11623 lines
427 KiB
Ada
11623 lines
427 KiB
Ada
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- S E M _ C H 6 --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- B o d y --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2016, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
|
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
|
-- ware Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later ver- --
|
|
-- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- --
|
|
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY --
|
|
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License --
|
|
-- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General --
|
|
-- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING3. If not, go to --
|
|
-- http://www.gnu.org/licenses for a complete copy of the license. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
-- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. --
|
|
-- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. --
|
|
-- --
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
with Aspects; use Aspects;
|
|
with Atree; use Atree;
|
|
with Checks; use Checks;
|
|
with Contracts; use Contracts;
|
|
with Debug; use Debug;
|
|
with Einfo; use Einfo;
|
|
with Elists; use Elists;
|
|
with Errout; use Errout;
|
|
with Expander; use Expander;
|
|
with Exp_Ch6; use Exp_Ch6;
|
|
with Exp_Ch7; use Exp_Ch7;
|
|
with Exp_Ch9; use Exp_Ch9;
|
|
with Exp_Dbug; use Exp_Dbug;
|
|
with Exp_Disp; use Exp_Disp;
|
|
with Exp_Tss; use Exp_Tss;
|
|
with Exp_Util; use Exp_Util;
|
|
with Fname; use Fname;
|
|
with Freeze; use Freeze;
|
|
with Ghost; use Ghost;
|
|
with Inline; use Inline;
|
|
with Itypes; use Itypes;
|
|
with Lib.Xref; use Lib.Xref;
|
|
with Layout; use Layout;
|
|
with Namet; use Namet;
|
|
with Lib; use Lib;
|
|
with Nlists; use Nlists;
|
|
with Nmake; use Nmake;
|
|
with Opt; use Opt;
|
|
with Output; use Output;
|
|
with Restrict; use Restrict;
|
|
with Rident; use Rident;
|
|
with Rtsfind; use Rtsfind;
|
|
with Sem; use Sem;
|
|
with Sem_Aux; use Sem_Aux;
|
|
with Sem_Cat; use Sem_Cat;
|
|
with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3;
|
|
with Sem_Ch4; use Sem_Ch4;
|
|
with Sem_Ch5; use Sem_Ch5;
|
|
with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8;
|
|
with Sem_Ch10; use Sem_Ch10;
|
|
with Sem_Ch12; use Sem_Ch12;
|
|
with Sem_Ch13; use Sem_Ch13;
|
|
with Sem_Dim; use Sem_Dim;
|
|
with Sem_Disp; use Sem_Disp;
|
|
with Sem_Dist; use Sem_Dist;
|
|
with Sem_Elim; use Sem_Elim;
|
|
with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval;
|
|
with Sem_Mech; use Sem_Mech;
|
|
with Sem_Prag; use Sem_Prag;
|
|
with Sem_Res; use Sem_Res;
|
|
with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util;
|
|
with Sem_Type; use Sem_Type;
|
|
with Sem_Warn; use Sem_Warn;
|
|
with Sinput; use Sinput;
|
|
with Stand; use Stand;
|
|
with Sinfo; use Sinfo;
|
|
with Sinfo.CN; use Sinfo.CN;
|
|
with Snames; use Snames;
|
|
with Stringt; use Stringt;
|
|
with Style;
|
|
with Stylesw; use Stylesw;
|
|
with Tbuild; use Tbuild;
|
|
with Uintp; use Uintp;
|
|
with Urealp; use Urealp;
|
|
with Validsw; use Validsw;
|
|
|
|
package body Sem_Ch6 is
|
|
|
|
May_Hide_Profile : Boolean := False;
|
|
-- This flag is used to indicate that two formals in two subprograms being
|
|
-- checked for conformance differ only in that one is an access parameter
|
|
-- while the other is of a general access type with the same designated
|
|
-- type. In this case, if the rest of the signatures match, a call to
|
|
-- either subprogram may be ambiguous, which is worth a warning. The flag
|
|
-- is set in Compatible_Types, and the warning emitted in
|
|
-- New_Overloaded_Entity.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Local Subprograms --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Function_Return (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Subsidiary to Analyze_Return_Statement. Called when the return statement
|
|
-- applies to a [generic] function.
