4fe706d8e0
2001-07-17 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> * testsuite/README: Add notes on naming test cases. * testsuite/22_locale/members.cc: Mark as xfail. * testsuite/22_locale/numpunct_char_members.cc: Same. From-SVN: r44076
199 lines
8.3 KiB
Plaintext
199 lines
8.3 KiB
Plaintext
We're in the process of converting the existing testsuite machinery to
|
|
use the new style DejaGnu framework. Eventually, we'll abandon
|
|
../mkcheck.in in favor of this new testsuite framework.
|
|
|
|
// 1: Thoughts on naming test cases, and structuring them.
|
|
The testsuite directory has been divided into 11 directories, directly
|
|
correlated to the relevant chapters in the standard. For example, the
|
|
directory testsuite/21_strings contains tests related to "Chapter 21,
|
|
Strings library" in the C++ standard.
|
|
|
|
So, the first step in making a new test case is to choose the correct
|
|
directory. The second item is seeing if a test file exists that tests
|
|
the item in question. Generally, within chapters test files are named
|
|
after the section headings in ISO 14882, the C++ standard. For instance,
|
|
|
|
21.3.7.9 Inserters and Extractors
|
|
|
|
Has a related test case:
|
|
21_strings/inserters_extractors.cc
|
|
|
|
Not so hard. Some time, the words "ctor" and "dtor" are used instead
|
|
of "construct", "constructor", "cons", "destructor", etc. Other than
|
|
that, the naming seems mostly consistent. If the file exists, add a
|
|
test to it. If it does not, then create a new file. All files are
|
|
copyright the FSF, and GPL'd: this is very important.
|
|
|
|
Inside a test file, the plan is to test the relevant parts of the
|
|
standard, and then add specific regressions as additional test
|
|
functions, ie test04() can represent a specific regression noted in
|
|
GNATS. Once test files get unwieldy or too big, then they should be
|
|
broken up into multiple sub-categories, hopefully intelligently named
|
|
after the relevant (and more specific) part of the standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
// 2: How to write a test case, from a dejagnu perspective
|
|
As per the dejagnu instructions, always return 0 from main to indicate
|
|
success.
|
|
|
|
Basically, a test case contains dg-keywords (see dg.exp) indicating
|
|
what to do and what kinds of behaviour are to be expected. New
|
|
testcases should be written with the new style DejaGnu framework in
|
|
mind.
|
|
|
|
To ease transition, here is the list of dg-keyword documentation
|
|
lifted from dg.exp -- eventually we should improve DejaGnu
|
|
documentation, but getting checkin account currently demands Pyrrhic
|
|
effort.
|
|
|
|
# The currently supported options are:
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-prms-id N
|
|
# set prms_id to N
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-options "options ..." [{ target selector }]
|
|
# specify special options to pass to the tool (eg: compiler)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-do do-what-keyword [{ target/xfail selector }]
|
|
# `do-what-keyword' is tool specific and is passed unchanged to
|
|
# ${tool}-dg-test. An example is gcc where `keyword' can be any of:
|
|
# preprocess|compile|assemble|link|run
|
|
# and will do one of: produce a .i, produce a .s, produce a .o,
|
|
# produce an a.out, or produce an a.out and run it (the default is
|
|
# compile).
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-error regexp comment [{ target/xfail selector } [{.|0|linenum}]]
|
|
# indicate an error message <regexp> is expected on this line
|
|
# (the test fails if it doesn't occur)
|
|
# Linenum=0 for general tool messages (eg: -V arg missing).
|
|
# "." means the current line.
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-warning regexp comment [{ target/xfail selector } [{.|0|linenum}]]
|
|
# indicate a warning message <regexp> is expected on this line
|
|
# (the test fails if it doesn't occur)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-bogus regexp comment [{ target/xfail selector } [{.|0|linenum}]]
|
|
# indicate a bogus error message <regexp> use to occur here
|
|
# (the test fails if it does occur)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-build regexp comment [{ target/xfail selector }]
|
|
# indicate the build use to fail for some reason
|
|
# (errors covered here include bad assembler generated, tool crashes,
|
|
# and link failures)
|
|
# (the test fails if it does occur)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-excess-errors comment [{ target/xfail selector }]
|
|
# indicate excess errors are expected (any line)
|
|
# (this should only be used sparingly and temporarily)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-output regexp [{ target selector }]
