gcc/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/howto.html
Jonathan Wakely dced0d12fb howto.html: Update URL for SGI STL docs.
2003-07-16  Jonathan Wakely  <redi@gcc.gnu.org>

	* docs/html/ext/howto.html: Update URL for SGI STL docs.
	* docs/html/faq/index.html: Same.
	* docs/html/faq/index.txt: Regenerate.

From-SVN: r69463
2003-07-16 18:06:36 +01:00

668 lines
28 KiB
HTML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<meta name="AUTHOR" content="pme@gcc.gnu.org (Phil Edwards)" />
<meta name="KEYWORDS" content="HOWTO, libstdc++, GCC, g++, libg++, STL" />
<meta name="DESCRIPTION" content="Notes for the libstdc++ extensions." />
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="vi and eight fingers" />
<title>libstdc++-v3 HOWTO: Extensions</title>
<link rel="StyleSheet" href="../lib3styles.css" />
</head>
<body>
<h1 class="centered"><a name="top">Extensions</a></h1>
<p>Here we will make an attempt at describing the non-Standard extensions to
the library. Some of these are from SGI's STL, some of these are GNU's,
and some just seemed to appear on the doorstep.
</p>
<p><strong>Before you leap in and use these</strong>, be aware of two things:
</p>
<ol>
<li>Non-Standard means exactly that. The behavior, and the very
existence, of these extensions may change with little or no
warning. (Ideally, the really good ones will appear in the next
revision of C++.) Also, other platforms, other compilers, other
versions of g++ or libstdc++-v3 may not recognize these names, or
treat them differently, or... </li>
<li>You should know how to <a href="../faq/index.html#5_4">access
these headers properly</a>. </li>
</ol>
<!-- ####################################################### -->
<hr />
<h1>Contents</h1>
<ul>
<li><a href="#1">Ropes and trees and hashes, oh my!</a></li>
<li><a href="#2">Added members and types</a></li>
<li><a href="#3">Allocators (versions 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3)</a></li>
<li><a href="#6">Allocators (version 3.4)</a></li>
<li><a href="#4">Compile-time checks</a></li>
<li><a href="#5">LWG Issues</a></li>
<li><a href="../18_support/howto.html#5">Demangling</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<!-- ####################################################### -->
<h2><a name="1">Ropes and trees and hashes, oh my!</a></h2>
<p>The SGI headers</p>
<pre>
&lt;bvector&gt;
&lt;hash_map&gt;
&lt;hash_set&gt;
&lt;rope&gt;
&lt;slist&gt;
&lt;tree&gt;
</pre>
<p>are all here; <code>&lt;bvector&gt;</code> exposes the old bit_vector
class that was used before specialization of vector&lt;bool&gt; was
available (it's actually a typedef for the specialization now).
<code>&lt;hash_map&gt;</code> and <code>&lt;hash_set&gt;</code>
are discussed further below. <code>&lt;rope&gt;</code> is the SGI
specialization for large strings (&quot;rope,&quot; &quot;large
strings,&quot; get it? love those SGI folks).
<code>&lt;slist&gt;</code> is a singly-linked list, for when the
doubly-linked <code>list&lt;&gt;</code> is too much space overhead, and
<code>&lt;tree&gt;</code> exposes the red-black tree classes used in the
implementation of the standard maps and sets.
</p>
<p>Okay, about those hashing classes... I'm going to foist most of the
work off onto SGI's own site.
</p>
<p>Each of the associative containers map, multimap, set, and multiset
have a counterpart which uses a
<a href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/HashFunction.html">hashing
function</a> to do the arranging, instead of a strict weak ordering
function. The classes take as one of their template parameters a
function object that will return the hash value; by default, an
instantiation of
<a href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/hash.html">hash</a>.
You should specialize this functor for your class, or define your own,
before trying to use one of the hashing classes.
</p>
<p>The hashing classes support all the usual associative container
functions, as well as some extra constructors specifying the number
of buckets, etc.
