75efe9cb1f
This does away with enabling -ffinite-loops at -O2+ for all languages and instead enables it selectively for C++ only. It also makes -ffinite-loops loop-private at CFG construction time fixing correctness issues with inlining. 2020-04-02 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR c/94392 * c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Enable -ffinite-loops for -O2 and C++11 or newer. * common.opt (ffinite-loops): Initialize to zero. * opts.c (default_options_table): Remove OPT_ffinite_loops entry. * cfgloop.h (loop::finite_p): New member. * cfgloopmanip.c (copy_loop_info): Copy finite_p. * ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compare_loops): Compare finite_p. * lto-streamer-in.c (input_cfg): Stream finite_p. * lto-streamer-out.c (output_cfg): Likewise. * tree-cfg.c (replace_loop_annotate): Initialize finite_p from flag_finite_loops at CFG build time. * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (finite_loop_p): Check the loops finite_p flag instead of flag_finite_loops. * doc/invoke.texi (ffinite-loops): Adjust documentation of default setting. * gcc.dg/torture/pr94392.c: New testcase.
5008 lines
145 KiB
C
5008 lines
145 KiB
C
/* Functions to determine/estimate number of iterations of a loop.
|
|
Copyright (C) 2004-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
|
|
|
This file is part of GCC.
|
|
|
|
GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
|
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
|
|
Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any
|
|
later version.
|
|
|
|
GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
|
ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
|
|
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
|
|
for more details.
|
|
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
|
|
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
|
|
|
|
#include "config.h"
|
|
#include "system.h"
|
|
#include "coretypes.h"
|
|
#include "backend.h"
|
|
#include "rtl.h"
|
|
#include "tree.h"
|
|
#include "gimple.h"
|
|
#include "tree-pass.h"
|
|
#include "ssa.h"
|
|
#include "gimple-pretty-print.h"
|
|
#include "diagnostic-core.h"
|
|
#include "stor-layout.h"
|
|
#include "fold-const.h"
|
|
#include "calls.h"
|
|
#include "intl.h"
|
|
#include "gimplify.h"
|
|
#include "gimple-iterator.h"
|
|
#include "tree-cfg.h"
|
|
#include "tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.h"
|
|
#include "tree-ssa-loop-niter.h"
|
|
#include "tree-ssa-loop.h"
|
|
#include "cfgloop.h"
|
|
#include "tree-chrec.h"
|
|
#include "tree-scalar-evolution.h"
|
|
#include "tree-dfa.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The maximum number of dominator BBs we search for conditions
|
|
of loop header copies we use for simplifying a conditional
|
|
expression. */
|
|
#define MAX_DOMINATORS_TO_WALK 8
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
Analysis of number of iterations of an affine exit test.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* Bounds on some value, BELOW <= X <= UP. */
|
|
|
|
struct bounds
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_t below, up;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static bool number_of_iterations_popcount (loop_p loop, edge exit,
|
|
enum tree_code code,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter);
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Splits expression EXPR to a variable part VAR and constant OFFSET. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (tree expr, tree *var, mpz_t offset)
|
|
{
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (expr);
|
|
tree op0, op1;
|
|
bool negate = false;
|
|
|
|
*var = expr;
|
|
mpz_set_ui (offset, 0);
|
|
|
|
switch (TREE_CODE (expr))
|
|
{
|
|
case MINUS_EXPR:
|
|
negate = true;
|
|
/* Fallthru. */
|
|
|
|
case PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
case POINTER_PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
op0 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
|
|
op1 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (op1) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
*var = op0;
|
|
/* Always sign extend the offset. */
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (op1), offset, SIGNED);
|
|
if (negate)
|
|
mpz_neg (offset, offset);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case INTEGER_CST:
|
|
*var = build_int_cst_type (type, 0);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (expr), offset, TYPE_SIGN (type));
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* From condition C0 CMP C1 derives information regarding the value range
|
|
of VAR, which is of TYPE. Results are stored in to BELOW and UP. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
refine_value_range_using_guard (tree type, tree var,
|
|
tree c0, enum tree_code cmp, tree c1,
|
|
mpz_t below, mpz_t up)
|
|
{
|
|
tree varc0, varc1, ctype;
|
|
mpz_t offc0, offc1;
|
|
mpz_t mint, maxt, minc1, maxc1;
|
|
wide_int minv, maxv;
|
|
bool no_wrap = nowrap_type_p (type);
|
|
bool c0_ok, c1_ok;
|
|
signop sgn = TYPE_SIGN (type);
|
|
|
|
switch (cmp)
|
|
{
|
|
case LT_EXPR:
|
|
case LE_EXPR:
|
|
case GT_EXPR:
|
|
case GE_EXPR:
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (c0);
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (c1);
|
|
ctype = TREE_TYPE (c0);
|
|
if (!useless_type_conversion_p (ctype, type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case EQ_EXPR:
|
|
/* We could derive quite precise information from EQ_EXPR, however,
|
|
such a guard is unlikely to appear, so we do not bother with
|
|
handling it. */
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
case NE_EXPR:
|
|
/* NE_EXPR comparisons do not contain much of useful information,
|
|
except for cases of comparing with bounds. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (c1) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/* Ensure that the condition speaks about an expression in the same
|
|
type as X and Y. */
|
|
ctype = TREE_TYPE (c0);
|
|
if (TYPE_PRECISION (ctype) != TYPE_PRECISION (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
c0 = fold_convert (type, c0);
|
|
c1 = fold_convert (type, c1);
|
|
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (var, c0, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_t valc1;
|
|
|
|
/* Case of comparing VAR with its below/up bounds. */
|
|
mpz_init (valc1);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (c1), valc1, TYPE_SIGN (type));
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (valc1, below) == 0)
|
|
cmp = GT_EXPR;
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (valc1, up) == 0)
|
|
cmp = LT_EXPR;
|
|
|
|
mpz_clear (valc1);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/* Case of comparing with the bounds of the type. */
|
|
wide_int min = wi::min_value (type);
|
|
wide_int max = wi::max_value (type);
|
|
|
|
if (wi::to_wide (c1) == min)
|
|
cmp = GT_EXPR;
|
|
if (wi::to_wide (c1) == max)
|
|
cmp = LT_EXPR;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Quick return if no useful information. */
|
|
if (cmp == NE_EXPR)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (offc0);
|
|
mpz_init (offc1);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (expand_simple_operations (c0), &varc0, offc0);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (expand_simple_operations (c1), &varc1, offc1);
|
|
|
|
/* We are only interested in comparisons of expressions based on VAR. */
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (var, varc1, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
std::swap (varc0, varc1);
|
|
mpz_swap (offc0, offc1);
|
|
cmp = swap_tree_comparison (cmp);
|
|
}
|
|
else if (!operand_equal_p (var, varc0, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_clear (offc0);
|
|
mpz_clear (offc1);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (mint);
|
|
mpz_init (maxt);
|
|
get_type_static_bounds (type, mint, maxt);
|
|
mpz_init (minc1);
|
|
mpz_init (maxc1);
|
|
/* Setup range information for varc1. */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (varc1))
|
|
{
|
|
wi::to_mpz (0, minc1, TYPE_SIGN (type));
|
|
wi::to_mpz (0, maxc1, TYPE_SIGN (type));
|
|
}
|
|
else if (TREE_CODE (varc1) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
|
|
&& get_range_info (varc1, &minv, &maxv) == VR_RANGE)
|
|
{
|
|
gcc_assert (wi::le_p (minv, maxv, sgn));
|
|
wi::to_mpz (minv, minc1, sgn);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (maxv, maxc1, sgn);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_set (minc1, mint);
|
|
mpz_set (maxc1, maxt);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Compute valid range information for varc1 + offc1. Note nothing
|
|
useful can be derived if it overflows or underflows. Overflow or
|
|
underflow could happen when:
|
|
|
|
offc1 > 0 && varc1 + offc1 > MAX_VAL (type)
|
|
offc1 < 0 && varc1 + offc1 < MIN_VAL (type). */
|
|
mpz_add (minc1, minc1, offc1);
|
|
mpz_add (maxc1, maxc1, offc1);
|
|
c1_ok = (no_wrap
|
|
|| mpz_sgn (offc1) == 0
|
|
|| (mpz_sgn (offc1) < 0 && mpz_cmp (minc1, mint) >= 0)
|
|
|| (mpz_sgn (offc1) > 0 && mpz_cmp (maxc1, maxt) <= 0));
|
|
if (!c1_ok)
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (minc1, mint) < 0)
|
|
mpz_set (minc1, mint);
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (maxc1, maxt) > 0)
|
|
mpz_set (maxc1, maxt);
|
|
|
|
if (cmp == LT_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
cmp = LE_EXPR;
|
|
mpz_sub_ui (maxc1, maxc1, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
if (cmp == GT_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
cmp = GE_EXPR;
|
|
mpz_add_ui (minc1, minc1, 1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Compute range information for varc0. If there is no overflow,
|
|
the condition implied that
|
|
|
|
(varc0) cmp (varc1 + offc1 - offc0)
|
|
|
|
We can possibly improve the upper bound of varc0 if cmp is LE_EXPR,
|
|
or the below bound if cmp is GE_EXPR.
|
|
|
|
To prove there is no overflow/underflow, we need to check below
|
|
four cases:
|
|
1) cmp == LE_EXPR && offc0 > 0
|
|
|
|
(varc0 + offc0) doesn't overflow
|
|
&& (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't underflow
|
|
|
|
2) cmp == LE_EXPR && offc0 < 0
|
|
|
|
(varc0 + offc0) doesn't underflow
|
|
&& (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't overfloe
|
|
|
|
In this case, (varc0 + offc0) will never underflow if we can
|
|
prove (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't overflow.
|
|
|
|
3) cmp == GE_EXPR && offc0 < 0
|
|
|
|
(varc0 + offc0) doesn't underflow
|
|
&& (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't overflow
|
|
|
|
4) cmp == GE_EXPR && offc0 > 0
|
|
|
|
(varc0 + offc0) doesn't overflow
|
|
&& (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't underflow
|
|
|
|
In this case, (varc0 + offc0) will never overflow if we can
|
|
prove (varc1 + offc1 - offc0) doesn't underflow.
|
|
|
|
Note we only handle case 2 and 4 in below code. */
|
|
|
|
mpz_sub (minc1, minc1, offc0);
|
|
mpz_sub (maxc1, maxc1, offc0);
|
|
c0_ok = (no_wrap
|
|
|| mpz_sgn (offc0) == 0
|
|
|| (cmp == LE_EXPR
|
|
&& mpz_sgn (offc0) < 0 && mpz_cmp (maxc1, maxt) <= 0)
|
|
|| (cmp == GE_EXPR
|
|
&& mpz_sgn (offc0) > 0 && mpz_cmp (minc1, mint) >= 0));
|
|
if (!c0_ok)
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
if (cmp == LE_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (up, maxc1) > 0)
|
|
mpz_set (up, maxc1);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (below, minc1) < 0)
|
|
mpz_set (below, minc1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
mpz_clear (mint);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxt);
|
|
mpz_clear (minc1);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxc1);
|
|
mpz_clear (offc0);
|
|
mpz_clear (offc1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Stores estimate on the minimum/maximum value of the expression VAR + OFF
|
|
in TYPE to MIN and MAX. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
determine_value_range (class loop *loop, tree type, tree var, mpz_t off,
|
|
mpz_t min, mpz_t max)
|
|
{
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
mpz_t minm, maxm;
|
|
basic_block bb;
|
|
wide_int minv, maxv;
|
|
enum value_range_kind rtype = VR_VARYING;
|
|
|
|
/* If the expression is a constant, we know its value exactly. */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (var))
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_set (min, off);
|
|
mpz_set (max, off);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
get_type_static_bounds (type, min, max);
|
|
|
|
/* See if we have some range info from VRP. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
{
|
|
edge e = loop_preheader_edge (loop);
|
|
signop sgn = TYPE_SIGN (type);
|
|
gphi_iterator gsi;
|
|
|
|
/* Either for VAR itself... */
|
|
rtype = get_range_info (var, &minv, &maxv);
|
|
/* Or for PHI results in loop->header where VAR is used as
|
|
PHI argument from the loop preheader edge. */
|
|
for (gsi = gsi_start_phis (loop->header); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
|
|
{
|
|
gphi *phi = gsi.phi ();
|
|
wide_int minc, maxc;
|
|
if (PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, e) == var
|
|
&& (get_range_info (gimple_phi_result (phi), &minc, &maxc)
|
|
== VR_RANGE))
|
|
{
|
|
if (rtype != VR_RANGE)
|
|
{
|
|
rtype = VR_RANGE;
|
|
minv = minc;
|
|
maxv = maxc;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
minv = wi::max (minv, minc, sgn);
|
|
maxv = wi::min (maxv, maxc, sgn);
|
|
/* If the PHI result range are inconsistent with
|
|
the VAR range, give up on looking at the PHI
|
|
results. This can happen if VR_UNDEFINED is
|
|
involved. */
|
|
if (wi::gt_p (minv, maxv, sgn))
|
|
{
|
|
rtype = get_range_info (var, &minv, &maxv);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
mpz_init (minm);
|
|
mpz_init (maxm);
|
|
if (rtype != VR_RANGE)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_set (minm, min);
|
|
mpz_set (maxm, max);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
gcc_assert (wi::le_p (minv, maxv, sgn));
|
|
wi::to_mpz (minv, minm, sgn);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (maxv, maxm, sgn);
|
|
}
|
|
/* Now walk the dominators of the loop header and use the entry
|
|
guards to refine the estimates. */
|
|
for (bb = loop->header;
|
|
bb != ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun) && cnt < MAX_DOMINATORS_TO_WALK;
|
|
bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb))
|
|
{
|
|
edge e;
|
|
tree c0, c1;
|
|
gimple *cond;
|
|
enum tree_code cmp;
|
|
|
|
if (!single_pred_p (bb))
|
|
continue;
|
|
e = single_pred_edge (bb);
|
|
|
|
if (!(e->flags & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
cond = last_stmt (e->src);
|
|
c0 = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
|
|
cmp = gimple_cond_code (cond);
|
|
c1 = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
|
|
|
|
if (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)
|
|
cmp = invert_tree_comparison (cmp, false);
|
|
|
|
refine_value_range_using_guard (type, var, c0, cmp, c1, minm, maxm);
|
|
++cnt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_add (minm, minm, off);
|
|
mpz_add (maxm, maxm, off);
|
|
/* If the computation may not wrap or off is zero, then this
|
|
is always fine. If off is negative and minv + off isn't
|
|
smaller than type's minimum, or off is positive and
|
|
maxv + off isn't bigger than type's maximum, use the more
|
|
precise range too. */
|
|
if (nowrap_type_p (type)
|
|
|| mpz_sgn (off) == 0
|
|
|| (mpz_sgn (off) < 0 && mpz_cmp (minm, min) >= 0)
|
|
|| (mpz_sgn (off) > 0 && mpz_cmp (maxm, max) <= 0))
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_set (min, minm);
|
|
mpz_set (max, maxm);
|
|
mpz_clear (minm);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxm);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
mpz_clear (minm);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxm);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the computation may wrap, we know nothing about the value, except for
|
|
the range of the type. */
|
|
if (!nowrap_type_p (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/* Since the addition of OFF does not wrap, if OFF is positive, then we may
|
|
add it to MIN, otherwise to MAX. */
|
|
if (mpz_sgn (off) < 0)
|
|
mpz_add (max, max, off);
|
|
else
|
|
mpz_add (min, min, off);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Stores the bounds on the difference of the values of the expressions
|
|
(var + X) and (var + Y), computed in TYPE, to BNDS. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
bound_difference_of_offsetted_base (tree type, mpz_t x, mpz_t y,
|
|
bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
int rel = mpz_cmp (x, y);
|
|
bool may_wrap = !nowrap_type_p (type);
|
|
mpz_t m;
|
|
|
|
/* If X == Y, then the expressions are always equal.
|
|
If X > Y, there are the following possibilities:
|
|
a) neither of var + X and var + Y overflow or underflow, or both of
|
|
them do. Then their difference is X - Y.
|
|
b) var + X overflows, and var + Y does not. Then the values of the
|
|
expressions are var + X - M and var + Y, where M is the range of
|
|
the type, and their difference is X - Y - M.
|
|
c) var + Y underflows and var + X does not. Their difference again
|
|
is M - X + Y.
|
|
Therefore, if the arithmetics in type does not overflow, then the
|
|
bounds are (X - Y, X - Y), otherwise they are (X - Y - M, X - Y)
|
|
Similarly, if X < Y, the bounds are either (X - Y, X - Y) or
|
|
(X - Y, X - Y + M). */
|
|
|
|
if (rel == 0)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_set_ui (bnds->below, 0);
|
|
mpz_set_ui (bnds->up, 0);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (m);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)), m, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_add_ui (m, m, 1);
|
|
mpz_sub (bnds->up, x, y);
|
|
mpz_set (bnds->below, bnds->up);
|
|
|
|
if (may_wrap)
|
|
{
|
|
if (rel > 0)
|
|
mpz_sub (bnds->below, bnds->below, m);
|
|
else
|
|
mpz_add (bnds->up, bnds->up, m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_clear (m);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* From condition C0 CMP C1 derives information regarding the
|
|
difference of values of VARX + OFFX and VARY + OFFY, computed in TYPE,
|
|
and stores it to BNDS. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
refine_bounds_using_guard (tree type, tree varx, mpz_t offx,
|
|
tree vary, mpz_t offy,
|
|
tree c0, enum tree_code cmp, tree c1,
|
|
bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree varc0, varc1, ctype;
|
|
mpz_t offc0, offc1, loffx, loffy, bnd;
|
|
bool lbound = false;
|
|
bool no_wrap = nowrap_type_p (type);
|
|
bool x_ok, y_ok;
|
|
|
|
switch (cmp)
|
|
{
|
|
case LT_EXPR:
|
|
case LE_EXPR:
|
|
case GT_EXPR:
|
|
case GE_EXPR:
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (c0);
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (c1);
|
|
ctype = TREE_TYPE (c0);
|
|
if (!useless_type_conversion_p (ctype, type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case EQ_EXPR:
|
|
/* We could derive quite precise information from EQ_EXPR, however, such
|
|
a guard is unlikely to appear, so we do not bother with handling
|
|
it. */
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
case NE_EXPR:
|
|
/* NE_EXPR comparisons do not contain much of useful information, except for
|
|
special case of comparing with the bounds of the type. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (c1) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/* Ensure that the condition speaks about an expression in the same type
|
|
as X and Y. */
|
|
ctype = TREE_TYPE (c0);
|
|
if (TYPE_PRECISION (ctype) != TYPE_PRECISION (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
c0 = fold_convert (type, c0);
|
|
c1 = fold_convert (type, c1);
|
|
|
|
if (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type)
|
|
&& operand_equal_p (c1, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type), 0))
|
|
{
|
|
cmp = GT_EXPR;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
if (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type)
|
|
&& operand_equal_p (c1, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type), 0))
|
|
{
|
|
cmp = LT_EXPR;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
default:
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (offc0);
|
|
mpz_init (offc1);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (expand_simple_operations (c0), &varc0, offc0);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (expand_simple_operations (c1), &varc1, offc1);
|
|
|
|
/* We are only interested in comparisons of expressions based on VARX and
|
|
VARY. TODO -- we might also be able to derive some bounds from
|
|
expressions containing just one of the variables. */
|
|
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (varx, varc1, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
std::swap (varc0, varc1);
|
|
mpz_swap (offc0, offc1);
|
|
cmp = swap_tree_comparison (cmp);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!operand_equal_p (varx, varc0, 0)
|
|
|| !operand_equal_p (vary, varc1, 0))
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
mpz_init_set (loffx, offx);
|
|
mpz_init_set (loffy, offy);
|
|
|
|
if (cmp == GT_EXPR || cmp == GE_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
std::swap (varx, vary);
|
|
mpz_swap (offc0, offc1);
|
|
mpz_swap (loffx, loffy);
|
|
cmp = swap_tree_comparison (cmp);
|
|
lbound = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If there is no overflow, the condition implies that
|
|
|
|
(VARX + OFFX) cmp (VARY + OFFY) + (OFFX - OFFY + OFFC1 - OFFC0).
