gcc/libstdc++-v3/doc
Jonathan Wakely 0f3d27f01a re PR libstdc++/64276 (would be better to use __cpp_exceptions rather than __EXCEPTIONS to determine whether exceptions are available)
PR libstdc++/64276
	* doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in: Define __cpp_exceptions and __cpp_rtti.
	* doc/html/manual/using_exceptions.html: Regenerate.
	* doc/xml/manual/using_exceptions.xml: Use SD-6 feature-testing
	macros, __cpp_exceptions and __cpp_rtti, instead of __EXCEPTIONS and
	__GXX_RTTI.
	* include/bits/c++config: Likewise.
	* include/bits/locale_classes.tcc: Likewise.
	* include/bits/shared_ptr.h: Likewise.
	* include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: Likewise.
	* include/debug/formatter.h: Likewise.
	* include/experimental/any: Likewise.
	* include/ext/rope: Likewise.
	* include/ext/ropeimpl.h: Likewise.
	* include/std/functional: Likewise.
	* include/tr1/functional: Likewise.
	* include/tr1/shared_ptr.h: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/eh_call.cc: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/eh_personality.cc: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/exception_defines.h: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/exception_ptr.h: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/guard.cc: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/pbase_type_info.cc: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/pointer_type_info.cc: Likewise.
	* libsupc++/vterminate.cc: Likewise.
	* src/c++11/thread.cc: Likewise.

From-SVN: r218679
2014-12-12 15:58:49 +00:00
..
doxygen re PR libstdc++/64276 (would be better to use __cpp_exceptions rather than __EXCEPTIONS to determine whether exceptions are available) 2014-12-12 15:58:49 +00:00
html re PR libstdc++/64276 (would be better to use __cpp_exceptions rather than __EXCEPTIONS to determine whether exceptions are available) 2014-12-12 15:58:49 +00:00
xml re PR libstdc++/64276 (would be better to use __cpp_exceptions rather than __EXCEPTIONS to determine whether exceptions are available) 2014-12-12 15:58:49 +00:00
xsl re PR libstdc++/54102 (generated html vs. utf8) 2012-08-29 01:37:16 +00:00
Makefile.am Makefile.am: Add missing file. 2014-06-09 15:47:17 +01:00
Makefile.in Makefile.am: Add missing file. 2014-06-09 15:47:17 +01:00