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body (N : Node_Id; Gen_Id : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Analyze a generic subprogram body. N is the body to be analyzed, and
|
|
-- Gen_Id is the defining entity Id for the corresponding spec.
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Null_Procedure
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Is_Completion : out Boolean);
|
|
-- A null procedure can be a declaration or (Ada 2012) a completion
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Common processing for simple and extended return statements
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Return_Type (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Subsidiary to Process_Formals: analyze subtype mark in function
|
|
-- specification in a context where the formals are visible and hide
|
|
-- outer homographs.
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Does all the real work of Analyze_Subprogram_Body. This is split out so
|
|
-- that we can use RETURN but not skip the debug output at the end.
|
|
|
|
function Can_Override_Operator (Subp : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Returns true if Subp can override a predefined operator.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ctype : Conformance_Type;
|
|
Errmsg : Boolean;
|
|
Conforms : out Boolean;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Get_Inst : Boolean := False;
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals : Boolean := False);
|
|
-- Given two entities, this procedure checks that the profiles associated
|
|
-- with these entities meet the conformance criterion given by the third
|
|
-- parameter. If they conform, Conforms is set True and control returns
|
|
-- to the caller. If they do not conform, Conforms is set to False, and
|
|
-- in addition, if Errmsg is True on the call, proper messages are output
|
|
-- to complain about the conformance failure. If Err_Loc is non_Empty
|
|
-- the error messages are placed on Err_Loc, if Err_Loc is empty, then
|
|
-- error messages are placed on the appropriate part of the construct
|
|
-- denoted by New_Id. If Get_Inst is true, then this is a mode conformance
|
|
-- against a formal access-to-subprogram type so Get_Instance_Of must
|
|
-- be called.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Limited_Return
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
R_Type : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Check the appropriate (Ada 95 or Ada 2005) rules for returning limited
|
|
-- types. Used only for simple return statements. Expr is the expression
|
|
-- returned.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Subprogram_Order (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- N is the N_Subprogram_Body node for a subprogram. This routine applies
|
|
-- the alpha ordering rule for N if this ordering requirement applicable.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Returns
|
|
(HSS : Node_Id;
|
|
Mode : Character;
|
|
Err : out Boolean;
|
|
Proc : Entity_Id := Empty);
|
|
-- Called to check for missing return statements in a function body, or for
|
|
-- returns present in a procedure body which has No_Return set. HSS is the
|
|
-- handled statement sequence for the subprogram body. This procedure
|
|
-- checks all flow paths to make sure they either have return (Mode = 'F',
|
|
-- used for functions) or do not have a return (Mode = 'P', used for
|
|
-- No_Return procedures). The flag Err is set if there are any control
|
|
-- paths not explicitly terminated by a return in the function case, and is
|
|
-- True otherwise. Proc is the entity for the procedure case and is used
|
|
-- in posting the warning message.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Untagged_Equality (Eq_Op : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- In Ada 2012, a primitive equality operator on an untagged record type
|
|
-- must appear before the type is frozen, and have the same visibility as
|
|
-- that of the type. This procedure checks that this rule is met, and
|
|
-- otherwise emits an error on the subprogram declaration and a warning
|
|
-- on the earlier freeze point if it is easy to locate. In Ada 2012 mode,
|
|
-- this routine outputs errors (or warnings if -gnatd.E is set). In earlier
|
|
-- versions of Ada, warnings are output if Warn_On_Ada_2012_Incompatibility
|
|
-- is set, otherwise the call has no effect.
|
|
|
|
procedure Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- This procedure makes S, a new overloaded entity, into the first visible
|
|
-- entity with that name.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Non_Overriding_Operation
|
|
(Prev_E : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Enforce the rule given in 12.3(18): a private operation in an instance
|
|
-- overrides an inherited operation only if the corresponding operation
|
|
-- was overriding in the generic. This needs to be checked for primitive
|
|
-- operations of types derived (in the generic unit) from formal private
|
|
-- or formal derived types.
|
|
|
|
procedure Make_Inequality_Operator (S : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Create the declaration for an inequality operator that is implicitly
|
|
-- created by a user-defined equality operator that yields a boolean.