|
|
|
|
The overflows and underflows may complicate things a bit; each
|
|
overflow decreases the appropriate offset by M, and underflow
|
|
increases it by M. The above inequality would not necessarily be
|
|
true if
|
|
|
|
-- VARX + OFFX underflows and VARX + OFFC0 does not, or
|
|
VARX + OFFC0 overflows, but VARX + OFFX does not.
|
|
This may only happen if OFFX < OFFC0.
|
|
-- VARY + OFFY overflows and VARY + OFFC1 does not, or
|
|
VARY + OFFC1 underflows and VARY + OFFY does not.
|
|
This may only happen if OFFY > OFFC1. */
|
|
|
|
if (no_wrap)
|
|
{
|
|
x_ok = true;
|
|
y_ok = true;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
x_ok = (integer_zerop (varx)
|
|
|| mpz_cmp (loffx, offc0) >= 0);
|
|
y_ok = (integer_zerop (vary)
|
|
|| mpz_cmp (loffy, offc1) <= 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (x_ok && y_ok)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_init (bnd);
|
|
mpz_sub (bnd, loffx, loffy);
|
|
mpz_add (bnd, bnd, offc1);
|
|
mpz_sub (bnd, bnd, offc0);
|
|
|
|
if (cmp == LT_EXPR)
|
|
mpz_sub_ui (bnd, bnd, 1);
|
|
|
|
if (lbound)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_neg (bnd, bnd);
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (bnds->below, bnd) < 0)
|
|
mpz_set (bnds->below, bnd);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (bnd, bnds->up) < 0)
|
|
mpz_set (bnds->up, bnd);
|
|
}
|
|
mpz_clear (bnd);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_clear (loffx);
|
|
mpz_clear (loffy);
|
|
end:
|
|
mpz_clear (offc0);
|
|
mpz_clear (offc1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Stores the bounds on the value of the expression X - Y in LOOP to BNDS.
|
|
The subtraction is considered to be performed in arbitrary precision,
|
|
without overflows.
|
|
|
|
We do not attempt to be too clever regarding the value ranges of X and
|
|
Y; most of the time, they are just integers or ssa names offsetted by
|
|
integer. However, we try to use the information contained in the
|
|
comparisons before the loop (usually created by loop header copying). */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
bound_difference (class loop *loop, tree x, tree y, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (x);
|
|
tree varx, vary;
|
|
mpz_t offx, offy;
|
|
mpz_t minx, maxx, miny, maxy;
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
edge e;
|
|
basic_block bb;
|
|
tree c0, c1;
|
|
gimple *cond;
|
|
enum tree_code cmp;
|
|
|
|
/* Get rid of unnecessary casts, but preserve the value of
|
|
the expressions. */
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (x);
|
|
STRIP_SIGN_NOPS (y);
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (bnds->below);
|
|
mpz_init (bnds->up);
|
|
mpz_init (offx);
|
|
mpz_init (offy);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (x, &varx, offx);
|
|
split_to_var_and_offset (y, &vary, offy);
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (varx)
|
|
&& operand_equal_p (varx, vary, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
/* Special case VARX == VARY -- we just need to compare the
|
|
offsets. The matters are a bit more complicated in the
|
|
case addition of offsets may wrap. */
|
|
bound_difference_of_offsetted_base (type, offx, offy, bnds);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/* Otherwise, use the value ranges to determine the initial
|
|
estimates on below and up. */
|
|
mpz_init (minx);
|
|
mpz_init (maxx);
|
|
mpz_init (miny);
|
|
mpz_init (maxy);
|
|
determine_value_range (loop, type, varx, offx, minx, maxx);
|
|
determine_value_range (loop, type, vary, offy, miny, maxy);
|
|
|
|
mpz_sub (bnds->below, minx, maxy);
|
|
mpz_sub (bnds->up, maxx, miny);
|
|
mpz_clear (minx);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxx);
|
|
mpz_clear (miny);
|
|
mpz_clear (maxy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If both X and Y are constants, we cannot get any more precise. */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (varx) && integer_zerop (vary))
|
|
goto end;
|
|
|
|
/* Now walk the dominators of the loop header and use the entry
|
|
guards to refine the estimates. */
|
|
for (bb = loop->header;
|
|
bb != ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun) && cnt < MAX_DOMINATORS_TO_WALK;
|
|
bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb))
|
|
{
|
|
if (!single_pred_p (bb))
|
|
continue;
|
|
e = single_pred_edge (bb);
|
|
|
|
if (!(e->flags & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
cond = last_stmt (e->src);
|
|
c0 = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
|
|
cmp = gimple_cond_code (cond);
|
|
c1 = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
|
|
|
|
if (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)
|
|
cmp = invert_tree_comparison (cmp, false);
|
|
|
|
refine_bounds_using_guard (type, varx, offx, vary, offy,
|
|
c0, cmp, c1, bnds);
|
|
++cnt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
mpz_clear (offx);
|
|
mpz_clear (offy);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Update the bounds in BNDS that restrict the value of X to the bounds
|
|
that restrict the value of X + DELTA. X can be obtained as a
|
|
difference of two values in TYPE. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
bounds_add (bounds *bnds, const widest_int &delta, tree type)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_t mdelta, max;
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (mdelta);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (delta, mdelta, SIGNED);
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (max);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)), max, UNSIGNED);
|
|
|
|
mpz_add (bnds->up, bnds->up, mdelta);
|
|
mpz_add (bnds->below, bnds->below, mdelta);
|
|
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (bnds->up, max) > 0)
|
|
mpz_set (bnds->up, max);
|
|
|
|
mpz_neg (max, max);
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (bnds->below, max) < 0)
|
|
mpz_set (bnds->below, max);
|
|
|
|
mpz_clear (mdelta);
|
|
mpz_clear (max);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Update the bounds in BNDS that restrict the value of X to the bounds
|
|
that restrict the value of -X. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
bounds_negate (bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
mpz_t tmp;
|
|
|
|
mpz_init_set (tmp, bnds->up);
|
|
mpz_neg (bnds->up, bnds->below);
|
|
mpz_neg (bnds->below, tmp);
|
|
mpz_clear (tmp);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns inverse of X modulo 2^s, where MASK = 2^s-1. */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
inverse (tree x, tree mask)
|
|
{
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (x);
|
|
tree rslt;
|
|
unsigned ctr = tree_floor_log2 (mask);
|
|
|
|
if (TYPE_PRECISION (type) <= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT ix;
|
|
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT imask;
|
|
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT irslt = 1;
|
|
|
|
gcc_assert (cst_and_fits_in_hwi (x));
|
|
gcc_assert (cst_and_fits_in_hwi (mask));
|
|
|
|
ix = int_cst_value (x);
|
|
imask = int_cst_value (mask);
|
|
|
|
for (; ctr; ctr--)
|
|
{
|
|
irslt *= ix;
|
|
ix *= ix;
|
|
}
|
|
irslt &= imask;
|
|
|
|
rslt = build_int_cst_type (type, irslt);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
rslt = build_int_cst (type, 1);
|
|
for (; ctr; ctr--)
|
|
{
|
|
rslt = int_const_binop (MULT_EXPR, rslt, x);
|
|
x = int_const_binop (MULT_EXPR, x, x);
|
|
}
|
|
rslt = int_const_binop (BIT_AND_EXPR, rslt, mask);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return rslt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Derives the upper bound BND on the number of executions of loop with exit
|
|
condition S * i <> C. If NO_OVERFLOW is true, then the control variable of
|
|
the loop does not overflow. EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is true if we are guaranteed
|
|
that the loop ends through this exit, i.e., the induction variable ever
|
|
reaches the value of C.
|
|
|
|
The value C is equal to final - base, where final and base are the final and
|
|
initial value of the actual induction variable in the analysed loop. BNDS
|
|
bounds the value of this difference when computed in signed type with
|
|
unbounded range, while the computation of C is performed in an unsigned
|
|
type with the range matching the range of the type of the induction variable.
|
|
In particular, BNDS.up contains an upper bound on C in the following cases:
|
|
-- if the iv must reach its final value without overflow, i.e., if
|
|
NO_OVERFLOW && EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is true, or
|
|
-- if final >= base, which we know to hold when BNDS.below >= 0. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
number_of_iterations_ne_max (mpz_t bnd, bool no_overflow, tree c, tree s,
|
|
bounds *bnds, bool exit_must_be_taken)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int max;
|
|
mpz_t d;
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (c);
|
|
bool bnds_u_valid = ((no_overflow && exit_must_be_taken)
|
|
|| mpz_sgn (bnds->below) >= 0);
|
|
|
|
if (integer_onep (s)
|
|
|| (TREE_CODE (c) == INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (s) == INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& wi::mod_trunc (wi::to_wide (c), wi::to_wide (s),
|
|
TYPE_SIGN (type)) == 0)
|
|
|| (TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type)
|
|
&& multiple_of_p (type, c, s)))
|
|
{
|
|
/* If C is an exact multiple of S, then its value will be reached before
|
|
the induction variable overflows (unless the loop is exited in some
|
|
other way before). Note that the actual induction variable in the
|
|
loop (which ranges from base to final instead of from 0 to C) may
|
|
overflow, in which case BNDS.up will not be giving a correct upper
|
|
bound on C; thus, BNDS_U_VALID had to be computed in advance. */
|
|
no_overflow = true;
|
|
exit_must_be_taken = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the induction variable can overflow, the number of iterations is at
|
|
most the period of the control variable (or infinite, but in that case
|
|
the whole # of iterations analysis will fail). */
|
|
if (!no_overflow)
|
|
{
|
|
max = wi::mask <widest_int> (TYPE_PRECISION (type)
|
|
- wi::ctz (wi::to_wide (s)), false);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (max, bnd, UNSIGNED);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Now we know that the induction variable does not overflow, so the loop
|
|
iterates at most (range of type / S) times. */
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)), bnd, UNSIGNED);
|
|
|
|
/* If the induction variable is guaranteed to reach the value of C before
|
|
overflow, ... */
|
|
if (exit_must_be_taken)
|
|
{
|
|
/* ... then we can strengthen this to C / S, and possibly we can use
|
|
the upper bound on C given by BNDS. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (c) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (c), bnd, UNSIGNED);
|
|
else if (bnds_u_valid)
|
|
mpz_set (bnd, bnds->up);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (d);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (s), d, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_fdiv_q (bnd, bnd, d);
|
|
mpz_clear (d);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determines number of iterations of loop whose ending condition
|
|
is IV <> FINAL. TYPE is the type of the iv. The number of
|
|
iterations is stored to NITER. EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is true if
|
|
we know that the exit must be taken eventually, i.e., that the IV
|
|
ever reaches the value FINAL (we derived this earlier, and possibly set
|
|
NITER->assumptions to make sure this is the case). BNDS contains the
|
|
bounds on the difference FINAL - IV->base. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_ne (class loop *loop, tree type, affine_iv *iv,
|
|
tree final, class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
bool exit_must_be_taken, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree niter_type = unsigned_type_for (type);
|
|
tree s, c, d, bits, assumption, tmp, bound;
|
|
mpz_t max;
|
|
|
|
niter->control = *iv;
|
|
niter->bound = final;
|
|
niter->cmp = NE_EXPR;
|
|
|
|
/* Rearrange the terms so that we get inequality S * i <> C, with S
|
|
positive. Also cast everything to the unsigned type. If IV does
|
|
not overflow, BNDS bounds the value of C. Also, this is the
|
|
case if the computation |FINAL - IV->base| does not overflow, i.e.,
|
|
if BNDS->below in the result is nonnegative. */
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv->step))
|
|
{
|
|
s = fold_convert (niter_type,
|
|
fold_build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, type, iv->step));
|
|
c = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv->base),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, final));
|
|
bounds_negate (bnds);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
s = fold_convert (niter_type, iv->step);
|
|
c = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, final),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv->base));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (max);
|
|
number_of_iterations_ne_max (max, iv->no_overflow, c, s, bnds,
|
|
exit_must_be_taken);
|
|
niter->max = widest_int::from (wi::from_mpz (niter_type, max, false),
|
|
TYPE_SIGN (niter_type));
|
|
mpz_clear (max);
|
|
|
|
/* Compute no-overflow information for the control iv. This can be
|
|
proven when below two conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
1) IV evaluates toward FINAL at beginning, i.e:
|
|
base <= FINAL ; step > 0
|
|
base >= FINAL ; step < 0
|
|
|
|
2) |FINAL - base| is an exact multiple of step.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it's hard to prove above conditions after pass loop-ch
|
|
because loop with exit condition (IV != FINAL) usually will be guarded
|
|
by initial-condition (IV.base - IV.step != FINAL). In this case, we
|
|
can alternatively try to prove below conditions:
|
|
|
|
1') IV evaluates toward FINAL at beginning, i.e:
|
|
new_base = base - step < FINAL ; step > 0
|
|
&& base - step doesn't underflow
|
|
new_base = base - step > FINAL ; step < 0
|
|
&& base - step doesn't overflow
|
|
|
|
2') |FINAL - new_base| is an exact multiple of step.
|
|
|
|
Please refer to PR34114 as an example of loop-ch's impact, also refer
|
|
to PR72817 as an example why condition 2') is necessary.
|
|
|
|
Note, for NE_EXPR, base equals to FINAL is a special case, in
|
|
which the loop exits immediately, and the iv does not overflow. */
|
|
if (!niter->control.no_overflow
|
|
&& (integer_onep (s) || multiple_of_p (type, c, s)))
|
|
{
|
|
tree t, cond, new_c, relaxed_cond = boolean_false_node;
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv->step))
|
|
{
|
|
cond = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, iv->base, final);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (type) == INTEGER_TYPE)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Only when base - step doesn't overflow. */
|
|
t = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type);
|
|
t = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, t, iv->step);
|
|
t = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t, iv->base);
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (t))
|
|
{
|
|
t = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type, iv->base, iv->step);
|
|
new_c = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, t),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, final));
|
|
if (multiple_of_p (type, new_c, s))
|
|
relaxed_cond = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
t, final);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
cond = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, iv->base, final);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (type) == INTEGER_TYPE)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Only when base - step doesn't underflow. */
|
|
t = TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type);
|
|
t = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type, t, iv->step);
|
|
t = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t, iv->base);
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (t))
|
|
{
|
|
t = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type, iv->base, iv->step);
|
|
new_c = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, final),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, t));
|
|
if (multiple_of_p (type, new_c, s))
|
|
relaxed_cond = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
t, final);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
t = simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop, cond);
|
|
if (!t || !integer_onep (t))
|
|
t = simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop, relaxed_cond);
|
|
|
|
if (t && integer_onep (t))
|
|
niter->control.no_overflow = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* First the trivial cases -- when the step is 1. */
|
|
if (integer_onep (s))
|
|
{
|
|
niter->niter = c;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
if (niter->control.no_overflow && multiple_of_p (type, c, s))
|
|
{
|
|
niter->niter = fold_build2 (FLOOR_DIV_EXPR, niter_type, c, s);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Let nsd (step, size of mode) = d. If d does not divide c, the loop
|
|
is infinite. Otherwise, the number of iterations is
|
|
(inverse(s/d) * (c/d)) mod (size of mode/d). */
|
|
bits = num_ending_zeros (s);
|
|
bound = build_low_bits_mask (niter_type,
|
|
(TYPE_PRECISION (niter_type)
|
|
- tree_to_uhwi (bits)));
|
|
|
|
d = fold_binary_to_constant (LSHIFT_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
build_int_cst (niter_type, 1), bits);
|
|
s = fold_binary_to_constant (RSHIFT_EXPR, niter_type, s, bits);
|
|
|
|
if (!exit_must_be_taken)
|
|
{
|
|
/* If we cannot assume that the exit is taken eventually, record the
|
|
assumptions for divisibility of c. */
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (FLOOR_MOD_EXPR, niter_type, c, d);
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
assumption, build_int_cst (niter_type, 0));
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions, assumption);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
c = fold_build2 (EXACT_DIV_EXPR, niter_type, c, d);
|
|
if (integer_onep (s))
|
|
{
|
|
niter->niter = c;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
tmp = fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, niter_type, c, inverse (s, bound));
|
|
niter->niter = fold_build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, niter_type, tmp, bound);
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Checks whether we can determine the final value of the control variable
|
|
of the loop with ending condition IV0 < IV1 (computed in TYPE).