</p>
<p>Why would you want to use a hashing class instead of the
&quot;normal&quot; implementations? Matt Austern writes:
</p>
<blockquote><em>[W]ith a well chosen hash function, hash tables
generally provide much better average-case performance than binary
search trees, and much worse worst-case performance. So if your
implementation has hash_map, if you don't mind using nonstandard
components, and if you aren't scared about the possibility of
pathological cases, you'll probably get better performance from
hash_map.</em></blockquote>
<p>(Side note: for those of you wondering, <strong>&quot;Why wasn't a hash
table included in the Standard in the first #!$@ place?&quot;</strong>
I'll give a quick answer: it was proposed, but too late and in too
unorganized a fashion. Some sort of hashing will undoubtedly be
included in a future Standard.)
</p>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<hr />
<h2><a name="2">Added members and types</a></h2>
<p>Some of the classes in the Standard Library have additional
publicly-available members, and some classes are themselves not in
the standard. Of those, some are intended purely for the implementors,
for example, additional typedefs. Those won't be described here
(or anywhere else).
</p>
<ul>
<li>The extensions added by SGI are so numerous that they have
<a href="sgiexts.html">their own page</a>. Since the SGI STL is no
longer actively maintained, we will try and keep this code working
ourselves.</li>
<li>Extensions allowing <code>filebuf</code>s to be constructed from
stdio types are described in the
<a href="../27_io/howto.html#11">chapter 27 notes</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<hr />
<h2><a name="3">Allocators (versions 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3)</a></h2>
<p>Thread-safety, space efficiency, high speed, portability... this is a
mess. Where to begin?
</p>
<h3>The Rules</h3>
<p>The C++ standard only gives a few directives in this area:
</p>
<ul>
<li>When you add elements to a container, and the container must allocate
more memory to hold them, the container makes the request via its
<code>Allocator</code> template parameter. This includes adding
char's to the string class, which acts as a regular STL container
in this respect.
</li>
<li>The default <code>Allocator</code> of every container-of-T is
<code>std::allocator&lt;T&gt;</code>.
</li>
<li>The interface of the <code>allocator&lt;T&gt;</code> class is
extremely simple. It has about 20 public declarations (nested
typedefs, member functions, etc), but the two which concern us most
are:
<pre>
T* allocate (size_type n, const void* hint = 0);
void deallocate (T* p, size_type n);</pre>
(This is a simplicifcation; the real signatures use nested typedefs.)
The <code>&quot;n&quot;</code> arguments in both those functions is a
<em>count</em> of the number of T's to allocate space for,
<em>not their total size</em>.
</li>
<li>&quot;The storage is obtained by calling
<code>::operator new(size_t)</code>, but it is unspecified when or
how often this function is called. The use of <code>hint</code>
is unspecified, but intended as an aid to locality if an
implementation so desires.&quot; [20.4.1.1]/6
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Problems and Possibilities</h3>
<p>The easiest way of fulfilling the requirements is to call operator new
each time a container needs memory, and to call operator delete each
time the container releases memory. <strong>BUT</strong>
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-05/msg00105.html">this
method is horribly slow</a>.
</p>
<p>Or we can keep old memory around, and reuse it in a pool to save time.
The old libstdc++-v2 used a memory pool, and so do we. As of 3.0,
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-05/msg00136.html">it's
on by default</a>. The pool is shared among all the containers in the
program: when your program's std::vector&lt;int&gt; gets cut in half
and frees a bunch of its storage, that memory can be reused by the
private std::list&lt;WonkyWidget&gt; brought in from a KDE library
that you linked against. And we don't have to call operators new and
delete to pass the memory on, either, which is a speed bonus.
<strong>BUT</strong>...
</p>
<p>What about threads? No problem: in a threadsafe environment, the
memory pool is manipulated atomically, so you can grow a container in
one thread and shrink it in another, etc. <strong>BUT</strong> what
if threads in libstdc++-v3 aren't set up properly?
