (span): Reorder data members to match common
implementations of struct iovec.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/layout_compat.cc: New test.
For a span with statically empty extent, we currently model the
preconditions of front(), back(), and operator[] as if they are
mandates, by using a static_assert to verify that extent != 0. This
causes us to reject valid programs that would instantiate these member
functions and at runtime never call them.
Since they are already followed by more general runtime asserts, this
patch just removes these static_asserts altogether,
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/span (span::front): Remove static_assert.
(span::back): Likewise.
(span::operator[]): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/back_neg.cc: Rewrite to verify
that we check the preconditions of back() only when it's called.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/front_neg.cc: Likewise for
front().
* testsuite/23_containers/span/index_op_neg.cc: Likewise for
operator[].
The spaceship operator for std::array uses memcmp when the
__is_byte<value_type> trait is true, but memcmp isn't usable in
constexpr contexts. Also, memcmp should only be used for unsigned byte
types, because it gives the wrong answer for signed chars with negative
values.
We can simply check std::is_constant_evaluated() so that we don't use
memcmp during constant evaluation.
To fix the problem of using memcmp for inappropriate types, this patch
adds new __is_memcmp_ordered and __is_memcmp_ordered_with traits. These
say whether using memcmp will give the right answer for ordering
operations such as lexicographical_compare and three-way comparisons.
The new traits can be used in several places, and can also be used to
implement my suggestion in PR 93059 comment 37 to use memcmp for
unsigned integers larger than one byte on big endian targets.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96851
* include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h (__is_memcmp_ordered):
New trait that says if memcmp can be used for ordering.
(__is_memcmp_ordered_with): Likewise, for two types.
* include/bits/deque.tcc (__lex_cmp_dit): Use new traits
instead of __is_byte and __numeric_traits.
(__lexicographical_compare_aux1): Likewise.
* include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__lexicographical_compare_fn):
Likewise.
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__lexicographical_compare_aux1)
(__is_byte_iter): Likewise.
* include/std/array (operator<=>): Likewise. Only use memcmp
when std::is_constant_evaluated() is false.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/comparison_operators/96851.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/tuple_interface/get_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line numbers.
A recent change altered the layout of EBO-helper base classes, resulting
in an ambiguity when the hash function and equality predicate are the
same type.
This modifies the type of one of the base classes, so that we don't get
two base classes of the same type.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Hash_code_base): Change
index of _Hashtable_ebo_helper base class.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/dup_types.cc: New test.
The C++ LWG recently confirmed that self-move assignment should not have
undefined behaviour for standard containers (see the proposed resolution
of LWG 2839). The result should be a valid but unspecified value, just
like other times when a container is moved from.
Our std::list, std::__cxx11::basic_string and unordered containers all
have bugs which result in undefined behaviour.
For std::list the problem is that we clear the previous contents using
_M_clear() instead of clear(). This means the _M_next, _M_prev and
_M_size members are not zeroed, and so after we "update" them (with
their existing values), we are left with dangling pointers and a
non-zero size, but no elements.
For the unordered containers the problem is similar. _Hashtable first
deallocates the existing contents, then takes ownership of the pointers
from the RHS object (which has just had its contents deallocated so the
pointers are dangling).
For std::basic_string it's a little more subtle. When the string is
local (i.e. fits in the SSO buffer) we use char_traits::copy to copy the
contents from this->data() to __rhs.data(). When &__rhs == this that
copy violates the precondition that the ranges don't overlap. We only
need to check for self-move for this case where it's local, because the
only other case that can be true for self-move is that it's non-local
but the allocators compare equal. In that case the data pointer is
neither deallocated nor leaked, so the result is well-defined.
This patch also makes a small optimization for std::deque move
assignment, to use the efficient move when is_always_equal is false, but
the allocators compare equal at runtime.
Finally, we need to remove all the Debug Mode checks which abort the
program when a self-move is detected, because it's not undefined to do
that.
Before PR 85828 can be closed we should also look into fixing
std::shuffle so it doesn't do any redundant self-swaps.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/85828
* include/bits/basic_string.h (operator=(basic_string&&)): Check
for self-move before copying with char_traits::copy.
* include/bits/hashtable.h (operator=(_Hashtable&&)): Check for
self-move.
* include/bits/stl_deque.h (_M_move_assign1(deque&&, false_type)):
Check for equal allocators.
* include/bits/stl_list.h (_M_move_assign(list&&, true_type)):
Call clear() instead of _M_clear().
* include/debug/formatter.h (__msg_self_move_assign): Change
comment.