|
|
DELTA is the difference IV1->base - IV0->base, STEP is the absolute value
|
|
of the step. The assumptions necessary to ensure that the computation
|
|
of the final value does not overflow are recorded in NITER. If we
|
|
find the final value, we adjust DELTA and return TRUE. Otherwise
|
|
we return false. BNDS bounds the value of IV1->base - IV0->base,
|
|
and will be updated by the same amount as DELTA. EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is
|
|
true if we know that the exit must be taken eventually. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne (tree type, affine_iv *iv0, affine_iv *iv1,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
tree *delta, tree step,
|
|
bool exit_must_be_taken, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree niter_type = TREE_TYPE (step);
|
|
tree mod = fold_build2 (FLOOR_MOD_EXPR, niter_type, *delta, step);
|
|
tree tmod;
|
|
mpz_t mmod;
|
|
tree assumption = boolean_true_node, bound, noloop;
|
|
bool ret = false, fv_comp_no_overflow;
|
|
tree type1 = type;
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
type1 = sizetype;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (mod) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return false;
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (mod))
|
|
mod = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type, step, mod);
|
|
tmod = fold_convert (type1, mod);
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (mmod);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (mod), mmod, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_neg (mmod, mmod);
|
|
|
|
/* If the induction variable does not overflow and the exit is taken,
|
|
then the computation of the final value does not overflow. This is
|
|
also obviously the case if the new final value is equal to the
|
|
current one. Finally, we postulate this for pointer type variables,
|
|
as the code cannot rely on the object to that the pointer points being
|
|
placed at the end of the address space (and more pragmatically,
|
|
TYPE_{MIN,MAX}_VALUE is not defined for pointers). */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (mod) || POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
fv_comp_no_overflow = true;
|
|
else if (!exit_must_be_taken)
|
|
fv_comp_no_overflow = false;
|
|
else
|
|
fv_comp_no_overflow =
|
|
(iv0->no_overflow && integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
|| (iv1->no_overflow && integer_nonzerop (iv1->step));
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
/* The final value of the iv is iv1->base + MOD, assuming that this
|
|
computation does not overflow, and that
|
|
iv0->base <= iv1->base + MOD. */
|
|
if (!fv_comp_no_overflow)
|
|
{
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type1), tmod);
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv1->base, bound);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (assumption))
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (mmod, bnds->below) < 0)
|
|
noloop = boolean_false_node;
|
|
else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
noloop = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base,
|
|
fold_build_pointer_plus (iv1->base, tmod));
|
|
else
|
|
noloop = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base,
|
|
fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
iv1->base, tmod));
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/* The final value of the iv is iv0->base - MOD, assuming that this
|
|
computation does not overflow, and that
|
|
iv0->base - MOD <= iv1->base. */
|
|
if (!fv_comp_no_overflow)
|
|
{
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type1), tmod);
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base, bound);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (assumption))
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
if (mpz_cmp (mmod, bnds->below) < 0)
|
|
noloop = boolean_false_node;
|
|
else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
noloop = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
fold_build_pointer_plus (iv0->base,
|
|
fold_build1 (NEGATE_EXPR,
|
|
type1, tmod)),
|
|
iv1->base);
|
|
else
|
|
noloop = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
iv0->base, tmod),
|
|
iv1->base);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions,
|
|
assumption);
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (noloop))
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = fold_build2 (TRUTH_OR_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->may_be_zero,
|
|
noloop);
|
|
bounds_add (bnds, wi::to_widest (mod), type);
|
|
*delta = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, niter_type, *delta, mod);
|
|
|
|
ret = true;
|
|
end:
|
|
mpz_clear (mmod);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Add assertions to NITER that ensure that the control variable of the loop
|
|
with ending condition IV0 < IV1 does not overflow. Types of IV0 and IV1
|
|
are TYPE. Returns false if we can prove that there is an overflow, true
|
|
otherwise. STEP is the absolute value of the step. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
assert_no_overflow_lt (tree type, affine_iv *iv0, affine_iv *iv1,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter, tree step)
|
|
{
|
|
tree bound, d, assumption, diff;
|
|
tree niter_type = TREE_TYPE (step);
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
/* for (i = iv0->base; i < iv1->base; i += iv0->step) */
|
|
if (iv0->no_overflow)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* If iv0->base is a constant, we can determine the last value before
|
|
overflow precisely; otherwise we conservatively assume
|
|
MAX - STEP + 1. */
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (iv0->base) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
{
|
|
d = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type)),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv0->base));
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (FLOOR_MOD_EXPR, niter_type, d, step);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type, step,
|
|
build_int_cst (niter_type, 1));
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type,
|
|
TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type), fold_convert (type, diff));
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv1->base, bound);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/* for (i = iv1->base; i > iv0->base; i += iv1->step) */
|
|
if (iv1->no_overflow)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (iv1->base) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
{
|
|
d = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv1->base),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type)));
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (FLOOR_MOD_EXPR, niter_type, d, step);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type, step,
|
|
build_int_cst (niter_type, 1));
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type,
|
|
TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type), fold_convert (type, diff));
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base, bound);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (integer_zerop (assumption))
|
|
return false;
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions, assumption);
|
|
|
|
iv0->no_overflow = true;
|
|
iv1->no_overflow = true;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Add an assumption to NITER that a loop whose ending condition
|
|
is IV0 < IV1 rolls. TYPE is the type of the control iv. BNDS
|
|
bounds the value of IV1->base - IV0->base. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
assert_loop_rolls_lt (tree type, affine_iv *iv0, affine_iv *iv1,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree assumption = boolean_true_node, bound, diff;
|
|
tree mbz, mbzl, mbzr, type1;
|
|
bool rolls_p, no_overflow_p;
|
|
widest_int dstep;
|
|
mpz_t mstep, max;
|
|
|
|
/* We are going to compute the number of iterations as
|
|
(iv1->base - iv0->base + step - 1) / step, computed in the unsigned
|
|
variant of TYPE. This formula only works if
|
|
|
|
-step + 1 <= (iv1->base - iv0->base) <= MAX - step + 1
|
|
|
|
(where MAX is the maximum value of the unsigned variant of TYPE, and
|
|
the computations in this formula are performed in full precision,
|
|
i.e., without overflows).
|
|
|
|
Usually, for loops with exit condition iv0->base + step * i < iv1->base,
|
|
we have a condition of the form iv0->base - step < iv1->base before the loop,
|
|
and for loops iv0->base < iv1->base - step * i the condition
|
|
iv0->base < iv1->base + step, due to loop header copying, which enable us
|
|
to prove the lower bound.
|
|
|
|
The upper bound is more complicated. Unless the expressions for initial
|
|
and final value themselves contain enough information, we usually cannot
|
|
derive it from the context. */
|
|
|
|
/* First check whether the answer does not follow from the bounds we gathered
|
|
before. */
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
dstep = wi::to_widest (iv0->step);
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
dstep = wi::sext (wi::to_widest (iv1->step), TYPE_PRECISION (type));
|
|
dstep = -dstep;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (mstep);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (dstep, mstep, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_neg (mstep, mstep);
|
|
mpz_add_ui (mstep, mstep, 1);
|
|
|
|
rolls_p = mpz_cmp (mstep, bnds->below) <= 0;
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (max);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::minus_one (TYPE_PRECISION (type)), max, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_add (max, max, mstep);
|
|
no_overflow_p = (mpz_cmp (bnds->up, max) <= 0
|
|
/* For pointers, only values lying inside a single object
|
|
can be compared or manipulated by pointer arithmetics.
|
|
Gcc in general does not allow or handle objects larger
|
|
than half of the address space, hence the upper bound
|
|
is satisfied for pointers. */
|
|
|| POINTER_TYPE_P (type));
|
|
mpz_clear (mstep);
|
|
mpz_clear (max);
|
|
|
|
if (rolls_p && no_overflow_p)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
type1 = type;
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
type1 = sizetype;
|
|
|
|
/* Now the hard part; we must formulate the assumption(s) as expressions, and
|
|
we must be careful not to introduce overflow. */
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
iv0->step, build_int_cst (type1, 1));
|
|
|
|
/* We need to know that iv0->base >= MIN + iv0->step - 1. Since
|
|
0 address never belongs to any object, we can assume this for
|
|
pointers. */
|
|
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
{
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type), diff);
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base, bound);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* And then we can compute iv0->base - diff, and compare it with
|
|
iv1->base. */
|
|
mbzl = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
fold_convert (type1, iv0->base), diff);
|
|
mbzr = fold_convert (type1, iv1->base);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
diff = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
iv1->step, build_int_cst (type1, 1));
|
|
|
|
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
{
|
|
bound = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type), diff);
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv1->base, bound);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mbzl = fold_convert (type1, iv0->base);
|
|
mbzr = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
fold_convert (type1, iv1->base), diff);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions, assumption);
|
|
if (!rolls_p)
|
|
{
|
|
mbz = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, mbzl, mbzr);
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = fold_build2 (TRUTH_OR_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->may_be_zero, mbz);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determines number of iterations of loop whose ending condition
|
|
is IV0 < IV1. TYPE is the type of the iv. The number of
|
|
iterations is stored to NITER. BNDS bounds the difference
|
|
IV1->base - IV0->base. EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is true if we know
|
|
that the exit must be taken eventually. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_lt (class loop *loop, tree type, affine_iv *iv0,
|
|
affine_iv *iv1, class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
bool exit_must_be_taken, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree niter_type = unsigned_type_for (type);
|
|
tree delta, step, s;
|
|
mpz_t mstep, tmp;
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
niter->control = *iv0;
|
|
niter->cmp = LT_EXPR;
|
|
niter->bound = iv1->base;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
niter->control = *iv1;
|
|
niter->cmp = GT_EXPR;
|
|
niter->bound = iv0->base;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv1->base),
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv0->base));
|
|
|
|
/* First handle the special case that the step is +-1. */
|
|
if ((integer_onep (iv0->step) && integer_zerop (iv1->step))
|
|
|| (integer_all_onesp (iv1->step) && integer_zerop (iv0->step)))
|
|
{
|
|
/* for (i = iv0->base; i < iv1->base; i++)
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
for (i = iv1->base; i > iv0->base; i--).
|
|
|
|
In both cases # of iterations is iv1->base - iv0->base, assuming that
|
|
iv1->base >= iv0->base.
|
|
|
|
First try to derive a lower bound on the value of
|
|
iv1->base - iv0->base, computed in full precision. If the difference
|
|
is nonnegative, we are done, otherwise we must record the
|
|
condition. */
|
|
|
|
if (mpz_sgn (bnds->below) < 0)
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv1->base, iv0->base);
|
|
niter->niter = delta;
|
|
niter->max = widest_int::from (wi::from_mpz (niter_type, bnds->up, false),
|
|
TYPE_SIGN (niter_type));
|
|
niter->control.no_overflow = true;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
step = fold_convert (niter_type, iv0->step);
|
|
else
|
|
step = fold_convert (niter_type,
|
|
fold_build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, type, iv1->step));
|
|
|
|
/* If we can determine the final value of the control iv exactly, we can
|
|
transform the condition to != comparison. In particular, this will be
|
|
the case if DELTA is constant. */
|
|
if (number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne (type, iv0, iv1, niter, &delta, step,
|
|
exit_must_be_taken, bnds))
|
|
{
|
|
affine_iv zps;
|
|
|
|
zps.base = build_int_cst (niter_type, 0);
|
|
zps.step = step;
|
|
/* number_of_iterations_lt_to_ne will add assumptions that ensure that
|
|
zps does not overflow. */
|
|
zps.no_overflow = true;
|
|
|
|
return number_of_iterations_ne (loop, type, &zps,
|
|
delta, niter, true, bnds);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Make sure that the control iv does not overflow. */
|
|
if (!assert_no_overflow_lt (type, iv0, iv1, niter, step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* We determine the number of iterations as (delta + step - 1) / step. For
|
|
this to work, we must know that iv1->base >= iv0->base - step + 1,
|
|
otherwise the loop does not roll. */
|
|
assert_loop_rolls_lt (type, iv0, iv1, niter, bnds);
|
|
|
|
s = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
step, build_int_cst (niter_type, 1));
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, niter_type, delta, s);
|
|
niter->niter = fold_build2 (FLOOR_DIV_EXPR, niter_type, delta, step);
|
|
|
|
mpz_init (mstep);
|
|
mpz_init (tmp);
|
|
wi::to_mpz (wi::to_wide (step), mstep, UNSIGNED);
|
|
mpz_add (tmp, bnds->up, mstep);
|
|
mpz_sub_ui (tmp, tmp, 1);
|
|
mpz_fdiv_q (tmp, tmp, mstep);
|
|
niter->max = widest_int::from (wi::from_mpz (niter_type, tmp, false),
|
|
TYPE_SIGN (niter_type));
|
|
mpz_clear (mstep);
|
|
mpz_clear (tmp);
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determines number of iterations of loop whose ending condition
|
|
is IV0 <= IV1. TYPE is the type of the iv. The number of
|
|
iterations is stored to NITER. EXIT_MUST_BE_TAKEN is true if
|
|
we know that this condition must eventually become false (we derived this
|
|
earlier, and possibly set NITER->assumptions to make sure this
|
|
is the case). BNDS bounds the difference IV1->base - IV0->base. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_le (class loop *loop, tree type, affine_iv *iv0,
|
|
affine_iv *iv1, class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
bool exit_must_be_taken, bounds *bnds)
|
|
{
|
|
tree assumption;
|
|
tree type1 = type;
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
type1 = sizetype;
|
|
|
|
/* Say that IV0 is the control variable. Then IV0 <= IV1 iff
|
|
IV0 < IV1 + 1, assuming that IV1 is not equal to the greatest
|
|
value of the type. This we must know anyway, since if it is
|
|
equal to this value, the loop rolls forever. We do not check
|
|
this condition for pointer type ivs, as the code cannot rely on
|
|
the object to that the pointer points being placed at the end of
|
|
the address space (and more pragmatically, TYPE_{MIN,MAX}_VALUE is
|
|
not defined for pointers). */
|
|
|
|
if (!exit_must_be_taken && !POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
{
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv1->base, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type));
|
|
else
|
|
assumption = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
iv0->base, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type));
|
|
|
|
if (integer_zerop (assumption))
|
|
return false;
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions, assumption);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
iv1->base = fold_build_pointer_plus_hwi (iv1->base, 1);
|
|
else
|
|
iv1->base = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, type1, iv1->base,
|
|
build_int_cst (type1, 1));
|
|
}
|
|
else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
iv0->base = fold_build_pointer_plus_hwi (iv0->base, -1);
|
|
else
|
|
iv0->base = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type1,
|
|
iv0->base, build_int_cst (type1, 1));
|
|
|
|
bounds_add (bnds, 1, type1);
|
|
|
|
return number_of_iterations_lt (loop, type, iv0, iv1, niter, exit_must_be_taken,
|
|
bnds);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Dumps description of affine induction variable IV to FILE. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
dump_affine_iv (FILE *file, affine_iv *iv)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (iv->step))
|
|
fprintf (file, "[");
|
|
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, iv->base, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (iv->step))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (file, ", + , ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, iv->step, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (file, "]%s", iv->no_overflow ? "(no_overflow)" : "");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Given exit condition IV0 CODE IV1 in TYPE, this function adjusts
|
|
the condition for loop-until-wrap cases. For example:
|
|
(unsigned){8, -1}_loop < 10 => {0, 1} != 9
|
|
10 < (unsigned){0, max - 7}_loop => {0, 1} != 8
|
|
Return true if condition is successfully adjusted. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
adjust_cond_for_loop_until_wrap (tree type, affine_iv *iv0, tree_code *code,
|
|
affine_iv *iv1)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Only support simple cases for the moment. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (iv0->base) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (iv1->base) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
tree niter_type = unsigned_type_for (type), high, low;
|
|
/* Case: i-- < 10. */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (iv1->step))
|
|
{
|
|
/* TODO: Should handle case in which abs(step) != 1. */
|
|
if (!integer_minus_onep (iv0->step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
/* Give up on infinite loop. */
|
|
if (*code == LE_EXPR
|
|
&& tree_int_cst_equal (iv1->base, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
high = fold_build2 (PLUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv0->base),
|
|
build_int_cst (niter_type, 1));
|
|
low = fold_convert (niter_type, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type));
|
|
}
|
|
else if (integer_zerop (iv0->step))
|
|
{
|
|
/* TODO: Should handle case in which abs(step) != 1. */
|
|
if (!integer_onep (iv1->step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
/* Give up on infinite loop. */
|
|
if (*code == LE_EXPR
|
|
&& tree_int_cst_equal (iv0->base, TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
high = fold_convert (niter_type, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type));
|
|
low = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, niter_type,
|
|
fold_convert (niter_type, iv1->base),
|
|
build_int_cst (niter_type, 1));
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
gcc_unreachable ();
|
|
|
|
iv0->base = low;
|
|
iv0->step = fold_convert (niter_type, integer_one_node);
|
|
iv1->base = high;
|
|
iv1->step = build_int_cst (niter_type, 0);
|
|
*code = NE_EXPR;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine the number of iterations according to condition (for staying
|
|
inside loop) which compares two induction variables using comparison
|
|
operator CODE. The induction variable on left side of the comparison
|
|
is IV0, the right-hand side is IV1. Both induction variables must have
|
|
type TYPE, which must be an integer or pointer type. The steps of the
|
|
ivs must be constants (or NULL_TREE, which is interpreted as constant zero).
|
|
|
|
LOOP is the loop whose number of iterations we are determining.
|
|
|
|
ONLY_EXIT is true if we are sure this is the only way the loop could be
|
|
exited (including possibly non-returning function calls, exceptions, etc.)
|
|
-- in this case we can use the information whether the control induction
|
|
variables can overflow or not in a more efficient way.
|
|
|
|
if EVERY_ITERATION is true, we know the test is executed on every iteration.
|
|
|
|
The results (number of iterations and assumptions as described in
|
|
comments at class tree_niter_desc in tree-ssa-loop.h) are stored to NITER.
|
|
Returns false if it fails to determine number of iterations, true if it
|
|
was determined (possibly with some assumptions). */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_cond (class loop *loop,
|
|
tree type, affine_iv *iv0, enum tree_code code,
|
|
affine_iv *iv1, class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
bool only_exit, bool every_iteration)
|
|
{
|
|
bool exit_must_be_taken = false, ret;
|
|
bounds bnds;
|
|
|
|
/* If the test is not executed every iteration, wrapping may make the test
|
|
to pass again.
|
|
TODO: the overflow case can be still used as unreliable estimate of upper
|
|
bound. But we have no API to pass it down to number of iterations code
|
|
and, at present, it will not use it anyway. */
|
|
if (!every_iteration
|
|
&& (!iv0->no_overflow || !iv1->no_overflow
|
|
|| code == NE_EXPR || code == EQ_EXPR))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* The meaning of these assumptions is this:
|
|
if !assumptions
|
|
then the rest of information does not have to be valid
|
|
if may_be_zero then the loop does not roll, even if
|
|
niter != 0. */
|
|
niter->assumptions = boolean_true_node;
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = boolean_false_node;
|
|
niter->niter = NULL_TREE;
|
|
niter->max = 0;
|
|
niter->bound = NULL_TREE;
|
|
niter->cmp = ERROR_MARK;
|
|
|
|
/* Make < comparison from > ones, and for NE_EXPR comparisons, ensure that
|
|
the control variable is on lhs. */
|
|
if (code == GE_EXPR || code == GT_EXPR
|
|
|| (code == NE_EXPR && integer_zerop (iv0->step)))
|
|
{
|
|
std::swap (iv0, iv1);
|
|
code = swap_tree_comparison (code);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
{
|
|
/* Comparison of pointers is undefined unless both iv0 and iv1 point
|
|
to the same object. If they do, the control variable cannot wrap
|
|
(as wrap around the bounds of memory will never return a pointer
|
|
that would be guaranteed to point to the same object, even if we
|
|
avoid undefined behavior by casting to size_t and back). */
|
|
iv0->no_overflow = true;
|
|
iv1->no_overflow = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the control induction variable does not overflow and the only exit
|
|
from the loop is the one that we analyze, we know it must be taken
|
|
eventually. */
|
|
if (only_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (iv0->step) && iv0->no_overflow)
|
|
exit_must_be_taken = true;
|
|
else if (!integer_zerop (iv1->step) && iv1->no_overflow)
|
|
exit_must_be_taken = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* We can handle cases which neither of the sides of the comparison is
|
|
invariant:
|
|
|
|
{iv0.base, iv0.step} cmp_code {iv1.base, iv1.step}
|
|
as if:
|
|
{iv0.base, iv0.step - iv1.step} cmp_code {iv1.base, 0}
|
|
|
|
provided that either below condition is satisfied:
|
|
|
|
a) the test is NE_EXPR;
|
|
b) iv0.step - iv1.step is integer and iv0/iv1 don't overflow.