<a href="../faq/index.html#5_6">That's been answered already</a>.
</p>
<p><strong>BUT</strong> what if you want to use your own allocator? What
if you plan on using a runtime-loadable version of malloc() which uses
shared telepathic anonymous mmap'd sections serializable over a
network, so that memory requests <em>should</em> go through malloc?
And what if you need to debug it?
</p>
<p>Well then:
</p>
<h3>Available allocators in namespace std</h3>
<p>First I'll describe the situation as it exists for the code which
was released in GCC 3.1 and 3.2. Then I'll describe the differences
for 3.0. The allocator classes also have source documentation,
which is described <a href="../documentation.html#4">here</a> (you
will need to retrieve the maintainer-level docs, as almost none of
these entities are in the ISO standard).
</p>
<p>As a general rule of thumb, users are not allowed to use names which
begin with an underscore. This means that to be portable between
compilers, none of the following may be used in your program directly.
(If you decide to be unportable, then you're free do do what you want,
but it's not our fault if stuff breaks.) They are presented here for
information for maintainers and contributors in addition to users.
</p>
<p>These classes are always available:
</p>
<ul>
<li><code>__new_alloc</code> simply wraps <code>::operator new</code>
and <code>::operator delete</code>.
</li>
<li><code>__malloc_alloc_template&lt;int inst&gt;</code> simply wraps
<code>malloc</code> and <code>free</code>. There is also a hook
for an out-of-memory handler (for new/delete this is taken care of
elsewhere). The <code>inst</code> parameter is described below.
This class was called <code>malloc_alloc</code> in earlier versions.
</li>
<li><code>allocator&lt;T&gt;</code> has already been described; it is
The Standard Allocator for instances of T. It uses the internal
<code>__alloc</code> typedef (see below) to satisy its requests.
</li>
<li><code>__simple_alloc&lt;T,A&gt;</code> is a wrapper around another
allocator, A, which itself is an allocator for instances of T.
This is primarily used in an internal &quot;allocator traits&quot;
class which helps encapsulate the different styles of allocators.
</li>
<li><code>__debug_alloc&lt;A&gt;</code> is also a wrapper around an
arbitrary allocator A. It passes on slightly increased size
requests to A, and uses the extra memory to store size information.
When a pointer is passed to <code>deallocate()</code>, the stored
size is checked, and assert() is used to guarantee they match.
</li>
<li><code>__allocator&lt;T,A&gt;</code> is an adaptor. Many of these
allocator classes have a consistent yet non-standard interface.
Such classes can be changed to a conforming interface with this
wrapper: <code>__allocator&lt;T, __alloc&gt;</code> is thus the
same as <code>allocator&lt;T&gt;</code>.
</li>
</ul>
<p>Normally,
<code> __default_alloc_template&lt;bool thr, int inst&gt; </code>
is also available. This is the high-speed pool, called the default
node allocator. The reusable memory is shared among identical
instantiations of
this type. It calls through <code>__new_alloc</code> to obtain
new memory when its lists run out. If a client container requests a
block larger than a certain threshold size, then the pool is bypassed,
and the allocate/deallocate request is passed to
<code>__new_alloc</code> directly.
</p>
<p>Its <code>inst</code> parameter is described below. The
<code>thr</code> boolean determines whether the pool should be
manipulated atomically or not. Two typedefs are provided:
<code>__alloc</code> is defined as this node allocator with thr=true,
and therefore is threadsafe, while <code>__single_client_alloc</code>
defines thr=false, and is slightly faster but unsafe for multiple
threads.
</p>
<p>(Note that the GCC thread abstraction layer allows us to provide safe
zero-overhead stubs for the threading routines, if threads were
disabled at configuration time. In this situation,
<code>__alloc</code> should not be noticably slower than
<code>__single_client_alloc</code>.)
</p>
<p>[Another threadsafe allocator where each thread keeps its own free
list, so that no locking is needed, might be described here.]
