As reported, the alloc-9.c test and alloc-{1,2,3}.F* and alloc-11.f90
tests fail on powerpc64-linux with -m32.
The reason why it fails just there is that malloc doesn't guarantee there
128-bit alignment (historically glibc guaranteed 2 * sizeof (void *)
alignment from malloc).
There are two separate issues.
One is a thinko on my side.
In this part of alloc-9.c test (copied to alloc-11.f90), we have
2 allocators, a with pool size 1024B and alignment 16B and default fallback
and a2 with pool size 512B and alignment 32B and a as fallback allocator.
We start at no allocations in both at line 194 and do:
p = (int *) omp_alloc (sizeof (int), a2);
// This succeeds in a2 and needs 4+overhead bytes (which includes the 32B alignment)
p = (int *) omp_realloc (p, 420, a, a2);
// This allocates 420 bytes+overhead in a, with 16B alignment and deallocates the above
q = (int *) omp_alloc (sizeof (int), a);
// This allocates 4+overhead bytes in a, with 16B alignment
q = (int *) omp_realloc (q, 420, a2, a);
// This allocates 420+overhead in a2 with 32B alignment
q = (int *) omp_realloc (q, 768, a2, a2);
// This attempts to reallocate, but as there are elevated alignment
// requirements doesn't try to just realloc (even if it wanted to try that
// a2 is almost full, with 512-420-overhead bytes left in it), so it
// tries to alloc in a2, but there is no space left in the pool, falls
// back to a, which already has 420+overhead bytes allocated in it and
// 1024-420-overhead bytes left and so fails too and fails to default
// non-pool allocator that allocates it, but doesn't guarantee alignment
// higher than malloc guarantees.
// But, the test expected 16B alignment.
So, I've slightly lowered the allocation sizes in that part of the test
420->320 and 768 -> 568, so that the last test still fails to allocate
in a2 (568 > 512-320-overhead) but succeeds in a as fallback, which was
the intent of the test.
Another thing is that alloc-1.F90 seems to be transcription of
libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-1.c into Fortran, but alloc-1.c had:
q = (int *) omp_alloc (768, a2);
if ((((uintptr_t) q) % 16) != 0)
abort ();
q[0] = 7;
q[767 / sizeof (int)] = 8;
r = (int *) omp_alloc (512, a2);
if ((((uintptr_t) r) % __alignof (int)) != 0)
abort ();
there but Fortran has:
cq = omp_alloc (768_c_size_t, a2)
if (mod (transfer (cq, intptr), 16_c_intptr_t) /= 0) stop 12
call c_f_pointer (cq, q, [768 / c_sizeof (i)])
q(1) = 7
q(768 / c_sizeof (i)) = 8
cr = omp_alloc (512_c_size_t, a2)
if (mod (transfer (cr, intptr), 16_c_intptr_t) /= 0) stop 13
I'm changing the latter to 4_c_intptr_t because other spots in the
testcase do that, Fortran sadly doesn't have c_alignof, but strictly
speaking it isn't correct, __alignof (int) could be on some architectures
smaller than 4.
So probably alloc-1.F90 etc. should also have
! { dg-additional-sources alloc-7.c }
! { dg-prune-output "command-line option '-fintrinsic-modules-path=.*' is valid for Fortran but not for C" }
and use get__alignof_int.
2021-10-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR libgomp/102628
PR libgomp/102668
* testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-9.c (main): Decrease
allocation sizes from 420 to 320 and from 768 to 568.
* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/alloc-11.f90: Likewise.
* testsuite/libgomp.fortran/alloc-1.F90: Change expected alignment
for cr from 16 to 4.
This directory contains the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
The GNU Compiler Collection is free software. See the files whose
names start with COPYING for copying permission. The manuals, and
some of the runtime libraries, are under different terms; see the
individual source files for details.
The directory INSTALL contains copies of the installation information
as HTML and plain text. The source of this information is
gcc/doc/install.texi. The installation information includes details
of what is included in the GCC sources and what files GCC installs.
See the file gcc/doc/gcc.texi (together with other files that it
includes) for usage and porting information. An online readable
version of the manual is in the files gcc/doc/gcc.info*.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for how to report bugs usefully.
Copyright years on GCC source files may be listed using range
notation, e.g., 1987-2012, indicating that every year in the range,
inclusive, is a copyrightable year that could otherwise be listed
individually.
342aedf0e5