|
|
|
|
This rarely occurs in practice, but it is simple enough to manage. */
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (iv0->step) && !integer_zerop (iv1->step))
|
|
{
|
|
tree step_type = POINTER_TYPE_P (type) ? sizetype : type;
|
|
tree step = fold_binary_to_constant (MINUS_EXPR, step_type,
|
|
iv0->step, iv1->step);
|
|
|
|
/* No need to check sign of the new step since below code takes care
|
|
of this well. */
|
|
if (code != NE_EXPR
|
|
&& (TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !iv0->no_overflow || !iv1->no_overflow))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
iv0->step = step;
|
|
if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
iv0->no_overflow = false;
|
|
|
|
iv1->step = build_int_cst (step_type, 0);
|
|
iv1->no_overflow = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the result of the comparison is a constant, the loop is weird. More
|
|
precise handling would be possible, but the situation is not common enough
|
|
to waste time on it. */
|
|
if (integer_zerop (iv0->step) && integer_zerop (iv1->step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* If the loop exits immediately, there is nothing to do. */
|
|
tree tem = fold_binary (code, boolean_type_node, iv0->base, iv1->base);
|
|
if (tem && integer_zerop (tem))
|
|
{
|
|
if (!every_iteration)
|
|
return false;
|
|
niter->niter = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_for (type), 0);
|
|
niter->max = 0;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Handle special case loops: while (i-- < 10) and while (10 < i++) by
|
|
adjusting iv0, iv1 and code. */
|
|
if (code != NE_EXPR
|
|
&& (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv0->step)
|
|
|| (!integer_zerop (iv1->step)
|
|
&& !tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv1->step)))
|
|
&& !adjust_cond_for_loop_until_wrap (type, iv0, &code, iv1))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* OK, now we know we have a senseful loop. Handle several cases, depending
|
|
on what comparison operator is used. */
|
|
bound_difference (loop, iv1->base, iv0->base, &bnds);
|
|
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file,
|
|
"Analyzing # of iterations of loop %d\n", loop->num);
|
|
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " exit condition ");
|
|
dump_affine_iv (dump_file, iv0);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " %s ",
|
|
code == NE_EXPR ? "!="
|
|
: code == LT_EXPR ? "<"
|
|
: "<=");
|
|
dump_affine_iv (dump_file, iv1);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " bounds on difference of bases: ");
|
|
mpz_out_str (dump_file, 10, bnds.below);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " ... ");
|
|
mpz_out_str (dump_file, 10, bnds.up);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (code)
|
|
{
|
|
case NE_EXPR:
|
|
gcc_assert (integer_zerop (iv1->step));
|
|
ret = number_of_iterations_ne (loop, type, iv0, iv1->base, niter,
|
|
exit_must_be_taken, &bnds);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case LT_EXPR:
|
|
ret = number_of_iterations_lt (loop, type, iv0, iv1, niter,
|
|
exit_must_be_taken, &bnds);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case LE_EXPR:
|
|
ret = number_of_iterations_le (loop, type, iv0, iv1, niter,
|
|
exit_must_be_taken, &bnds);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
gcc_unreachable ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mpz_clear (bnds.up);
|
|
mpz_clear (bnds.below);
|
|
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
{
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " result:\n");
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (niter->assumptions))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " under assumptions ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, niter->assumptions, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (niter->may_be_zero))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " zero if ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, niter->may_be_zero, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " # of iterations ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, niter->niter, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, ", bounded by ");
|
|
print_decu (niter->max, dump_file);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " failed\n\n");
|
|
}
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Substitute NEW_TREE for OLD in EXPR and fold the result.
|
|
If VALUEIZE is non-NULL then OLD and NEW_TREE are ignored and instead
|
|
all SSA names are replaced with the result of calling the VALUEIZE
|
|
function with the SSA name as argument. */
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
simplify_replace_tree (tree expr, tree old, tree new_tree,
|
|
tree (*valueize) (tree, void*), void *context,
|
|
bool do_fold)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i, n;
|
|
tree ret = NULL_TREE, e, se;
|
|
|
|
if (!expr)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
/* Do not bother to replace constants. */
|
|
if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (expr))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
if (valueize)
|
|
{
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (expr) == SSA_NAME)
|
|
{
|
|
new_tree = valueize (expr, context);
|
|
if (new_tree != expr)
|
|
return new_tree;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
else if (expr == old
|
|
|| operand_equal_p (expr, old, 0))
|
|
return unshare_expr (new_tree);
|
|
|
|
if (!EXPR_P (expr))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
n = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (expr);
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
e = TREE_OPERAND (expr, i);
|
|
se = simplify_replace_tree (e, old, new_tree, valueize, context, do_fold);
|
|
if (e == se)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
ret = copy_node (expr);
|
|
|
|
TREE_OPERAND (ret, i) = se;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return (ret ? (do_fold ? fold (ret) : ret) : expr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Expand definitions of ssa names in EXPR as long as they are simple
|
|
enough, and return the new expression. If STOP is specified, stop
|
|
expanding if EXPR equals to it. */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
expand_simple_operations (tree expr, tree stop, hash_map<tree, tree> &cache)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i, n;
|
|
tree ret = NULL_TREE, e, ee, e1;
|
|
enum tree_code code;
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
|
|
if (expr == NULL_TREE)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (expr))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
code = TREE_CODE (expr);
|
|
if (IS_EXPR_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code)))
|
|
{
|
|
n = TREE_OPERAND_LENGTH (expr);
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
e = TREE_OPERAND (expr, i);
|
|
/* SCEV analysis feeds us with a proper expression
|
|
graph matching the SSA graph. Avoid turning it
|
|
into a tree here, thus handle tree sharing
|
|
properly.
|
|
??? The SSA walk below still turns the SSA graph
|
|
into a tree but until we find a testcase do not
|
|
introduce additional tree sharing here. */
|
|
bool existed_p;
|
|
tree &cee = cache.get_or_insert (e, &existed_p);
|
|
if (existed_p)
|
|
ee = cee;
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
cee = e;
|
|
ee = expand_simple_operations (e, stop, cache);
|
|
if (ee != e)
|
|
*cache.get (e) = ee;
|
|
}
|
|
if (e == ee)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
ret = copy_node (expr);
|
|
|
|
TREE_OPERAND (ret, i) = ee;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
ret = fold (ret);
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Stop if it's not ssa name or the one we don't want to expand. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (expr) != SSA_NAME || expr == stop)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (expr);
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
{
|
|
basic_block src, dest;
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_phi_num_args (stmt) != 1)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
e = PHI_ARG_DEF (stmt, 0);
|
|
|
|
/* Avoid propagating through loop exit phi nodes, which
|
|
could break loop-closed SSA form restrictions. */
|
|
dest = gimple_bb (stmt);
|
|
src = single_pred (dest);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (e) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& src->loop_father != dest->loop_father)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
return expand_simple_operations (e, stop, cache);
|
|
}
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_ASSIGN)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
/* Avoid expanding to expressions that contain SSA names that need
|
|
to take part in abnormal coalescing. */
|
|
ssa_op_iter iter;
|
|
FOR_EACH_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (e, stmt, iter, SSA_OP_USE)
|
|
if (SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (e))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
e = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
|
|
code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
|
|
if (get_gimple_rhs_class (code) == GIMPLE_SINGLE_RHS)
|
|
{
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
if (code == SSA_NAME)
|
|
return expand_simple_operations (e, stop, cache);
|
|
else if (code == ADDR_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
poly_int64 offset;
|
|
tree base = get_addr_base_and_unit_offset (TREE_OPERAND (e, 0),
|
|
&offset);
|
|
if (base
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF)
|
|
{
|
|
ee = expand_simple_operations (TREE_OPERAND (base, 0), stop,
|
|
cache);
|
|
return fold_build2 (POINTER_PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (expr), ee,
|
|
wide_int_to_tree (sizetype,
|
|
mem_ref_offset (base)
|
|
+ offset));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (code)
|
|
{
|
|
CASE_CONVERT:
|
|
/* Casts are simple. */
|
|
ee = expand_simple_operations (e, stop, cache);
|
|
return fold_build1 (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), ee);
|
|
|
|
case PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
case MINUS_EXPR:
|
|
if (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr))
|
|
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_TRAPS (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
/* Fallthru. */
|
|
case POINTER_PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
/* And increments and decrements by a constant are simple. */
|
|
e1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
|
|
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (e1))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
ee = expand_simple_operations (e, stop, cache);
|
|
return fold_build2 (code, TREE_TYPE (expr), ee, e1);
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
expand_simple_operations (tree expr, tree stop)
|
|
{
|
|
hash_map<tree, tree> cache;
|
|
return expand_simple_operations (expr, stop, cache);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Tries to simplify EXPR using the condition COND. Returns the simplified
|
|
expression (or EXPR unchanged, if no simplification was possible). */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
tree_simplify_using_condition_1 (tree cond, tree expr)
|
|
{
|
|
bool changed;
|
|
tree e, e0, e1, e2, notcond;
|
|
enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (expr);
|
|
|
|
if (code == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
if (code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
|
|
|| code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
|
|
|| code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
changed = false;
|
|
|
|
e0 = tree_simplify_using_condition_1 (cond, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) != e0)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
|
|
e1 = tree_simplify_using_condition_1 (cond, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1) != e1)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
|
|
if (code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
e2 = tree_simplify_using_condition_1 (cond, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) != e2)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
e2 = NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
if (changed)
|
|
{
|
|
if (code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
expr = fold_build3 (code, boolean_type_node, e0, e1, e2);
|
|
else
|
|
expr = fold_build2 (code, boolean_type_node, e0, e1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* In case COND is equality, we may be able to simplify EXPR by copy/constant
|
|
propagation, and vice versa. Fold does not handle this, since it is
|
|
considered too expensive. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (cond) == EQ_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
e0 = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
|
|
e1 = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1);
|
|
|
|
/* We know that e0 == e1. Check whether we cannot simplify expr
|
|
using this fact. */
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (expr, e0, e1);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e) || integer_nonzerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (expr, e1, e0);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e) || integer_nonzerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
}
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (expr) == EQ_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
e0 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
|
|
e1 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
|
|
|
|
/* If e0 == e1 (EXPR) implies !COND, then EXPR cannot be true. */
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (cond, e0, e1);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (cond, e1, e0);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
}
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (expr) == NE_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
e0 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
|
|
e1 = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
|
|
|
|
/* If e0 == e1 (!EXPR) implies !COND, then EXPR must be true. */
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (cond, e0, e1);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return boolean_true_node;
|
|
e = simplify_replace_tree (cond, e1, e0);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return boolean_true_node;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Check whether COND ==> EXPR. */
|
|
notcond = invert_truthvalue (cond);
|
|
e = fold_binary (TRUTH_OR_EXPR, boolean_type_node, notcond, expr);
|
|
if (e && integer_nonzerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
/* Check whether COND ==> not EXPR. */
|
|
e = fold_binary (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node, cond, expr);
|
|
if (e && integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Tries to simplify EXPR using the condition COND. Returns the simplified
|
|
expression (or EXPR unchanged, if no simplification was possible).
|
|
Wrapper around tree_simplify_using_condition_1 that ensures that chains
|
|
of simple operations in definitions of ssa names in COND are expanded,
|
|
so that things like casts or incrementing the value of the bound before
|
|
the loop do not cause us to fail. */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
tree_simplify_using_condition (tree cond, tree expr)
|
|
{
|
|
cond = expand_simple_operations (cond);
|
|
|
|
return tree_simplify_using_condition_1 (cond, expr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Tries to simplify EXPR using the conditions on entry to LOOP.
|
|
Returns the simplified expression (or EXPR unchanged, if no
|
|
simplification was possible). */
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
simplify_using_initial_conditions (class loop *loop, tree expr)
|
|
{
|
|
edge e;
|
|
basic_block bb;
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
tree cond, expanded, backup;
|
|
int cnt = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (expr) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
backup = expanded = expand_simple_operations (expr);
|
|
|
|
/* Limit walking the dominators to avoid quadraticness in
|
|
the number of BBs times the number of loops in degenerate
|
|
cases. */
|
|
for (bb = loop->header;
|
|
bb != ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun) && cnt < MAX_DOMINATORS_TO_WALK;
|
|
bb = get_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb))
|
|
{
|
|
if (!single_pred_p (bb))
|
|
continue;
|
|
e = single_pred_edge (bb);
|
|
|
|
if (!(e->flags & (EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
stmt = last_stmt (e->src);
|
|
cond = fold_build2 (gimple_cond_code (stmt),
|
|
boolean_type_node,
|
|
gimple_cond_lhs (stmt),
|
|
gimple_cond_rhs (stmt));
|
|
if (e->flags & EDGE_FALSE_VALUE)
|
|
cond = invert_truthvalue (cond);
|
|
expanded = tree_simplify_using_condition (cond, expanded);
|
|
/* Break if EXPR is simplified to const values. */
|
|
if (expanded
|
|
&& (integer_zerop (expanded) || integer_nonzerop (expanded)))
|
|
return expanded;
|
|
|
|
++cnt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Return the original expression if no simplification is done. */
|
|
return operand_equal_p (backup, expanded, 0) ? expr : expanded;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Tries to simplify EXPR using the evolutions of the loop invariants
|
|
in the superloops of LOOP. Returns the simplified expression
|
|
(or EXPR unchanged, if no simplification was possible). */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
simplify_using_outer_evolutions (class loop *loop, tree expr)
|
|
{
|
|
enum tree_code code = TREE_CODE (expr);
|
|
bool changed;
|
|
tree e, e0, e1, e2;
|
|
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (expr))
|
|
return expr;
|
|
|
|
if (code == TRUTH_OR_EXPR
|
|
|| code == TRUTH_AND_EXPR
|
|
|| code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
changed = false;
|
|
|
|
e0 = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) != e0)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
|
|
e1 = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1) != e1)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
|
|
if (code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
{
|
|
e2 = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop, TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2));
|
|
if (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) != e2)
|
|
changed = true;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
e2 = NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
if (changed)
|
|
{
|
|
if (code == COND_EXPR)
|
|
expr = fold_build3 (code, boolean_type_node, e0, e1, e2);
|
|
else
|
|
expr = fold_build2 (code, boolean_type_node, e0, e1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
e = instantiate_parameters (loop, expr);
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (e))
|
|
return e;
|
|
|
|
return expr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns true if EXIT is the only possible exit from LOOP. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
loop_only_exit_p (const class loop *loop, basic_block *body, const_edge exit)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple_stmt_iterator bsi;
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
|
|
if (exit != single_exit (loop))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++)
|
|
for (bsi = gsi_start_bb (body[i]); !gsi_end_p (bsi); gsi_next (&bsi))
|
|
if (stmt_can_terminate_bb_p (gsi_stmt (bsi)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Stores description of number of iterations of LOOP derived from
|
|
EXIT (an exit edge of the LOOP) in NITER. Returns true if some useful
|
|
information could be derived (and fields of NITER have meaning described
|
|
in comments at class tree_niter_desc declaration), false otherwise.
|
|
When EVERY_ITERATION is true, only tests that are known to be executed
|
|
every iteration are considered (i.e. only test that alone bounds the loop).
|
|
If AT_STMT is not NULL, this function stores LOOP's condition statement in
|
|
it when returning true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_exit_assumptions (class loop *loop, edge exit,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
gcond **at_stmt, bool every_iteration,
|
|
basic_block *body)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *last;
|
|
gcond *stmt;
|
|
tree type;
|
|
tree op0, op1;
|
|
enum tree_code code;
|
|
affine_iv iv0, iv1;
|
|
bool safe;
|
|
|
|
/* Nothing to analyze if the loop is known to be infinite. */
|
|
if (loop_constraint_set_p (loop, LOOP_C_INFINITE))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
safe = dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, exit->src);
|
|
|
|
if (every_iteration && !safe)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
niter->assumptions = boolean_false_node;
|
|
niter->control.base = NULL_TREE;
|
|
niter->control.step = NULL_TREE;
|
|
niter->control.no_overflow = false;
|
|
last = last_stmt (exit->src);
|
|
if (!last)
|
|
return false;
|
|
stmt = dyn_cast <gcond *> (last);
|
|
if (!stmt)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* We want the condition for staying inside loop. */
|
|
code = gimple_cond_code (stmt);
|
|
if (exit->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE)
|
|
code = invert_tree_comparison (code, false);
|
|
|
|
switch (code)
|
|
{
|
|
case GT_EXPR:
|
|
case GE_EXPR:
|
|
case LT_EXPR:
|
|
case LE_EXPR:
|
|
case NE_EXPR:
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
op0 = gimple_cond_lhs (stmt);
|
|
op1 = gimple_cond_rhs (stmt);
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (op0);
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (type) != INTEGER_TYPE
|
|
&& !POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
tree iv0_niters = NULL_TREE;
|
|
if (!simple_iv_with_niters (loop, loop_containing_stmt (stmt),
|
|
op0, &iv0, safe ? &iv0_niters : NULL, false))
|
|
return number_of_iterations_popcount (loop, exit, code, niter);
|
|
tree iv1_niters = NULL_TREE;
|
|
if (!simple_iv_with_niters (loop, loop_containing_stmt (stmt),
|
|
op1, &iv1, safe ? &iv1_niters : NULL, false))
|
|
return false;
|
|
/* Give up on complicated case. */
|
|
if (iv0_niters && iv1_niters)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* We don't want to see undefined signed overflow warnings while
|
|
computing the number of iterations. */
|
|
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
iv0.base = expand_simple_operations (iv0.base);
|
|
iv1.base = expand_simple_operations (iv1.base);
|
|
bool body_from_caller = true;
|
|
if (!body)
|
|
{
|
|
body = get_loop_body (loop);
|
|
body_from_caller = false;
|
|
}
|
|
bool only_exit_p = loop_only_exit_p (loop, body, exit);
|
|
if (!body_from_caller)
|
|
free (body);
|
|
if (!number_of_iterations_cond (loop, type, &iv0, code, &iv1, niter,
|
|
only_exit_p, safe))
|
|
{
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Incorporate additional assumption implied by control iv. */
|
|
tree iv_niters = iv0_niters ? iv0_niters : iv1_niters;
|
|
if (iv_niters)
|
|
{
|
|
tree assumption = fold_build2 (LE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, niter->niter,
|
|
fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (niter->niter),
|
|
iv_niters));
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_nonzerop (assumption))
|
|
niter->assumptions = fold_build2 (TRUTH_AND_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter->assumptions, assumption);
|
|
|
|
/* Refine upper bound if possible. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (iv_niters) == INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& niter->max > wi::to_widest (iv_niters))
|
|
niter->max = wi::to_widest (iv_niters);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* There is no assumptions if the loop is known to be finite. */
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (niter->assumptions)
|
|
&& loop_constraint_set_p (loop, LOOP_C_FINITE))
|
|
niter->assumptions = boolean_true_node;
|
|
|
|
if (optimize >= 3)
|
|
{
|
|
niter->assumptions = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop,
|
|
niter->assumptions);
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop,
|
|
niter->may_be_zero);
|
|
niter->niter = simplify_using_outer_evolutions (loop, niter->niter);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
niter->assumptions
|
|
= simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop,
|
|
niter->assumptions);
|
|
niter->may_be_zero
|
|
= simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop,
|
|
niter->may_be_zero);
|
|
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
/* If NITER has simplified into a constant, update MAX. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (niter->niter) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
niter->max = wi::to_widest (niter->niter);
|
|
|
|
if (at_stmt)
|
|
*at_stmt = stmt;
|
|
|
|
return (!integer_zerop (niter->assumptions));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Utility function to check if OP is defined by a stmt
|
|
that is a val - 1. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
ssa_defined_by_minus_one_stmt_p (tree op, tree val)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
return (TREE_CODE (op) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& (stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (op))
|
|
&& is_gimple_assign (stmt)
|
|
&& (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt) == PLUS_EXPR)
|
|
&& val == gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt)
|
|
&& integer_minus_onep (gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* See if LOOP is a popcout implementation, determine NITER for the loop
|
|
|
|
We match:
|
|
<bb 2>
|
|
goto <bb 4>
|
|
|
|
<bb 3>
|
|
_1 = b_11 + -1
|
|
b_6 = _1 & b_11
|
|
|
|
<bb 4>
|
|
b_11 = PHI <b_5(D)(2), b_6(3)>
|
|
|
|
exit block
|
|
if (b_11 != 0)
|
|
goto <bb 3>
|
|
else
|
|
goto <bb 5>
|
|
|
|
OR we match copy-header version:
|
|
if (b_5 != 0)
|
|
goto <bb 3>
|
|
else
|
|
goto <bb 4>
|
|
|
|
<bb 3>
|
|
b_11 = PHI <b_5(2), b_6(3)>
|
|
_1 = b_11 + -1
|
|
b_6 = _1 & b_11
|
|
|
|
exit block
|
|
if (b_6 != 0)
|
|
goto <bb 3>
|
|
else
|
|
goto <bb 4>
|
|
|
|
If popcount pattern, update NITER accordingly.