</p>
<h3>A cannon to swat a fly:<code> __USE_MALLOC</code></h3>
<p>If you've already read <a href="../23_containers/howto.html#3">this
advice</a> but still think you remember how to use this macro from
SGI STL days. We have removed it in gcc 3.3. See next section
for the new way to get the same effect.
</p>
<h3>Globally disabling memory caching:<code> GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW</code></h3>
<p>Starting with gcc 3.3, if you want to globally disable memory
caching within the library for the default allocator (i.e.
the one you get for all library objects when you do not specify
which one to use), merely set GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW (at this time,
with any value) into your environment before running the
program. You will obtain a similar effect without having to
recompile your entire program and the entire library (the new
operator in gcc is a light wrapper around malloc). If your
program crashes with GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW in the environment,
it likely means that you linked against objects built against
the older library. Code to support this extension is fully
compatible with 3.2 code if GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW is not in the
environment.
</p>
<h3>Writing your own allocators</h3>
<p>Depending on your application (a specific program, a generic library,
etc), allocator classes tend to be one of two styles: &quot;SGI&quot;
or &quot;standard&quot;. See the comments in stl_alloc.h for more
information on this crucial difference.
</p>
<p>At the bottom of that header is a helper type,
<code>_Alloc_traits</code>, and various specializations of it. This
allows the container classes to make possible compile-time
optimizations based on features of the allocator. You should provide
a specialization of this type for your allocator (doing so takes only
two or three statements).
</p>
<h3>Using non-default allocators</h3>
<p>You can specify different memory management schemes on a per-container
basis, by overriding the default <code>Allocator</code> template
parameter. For example, an easy
(but nonportable)
method of specifying that only malloc/free should be used instead of
the default node allocator is:
</p>
<pre>
std::list &lt;my_type, std::__malloc_alloc_template&lt;0&gt; &gt; my_malloc_based_list;</pre>
Likewise, a debugging form of whichever allocator is currently in use:
<pre>
std::deque &lt;my_type, std::__debug_alloc&lt;std::__alloc&gt; &gt; debug_deque;</pre>
<h3><code>inst</code></h3>
<p>The <code>__malloc_alloc_template</code> and
<code>__default_alloc_template</code> classes take an integer parameter,
called inst here. This number is completely unused.
</p>
<p>The point of the number is to allow multiple instantiations of the
classes without changing the semantics at all. All three of
</p>
<pre>
typedef __default_alloc_template&lt;true,0&gt; normal;
typedef __default_alloc_template&lt;true,1&gt; private;
typedef __default_alloc_template&lt;true,42&gt; also_private;</pre>
<p>behave exactly the same way. However, the memory pool for each type
(and remember that different instantiations result in different types)
remains separate.
</p>
<p>The library uses <strong>0</strong> in all its instantiations. If you
wish to keep separate free lists for a particular purpose, use a
different number.
</p>
<h3>3.0.x</h3>
<p>For 3.0.x, many of the names were incorrectly <em>not</em> prefixed
with underscores. So symbols such as &quot;std::single_client_alloc&quot;
are present. Be very careful to not depend on these names any more
than you would depend on implementation-only names.
</p>
<p>Certain macros like <code>_NOTHREADS</code> and <code>__STL_THREADS</code>
can affect the 3.0.x allocators. Do not use them. Those macros have
been completely removed for 3.1.
</p>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<hr />
<h2><a name="6">Allocators (version 3.4)</a></h2>
<p>Changes are coming...
</p>
<p>If you plan on writing your own allocators,
<a href="../documentation.html#4">source documentation</a> is
available. You'll need to get the &quot;maintainers&quot; collection
in order to see the helper classes and extra notes.
</p>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<hr />
<h2><a name="4">Compile-time checks</a></h2>
<p>Currently libstdc++-v3 uses the concept checkers from the Boost
library to perform <a href="../19_diagnostics/howto.html#3">optional
compile-time checking</a> of template instantiations of the standard
containers. They are described in the linked-to page.