* include/debug/macros.h (__glibcxx_check_self_move_assign):
(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_VERIFY): Remove.
* include/debug/safe_container.h (operator=(_Safe_container&&)):
Remove assertion check for safe move and make it well-defined.
* include/debug/safe_iterator.h (operator=(_Safe_iterator&&)):
Remove assertion check for self-move.
* include/debug/safe_local_iterator.h
(operator=(_Safe_local_iterator&&)): Likewise.
* testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/cons/char/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/forward_list/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/cons/self_move.cc: New test.
Respect DR 526 in implementation of std::[forward_]list remove/remove_if/unique.
[forward_]list::remove was already implementing it but the implementation has
been modified to generalize the following pattern. All nodes to remove are
collected in an intermediate [forward_]list which purpose is just to be
detroyed once out of scope.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/91620
* include/bits/forward_list.tcc (forward_list<>::remove): Collect nodes
to destroy in an intermediate forward_list.
(forward_list<>::remove_if, forward_list<>::unique): Likewise.
* include/bits/list.tcc (list<>::remove, list<>::unique): Likewise.
(list<>::remove_if): Likewise.
* include/debug/forward_list (forward_list<>::_M_erase_after): Remove.
(forward_list<>::erase_after): Adapt.
(forward_list<>::remove, forward_list<>::remove_if): Collect nodes to
destroy in an intermediate forward_list.
(forward_list<>::unique): Likewise.
* include/debug/list (list<>::remove, list<>::unique): Likewise.
(list<>::remove_if): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/forward_list/operations/91620.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/operations/91620.cc: New test.
With -pedantic the debug mode bitset has an ambiguous equality
comparison operator, because it tries to compare the non-debug base to
the debug object. The base object can be converted to another debug
bitset, making the same operator== a candidate again.
The fix is to do the comparison on both base objects, so the operator
for the derived type isn't a candidate.
For the inequality operator the same change should be done, but that
operator can be removed entirely for C++20 because it can be synthesized
by the compiler.
I don't think either equality or inequality operators are really needed,
because the public _GLIBCXX_STD_C::bitset base class cam always be
compared using its own comparison operators. I'm not changing that here
though.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96303
* include/debug/bitset (bitset::operator==): Call _M_base() on
right operand.
(bitset::operator!=): Likewise, but don't define it at all when
default comparisons are supported by the compiler.
* testsuite/23_containers/bitset/operations/96303.cc: New test.
The current dg directives say that the tests can run for any standard
mode, but should fail for C++20. What we want is that they only run for
C++20, and are always expected to fail.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/23_containers/span/back_assert_neg.cc: Split c++2a
effective-target from xfail selector.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/first_2_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/first_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/front_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/index_op_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/last_2_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/last_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_2_assert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_3_assert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_4_assert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_5_assert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_6_assert_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/subspan_assert_neg.cc: Likewise.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/cons/noexcept_default_construct.cc:
Use allocator with the correct value type.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/noexcept_default_construct.cc:
Likewise.
Previously it was not possible to add -fno-exceptions to the testsuite
flags, because some files that are compiled by the v3-build_support
procedure failed with exceptions disabled.
This adjusts those files to still compile without exceptions (with
degraded functionality in some cases).
The sole testcase that explicitly checks for -fno-exceptions has also
been adjusted to use the more robust exceptions_enabled effective-target
keyword from gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/bool/72847.cc: Use the
exceptions_enabled effective-target keyword instead of
checking for an explicit -fno-exceptions option.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc (examine_symbol): Remove
redundant try-catch.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_allocator.h [!__cpp_exceptions]:
Do not define check_allocate_max_size and memory_resource.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_containers.h: Replace comment with
#error if wrong standard dialect used.
* testsuite/util/testsuite_shared.cc: Likewise.
We used to consider range size on insertion but on unique keys container
not all range values might be inserted resulting in over-sizing. In this
case we just consider user reservation and if none then the container will
adapt to actually inserted elements.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/hashtable.h
(_Hashtable<>(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, size_t, const _H1&,
const _H2&, const _Hash&, const _Equal&, const _ExtractKey&,
const allocator_type&, true_type)): New.
(_Hashtable<>(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, size_t, const _H1&,
const _H2&, const _Hash&, const _Equal&, const _ExtractKey&,
const allocator_type&, false_type)): New.
(_Hashtable<>(_InputIterator, _InputIterator, size_t, const _H1&,
const _H2&, const _Hash&, const _Equal&, const _ExtractKey&,
const allocator_type&)): Delegate to latters.