|
|
i.e., set NITER to __builtin_popcount (b)
|
|
return true if we did, false otherwise.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_popcount (loop_p loop, edge exit,
|
|
enum tree_code code,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter)
|
|
{
|
|
bool adjust = true;
|
|
tree iter;
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT max;
|
|
adjust = true;
|
|
tree fn = NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
/* Check loop terminating branch is like
|
|
if (b != 0). */
|
|
gimple *stmt = last_stmt (exit->src);
|
|
if (!stmt
|
|
|| gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_COND
|
|
|| code != NE_EXPR
|
|
|| !integer_zerop (gimple_cond_rhs (stmt))
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (gimple_cond_lhs (stmt)) != SSA_NAME)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
gimple *and_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (gimple_cond_lhs (stmt));
|
|
|
|
/* Depending on copy-header is performed, feeding PHI stmts might be in
|
|
the loop header or loop latch, handle this. */
|
|
if (gimple_code (and_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI
|
|
&& gimple_bb (and_stmt) == loop->header
|
|
&& gimple_phi_num_args (and_stmt) == 2
|
|
&& (TREE_CODE (gimple_phi_arg_def (and_stmt,
|
|
loop_latch_edge (loop)->dest_idx))
|
|
== SSA_NAME))
|
|
{
|
|
/* SSA used in exit condition is defined by PHI stmt
|
|
b_11 = PHI <b_5(D)(2), b_6(3)>
|
|
from the PHI stmt, get the and_stmt
|
|
b_6 = _1 & b_11. */
|
|
tree t = gimple_phi_arg_def (and_stmt, loop_latch_edge (loop)->dest_idx);
|
|
and_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (t);
|
|
adjust = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Make sure it is indeed an and stmt (b_6 = _1 & b_11). */
|
|
if (!is_gimple_assign (and_stmt)
|
|
|| gimple_assign_rhs_code (and_stmt) != BIT_AND_EXPR)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
tree b_11 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (and_stmt);
|
|
tree _1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (and_stmt);
|
|
|
|
/* Check that _1 is defined by _b11 + -1 (_1 = b_11 + -1).
|
|
Also make sure that b_11 is the same in and_stmt and _1 defining stmt.
|
|
Also canonicalize if _1 and _b11 are revrsed. */
|
|
if (ssa_defined_by_minus_one_stmt_p (b_11, _1))
|
|
std::swap (b_11, _1);
|
|
else if (ssa_defined_by_minus_one_stmt_p (_1, b_11))
|
|
;
|
|
else
|
|
return false;
|
|
/* Check the recurrence:
|
|
... = PHI <b_5(2), b_6(3)>. */
|
|
gimple *phi = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (b_11);
|
|
if (gimple_code (phi) != GIMPLE_PHI
|
|
|| (gimple_bb (phi) != loop_latch_edge (loop)->dest)
|
|
|| (gimple_assign_lhs (and_stmt)
|
|
!= gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop)->dest_idx)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* We found a match. Get the corresponding popcount builtin. */
|
|
tree src = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, loop_preheader_edge (loop)->dest_idx);
|
|
if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (src)) == TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node))
|
|
fn = builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_POPCOUNT);
|
|
else if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (src)) == TYPE_PRECISION
|
|
(long_integer_type_node))
|
|
fn = builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_POPCOUNTL);
|
|
else if (TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (src)) == TYPE_PRECISION
|
|
(long_long_integer_type_node))
|
|
fn = builtin_decl_implicit (BUILT_IN_POPCOUNTLL);
|
|
|
|
/* ??? Support promoting char/short to int. */
|
|
if (!fn)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* Update NITER params accordingly */
|
|
tree utype = unsigned_type_for (TREE_TYPE (src));
|
|
src = fold_convert (utype, src);
|
|
tree call = fold_convert (utype, build_call_expr (fn, 1, src));
|
|
if (adjust)
|
|
iter = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, utype,
|
|
call,
|
|
build_int_cst (utype, 1));
|
|
else
|
|
iter = call;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (call) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
max = tree_to_uhwi (call);
|
|
else
|
|
max = TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (src));
|
|
if (adjust)
|
|
max = max - 1;
|
|
|
|
niter->niter = iter;
|
|
niter->assumptions = boolean_true_node;
|
|
|
|
if (adjust)
|
|
{
|
|
tree may_be_zero = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, src,
|
|
build_zero_cst
|
|
(TREE_TYPE (src)));
|
|
niter->may_be_zero =
|
|
simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop, may_be_zero);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
niter->may_be_zero = boolean_false_node;
|
|
|
|
niter->max = max;
|
|
niter->bound = NULL_TREE;
|
|
niter->cmp = ERROR_MARK;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Like number_of_iterations_exit_assumptions, but return TRUE only if
|
|
the niter information holds unconditionally. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
number_of_iterations_exit (class loop *loop, edge exit,
|
|
class tree_niter_desc *niter,
|
|
bool warn, bool every_iteration,
|
|
basic_block *body)
|
|
{
|
|
gcond *stmt;
|
|
if (!number_of_iterations_exit_assumptions (loop, exit, niter,
|
|
&stmt, every_iteration, body))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (niter->assumptions))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (warn && dump_enabled_p ())
|
|
dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, stmt,
|
|
"missed loop optimization: niters analysis ends up "
|
|
"with assumptions.\n");
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Try to determine the number of iterations of LOOP. If we succeed,
|
|
expression giving number of iterations is returned and *EXIT is
|
|
set to the edge from that the information is obtained. Otherwise
|
|
chrec_dont_know is returned. */
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
find_loop_niter (class loop *loop, edge *exit)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
vec<edge> exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop);
|
|
edge ex;
|
|
tree niter = NULL_TREE, aniter;
|
|
class tree_niter_desc desc;
|
|
|
|
*exit = NULL;
|
|
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (exits, i, ex)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, ex, &desc, false))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (integer_nonzerop (desc.may_be_zero))
|
|
{
|
|
/* We exit in the first iteration through this exit.
|
|
We won't find anything better. */
|
|
niter = build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, 0);
|
|
*exit = ex;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_zerop (desc.may_be_zero))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
aniter = desc.niter;
|
|
|
|
if (!niter)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Nothing recorded yet. */
|
|
niter = aniter;
|
|
*exit = ex;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Prefer constants, the lower the better. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (aniter) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (niter) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
{
|
|
niter = aniter;
|
|
*exit = ex;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_lt (aniter, niter))
|
|
{
|
|
niter = aniter;
|
|
*exit = ex;
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
|
|
return niter ? niter : chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Return true if loop is known to have bounded number of iterations. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
finite_loop_p (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit;
|
|
int flags;
|
|
|
|
flags = flags_from_decl_or_type (current_function_decl);
|
|
if ((flags & (ECF_CONST|ECF_PURE)) && !(flags & ECF_LOOPING_CONST_OR_PURE))
|
|
{
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Found loop %i to be finite: it is within pure or const function.\n",
|
|
loop->num);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (loop->any_upper_bound
|
|
|| max_loop_iterations (loop, &nit))
|
|
{
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Found loop %i to be finite: upper bound found.\n",
|
|
loop->num);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (loop->finite_p)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
vec<edge> exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop);
|
|
edge ex;
|
|
|
|
/* If the loop has a normal exit, we can assume it will terminate. */
|
|
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (exits, i, ex)
|
|
if (!(ex->flags & (EDGE_EH | EDGE_ABNORMAL | EDGE_FAKE)))
|
|
{
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
if (dump_file)
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Assume loop %i to be finite: it has an exit "
|
|
"and -ffinite-loops is on.\n", loop->num);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
Analysis of a number of iterations of a loop by a brute-force evaluation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* Bound on the number of iterations we try to evaluate. */
|
|
|
|
#define MAX_ITERATIONS_TO_TRACK \
|
|
((unsigned) param_max_iterations_to_track)
|
|
|
|
/* Returns the loop phi node of LOOP such that ssa name X is derived from its
|
|
result by a chain of operations such that all but exactly one of their
|
|
operands are constants. */
|
|
|
|
static gphi *
|
|
chain_of_csts_start (class loop *loop, tree x)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (x);
|
|
tree use;
|
|
basic_block bb = gimple_bb (stmt);
|
|
enum tree_code code;
|
|
|
|
if (!bb
|
|
|| !flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, bb))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
{
|
|
if (bb == loop->header)
|
|
return as_a <gphi *> (stmt);
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_ASSIGN
|
|
|| gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) == GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
|
|
if (gimple_references_memory_p (stmt)
|
|
|| TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_reference
|
|
|| (code == ADDR_EXPR
|
|
&& !is_gimple_min_invariant (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt))))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
use = SINGLE_SSA_TREE_OPERAND (stmt, SSA_OP_USE);
|
|
if (use == NULL_TREE)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
return chain_of_csts_start (loop, use);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determines whether the expression X is derived from a result of a phi node
|
|
in header of LOOP such that
|
|
|
|
* the derivation of X consists only from operations with constants
|
|
* the initial value of the phi node is constant
|
|
* the value of the phi node in the next iteration can be derived from the
|
|
value in the current iteration by a chain of operations with constants,
|
|
or is also a constant
|
|
|
|
If such phi node exists, it is returned, otherwise NULL is returned. */
|
|
|
|
static gphi *
|
|
get_base_for (class loop *loop, tree x)
|
|
{
|
|
gphi *phi;
|
|
tree init, next;
|
|
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (x))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
phi = chain_of_csts_start (loop, x);
|
|
if (!phi)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
init = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_preheader_edge (loop));
|
|
next = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop));
|
|
|
|
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (init))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (next) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& chain_of_csts_start (loop, next) != phi)
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
return phi;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Given an expression X, then
|
|
|
|
* if X is NULL_TREE, we return the constant BASE.
|
|
* if X is a constant, we return the constant X.
|
|
* otherwise X is a SSA name, whose value in the considered loop is derived
|
|
by a chain of operations with constant from a result of a phi node in
|
|
the header of the loop. Then we return value of X when the value of the
|
|
result of this phi node is given by the constant BASE. */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
get_val_for (tree x, tree base)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
|
|
gcc_checking_assert (is_gimple_min_invariant (base));
|
|
|
|
if (!x)
|
|
return base;
|
|
else if (is_gimple_min_invariant (x))
|
|
return x;
|
|
|
|
stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (x);
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
return base;
|
|
|
|
gcc_checking_assert (is_gimple_assign (stmt));
|
|
|
|
/* STMT must be either an assignment of a single SSA name or an
|
|
expression involving an SSA name and a constant. Try to fold that
|
|
expression using the value for the SSA name. */
|
|
if (gimple_assign_ssa_name_copy_p (stmt))
|
|
return get_val_for (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt), base);
|
|
else if (gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) == GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt)) == SSA_NAME)
|
|
return fold_build1 (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt),
|
|
gimple_expr_type (stmt),
|
|
get_val_for (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt), base));
|
|
else if (gimple_assign_rhs_class (stmt) == GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS)
|
|
{
|
|
tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
|
|
tree rhs2 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (rhs1) == SSA_NAME)
|
|
rhs1 = get_val_for (rhs1, base);
|
|
else if (TREE_CODE (rhs2) == SSA_NAME)
|
|
rhs2 = get_val_for (rhs2, base);
|
|
else
|
|
gcc_unreachable ();
|
|
return fold_build2 (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt),
|
|
gimple_expr_type (stmt), rhs1, rhs2);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
gcc_unreachable ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Tries to count the number of iterations of LOOP till it exits by EXIT
|
|
by brute force -- i.e. by determining the value of the operands of the
|
|
condition at EXIT in first few iterations of the loop (assuming that
|
|
these values are constant) and determining the first one in that the
|
|
condition is not satisfied. Returns the constant giving the number
|
|
of the iterations of LOOP if successful, chrec_dont_know otherwise. */
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
loop_niter_by_eval (class loop *loop, edge exit)
|
|
{
|
|
tree acnd;
|
|
tree op[2], val[2], next[2], aval[2];
|
|
gphi *phi;
|
|
gimple *cond;
|
|
unsigned i, j;
|
|
enum tree_code cmp;
|
|
|
|
cond = last_stmt (exit->src);
|
|
if (!cond || gimple_code (cond) != GIMPLE_COND)
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
|
|
cmp = gimple_cond_code (cond);
|
|
if (exit->flags & EDGE_TRUE_VALUE)
|
|
cmp = invert_tree_comparison (cmp, false);
|
|
|
|
switch (cmp)
|
|
{
|
|
case EQ_EXPR:
|
|
case NE_EXPR:
|
|
case GT_EXPR:
|
|
case GE_EXPR:
|
|
case LT_EXPR:
|
|
case LE_EXPR:
|
|
op[0] = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
|
|
op[1] = gimple_cond_rhs (cond);
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
|
|
{
|
|
if (is_gimple_min_invariant (op[j]))
|
|
{
|
|
val[j] = op[j];
|
|
next[j] = NULL_TREE;
|
|
op[j] = NULL_TREE;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
phi = get_base_for (loop, op[j]);
|
|
if (!phi)
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
val[j] = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_preheader_edge (loop));
|
|
next[j] = PHI_ARG_DEF_FROM_EDGE (phi, loop_latch_edge (loop));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Don't issue signed overflow warnings. */
|
|
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITERATIONS_TO_TRACK; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
|
|
aval[j] = get_val_for (op[j], val[j]);
|
|
|
|
acnd = fold_binary (cmp, boolean_type_node, aval[0], aval[1]);
|
|
if (acnd && integer_zerop (acnd))
|
|
{
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
fprintf (dump_file,
|
|
"Proved that loop %d iterates %d times using brute force.\n",
|
|
loop->num, i);
|
|
return build_int_cst (unsigned_type_node, i);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
|
|
{
|
|
aval[j] = val[j];
|
|
val[j] = get_val_for (next[j], val[j]);
|
|
if (!is_gimple_min_invariant (val[j]))
|
|
{
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the next iteration would use the same base values
|
|
as the current one, there is no point looping further,
|
|
all following iterations will be the same as this one. */
|
|
if (val[0] == aval[0] && val[1] == aval[1])
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Finds the exit of the LOOP by that the loop exits after a constant
|
|
number of iterations and stores the exit edge to *EXIT. The constant
|
|
giving the number of iterations of LOOP is returned. The number of
|
|
iterations is determined using loop_niter_by_eval (i.e. by brute force
|
|
evaluation). If we are unable to find the exit for that loop_niter_by_eval
|
|
determines the number of iterations, chrec_dont_know is returned. */
|
|
|
|
tree
|
|
find_loop_niter_by_eval (class loop *loop, edge *exit)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
vec<edge> exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop);
|
|
edge ex;
|
|
tree niter = NULL_TREE, aniter;
|
|
|
|
*exit = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/* Loops with multiple exits are expensive to handle and less important. */
|
|
if (!flag_expensive_optimizations
|
|
&& exits.length () > 1)
|
|
{
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
return chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (exits, i, ex)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!just_once_each_iteration_p (loop, ex->src))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
aniter = loop_niter_by_eval (loop, ex);
|
|
if (chrec_contains_undetermined (aniter))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (niter
|
|
&& !tree_int_cst_lt (aniter, niter))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
niter = aniter;
|
|
*exit = ex;
|
|
}
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
|
|
return niter ? niter : chrec_dont_know;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
Analysis of upper bounds on number of iterations of a loop.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static widest_int derive_constant_upper_bound_ops (tree, tree,
|
|
enum tree_code, tree);
|
|
|
|
/* Returns a constant upper bound on the value of the right-hand side of
|
|
an assignment statement STMT. */
|
|
|
|
static widest_int
|
|
derive_constant_upper_bound_assign (gimple *stmt)
|
|
{
|
|
enum tree_code code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
|
|
tree op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
|
|
tree op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
|
|
|
|
return derive_constant_upper_bound_ops (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt)),
|
|
op0, code, op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns a constant upper bound on the value of expression VAL. VAL
|
|
is considered to be unsigned. If its type is signed, its value must
|
|
be nonnegative. */
|
|
|
|
static widest_int
|
|
derive_constant_upper_bound (tree val)
|
|
{
|
|
enum tree_code code;
|
|
tree op0, op1, op2;
|
|
|
|
extract_ops_from_tree (val, &code, &op0, &op1, &op2);
|
|
return derive_constant_upper_bound_ops (TREE_TYPE (val), op0, code, op1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns a constant upper bound on the value of expression OP0 CODE OP1,
|
|
whose type is TYPE. The expression is considered to be unsigned. If
|
|
its type is signed, its value must be nonnegative. */
|
|
|
|
static widest_int
|
|
derive_constant_upper_bound_ops (tree type, tree op0,
|
|
enum tree_code code, tree op1)
|
|
{
|
|
tree subtype, maxt;
|
|
widest_int bnd, max, cst;
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
|
|
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
maxt = TYPE_MAX_VALUE (type);
|
|
else
|
|
maxt = upper_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
|
|
max = wi::to_widest (maxt);
|
|
|
|
switch (code)
|
|
{
|
|
case INTEGER_CST:
|
|
return wi::to_widest (op0);
|
|
|
|
CASE_CONVERT:
|
|
subtype = TREE_TYPE (op0);
|
|
if (!TYPE_UNSIGNED (subtype)
|
|
/* If TYPE is also signed, the fact that VAL is nonnegative implies
|
|
that OP0 is nonnegative. */
|
|
&& TYPE_UNSIGNED (type)
|
|
&& !tree_expr_nonnegative_p (op0))
|
|
{
|
|
/* If we cannot prove that the casted expression is nonnegative,
|
|
we cannot establish more useful upper bound than the precision
|
|
of the type gives us. */
|
|
return max;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* We now know that op0 is an nonnegative value. Try deriving an upper
|
|
bound for it. */
|
|
bnd = derive_constant_upper_bound (op0);
|
|
|
|
/* If the bound does not fit in TYPE, max. value of TYPE could be
|
|
attained. */
|
|
if (wi::ltu_p (max, bnd))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
return bnd;
|
|
|
|
case PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
case POINTER_PLUS_EXPR:
|
|
case MINUS_EXPR:
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (op1) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !tree_expr_nonnegative_p (op0))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
/* Canonicalize to OP0 - CST. Consider CST to be signed, in order to
|
|
choose the most logical way how to treat this constant regardless
|
|
of the signedness of the type. */
|
|
cst = wi::sext (wi::to_widest (op1), TYPE_PRECISION (type));
|
|
if (code != MINUS_EXPR)
|
|
cst = -cst;
|
|
|
|
bnd = derive_constant_upper_bound (op0);
|
|
|
|
if (wi::neg_p (cst))
|
|
{
|
|
cst = -cst;
|
|
/* Avoid CST == 0x80000... */
|
|
if (wi::neg_p (cst))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
/* OP0 + CST. We need to check that
|
|
BND <= MAX (type) - CST. */
|
|
|
|
widest_int mmax = max - cst;
|
|
if (wi::leu_p (bnd, mmax))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
return bnd + cst;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/* OP0 - CST, where CST >= 0.