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Formal_Validity (Formal_Id : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Formal_Id is an formal parameter entity. This procedure deals with
|
|
-- setting the proper validity status for this entity, which depends on
|
|
-- the kind of parameter and the validity checking mode.
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration --
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Scop : constant Entity_Id := Current_Scope;
|
|
Subp_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Specification (N));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction ("abstract subprogram is not allowed", N);
|
|
|
|
Generate_Definition (Subp_Id);
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Subp_Id);
|
|
New_Overloaded_Entity (Subp_Id);
|
|
Check_Delayed_Subprogram (Subp_Id);
|
|
|
|
Set_Categorization_From_Scope (Subp_Id, Scop);
|
|
|
|
-- An abstract subprogram declared within a Ghost region is rendered
|
|
-- Ghost (SPARK RM 6.9(2)).
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Subp_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scope (Subp_Id)) = E_Protected_Type then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("abstract subprogram not allowed in protected type", N);
|
|
|
|
-- Issue a warning if the abstract subprogram is neither a dispatching
|
|
-- operation nor an operation that overrides an inherited subprogram or
|
|
-- predefined operator, since this most likely indicates a mistake.
|
|
|
|
elsif Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs
|
|
and then not Is_Dispatching_Operation (Subp_Id)
|
|
and then not Present (Overridden_Operation (Subp_Id))
|
|
and then (not Is_Operator_Symbol_Name (Chars (Subp_Id))
|
|
or else Scop /= Scope (Etype (First_Formal (Subp_Id))))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("abstract subprogram is not dispatching or overriding?r?", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Generate_Reference_To_Formals (Subp_Id);
|
|
Check_Eliminated (Subp_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications (N, Subp_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Expression_Function --
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Expression_Function (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
LocX : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (Expr);
|
|
Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (N);
|
|
|
|
Asp : Node_Id;
|
|
Def_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_Body : Node_Id;
|
|
New_Spec : Node_Id;
|
|
Orig_N : Node_Id;
|
|
Ret : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Prev : Entity_Id;
|
|
-- If the expression is a completion, Prev is the entity whose
|
|
-- declaration is completed. Def_Id is needed to analyze the spec.
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- This is one of the occasions on which we transform the tree during
|
|
-- semantic analysis. If this is a completion, transform the expression
|
|
-- function into an equivalent subprogram body, and analyze it.
|
|
|
|
-- Expression functions are inlined unconditionally. The back-end will
|
|
-- determine whether this is possible.
|
|
|
|
Inline_Processing_Required := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Create a specification for the generated body. This must be done
|
|
-- prior to the analysis of the initial declaration.
|
|
|
|
New_Spec := Copy_Subprogram_Spec (Spec);
|
|
Prev := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Defining_Entity (Spec));
|
|
|
|
-- If there are previous overloadable entities with the same name,
|
|
-- check whether any of them is completed by the expression function.
|
|
-- In a generic context a formal subprogram has no completion.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev)
|
|
and then Is_Overloadable (Prev)
|
|
and then not Is_Formal_Subprogram (Prev)
|
|
then
|
|
Def_Id := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Spec);
|
|
Prev := Find_Corresponding_Spec (N);
|
|
|
|
-- The previous entity may be an expression function as well, in
|
|
-- which case the redeclaration is illegal.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev)
|
|
and then Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (Prev))) =
|
|
N_Expression_Function
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Prev);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("& conflicts with declaration#", Def_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Ret := Make_Simple_Return_Statement (LocX, Expression (N));
|
|
|
|
New_Body :=
|
|
Make_Subprogram_Body (Loc,
|
|
Specification => New_Spec,
|
|
Declarations => Empty_List,
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (LocX,
|
|
Statements => New_List (Ret)));
|
|
Set_Was_Expression_Function (New_Body);
|
|
|
|
-- If the expression completes a generic subprogram, we must create a
|
|
-- separate node for the body, because at instantiation the original
|
|
-- node of the generic copy must be a generic subprogram body, and
|
|
-- cannot be a expression function. Otherwise we just rewrite the
|
|
-- expression with the non-generic body.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev) and then Ekind (Prev) = E_Generic_Function then
|
|
Insert_After (N, New_Body);
|
|
|
|
-- Propagate any aspects or pragmas that apply to the expression
|
|
-- function to the proper body when the expression function acts
|
|
-- as a completion.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Move_Aspects (N, To => New_Body);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Relocate_Pragmas_To_Body (New_Body);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Prev, False);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
Analyze (New_Body);
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Prev);
|
|
|
|
-- If the expression function is a completion, the previous declaration
|
|
-- must come from source. We know already that it appears in the current
|
|
-- scope. The entity itself may be internally created if within a body
|
|
-- to be inlined.