|
|
# indicate the expected output of the program is <regexp>
|
|
# (there may be multiple occurrences of this, they are concatenated)
|
|
#
|
|
# dg-final { tcl code }
|
|
# add some tcl code to be run at the end
|
|
# (there may be multiple occurrences of this, they are concatenated)
|
|
# (unbalanced braces must be \-escaped)
|
|
#
|
|
# "{ target selector }" is a list of expressions that determine whether the
|
|
# test succeeds or fails for a particular target, or in some cases whether the
|
|
# option applies for a particular target. If the case of `dg-do' it specifies
|
|
# whether the testcase is even attempted on the specified target.
|
|
#
|
|
# The target selector is always optional. The format is one of:
|
|
#
|
|
# { xfail *-*-* ... } - the test is expected to fail for the given targets
|
|
# { target *-*-* ... } - the option only applies to the given targets
|
|
#
|
|
# At least one target must be specified, use *-*-* for "all targets".
|
|
# At present it is not possible to specify both `xfail' and `target'.
|
|
# "native" may be used in place of "*-*-*".
|
|
|
|
Example 1: Testing compilation only
|
|
(to just have a testcase do compile testing, without linking and executing)
|
|
// { dg-do compile }
|
|
|
|
Example 2: Testing for expected warings on line 36
|
|
// { dg-warning "string literals" "" { xfail *-*-* } 36
|
|
|
|
Example 3: Testing for compilation errors on line 41
|
|
// { dg-do compile }
|
|
// { dg-error "no match for" "" { xfail *-*-* } 41 }
|
|
|
|
More examples can be found in the libstdc++-v3/testsuite/*/*.cc files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
// 3: Test harness notes, invocation, and debugging.
|
|
Configuring the dejagnu harness to work with libstdc++-v3 in a cross
|
|
compilation environment has been maddening. However, it does work now,
|
|
and on a variety of platforms. Including solaris, linux, and cygwin.
|
|
|
|
To debug the test harness during runs, try invoking with
|
|
|
|
make check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="-v"
|
|
or
|
|
make check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="-v -v"
|
|
|
|
There are two ways to run on a simulator: set up DEJAGNU to point to a
|
|
specially crafted site.exp, or pass down --target_board flags.
|
|
|
|
Example flags to pass down for various embedded builds are as follows:
|
|
|
|
--target=powerpc-eabism (libgloss/sim)
|
|
make check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=powerpc-sim"
|
|
|
|
--target=calmrisc32 (libgloss/sid)
|
|
make check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=calmrisc32-sid"
|
|
|
|
--target=xscale-elf (newlib/sim)
|
|
make check-target-libstdc++-v3 RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=arm-sim"
|
|
|
|
|
|
// 4: Future plans, to be done
|
|
Shared runs need to be implemented, for targets that support shared libraries.
|
|
|
|
Diffing of expected output to standard streams needs to be finished off.
|
|
|
|
The V3 testing framework supports, or will eventually support,
|
|
additional keywords for the purpose of easing the job of writing
|
|
testcases. All V3-keywords are of the form @xxx@. Currently plans
|
|
for supported keywords include:
|
|
|
|
@require@ <files>
|
|
The existence of <files> is essential for the test to complete
|
|
successfully. For example, a testcase foo.C using bar.baz as
|
|
input file could say
|
|
// @require@ bar.baz
|
|
The special variable % stands for the rootname, e.g. the
|
|
file-name without its `.C' extension. Example of use (taken
|
|
verbatim from 27_io/filebuf.cc)
|
|
// @require@ %-*.tst %-*.txt
|
|
|
|
@diff@ <first-list> <second-list>
|
|
After the testcase compiles and ran successfully, diff
|
|
<first-list> against <second-list>, these lists should have the
|
|
same length. The test fails if diff returns non-zero a pair of
|
|
files.
|
|
|
|
Current testing problems with cygwin-hosted tools:
|
|
|
|
There are two known problems which I have not addressed. The first is
|
|
that when testing cygwin hosted tools from the unix build dir, it does
|
|
the wrong thing building the wrapper program (testglue.c) because host
|
|
and target are the same in site.exp (host and target are the same from
|
|
the perspective of the target libraries)
|
|
|
|
Problem number two is a little more annoying. In order for me to make
|
|
v3 testing work on Windows, I had to tell dejagnu to copy over the
|
|
debug_assert.h file to the remote host and then set the includes to
|
|
-I./. This is how all the other tests like this are done so I didn't
|
|
think much of it. However, this had some unfortunate results due to
|
|
gcc having a testcase called "limits" and C++ having an include file
|
|
called "limits". The gcc "limits" binary was in the temporary dir
|
|
when the v3 tests were being built. As a result, the gcc "limits"
|
|
binary was being #included rather than the intended one. The only way
|
|
to fix this is to go through the testsuites and make sure binaries are
|
|
deleted on the remote host when testing is done with them. That is a
|
|
lot more work than I want to do so I worked around it by cleaning out
|
|
D:\kermit on compsognathus and rerunning tests.
|