|
|
|
|
If TYPE is signed, we have already verified that OP0 >= 0, and we
|
|
know that the result is nonnegative. This implies that
|
|
VAL <= BND - CST.
|
|
|
|
If TYPE is unsigned, we must additionally know that OP0 >= CST,
|
|
otherwise the operation underflows.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* This should only happen if the type is unsigned; however, for
|
|
buggy programs that use overflowing signed arithmetics even with
|
|
-fno-wrapv, this condition may also be true for signed values. */
|
|
if (wi::ltu_p (bnd, cst))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
|
|
{
|
|
tree tem = fold_binary (GE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0,
|
|
wide_int_to_tree (type, cst));
|
|
if (!tem || integer_nonzerop (tem))
|
|
return max;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bnd -= cst;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return bnd;
|
|
|
|
case FLOOR_DIV_EXPR:
|
|
case EXACT_DIV_EXPR:
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (op1) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| tree_int_cst_sign_bit (op1))
|
|
return max;
|
|
|
|
bnd = derive_constant_upper_bound (op0);
|
|
return wi::udiv_floor (bnd, wi::to_widest (op1));
|
|
|
|
case BIT_AND_EXPR:
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (op1) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| tree_int_cst_sign_bit (op1))
|
|
return max;
|
|
return wi::to_widest (op1);
|
|
|
|
case SSA_NAME:
|
|
stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (op0);
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_ASSIGN
|
|
|| gimple_assign_lhs (stmt) != op0)
|
|
return max;
|
|
return derive_constant_upper_bound_assign (stmt);
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
return max;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Emit a -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning if needed. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
do_warn_aggressive_loop_optimizations (class loop *loop,
|
|
widest_int i_bound, gimple *stmt)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Don't warn if the loop doesn't have known constant bound. */
|
|
if (!loop->nb_iterations
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (loop->nb_iterations) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !warn_aggressive_loop_optimizations
|
|
/* To avoid warning multiple times for the same loop,
|
|
only start warning when we preserve loops. */
|
|
|| (cfun->curr_properties & PROP_loops) == 0
|
|
/* Only warn once per loop. */
|
|
|| loop->warned_aggressive_loop_optimizations
|
|
/* Only warn if undefined behavior gives us lower estimate than the
|
|
known constant bound. */
|
|
|| wi::cmpu (i_bound, wi::to_widest (loop->nb_iterations)) >= 0
|
|
/* And undefined behavior happens unconditionally. */
|
|
|| !dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, gimple_bb (stmt)))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
edge e = single_exit (loop);
|
|
if (e == NULL)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
gimple *estmt = last_stmt (e->src);
|
|
char buf[WIDE_INT_PRINT_BUFFER_SIZE];
|
|
print_dec (i_bound, buf, TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (loop->nb_iterations))
|
|
? UNSIGNED : SIGNED);
|
|
auto_diagnostic_group d;
|
|
if (warning_at (gimple_location (stmt), OPT_Waggressive_loop_optimizations,
|
|
"iteration %s invokes undefined behavior", buf))
|
|
inform (gimple_location (estmt), "within this loop");
|
|
loop->warned_aggressive_loop_optimizations = true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Records that AT_STMT is executed at most BOUND + 1 times in LOOP. IS_EXIT
|
|
is true if the loop is exited immediately after STMT, and this exit
|
|
is taken at last when the STMT is executed BOUND + 1 times.
|
|
REALISTIC is true if BOUND is expected to be close to the real number
|
|
of iterations. UPPER is true if we are sure the loop iterates at most
|
|
BOUND times. I_BOUND is a widest_int upper estimate on BOUND. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
record_estimate (class loop *loop, tree bound, const widest_int &i_bound,
|
|
gimple *at_stmt, bool is_exit, bool realistic, bool upper)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int delta;
|
|
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Statement %s", is_exit ? "(exit)" : "");
|
|
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, at_stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " is %sexecuted at most ",
|
|
upper ? "" : "probably ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, bound, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " (bounded by ");
|
|
print_decu (i_bound, dump_file);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, ") + 1 times in loop %d.\n", loop->num);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If the I_BOUND is just an estimate of BOUND, it rarely is close to the
|
|
real number of iterations. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (bound) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
realistic = false;
|
|
else
|
|
gcc_checking_assert (i_bound == wi::to_widest (bound));
|
|
|
|
/* If we have a guaranteed upper bound, record it in the appropriate
|
|
list, unless this is an !is_exit bound (i.e. undefined behavior in
|
|
at_stmt) in a loop with known constant number of iterations. */
|
|
if (upper
|
|
&& (is_exit
|
|
|| loop->nb_iterations == NULL_TREE
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (loop->nb_iterations) != INTEGER_CST))
|
|
{
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *elt = ggc_alloc<nb_iter_bound> ();
|
|
|
|
elt->bound = i_bound;
|
|
elt->stmt = at_stmt;
|
|
elt->is_exit = is_exit;
|
|
elt->next = loop->bounds;
|
|
loop->bounds = elt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* If statement is executed on every path to the loop latch, we can directly
|
|
infer the upper bound on the # of iterations of the loop. */
|
|
if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, gimple_bb (at_stmt)))
|
|
upper = false;
|
|
|
|
/* Update the number of iteration estimates according to the bound.
|
|
If at_stmt is an exit then the loop latch is executed at most BOUND times,
|
|
otherwise it can be executed BOUND + 1 times. We will lower the estimate
|
|
later if such statement must be executed on last iteration */
|
|
if (is_exit)
|
|
delta = 0;
|
|
else
|
|
delta = 1;
|
|
widest_int new_i_bound = i_bound + delta;
|
|
|
|
/* If an overflow occurred, ignore the result. */
|
|
if (wi::ltu_p (new_i_bound, delta))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (upper && !is_exit)
|
|
do_warn_aggressive_loop_optimizations (loop, new_i_bound, at_stmt);
|
|
record_niter_bound (loop, new_i_bound, realistic, upper);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Records the control iv analyzed in NITER for LOOP if the iv is valid
|
|
and doesn't overflow. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
record_control_iv (class loop *loop, class tree_niter_desc *niter)
|
|
{
|
|
struct control_iv *iv;
|
|
|
|
if (!niter->control.base || !niter->control.step)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (!integer_onep (niter->assumptions) || !niter->control.no_overflow)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
iv = ggc_alloc<control_iv> ();
|
|
iv->base = niter->control.base;
|
|
iv->step = niter->control.step;
|
|
iv->next = loop->control_ivs;
|
|
loop->control_ivs = iv;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* This function returns TRUE if below conditions are satisfied:
|
|
1) VAR is SSA variable.
|
|
2) VAR is an IV:{base, step} in its defining loop.
|
|
3) IV doesn't overflow.
|
|
4) Both base and step are integer constants.
|
|
5) Base is the MIN/MAX value depends on IS_MIN.
|
|
Store value of base to INIT correspondingly. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
get_cst_init_from_scev (tree var, wide_int *init, bool is_min)
|
|
{
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (var) != SSA_NAME)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
gimple *def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (var);
|
|
class loop *loop = loop_containing_stmt (def_stmt);
|
|
|
|
if (loop == NULL)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
affine_iv iv;
|
|
if (!simple_iv (loop, loop, var, &iv, false))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (!iv.no_overflow)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (iv.base) != INTEGER_CST || TREE_CODE (iv.step) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (is_min == tree_int_cst_sign_bit (iv.step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
*init = wi::to_wide (iv.base);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Record the estimate on number of iterations of LOOP based on the fact that
|
|
the induction variable BASE + STEP * i evaluated in STMT does not wrap and
|
|
its values belong to the range <LOW, HIGH>. REALISTIC is true if the
|
|
estimated number of iterations is expected to be close to the real one.
|
|
UPPER is true if we are sure the induction variable does not wrap. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
record_nonwrapping_iv (class loop *loop, tree base, tree step, gimple *stmt,
|
|
tree low, tree high, bool realistic, bool upper)
|
|
{
|
|
tree niter_bound, extreme, delta;
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (base), unsigned_type;
|
|
tree orig_base = base;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST || integer_zerop (step))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Induction variable (");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, TREE_TYPE (base), TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, ") ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, base, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " + ");
|
|
print_generic_expr (dump_file, step, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " * iteration does not wrap in statement ");
|
|
print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " in loop %d.\n", loop->num);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
unsigned_type = unsigned_type_for (type);
|
|
base = fold_convert (unsigned_type, base);
|
|
step = fold_convert (unsigned_type, step);
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step))
|
|
{
|
|
wide_int min, max;
|
|
extreme = fold_convert (unsigned_type, low);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (orig_base) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (high) == INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (orig_base))
|
|
&& (get_range_info (orig_base, &min, &max) == VR_RANGE
|
|
|| get_cst_init_from_scev (orig_base, &max, false))
|
|
&& wi::gts_p (wi::to_wide (high), max))
|
|
base = wide_int_to_tree (unsigned_type, max);
|
|
else if (TREE_CODE (base) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS,
|
|
loop->latch, gimple_bb (stmt)))
|
|
base = fold_convert (unsigned_type, high);
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type, base, extreme);
|
|
step = fold_build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, unsigned_type, step);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
wide_int min, max;
|
|
extreme = fold_convert (unsigned_type, high);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (orig_base) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (low) == INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (orig_base))
|
|
&& (get_range_info (orig_base, &min, &max) == VR_RANGE
|
|
|| get_cst_init_from_scev (orig_base, &min, true))
|
|
&& wi::gts_p (min, wi::to_wide (low)))
|
|
base = wide_int_to_tree (unsigned_type, min);
|
|
else if (TREE_CODE (base) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
&& dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS,
|
|
loop->latch, gimple_bb (stmt)))
|
|
base = fold_convert (unsigned_type, low);
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type, extreme, base);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* STMT is executed at most NITER_BOUND + 1 times, since otherwise the value
|
|
would get out of the range. */
|
|
niter_bound = fold_build2 (FLOOR_DIV_EXPR, unsigned_type, delta, step);
|
|
widest_int max = derive_constant_upper_bound (niter_bound);
|
|
record_estimate (loop, niter_bound, max, stmt, false, realistic, upper);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine information about number of iterations a LOOP from the index
|
|
IDX of a data reference accessed in STMT. RELIABLE is true if STMT is
|
|
guaranteed to be executed in every iteration of LOOP. Callback for
|
|
for_each_index. */
|
|
|
|
struct ilb_data
|
|
{
|
|
class loop *loop;
|
|
gimple *stmt;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
idx_infer_loop_bounds (tree base, tree *idx, void *dta)
|
|
{
|
|
struct ilb_data *data = (struct ilb_data *) dta;
|
|
tree ev, init, step;
|
|
tree low, high, type, next;
|
|
bool sign, upper = true, at_end = false;
|
|
class loop *loop = data->loop;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (base) != ARRAY_REF)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* For arrays at the end of the structure, we are not guaranteed that they
|
|
do not really extend over their declared size. However, for arrays of
|
|
size greater than one, this is unlikely to be intended. */
|
|
if (array_at_struct_end_p (base))
|
|
{
|
|
at_end = true;
|
|
upper = false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class loop *dloop = loop_containing_stmt (data->stmt);
|
|
if (!dloop)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
ev = analyze_scalar_evolution (dloop, *idx);
|
|
ev = instantiate_parameters (loop, ev);
|
|
init = initial_condition (ev);
|
|
step = evolution_part_in_loop_num (ev, loop->num);
|
|
|
|
if (!init
|
|
|| !step
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| integer_zerop (step)
|
|
|| tree_contains_chrecs (init, NULL)
|
|
|| chrec_contains_symbols_defined_in_loop (init, loop->num))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
low = array_ref_low_bound (base);
|
|
high = array_ref_up_bound (base);
|
|
|
|
/* The case of nonconstant bounds could be handled, but it would be
|
|
complicated. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (low) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| !high
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (high) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return true;
|
|
sign = tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step);
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (step);
|
|
|
|
/* The array of length 1 at the end of a structure most likely extends
|
|
beyond its bounds. */
|
|
if (at_end
|
|
&& operand_equal_p (low, high, 0))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* In case the relevant bound of the array does not fit in type, or
|
|
it does, but bound + step (in type) still belongs into the range of the
|
|
array, the index may wrap and still stay within the range of the array
|
|
(consider e.g. if the array is indexed by the full range of
|
|
unsigned char).
|
|
|
|
To make things simpler, we require both bounds to fit into type, although
|
|
there are cases where this would not be strictly necessary. */
|
|
if (!int_fits_type_p (high, type)
|
|
|| !int_fits_type_p (low, type))
|
|
return true;
|
|
low = fold_convert (type, low);
|
|
high = fold_convert (type, high);
|
|
|
|
if (sign)
|
|
next = fold_binary (PLUS_EXPR, type, low, step);
|
|
else
|
|
next = fold_binary (PLUS_EXPR, type, high, step);
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_compare (low, next) <= 0
|
|
&& tree_int_cst_compare (next, high) <= 0)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* If access is not executed on every iteration, we must ensure that overlow
|
|
may not make the access valid later. */
|
|
if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, gimple_bb (data->stmt))
|
|
&& scev_probably_wraps_p (NULL_TREE,
|
|
initial_condition_in_loop_num (ev, loop->num),
|
|
step, data->stmt, loop, true))
|
|
upper = false;
|
|
|
|
record_nonwrapping_iv (loop, init, step, data->stmt, low, high, false, upper);
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine information about number of iterations a LOOP from the bounds
|
|
of arrays in the data reference REF accessed in STMT. RELIABLE is true if
|
|
STMT is guaranteed to be executed in every iteration of LOOP.*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_ref (class loop *loop, gimple *stmt, tree ref)
|
|
{
|
|
struct ilb_data data;
|
|
|
|
data.loop = loop;
|
|
data.stmt = stmt;
|
|
for_each_index (&ref, idx_infer_loop_bounds, &data);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine information about number of iterations of a LOOP from the way
|
|
arrays are used in STMT. RELIABLE is true if STMT is guaranteed to be
|
|
executed in every iteration of LOOP. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_array (class loop *loop, gimple *stmt)
|
|
{
|
|
if (is_gimple_assign (stmt))
|
|
{
|
|
tree op0 = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
|
|
tree op1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
|
|
|
|
/* For each memory access, analyze its access function
|
|
and record a bound on the loop iteration domain. */
|
|
if (REFERENCE_CLASS_P (op0))
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_ref (loop, stmt, op0);
|
|
|
|
if (REFERENCE_CLASS_P (op1))
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_ref (loop, stmt, op1);
|
|
}
|
|
else if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
|
|
{
|
|
tree arg, lhs;
|
|
unsigned i, n = gimple_call_num_args (stmt);
|
|
|
|
lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
|
|
if (lhs && REFERENCE_CLASS_P (lhs))
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_ref (loop, stmt, lhs);
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
arg = gimple_call_arg (stmt, i);
|
|
if (REFERENCE_CLASS_P (arg))
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_ref (loop, stmt, arg);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine information about number of iterations of a LOOP from the fact
|
|
that pointer arithmetics in STMT does not overflow. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_pointer_arith (class loop *loop, gimple *stmt)
|
|
{
|
|
tree def, base, step, scev, type, low, high;
|
|
tree var, ptr;
|
|
|
|
if (!is_gimple_assign (stmt)
|
|
|| gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt) != POINTER_PLUS_EXPR)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
def = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (def) != SSA_NAME)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (def);
|
|
if (!nowrap_type_p (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
ptr = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
|
|
if (!expr_invariant_in_loop_p (loop, ptr))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
var = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
|
|
if (TYPE_PRECISION (type) != TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (var)))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
class loop *uloop = loop_containing_stmt (stmt);
|
|
scev = instantiate_parameters (loop, analyze_scalar_evolution (uloop, def));
|
|
if (chrec_contains_undetermined (scev))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
base = initial_condition_in_loop_num (scev, loop->num);
|
|
step = evolution_part_in_loop_num (scev, loop->num);
|
|
|
|
if (!base || !step
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| tree_contains_chrecs (base, NULL)
|
|
|| chrec_contains_symbols_defined_in_loop (base, loop->num))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
low = lower_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
high = upper_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
|
|
/* In C, pointer arithmetic p + 1 cannot use a NULL pointer, and p - 1 cannot
|
|
produce a NULL pointer. The contrary would mean NULL points to an object,
|
|
while NULL is supposed to compare unequal with the address of all objects.