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Prev)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Parent (Prev))
|
|
and then not Is_Formal_Subprogram (Prev)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Prev, False);
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Prev);
|
|
|
|
-- An expression function that is a completion freezes the
|
|
-- expression. This means freezing the return type, and if it is
|
|
-- an access type, freezing its designated type as well.
|
|
|
|
-- Note that we cannot defer this freezing to the analysis of the
|
|
-- expression itself, because a freeze node might appear in a nested
|
|
-- scope, leading to an elaboration order issue in gigi.
|
|
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Etype (Prev));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Prev)) then
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Designated_Type (Etype (Prev)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For navigation purposes, indicate that the function is a body
|
|
|
|
Generate_Reference (Prev, Defining_Entity (N), 'b', Force => True);
|
|
Rewrite (N, New_Body);
|
|
|
|
-- Remove any existing aspects from the original node because the act
|
|
-- of rewriting causes the list to be shared between the two nodes.
|
|
|
|
Orig_N := Original_Node (N);
|
|
Remove_Aspects (Orig_N);
|
|
|
|
-- Propagate any pragmas that apply to the expression function to the
|
|
-- proper body when the expression function acts as a completion.
|
|
-- Aspects are automatically transfered because of node rewriting.
|
|
|
|
Relocate_Pragmas_To_Body (N);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Once the aspects of the generated body have been analyzed, create
|
|
-- a copy for ASIS purposes and associate it with the original node.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Set_Aspect_Specifications (Orig_N,
|
|
New_Copy_List_Tree (Aspect_Specifications (N)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Prev is the previous entity with the same name, but it is can
|
|
-- be an unrelated spec that is not completed by the expression
|
|
-- function. In that case the relevant entity is the one in the body.
|
|
-- Not clear that the backend can inline it in this case ???
|
|
|
|
if Has_Completion (Prev) then
|
|
|
|
-- The formals of the expression function are body formals,
|
|
-- and do not appear in the ali file, which will only contain
|
|
-- references to the formals of the original subprogram spec.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
F1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
F2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
F1 := First_Formal (Def_Id);
|
|
F2 := First_Formal (Prev);
|
|
|
|
while Present (F1) loop
|
|
Set_Spec_Entity (F1, F2);
|
|
Next_Formal (F1);
|
|
Next_Formal (F2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Defining_Entity (New_Body));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is not a completion, create both a declaration and a body, so
|
|
-- that the expression can be inlined whenever possible.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- An expression function that is not a completion is not a
|
|
-- subprogram declaration, and thus cannot appear in a protected
|
|
-- definition.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Protected_Definition then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("an expression function is not a legal protected operation", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Subprogram_Declaration (Loc, Specification => Spec));
|
|
|
|
-- Remove any existing aspects from the original node because the act
|
|
-- of rewriting causes the list to be shared between the two nodes.
|
|
|
|
Orig_N := Original_Node (N);
|
|
Remove_Aspects (Orig_N);
|
|
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Once the aspects of the generated spec have been analyzed, create
|
|
-- a copy for ASIS purposes and associate it with the original node.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Set_Aspect_Specifications (Orig_N,
|
|
New_Copy_List_Tree (Aspect_Specifications (N)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If aspect SPARK_Mode was specified on the body, it needs to be
|
|
-- repeated both on the generated spec and the body.
|
|
|
|
Asp := Find_Aspect (Defining_Unit_Name (Spec), Aspect_SPARK_Mode);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Asp) then
|
|
Asp := New_Copy_Tree (Asp);
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Asp, False);
|
|
Set_Aspect_Specifications (New_Body, New_List (Asp));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Def_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Within a generic pre-analyze the original expression for name
|
|
-- capture. The body is also generated but plays no role in
|
|
-- this because it is not part of the original source.