</p>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<hr />
<h2><a name="5">LWG Issues</a></h2>
<p>Everybody's got issues. Even the C++ Standard Library.
</p>
<p>The Library Working Group, or LWG, is the ISO subcommittee responsible
for making changes to the library. They periodically publish an
Issues List containing problems and possible solutions. As they reach
a consensus on proposed solutions, we often incorporate the solution
into libstdc++-v3.
</p>
<p>Here are the issues which have resulted in code changes to the library.
The links are to the specific defect reports from a <strong>partial
copy</strong> of the Issues List. You can read the full version online
at the <a href="http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/">ISO C++
Committee homepage</a>, linked to on the
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html">GCC &quot;Readings&quot;
page</a>. If
you spend a lot of time reading the issues, we recommend downloading
the ZIP file and reading them locally.
</p>
<p>(NB: <strong>partial copy</strong> means that not all links within
the lwg-*.html pages will work.
Specifically, links to defect reports that have not been accorded full
DR status will probably break. Rather than trying to mirror the
entire issues list on our overworked web server, we recommend you go
to the LWG homepage instead.)
</p>
<p>
If a DR is not listed here, we may simply not have gotten to it yet;
feel free to submit a patch. Search the include/bits and src
directories for appearances of _GLIBCPP_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS for
examples of style. Note that we usually do not make changes to the code
until an issue has reached <a href="lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> status.
</p>
<dl>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#5">5</a>:
<em>string::compare specification questionable</em>
</dt>
<dd>This should be two overloaded functions rather than a single function.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>:
<em>Bad bool parsing</em>
</dt>
<dd>Apparently extracting Boolean values was messed up...
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>:
<em>&quot;Noconv&quot; definition too vague</em>
</dt>
<dd>If <code>codecvt::do_in</code> returns <code>noconv</code> there are
no changes to the values in <code>[to, to_limit)</code>.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#22">22</a>:
<em>Member open vs flags</em>
</dt>
<dd>Re-opening a file stream does <em>not</em> clear the state flags.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#25">25</a>:
<em>String operator&lt;&lt; uses width() value wrong</em>
</dt>
<dd>Padding issues.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#48">48</a>:
<em>Use of non-existent exception constructor</em>
</dt>
<dd>An instance of <code>ios_base::failure</code> is constructed instead.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>:
<em>Underspecification of ios_base::sync_with_stdio</em>
</dt>
<dd>The return type is the <em>previous</em> state of synchronization.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#50">50</a>:
<em>Copy constructor and assignment operator of ios_base</em>
</dt>
<dd>These members functions are declared <code>private</code> and are
thus inaccessible. Specifying the correct semantics of
&quot;copying stream state&quot; was deemed too complicated.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#60">60</a>:
<em>What is a formatted input function?</em>
</dt>
<dd>This DR made many widespread changes to <code>basic_istream</code>,
not all of which have been implemented.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#68">68</a>:
<em>Extractors for char* should store null at end</em>
</dt>
<dd>And they do now. An editing glitch in the last item in the list of
[27.6.1.2.3]/7.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#74">74</a>:
<em>Garbled text for codecvt::do_max_length</em>
</dt>
<dd>The text of the standard was gibberish. Typos gone rampant.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>:
<em>string::npos vs. string::max_size()</em>
</dt>
<dd>Safety checks on the size of the string should test against
<code>max_size()</code> rather than <code>npos</code>.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#90">90</a>:
<em>Incorrect description of operator&gt;&gt; for strings</em>
</dt>
<dd>The effect contain <code>isspace(c,getloc())</code> which must be
replaced by <code>isspace(c,is.getloc())</code>.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>:
<em>Missing binders for non-const sequence elements</em>
</dt>
<dd>The <code>binder1st</code> and <code>binder2nd</code> didn't have an
<code>operator()</code> taking a non-const parameter.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>:
<em>istreambuf_iterator::equal not const</em>
</dt>
<dd>This was not a const member function. Note that the DR says to
replace the function with a const one; we have instead provided an
overloaded version with identical contents.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#117">117</a>:
<em>basic_ostream uses nonexistent num_put member functions</em>
</dt>
<dd><code>num_put::put()</code> was overloaded on the wrong types.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#118">118</a>:
<em>basic_istream uses nonexistent num_get member functions</em>
</dt>
<dd>Same as 117, but for <code>num_get::get()</code>.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>:
<em>Need error indication from seekp() and seekg()</em>
</dt>
<dd>These functions set <code>failbit</code> on error now.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>:
<em>seekp, seekg setting wrong streams?</em>
</dt>
<dd><code>seekp</code> should only set the output stream, and
<code>seekg</code> should only set the input stream.