(operator=(initializer_list<value_type>)): Rehash if too small.
(_M_insert(_Arg&&, const _NodeGenerator&, true_type)): Remove
size_t len parameter.
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Insert_base<>::_M_insert_range):
Do not try to get input range distance.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/cons/bucket_hint.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/modifiers/insert.cc: New test.
These tests verify that including C++11 headers fails to compile in
C++98 mode. They use { dg-options "-std=gnu++98" } so that they are
explicitly run in C++98 mode. This change also adds a target selector so
that the tests will be skipped even if the dg-options directive is
filtered out or overridden. This is in preparation for a desired future
change where tests do not use -std options, so that they can be tested
with e.g. --target_board=unix\"{-std=gnu++17,-std=gnu++20}\"
In some cases the dg-options and dg-do directives need to be reordered,
so that the -std=gnu++98 option is already added to the options before
the target selector is checked.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/18_support/headers/cstdalign/std_c++0x_neg.cc: Add
c++98_only target selector.
* testsuite/18_support/headers/cstdbool/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/18_support/headers/cstdint/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/18_support/headers/new/synopsis_cxx98.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/19_diagnostics/headers/system_error/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/20_util/headers/type_traits/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/headers/array/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/headers/tuple/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/headers/unordered_map/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/headers/unordered_set/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/ccomplex/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cfenv/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c++98.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/ctgmath/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/random/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/27_io/headers/cinttypes/std_c++0x_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/28_regex/headers/regex/std_c++0x_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/29_atomics/headers/atomic/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/30_threads/headers/condition_variable/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/30_threads/headers/future/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/30_threads/headers/mutex/std_c++0x_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/30_threads/headers/thread/std_c++0x_neg.cc:
Likewise.
The std::__uninitialized_default_n algorithm used by std::vector creates
an initial object as a local variable then copies that into the
destination range. If the object is too large for the stack this
crashes. We should create the first object directly into the
destination and then copy it from there.
This doesn't fix the bug for C++98, because in that case the initial
value is created as a default argument of the vector constructor i.e. in
the user's code, not inside libstdc++. We can't prevent that.
PR libstdc++/94540
* include/bits/stl_uninitialized.h (__uninitialized_default_1<true>):
Construct the first value at *__first instead of on the stack.
(__uninitialized_default_n_1<true>): Likewise.
Improve comments on several of the non-standard algorithms.
* testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_default/94540.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_default_n/94540.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_value_construct/94540.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/uninitialized_value_construct_n/94540.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/cons/94540.cc: New test.
When given a type which can convert to any container-like type, the
C(const C&) copy constructor and C(const C::_Base&) converting
constructor are ambiguous. This change replaces the converting
constructor's parameter with a reference_wrapper-like type so that
calling that constructor requires an additional user-defined conversion.
This gives it a lower rank than the copy constructor, avoiding the
ambiguity.
While testing this change I discovered that __gnu_debug::forward_list
doesn't have a convering constructor from the std::forward_list base, so
this adds it.
We should probably consider whether the converting constructors should
be 'explicit' but I'm not changing that now.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/90102
* include/debug/deque (deque(const _Base&)): Replace parameter
with a struct that wraps a const _Base&.
* include/debug/forward_list (forward_list(_Base_ref)): New
constructor.
* include/debug/list (list(const _Base&)): Replace parameter
with a struct that wraps a const _Base&.
* include/debug/map.h (map(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* include/debug/multimap.h (multimap(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* include/debug/multiset.h (multiset(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* include/debug/set.h (set(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* include/debug/unordered_map (unordered_map(const _Base&))
(unordered_multimap(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* include/debug/unordered_set (unordered_set(const _Base&))
(unordered_multiset(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/cons/destructible_debug_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line number.
* include/debug/vector (vector(const _Base&)): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/forward_list/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/map/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/multimap/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/multiset/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multimap/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_multiset/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/debug/90102.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/debug/90102.cc: New test.
By trying to reuse the existing std::_Construct function as a wrapper
for std::construct_at I introduced regressions, because changing
std::_Construct to return non-void made it ill-formed for array types.
The solution is to revert _Construct to its former state, and change
allocator_traits::construct to explicitly call construct_at instead.
This decouples all the existing callers of _Construct from the new
construct_at requirements.
PR libstdc++/94831
* include/bits/alloc_traits.h (_S_construct): Restore placement
new-expression for C++11/14/17 and call std::construct_at directly
for C++20.
* include/bits/stl_construct.h (_Construct): Revert to non-constexpr
function returning void.