|
|
|
|
if Inside_A_Generic then
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Def_Id);
|
|
Push_Scope (Def_Id);
|
|
Install_Formals (Def_Id);
|
|
Preanalyze_Spec_Expression (Expr, Etype (Def_Id));
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Defining_Entity (N));
|
|
|
|
-- If the expression function is Ghost, mark its body entity as
|
|
-- Ghost too. This avoids spurious errors on unanalyzed body entities
|
|
-- of expression functions, which are not yet marked as ghost, yet
|
|
-- identified as the Corresponding_Body of the ghost declaration.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Ghost_Entity (Def_Id) then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Defining_Entity (New_Body));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Establish the linkages between the spec and the body. These are
|
|
-- used when the expression function acts as the prefix of attribute
|
|
-- 'Access in order to freeze the original expression which has been
|
|
-- moved to the generated body.
|
|
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Body (N, Defining_Entity (New_Body));
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec (New_Body, Defining_Entity (N));
|
|
|
|
-- To prevent premature freeze action, insert the new body at the end
|
|
-- of the current declarations, or at the end of the package spec.
|
|
-- However, resolve usage names now, to prevent spurious visibility
|
|
-- on later entities. Note that the function can now be called in
|
|
-- the current declarative part, which will appear to be prior to
|
|
-- the presence of the body in the code. There are nevertheless no
|
|
-- order of elaboration issues because all name resolution has taken
|
|
-- place at the point of declaration.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Decls : List_Id := List_Containing (N);
|
|
Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (Ret);
|
|
Par : constant Node_Id := Parent (Decls);
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Def_Id);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If this is a wrapper created for in an instance for a formal
|
|
-- subprogram, insert body after declaration, to be analyzed when
|
|
-- the enclosing instance is analyzed.
|
|
|
|
if GNATprove_Mode
|
|
and then Is_Generic_Actual_Subprogram (Defining_Entity (N))
|
|
then
|
|
Insert_After (N, New_Body);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Nkind (Par) = N_Package_Specification
|
|
and then Decls = Visible_Declarations (Par)
|
|
and then Present (Private_Declarations (Par))
|
|
and then not Is_Empty_List (Private_Declarations (Par))
|
|
then
|
|
Decls := Private_Declarations (Par);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Insert_After (Last (Decls), New_Body);
|
|
|
|
-- Preanalyze the expression for name capture, except in an
|
|
-- instance, where this has been done during generic analysis,
|
|
-- and will be redone when analyzing the body.
|
|
|
|
Set_Parent (Expr, Ret);
|
|
Push_Scope (Def_Id);
|
|
Install_Formals (Def_Id);
|
|
|
|
if not In_Instance then
|
|
Preanalyze_Spec_Expression (Expr, Typ);
|
|
Check_Limited_Return (Original_Node (N), Expr, Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the return expression is a static constant, we suppress warning
|
|
-- messages on unused formals, which in most cases will be noise.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Trivial_Subprogram
|
|
(Defining_Entity (New_Body), Is_OK_Static_Expression (Expr));
|
|
end Analyze_Expression_Function;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Extended_Return_Statement --
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Extended_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Compiler_Unit ("extended return statement", N);
|
|
Analyze_Return_Statement (N);
|
|
end Analyze_Extended_Return_Statement;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Function_Call --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Function_Call (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
|
|
Func_Nam : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
Actual : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Analyze (Func_Nam);
|
|
|
|
-- A call of the form A.B (X) may be an Ada 2005 call, which is
|
|
-- rewritten as B (A, X). If the rewriting is successful, the call
|
|
-- has been analyzed and we just return.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Func_Nam) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
and then Name (N) /= Func_Nam
|
|
and then Is_Rewrite_Substitution (N)
|
|
and then Present (Etype (N))
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If error analyzing name, then set Any_Type as result type and return
|
|
|
|
if Etype (Func_Nam) = Any_Type then
|
|
Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise analyze the parameters
|
|
|
|
if Present (Actuals) then
|
|
Actual := First (Actuals);
|
|
while Present (Actual) loop
|
|
Analyze (Actual);
|
|
Check_Parameterless_Call (Actual);
|
|
Next (Actual);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Call (N);
|
|
end Analyze_Function_Call;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Function_Return --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Function_Return (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Stm_Entity : constant Entity_Id := Return_Statement_Entity (N);
|
|
Scope_Id : constant Entity_Id := Return_Applies_To (Stm_Entity);
|
|
|
|
R_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Scope_Id);
|
|
-- Function result subtype
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Aggregate_Accessibility (Aggr : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Apply legality rule of 6.5 (8.2) to the access discriminants of an
|
|
-- aggregate in a return statement.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Return_Subtype_Indication (Obj_Decl : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Check that the return_subtype_indication properly matches the result
|
|
-- subtype of the function, as required by RM-6.5(5.1/2-5.3/2).