|
|
Furthermore, p + 1 cannot produce a NULL pointer and p - 1 cannot use a
|
|
NULL pointer since that would mean wrapping, which we assume here not to
|
|
happen. So, we can exclude NULL from the valid range of pointer
|
|
arithmetic. */
|
|
if (flag_delete_null_pointer_checks && int_cst_value (low) == 0)
|
|
low = build_int_cstu (TREE_TYPE (low), TYPE_ALIGN_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (type)));
|
|
|
|
record_nonwrapping_iv (loop, base, step, stmt, low, high, false, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Determine information about number of iterations of a LOOP from the fact
|
|
that signed arithmetics in STMT does not overflow. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_signedness (class loop *loop, gimple *stmt)
|
|
{
|
|
tree def, base, step, scev, type, low, high;
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_ASSIGN)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
def = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (def) != SSA_NAME)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (def);
|
|
if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
|
|
|| !TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
scev = instantiate_parameters (loop, analyze_scalar_evolution (loop, def));
|
|
if (chrec_contains_undetermined (scev))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
base = initial_condition_in_loop_num (scev, loop->num);
|
|
step = evolution_part_in_loop_num (scev, loop->num);
|
|
|
|
if (!base || !step
|
|
|| TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST
|
|
|| tree_contains_chrecs (base, NULL)
|
|
|| chrec_contains_symbols_defined_in_loop (base, loop->num))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
low = lower_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
high = upper_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
wide_int minv, maxv;
|
|
if (get_range_info (def, &minv, &maxv) == VR_RANGE)
|
|
{
|
|
low = wide_int_to_tree (type, minv);
|
|
high = wide_int_to_tree (type, maxv);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
record_nonwrapping_iv (loop, base, step, stmt, low, high, false, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* The following analyzers are extracting informations on the bounds
|
|
of LOOP from the following undefined behaviors:
|
|
|
|
- data references should not access elements over the statically
|
|
allocated size,
|
|
|
|
- signed variables should not overflow when flag_wrapv is not set.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_undefined (class loop *loop, basic_block *bbs)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
gimple_stmt_iterator bsi;
|
|
basic_block bb;
|
|
bool reliable;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < loop->num_nodes; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
bb = bbs[i];
|
|
|
|
/* If BB is not executed in each iteration of the loop, we cannot
|
|
use the operations in it to infer reliable upper bound on the
|
|
# of iterations of the loop. However, we can use it as a guess.
|
|
Reliable guesses come only from array bounds. */
|
|
reliable = dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, bb);
|
|
|
|
for (bsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (bsi); gsi_next (&bsi))
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (bsi);
|
|
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_array (loop, stmt);
|
|
|
|
if (reliable)
|
|
{
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_signedness (loop, stmt);
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_pointer_arith (loop, stmt);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Compare wide ints, callback for qsort. */
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
wide_int_cmp (const void *p1, const void *p2)
|
|
{
|
|
const widest_int *d1 = (const widest_int *) p1;
|
|
const widest_int *d2 = (const widest_int *) p2;
|
|
return wi::cmpu (*d1, *d2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Return index of BOUND in BOUNDS array sorted in increasing order.
|
|
Lookup by binary search. */
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
bound_index (vec<widest_int> bounds, const widest_int &bound)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int end = bounds.length ();
|
|
unsigned int begin = 0;
|
|
|
|
/* Find a matching index by means of a binary search. */
|
|
while (begin != end)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int middle = (begin + end) / 2;
|
|
widest_int index = bounds[middle];
|
|
|
|
if (index == bound)
|
|
return middle;
|
|
else if (wi::ltu_p (index, bound))
|
|
begin = middle + 1;
|
|
else
|
|
end = middle;
|
|
}
|
|
gcc_unreachable ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* We recorded loop bounds only for statements dominating loop latch (and thus
|
|
executed each loop iteration). If there are any bounds on statements not
|
|
dominating the loop latch we can improve the estimate by walking the loop
|
|
body and seeing if every path from loop header to loop latch contains
|
|
some bounded statement. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *elt;
|
|
auto_vec<widest_int> bounds;
|
|
vec<vec<basic_block> > queues = vNULL;
|
|
vec<basic_block> queue = vNULL;
|
|
ptrdiff_t queue_index;
|
|
ptrdiff_t latch_index = 0;
|
|
|
|
/* Discover what bounds may interest us. */
|
|
for (elt = loop->bounds; elt; elt = elt->next)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int bound = elt->bound;
|
|
|
|
/* Exit terminates loop at given iteration, while non-exits produce undefined
|
|
effect on the next iteration. */
|
|
if (!elt->is_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
bound += 1;
|
|
/* If an overflow occurred, ignore the result. */
|
|
if (bound == 0)
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!loop->any_upper_bound
|
|
|| wi::ltu_p (bound, loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound))
|
|
bounds.safe_push (bound);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Exit early if there is nothing to do. */
|
|
if (!bounds.exists ())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, " Trying to walk loop body to reduce the bound.\n");
|
|
|
|
/* Sort the bounds in decreasing order. */
|
|
bounds.qsort (wide_int_cmp);
|
|
|
|
/* For every basic block record the lowest bound that is guaranteed to
|
|
terminate the loop. */
|
|
|
|
hash_map<basic_block, ptrdiff_t> bb_bounds;
|
|
for (elt = loop->bounds; elt; elt = elt->next)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int bound = elt->bound;
|
|
if (!elt->is_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
bound += 1;
|
|
/* If an overflow occurred, ignore the result. */
|
|
if (bound == 0)
|
|
continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!loop->any_upper_bound
|
|
|| wi::ltu_p (bound, loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound))
|
|
{
|
|
ptrdiff_t index = bound_index (bounds, bound);
|
|
ptrdiff_t *entry = bb_bounds.get (gimple_bb (elt->stmt));
|
|
if (!entry)
|
|
bb_bounds.put (gimple_bb (elt->stmt), index);
|
|
else if ((ptrdiff_t)*entry > index)
|
|
*entry = index;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
hash_map<basic_block, ptrdiff_t> block_priority;
|
|
|
|
/* Perform shortest path discovery loop->header ... loop->latch.
|
|
|
|
The "distance" is given by the smallest loop bound of basic block
|
|
present in the path and we look for path with largest smallest bound
|
|
on it.
|
|
|
|
To avoid the need for fibonacci heap on double ints we simply compress
|
|
double ints into indexes to BOUNDS array and then represent the queue
|
|
as arrays of queues for every index.
|
|
Index of BOUNDS.length() means that the execution of given BB has
|
|
no bounds determined.
|
|
|
|
VISITED is a pointer map translating basic block into smallest index
|
|
it was inserted into the priority queue with. */
|
|
latch_index = -1;
|
|
|
|
/* Start walk in loop header with index set to infinite bound. */
|
|
queue_index = bounds.length ();
|
|
queues.safe_grow_cleared (queue_index + 1);
|
|
queue.safe_push (loop->header);
|
|
queues[queue_index] = queue;
|
|
block_priority.put (loop->header, queue_index);
|
|
|
|
for (; queue_index >= 0; queue_index--)
|
|
{
|
|
if (latch_index < queue_index)
|
|
{
|
|
while (queues[queue_index].length ())
|
|
{
|
|
basic_block bb;
|
|
ptrdiff_t bound_index = queue_index;
|
|
edge e;
|
|
edge_iterator ei;
|
|
|
|
queue = queues[queue_index];
|
|
bb = queue.pop ();
|
|
|
|
/* OK, we later inserted the BB with lower priority, skip it. */
|
|
if (*block_priority.get (bb) > queue_index)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* See if we can improve the bound. */
|
|
ptrdiff_t *entry = bb_bounds.get (bb);
|
|
if (entry && *entry < bound_index)
|
|
bound_index = *entry;
|
|
|
|
/* Insert succesors into the queue, watch for latch edge
|
|
and record greatest index we saw. */
|
|
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
|
|
{
|
|
bool insert = false;
|
|
|
|
if (loop_exit_edge_p (loop, e))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (e == loop_latch_edge (loop)
|
|
&& latch_index < bound_index)
|
|
latch_index = bound_index;
|
|
else if (!(entry = block_priority.get (e->dest)))
|
|
{
|
|
insert = true;
|
|
block_priority.put (e->dest, bound_index);
|
|
}
|
|
else if (*entry < bound_index)
|
|
{
|
|
insert = true;
|
|
*entry = bound_index;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (insert)
|
|
queues[bound_index].safe_push (e->dest);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
queues[queue_index].release ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
gcc_assert (latch_index >= 0);
|
|
if ((unsigned)latch_index < bounds.length ())
|
|
{
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
{
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Found better loop bound ");
|
|
print_decu (bounds[latch_index], dump_file);
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
|
|
}
|
|
record_niter_bound (loop, bounds[latch_index], false, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
queues.release ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* See if every path cross the loop goes through a statement that is known
|
|
to not execute at the last iteration. In that case we can decrese iteration
|
|
count by 1. */
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
maybe_lower_iteration_bound (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
hash_set<gimple *> *not_executed_last_iteration = NULL;
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *elt;
|
|
bool found_exit = false;
|
|
auto_vec<basic_block> queue;
|
|
bitmap visited;
|
|
|
|
/* Collect all statements with interesting (i.e. lower than
|
|
nb_iterations_upper_bound) bound on them.
|
|
|
|
TODO: Due to the way record_estimate choose estimates to store, the bounds
|
|
will be always nb_iterations_upper_bound-1. We can change this to record
|
|
also statements not dominating the loop latch and update the walk bellow
|
|
to the shortest path algorithm. */
|
|
for (elt = loop->bounds; elt; elt = elt->next)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!elt->is_exit
|
|
&& wi::ltu_p (elt->bound, loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound))
|
|
{
|
|
if (!not_executed_last_iteration)
|
|
not_executed_last_iteration = new hash_set<gimple *>;
|
|
not_executed_last_iteration->add (elt->stmt);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (!not_executed_last_iteration)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/* Start DFS walk in the loop header and see if we can reach the
|
|
loop latch or any of the exits (including statements with side
|
|
effects that may terminate the loop otherwise) without visiting
|
|
any of the statements known to have undefined effect on the last
|
|
iteration. */
|
|
queue.safe_push (loop->header);
|
|
visited = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
|
|
bitmap_set_bit (visited, loop->header->index);
|
|
found_exit = false;
|
|
|
|
do
|
|
{
|
|
basic_block bb = queue.pop ();
|
|
gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
|
|
bool stmt_found = false;
|
|
|
|
/* Loop for possible exits and statements bounding the execution. */
|
|
for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
|
|
if (not_executed_last_iteration->contains (stmt))
|
|
{
|
|
stmt_found = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
if (gimple_has_side_effects (stmt))
|
|
{
|
|
found_exit = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if (found_exit)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
/* If no bounding statement is found, continue the walk. */
|
|
if (!stmt_found)
|
|
{
|
|
edge e;
|
|
edge_iterator ei;
|
|
|
|
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
|
|
{
|
|
if (loop_exit_edge_p (loop, e)
|
|
|| e == loop_latch_edge (loop))
|
|
{
|
|
found_exit = true;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
if (bitmap_set_bit (visited, e->dest->index))
|
|
queue.safe_push (e->dest);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
while (queue.length () && !found_exit);
|
|
|
|
/* If every path through the loop reach bounding statement before exit,
|
|
then we know the last iteration of the loop will have undefined effect
|
|
and we can decrease number of iterations. */
|
|
|
|
if (!found_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
|
|
fprintf (dump_file, "Reducing loop iteration estimate by 1; "
|
|
"undefined statement must be executed at the last iteration.\n");
|
|
record_niter_bound (loop, loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound - 1,
|
|
false, true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BITMAP_FREE (visited);
|
|
delete not_executed_last_iteration;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Get expected upper bound for number of loop iterations for
|
|
BUILT_IN_EXPECT_WITH_PROBABILITY for a condition COND. */
|
|
|
|
static tree
|
|
get_upper_bound_based_on_builtin_expr_with_prob (gcond *cond)
|
|
{
|
|
if (cond == NULL)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
tree lhs = gimple_cond_lhs (cond);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
gimple *stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (gimple_cond_lhs (cond));
|
|
gcall *def = dyn_cast<gcall *> (stmt);
|
|
if (def == NULL)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
tree decl = gimple_call_fndecl (def);
|
|
if (!decl
|
|
|| !fndecl_built_in_p (decl, BUILT_IN_EXPECT_WITH_PROBABILITY)
|
|
|| gimple_call_num_args (stmt) != 3)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
tree c = gimple_call_arg (def, 1);
|
|
tree condt = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
|
|
tree res = fold_build2 (gimple_cond_code (cond),
|
|
condt, c,
|
|
gimple_cond_rhs (cond));
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (res) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
tree prob = gimple_call_arg (def, 2);
|
|
tree t = TREE_TYPE (prob);
|
|
tree one
|
|
= build_real_from_int_cst (t,
|
|
integer_one_node);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (res))
|
|
prob = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, t, one, prob);
|
|
tree r = fold_build2 (RDIV_EXPR, t, one, prob);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (r) != REAL_CST)
|
|
return NULL_TREE;
|
|
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT probi
|
|
= real_to_integer (TREE_REAL_CST_PTR (r));
|
|
return build_int_cst (condt, probi);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Records estimates on numbers of iterations of LOOP. If USE_UNDEFINED_P
|
|
is true also use estimates derived from undefined behavior. */
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
vec<edge> exits;
|
|
tree niter, type;
|
|
unsigned i;
|
|
class tree_niter_desc niter_desc;
|
|
edge ex;
|
|
widest_int bound;
|
|
edge likely_exit;
|
|
|
|
/* Give up if we already have tried to compute an estimation. */
|
|
if (loop->estimate_state != EST_NOT_COMPUTED)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
loop->estimate_state = EST_AVAILABLE;
|
|
|
|
/* If we have a measured profile, use it to estimate the number of
|
|
iterations. Normally this is recorded by branch_prob right after
|
|
reading the profile. In case we however found a new loop, record the
|
|
information here.
|
|
|
|
Explicitly check for profile status so we do not report
|
|
wrong prediction hitrates for guessed loop iterations heuristics.
|
|
Do not recompute already recorded bounds - we ought to be better on
|
|
updating iteration bounds than updating profile in general and thus
|
|
recomputing iteration bounds later in the compilation process will just
|
|
introduce random roundoff errors. */
|
|
if (!loop->any_estimate
|
|
&& loop->header->count.reliable_p ())
|
|
{
|
|
gcov_type nit = expected_loop_iterations_unbounded (loop);
|
|
bound = gcov_type_to_wide_int (nit);
|
|
record_niter_bound (loop, bound, true, false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Ensure that loop->nb_iterations is computed if possible. If it turns out
|
|
to be constant, we avoid undefined behavior implied bounds and instead
|
|
diagnose those loops with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations. */
|
|
number_of_latch_executions (loop);
|
|
|
|
basic_block *body = get_loop_body (loop);
|
|
exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop, body);
|
|
likely_exit = single_likely_exit (loop, exits);
|
|
FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (exits, i, ex)
|
|
{
|
|
if (ex == likely_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple *stmt = last_stmt (ex->src);
|
|
if (stmt != NULL)
|
|
{
|
|
gcond *cond = dyn_cast<gcond *> (stmt);
|
|
tree niter_bound
|
|
= get_upper_bound_based_on_builtin_expr_with_prob (cond);
|
|
if (niter_bound != NULL_TREE)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int max = derive_constant_upper_bound (niter_bound);
|
|
record_estimate (loop, niter_bound, max, cond,
|
|
true, true, false);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (!number_of_iterations_exit (loop, ex, &niter_desc,
|
|
false, false, body))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
niter = niter_desc.niter;
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (niter);
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (niter_desc.may_be_zero) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
niter = build3 (COND_EXPR, type, niter_desc.may_be_zero,
|
|
build_int_cst (type, 0),
|
|
niter);
|
|
record_estimate (loop, niter, niter_desc.max,
|
|
last_stmt (ex->src),
|
|
true, ex == likely_exit, true);
|
|
record_control_iv (loop, &niter_desc);
|
|
}
|
|
exits.release ();
|
|
|
|
if (flag_aggressive_loop_optimizations)
|
|
infer_loop_bounds_from_undefined (loop, body);
|
|
|
|
discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (loop);
|
|
|
|
maybe_lower_iteration_bound (loop);
|
|
|
|
/* If we know the exact number of iterations of this loop, try to
|
|
not break code with undefined behavior by not recording smaller
|
|
maximum number of iterations. */
|
|
if (loop->nb_iterations
|
|
&& TREE_CODE (loop->nb_iterations) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
{
|
|
loop->any_upper_bound = true;
|
|
loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound = wi::to_widest (loop->nb_iterations);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to the estimated number of executions of the latch of the
|
|
LOOP. If CONSERVATIVE is true, we must be sure that NIT is at least as
|
|
large as the number of iterations. If we have no reliable estimate,
|
|
the function returns false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
estimated_loop_iterations (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
/* When SCEV information is available, try to update loop iterations
|
|
estimate. Otherwise just return whatever we recorded earlier. */
|
|
if (scev_initialized_p ())
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (loop);
|
|
|
|
return (get_estimated_loop_iterations (loop, nit));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Similar to estimated_loop_iterations, but returns the estimate only
|
|
if it fits to HOST_WIDE_INT. If this is not the case, or the estimate
|
|
on the number of iterations of LOOP could not be derived, returns -1. */
|
|
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT
|
|
estimated_loop_iterations_int (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit;
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT hwi_nit;
|
|
|
|
if (!estimated_loop_iterations (loop, &nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
if (!wi::fits_shwi_p (nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
hwi_nit = nit.to_shwi ();
|
|
|
|
return hwi_nit < 0 ? -1 : hwi_nit;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to an upper bound for the maximum number of executions of the
|
|
latch of the LOOP. If we have no reliable estimate, the function returns
|
|
false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
max_loop_iterations (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
/* When SCEV information is available, try to update loop iterations
|
|
estimate. Otherwise just return whatever we recorded earlier. */
|
|
if (scev_initialized_p ())
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (loop);
|
|
|
|
return get_max_loop_iterations (loop, nit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Similar to max_loop_iterations, but returns the estimate only
|
|
if it fits to HOST_WIDE_INT. If this is not the case, or the estimate
|
|
on the number of iterations of LOOP could not be derived, returns -1. */
|
|
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT
|
|
max_loop_iterations_int (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit;
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT hwi_nit;
|
|
|
|
if (!max_loop_iterations (loop, &nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
if (!wi::fits_shwi_p (nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
hwi_nit = nit.to_shwi ();
|
|
|
|
return hwi_nit < 0 ? -1 : hwi_nit;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to an likely upper bound for the maximum number of executions of the
|
|
latch of the LOOP. If we have no reliable estimate, the function returns
|
|
false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
likely_max_loop_iterations (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
/* When SCEV information is available, try to update loop iterations
|
|
estimate. Otherwise just return whatever we recorded earlier. */
|
|
if (scev_initialized_p ())
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (loop);
|
|
|
|
return get_likely_max_loop_iterations (loop, nit);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Similar to max_loop_iterations, but returns the estimate only
|
|
if it fits to HOST_WIDE_INT. If this is not the case, or the estimate
|
|
on the number of iterations of LOOP could not be derived, returns -1. */
|
|
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT
|
|
likely_max_loop_iterations_int (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit;
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT hwi_nit;
|
|
|
|
if (!likely_max_loop_iterations (loop, &nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
if (!wi::fits_shwi_p (nit))
|
|
return -1;
|
|
hwi_nit = nit.to_shwi ();
|
|
|
|
return hwi_nit < 0 ? -1 : hwi_nit;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns an estimate for the number of executions of statements
|
|
in the LOOP. For statements before the loop exit, this exceeds
|
|
the number of execution of the latch by one. */
|
|
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT
|
|
estimated_stmt_executions_int (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT nit = estimated_loop_iterations_int (loop);
|
|
HOST_WIDE_INT snit;
|
|
|
|
if (nit == -1)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
|
|
snit = (HOST_WIDE_INT) ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) nit + 1);
|
|
|
|
/* If the computation overflows, return -1. */
|
|
return snit < 0 ? -1 : snit;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to the maximum number of executions of the latch of the
|
|
LOOP, plus one. If we have no reliable estimate, the function returns
|
|
false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
max_stmt_executions (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit_minus_one;
|
|
|
|
if (!max_loop_iterations (loop, nit))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
nit_minus_one = *nit;
|
|
|
|
*nit += 1;
|
|
|
|
return wi::gtu_p (*nit, nit_minus_one);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to the estimated maximum number of executions of the latch of the
|
|
LOOP, plus one. If we have no likely estimate, the function returns
|
|
false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
likely_max_stmt_executions (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit_minus_one;
|
|
|
|
if (!likely_max_loop_iterations (loop, nit))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
nit_minus_one = *nit;
|
|
|
|
*nit += 1;
|
|
|
|
return wi::gtu_p (*nit, nit_minus_one);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Sets NIT to the estimated number of executions of the latch of the
|
|
LOOP, plus one. If we have no reliable estimate, the function returns
|
|
false, otherwise returns true. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
estimated_stmt_executions (class loop *loop, widest_int *nit)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int nit_minus_one;
|
|
|
|
if (!estimated_loop_iterations (loop, nit))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
nit_minus_one = *nit;
|
|
|
|
*nit += 1;
|
|
|
|
return wi::gtu_p (*nit, nit_minus_one);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Records estimates on numbers of iterations of loops. */
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (function *fn)
|
|
{
|
|
class loop *loop;
|
|
|
|
/* We don't want to issue signed overflow warnings while getting
|
|
loop iteration estimates. */
|
|
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN (fn, loop, 0)
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (loop);
|
|
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns true if statement S1 dominates statement S2. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
stmt_dominates_stmt_p (gimple *s1, gimple *s2)
|
|
{
|
|
basic_block bb1 = gimple_bb (s1), bb2 = gimple_bb (s2);
|
|
|
|
if (!bb1
|
|
|| s1 == s2)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (bb1 == bb2)
|
|
{
|
|
gimple_stmt_iterator bsi;
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_code (s2) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (gimple_code (s1) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
for (bsi = gsi_start_bb (bb1); gsi_stmt (bsi) != s2; gsi_next (&bsi))
|
|
if (gsi_stmt (bsi) == s1)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb2, bb1);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns true when we can prove that the number of executions of
|
|
STMT in the loop is at most NITER, according to the bound on
|
|
the number of executions of the statement NITER_BOUND->stmt recorded in
|
|
NITER_BOUND and fact that NITER_BOUND->stmt dominate STMT.