* testsuite/20_util/specialized_algorithms/
uninitialized_value_construct/94831.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/cons/94831.cc: New test.
This partially reverts my previous change related to this macro. The
C++20 constexpr iterator requirements are always met by array:iterator,
because it's just a pointer. So the macro can be set to 201803 even in
C++17 mode.
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (__cpp_lib_array_constexpr): Revert
value for C++17 to 201803L because P0858R0 is supported for C++17.
* include/std/version (__cpp_lib_array_constexpr): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/element_access/constexpr_c++17.cc:
Check for value corresponding to P0031R0 features being tested.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/requirements/constexpr_iter.cc:
Check for value corresponding to P0858R0 features being tested.
This macro should have been updated to 201811 when the last C++20
changes were implemented. However those changes are not enabled for
C++17 mode, so the macro should only have the new value in C++20 mode.
This change ensures that the macro is defined to 201603 for C++17 and
201811 for C++20.
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h (__cpp_lib_array_constexpr): Define
different values for C++17 and C++20, to indicate different feature
sets. Update value for C++20 to indicate P1032R1 support.
* include/std/version (__cpp_lib_array_constexpr): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/comparison_operators/constexpr.cc:
Check feature test macro.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/element_access/constexpr_c++17.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/requirements/constexpr_fill.cc: Check
feature test macro.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/requirements/constexpr_iter.cc: Test
in C++17 mode and check feature test macro.
Some more C++20 changes from P1614R2, "The Mothership has Landed".
* include/bits/stl_queue.h (queue): Define operator<=> for C++20.
* include/bits/stl_stack.h (stack): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/queue/cmp_c++20.cc: New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/stack/cmp_c++20.cc: New test.
The 24_iterators/ostream_iterator/1.cc test uses VERIFY and so is
obviously meant to have been run, not just compiled.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/allocator/ext_ptr.cc: Add
comment explaining multiple dg-do directives.
* testsuite/24_iterators/ostream_iterator/1.cc: Fix do-do directive
so test is run as well as compiled.
This fixes a test failure with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG:
FAIL: 23_containers/array/comparison_operators/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)
* include/debug/array (operator<=>): Define for C++20.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/tuple_interface/get_debug_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line numbers.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/tuple_interface/
tuple_element_debug_neg.cc: Likewise.
The 23_containers/span/deduction.cc test was already passing, but only
because I had previously implemented the original proposed resolution of
3255. As pointed out in 3255 that original P/R was incorrect because it
broke construction from array xvalues. This reverts the incorrect part
of 3255 (and adds tests for the case it broke), and implements the
resolution of 3369 instead.
* include/std/span (span(T (&)[N])): Use non-deduced context to
prevent first parameter from interfering with class template argument
deduction (LWG 3369).
* testsuite/23_containers/span/deduction.cc: Add missing 'const'.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/lwg3255.cc: Check for construction from
rvalues.
This includes fixes for first, last, as_bytes and as_writable_bytes
which were missing from the paper.
* include/std/span (__cpp_lib_span): Update value.
(span(It, size_type), span(It, End)): Make conditionally explicit. Add
assertion.
(span(R&&), span(const span<OType, OExtent>&)): Likewise and relax
constraints.
(span::first<Count>(), span::last<Count>()): Use explicit type in
return statement.
(as_bytes, as_writable_bytes): Likewise.
* include/std/version (__cpp_lib_span): Update value.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/1.cc: Check new value.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/2.cc: Check new value.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/explicit.cc: New test.
Following this change it's no longer possible to use std::span with
structured bindings or with the tuple-like API. It will probably come
back for C++23 though.
P2116R0 Remove tuple-like protocol support from fixed-extent span
* include/std/span (get, tuple_size, tuple_element): Remove.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/everything.cc: Remove checks for
tuple-like API.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/get_neg.cc: Remove.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/tuple_element_dynamic_neg.cc: Remove.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/tuple_element_oob_neg.cc: Remove.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/tuple_size_neg.cc: Remove.
Now that this feature has been approved for C++20 we can define the
macro to the official value.
* include/bits/erase_if.h (__cpp_lib_erase_if): Define to 202002L.
* include/std/deque: Likewise.
* include/std/forward_list: Likewise.
* include/std/list: Likewise.
* include/std/string: Likewise.
* include/std/vector: Likewise.
* include/std/version: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/erasure.cc: Test for new value.
* testsuite/23_containers/forward_list/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/list/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/map/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/set/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/erasure.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/erasure.cc: Likewise.