</dd>
<!--<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>:
<em>Strange use of underflow()</em>
</dt>
<dd>In fstream.tcc, the basic_filebuf&lt;&gt;::showmanyc() function
should probably not be calling <code>underflow()</code>.
</dd> -->
<dt><a href="lwg-active.html#167">167</a>:
<em>Improper use of traits_type::length()</em>
</dt>
<dd><code>op&lt;&lt;</code> with a <code>const char*</code> was
calculating an incorrect number of characters to write.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#171">171</a>:
<em>Strange seekpos() semantics due to joint position</em>
</dt>
<dd>Quite complex to summarize...
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>:
<em>make_pair() unintended behavior</em>
</dt>
<dd>This function used to take its arguments as reference-to-const, now
it copies them (pass by value).
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>:
<em>Should basic_istream::sentry's constructor ever set eofbit?</em>
</dt>
<dd>Yes, it can, specifically if EOF is reached while skipping whitespace.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>:
<em>operator&gt;&gt;(istream&amp;, string&amp;) doesn't set failbit</em>
</dt>
<dd>If nothing is extracted into the string, <code>op&gt;&gt;</code> now
sets <code>failbit</code> (which can cause an exception, etc, etc).
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#214">214</a>:
<em>set::find() missing const overload</em>
</dt>
<dd>Both <code>set</code> and <code>multiset</code> were missing
overloaded find, lower_bound, upper_bound, and equal_range functions
for const instances.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-active.html#231">231</a>:
<em>Precision in iostream?</em>
</dt>
<dd>For conversion from a floating-point type, <code>str.precision()</code>
is specified in the conversion specification.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>:
<em>No specification of default ctor for reverse_iterator</em>
</dt>
<dd>The declaration of <code>reverse_iterator</code> lists a default constructor.
However, no specification is given what this constructor should do.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#251">251</a>:
<em>basic_stringbuf missing allocator_type</em>
</dt>
<dd>This nested typdef was originally not specified.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>:
<em>std::pair::pair() effects overly restrictive</em>
</dt>
<dd>The default ctor would build its members from copies of temporaries;
now it simply uses their respective default ctors.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#266">266</a>:
<em>bad_exception::~bad_exception() missing Effects clause</em>
</dt>
<dd>The <code>bad_</code>* classes no longer have destructors (they
are trivial), since no description of them was ever given.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>:
<em>basic_iostream missing typedefs</em>
</dt>
<dd>The typedefs it inherits from its base classes can't be used, since
(for example) <code>basic_iostream&lt;T&gt;::traits_type</code> is ambiguous.
</dd>
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#275">275</a>:
<em>Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads</em>
</dt>
<dd>Similar to 118.
</dd>
<!--
<dt><a href="lwg-defects.html#"></a>:
<em></em>
</dt>
<dd>
</dd>
-->
</dl>
<p>Return <a href="#top">to top of page</a> or
<a href="../faq/index.html">to the FAQ</a>.
</p>
<!-- ####################################################### -->
<hr />
<p class="fineprint"><em>
See <a href="../17_intro/license.html">license.html</a> for copying conditions.
Comments and suggestions are welcome, and may be sent to
<a href="mailto:libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org">the libstdc++ mailing list</a>.
</em></p>
</body>
</html>