|
|
|
|
??? This code can become quite a CPU hog - we can have many bounds,
|
|
and large basic block forcing stmt_dominates_stmt_p to be queried
|
|
many times on a large basic blocks, so the whole thing is O(n^2)
|
|
for scev_probably_wraps_p invocation (that can be done n times).
|
|
|
|
It would make more sense (and give better answers) to remember BB
|
|
bounds computed by discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
n_of_executions_at_most (gimple *stmt,
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *niter_bound,
|
|
tree niter)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int bound = niter_bound->bound;
|
|
tree nit_type = TREE_TYPE (niter), e;
|
|
enum tree_code cmp;
|
|
|
|
gcc_assert (TYPE_UNSIGNED (nit_type));
|
|
|
|
/* If the bound does not even fit into NIT_TYPE, it cannot tell us that
|
|
the number of iterations is small. */
|
|
if (!wi::fits_to_tree_p (bound, nit_type))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* We know that NITER_BOUND->stmt is executed at most NITER_BOUND->bound + 1
|
|
times. This means that:
|
|
|
|
-- if NITER_BOUND->is_exit is true, then everything after
|
|
it at most NITER_BOUND->bound times.
|
|
|
|
-- If NITER_BOUND->is_exit is false, then if we can prove that when STMT
|
|
is executed, then NITER_BOUND->stmt is executed as well in the same
|
|
iteration then STMT is executed at most NITER_BOUND->bound + 1 times.
|
|
|
|
If we can determine that NITER_BOUND->stmt is always executed
|
|
after STMT, then STMT is executed at most NITER_BOUND->bound + 2 times.
|
|
We conclude that if both statements belong to the same
|
|
basic block and STMT is before NITER_BOUND->stmt and there are no
|
|
statements with side effects in between. */
|
|
|
|
if (niter_bound->is_exit)
|
|
{
|
|
if (stmt == niter_bound->stmt
|
|
|| !stmt_dominates_stmt_p (niter_bound->stmt, stmt))
|
|
return false;
|
|
cmp = GE_EXPR;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
if (!stmt_dominates_stmt_p (niter_bound->stmt, stmt))
|
|
{
|
|
gimple_stmt_iterator bsi;
|
|
if (gimple_bb (stmt) != gimple_bb (niter_bound->stmt)
|
|
|| gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI
|
|
|| gimple_code (niter_bound->stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* By stmt_dominates_stmt_p we already know that STMT appears
|
|
before NITER_BOUND->STMT. Still need to test that the loop
|
|
cannot be terinated by a side effect in between. */
|
|
for (bsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt); gsi_stmt (bsi) != niter_bound->stmt;
|
|
gsi_next (&bsi))
|
|
if (gimple_has_side_effects (gsi_stmt (bsi)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
bound += 1;
|
|
if (bound == 0
|
|
|| !wi::fits_to_tree_p (bound, nit_type))
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
cmp = GT_EXPR;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
e = fold_binary (cmp, boolean_type_node,
|
|
niter, wide_int_to_tree (nit_type, bound));
|
|
return e && integer_nonzerop (e);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Returns true if the arithmetics in TYPE can be assumed not to wrap. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
nowrap_type_p (tree type)
|
|
{
|
|
if (ANY_INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
|
|
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (type))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Return true if we can prove LOOP is exited before evolution of induction
|
|
variable {BASE, STEP} overflows with respect to its type bound. */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
loop_exits_before_overflow (tree base, tree step,
|
|
gimple *at_stmt, class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
widest_int niter;
|
|
struct control_iv *civ;
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *bound;
|
|
tree e, delta, step_abs, unsigned_base;
|
|
tree type = TREE_TYPE (step);
|
|
tree unsigned_type, valid_niter;
|
|
|
|
/* Don't issue signed overflow warnings. */
|
|
fold_defer_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
/* Compute the number of iterations before we reach the bound of the
|
|
type, and verify that the loop is exited before this occurs. */
|
|
unsigned_type = unsigned_type_for (type);
|
|
unsigned_base = fold_convert (unsigned_type, base);
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step))
|
|
{
|
|
tree extreme = fold_convert (unsigned_type,
|
|
lower_bound_in_type (type, type));
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type, unsigned_base, extreme);
|
|
step_abs = fold_build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, unsigned_type,
|
|
fold_convert (unsigned_type, step));
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
tree extreme = fold_convert (unsigned_type,
|
|
upper_bound_in_type (type, type));
|
|
delta = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, unsigned_type, extreme, unsigned_base);
|
|
step_abs = fold_convert (unsigned_type, step);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
valid_niter = fold_build2 (FLOOR_DIV_EXPR, unsigned_type, delta, step_abs);
|
|
|
|
estimate_numbers_of_iterations (loop);
|
|
|
|
if (max_loop_iterations (loop, &niter)
|
|
&& wi::fits_to_tree_p (niter, TREE_TYPE (valid_niter))
|
|
&& (e = fold_binary (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, valid_niter,
|
|
wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (valid_niter),
|
|
niter))) != NULL
|
|
&& integer_nonzerop (e))
|
|
{
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
if (at_stmt)
|
|
for (bound = loop->bounds; bound; bound = bound->next)
|
|
{
|
|
if (n_of_executions_at_most (at_stmt, bound, valid_niter))
|
|
{
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
fold_undefer_and_ignore_overflow_warnings ();
|
|
|
|
/* Try to prove loop is exited before {base, step} overflows with the
|
|
help of analyzed loop control IV. This is done only for IVs with
|
|
constant step because otherwise we don't have the information. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (step) == INTEGER_CST)
|
|
{
|
|
for (civ = loop->control_ivs; civ; civ = civ->next)
|
|
{
|
|
enum tree_code code;
|
|
tree civ_type = TREE_TYPE (civ->step);
|
|
|
|
/* Have to consider type difference because operand_equal_p ignores
|
|
that for constants. */
|
|
if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type) != TYPE_UNSIGNED (civ_type)
|
|
|| element_precision (type) != element_precision (civ_type))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Only consider control IV with same step. */
|
|
if (!operand_equal_p (step, civ->step, 0))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Done proving if this is a no-overflow control IV. */
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (base, civ->base, 0))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* Control IV is recorded after expanding simple operations,
|
|
Here we expand base and compare it too. */
|
|
tree expanded_base = expand_simple_operations (base);
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (expanded_base, civ->base, 0))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* If this is a before stepping control IV, in other words, we have
|
|
|
|
{civ_base, step} = {base + step, step}
|
|
|
|
Because civ {base + step, step} doesn't overflow during loop
|
|
iterations, {base, step} will not overflow if we can prove the
|
|
operation "base + step" does not overflow. Specifically, we try
|
|
to prove below conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
base <= UPPER_BOUND (type) - step ;;step > 0
|
|
base >= LOWER_BOUND (type) - step ;;step < 0
|
|
|
|
by proving the reverse conditions are false using loop's initial
|
|
condition. */
|
|
if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (base)))
|
|
code = POINTER_PLUS_EXPR;
|
|
else
|
|
code = PLUS_EXPR;
|
|
|
|
tree stepped = fold_build2 (code, TREE_TYPE (base), base, step);
|
|
tree expanded_stepped = fold_build2 (code, TREE_TYPE (base),
|
|
expanded_base, step);
|
|
if (operand_equal_p (stepped, civ->base, 0)
|
|
|| operand_equal_p (expanded_stepped, civ->base, 0))
|
|
{
|
|
tree extreme;
|
|
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step))
|
|
{
|
|
code = LT_EXPR;
|
|
extreme = lower_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
code = GT_EXPR;
|
|
extreme = upper_bound_in_type (type, type);
|
|
}
|
|
extreme = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, type, extreme, step);
|
|
e = fold_build2 (code, boolean_type_node, base, extreme);
|
|
e = simplify_using_initial_conditions (loop, e);
|
|
if (integer_zerop (e))
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* VAR is scev variable whose evolution part is constant STEP, this function
|
|
proves that VAR can't overflow by using value range info. If VAR's value
|
|
range is [MIN, MAX], it can be proven by:
|
|
MAX + step doesn't overflow ; if step > 0
|
|
or
|
|
MIN + step doesn't underflow ; if step < 0.
|
|
|
|
We can only do this if var is computed in every loop iteration, i.e, var's
|
|
definition has to dominate loop latch. Consider below example:
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned int i;
|
|
|
|
<bb 3>:
|
|
|
|
<bb 4>:
|
|
# RANGE [0, 4294967294] NONZERO 65535
|
|
# i_21 = PHI <0(3), i_18(9)>
|
|
if (i_21 != 0)
|
|
goto <bb 6>;
|
|
else
|
|
goto <bb 8>;
|
|
|
|
<bb 6>:
|
|
# RANGE [0, 65533] NONZERO 65535
|
|
_6 = i_21 + 4294967295;
|
|
# RANGE [0, 65533] NONZERO 65535
|
|
_7 = (long unsigned int) _6;
|
|
# RANGE [0, 524264] NONZERO 524280
|
|
_8 = _7 * 8;
|
|
# PT = nonlocal escaped
|
|
_9 = a_14 + _8;
|
|
*_9 = 0;
|
|
|
|
<bb 8>:
|
|
# RANGE [1, 65535] NONZERO 65535
|
|
i_18 = i_21 + 1;
|
|
if (i_18 >= 65535)
|
|
goto <bb 10>;
|
|
else
|
|
goto <bb 9>;
|
|
|
|
<bb 9>:
|
|
goto <bb 4>;
|
|
|
|
<bb 10>:
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
VAR _6 doesn't overflow only with pre-condition (i_21 != 0), here we
|
|
can't use _6 to prove no-overlfow for _7. In fact, var _7 takes value
|
|
sequence (4294967295, 0, 1, ..., 65533) in loop life time, rather than
|
|
(4294967295, 4294967296, ...). */
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
scev_var_range_cant_overflow (tree var, tree step, class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
tree type;
|
|
wide_int minv, maxv, diff, step_wi;
|
|
enum value_range_kind rtype;
|
|
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (var)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* Check if VAR evaluates in every loop iteration. It's not the case
|
|
if VAR is default definition or does not dominate loop's latch. */
|
|
basic_block def_bb = gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (var));
|
|
if (!def_bb || !dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, loop->latch, def_bb))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
rtype = get_range_info (var, &minv, &maxv);
|
|
if (rtype != VR_RANGE)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* VAR is a scev whose evolution part is STEP and value range info
|
|
is [MIN, MAX], we can prove its no-overflowness by conditions:
|
|
|
|
type_MAX - MAX >= step ; if step > 0
|
|
MIN - type_MIN >= |step| ; if step < 0.
|
|
|
|
Or VAR must take value outside of value range, which is not true. */
|
|
step_wi = wi::to_wide (step);
|
|
type = TREE_TYPE (var);
|
|
if (tree_int_cst_sign_bit (step))
|
|
{
|
|
diff = minv - wi::to_wide (lower_bound_in_type (type, type));
|
|
step_wi = - step_wi;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
diff = wi::to_wide (upper_bound_in_type (type, type)) - maxv;
|
|
|
|
return (wi::geu_p (diff, step_wi));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Return false only when the induction variable BASE + STEP * I is
|
|
known to not overflow: i.e. when the number of iterations is small
|
|
enough with respect to the step and initial condition in order to
|
|
keep the evolution confined in TYPEs bounds. Return true when the
|
|
iv is known to overflow or when the property is not computable.
|
|
|
|
USE_OVERFLOW_SEMANTICS is true if this function should assume that
|
|
the rules for overflow of the given language apply (e.g., that signed
|
|
arithmetics in C does not overflow).
|
|
|
|
If VAR is a ssa variable, this function also returns false if VAR can
|
|
be proven not overflow with value range info. */
|
|
|
|
bool
|
|
scev_probably_wraps_p (tree var, tree base, tree step,
|
|
gimple *at_stmt, class loop *loop,
|
|
bool use_overflow_semantics)
|
|
{
|
|
/* FIXME: We really need something like
|
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02025.html.
|
|
|
|
We used to test for the following situation that frequently appears
|
|
during address arithmetics:
|
|
|
|
D.1621_13 = (long unsigned intD.4) D.1620_12;
|
|
D.1622_14 = D.1621_13 * 8;
|
|
D.1623_15 = (doubleD.29 *) D.1622_14;
|
|
|
|
And derived that the sequence corresponding to D_14
|
|
can be proved to not wrap because it is used for computing a
|
|
memory access; however, this is not really the case -- for example,
|
|
if D_12 = (unsigned char) [254,+,1], then D_14 has values
|
|
2032, 2040, 0, 8, ..., but the code is still legal. */
|
|
|
|
if (chrec_contains_undetermined (base)
|
|
|| chrec_contains_undetermined (step))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
if (integer_zerop (step))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* If we can use the fact that signed and pointer arithmetics does not
|
|
wrap, we are done. */
|
|
if (use_overflow_semantics && nowrap_type_p (TREE_TYPE (base)))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* To be able to use estimates on number of iterations of the loop,
|
|
we must have an upper bound on the absolute value of the step. */
|
|
if (TREE_CODE (step) != INTEGER_CST)
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
/* Check if var can be proven not overflow with value range info. */
|
|
if (var && TREE_CODE (var) == SSA_NAME
|
|
&& scev_var_range_cant_overflow (var, step, loop))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (loop_exits_before_overflow (base, step, at_stmt, loop))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/* At this point we still don't have a proof that the iv does not
|
|
overflow: give up. */
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Frees the information on upper bounds on numbers of iterations of LOOP. */
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates (class loop *loop)
|
|
{
|
|
struct control_iv *civ;
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *bound;
|
|
|
|
loop->nb_iterations = NULL;
|
|
loop->estimate_state = EST_NOT_COMPUTED;
|
|
for (bound = loop->bounds; bound;)
|
|
{
|
|
class nb_iter_bound *next = bound->next;
|
|
ggc_free (bound);
|
|
bound = next;
|
|
}
|
|
loop->bounds = NULL;
|
|
|
|
for (civ = loop->control_ivs; civ;)
|
|
{
|
|
struct control_iv *next = civ->next;
|
|
ggc_free (civ);
|
|
civ = next;
|
|
}
|
|
loop->control_ivs = NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Frees the information on upper bounds on numbers of iterations of loops. */
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates (function *fn)
|
|
{
|
|
class loop *loop;
|
|
|
|
FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN (fn, loop, 0)
|
|
free_numbers_of_iterations_estimates (loop);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Substitute value VAL for ssa name NAME inside expressions held
|
|
at LOOP. */
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
substitute_in_loop_info (class loop *loop, tree name, tree val)
|
|
{
|
|
loop->nb_iterations = simplify_replace_tree (loop->nb_iterations, name, val);
|
|
}
|