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Aggregate_Accessibility --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Aggregate_Accessibility (Aggr : Node_Id) is
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Aggr);
|
|
Assoc : Node_Id;
|
|
Discr : Entity_Id;
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
Obj : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Record_Type (Typ) and then Has_Discriminants (Typ) then
|
|
Discr := First_Discriminant (Typ);
|
|
Assoc := First (Component_Associations (Aggr));
|
|
while Present (Discr) loop
|
|
if Ekind (Etype (Discr)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
Expr := Expression (Assoc);
|
|
if Nkind (Expr) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Attribute_Name (Expr) /= Name_Unrestricted_Access
|
|
then
|
|
Obj := Prefix (Expr);
|
|
while Nkind_In (Obj, N_Indexed_Component,
|
|
N_Selected_Component)
|
|
loop
|
|
Obj := Prefix (Obj);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- No check needed for an aliased formal.
|
|
-- A run-time check may still be needed ???
|
|
|
|
if Is_Entity_Name (Obj)
|
|
and then Is_Formal (Entity (Obj))
|
|
and then Is_Aliased (Entity (Obj))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Object_Access_Level (Obj) >
|
|
Scope_Depth (Scope (Scope_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("access discriminant in return aggregate would be "
|
|
& "a dangling reference", Obj);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Discriminant (Discr);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Aggregate_Accessibility;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Return_Subtype_Indication --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Return_Subtype_Indication (Obj_Decl : Node_Id) is
|
|
Return_Obj : constant Node_Id := Defining_Identifier (Obj_Decl);
|
|
|
|
R_Stm_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Return_Obj);
|
|
-- Subtype given in the extended return statement (must match R_Type)
|
|
|
|
Subtype_Ind : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Object_Definition (Original_Node (Obj_Decl));
|
|
|
|
R_Type_Is_Anon_Access : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Ekind_In (R_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Type);
|
|
-- True if return type of the function is an anonymous access type
|
|
-- Can't we make Is_Anonymous_Access_Type in einfo ???
|
|
|
|
R_Stm_Type_Is_Anon_Access : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Ekind_In (R_Stm_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Type);
|
|
-- True if type of the return object is an anonymous access type
|
|
|
|
procedure Error_No_Match (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Output error messages for case where types do not statically
|
|
-- match. N is the location for the messages.
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
-- Error_No_Match --
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Error_No_Match (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("subtype must statically match function result subtype", N);
|
|
|
|
if not Predicates_Match (R_Stm_Type, R_Type) then
|
|
Error_Msg_Node_2 := R_Type;
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("\predicate of& does not match predicate of&",
|
|
N, R_Stm_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Error_No_Match;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Return_Subtype_Indication
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- First, avoid cascaded errors
|
|
|
|
if Error_Posted (Obj_Decl) or else Error_Posted (Subtype_Ind) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- "return access T" case; check that the return statement also has
|
|
-- "access T", and that the subtypes statically match:
|
|
-- if this is an access to subprogram the signatures must match.
|
|
|
|
if R_Type_Is_Anon_Access then
|
|
if R_Stm_Type_Is_Anon_Access then
|
|
if
|
|
Ekind (Designated_Type (R_Stm_Type)) /= E_Subprogram_Type
|
|
then
|
|
if Base_Type (Designated_Type (R_Stm_Type)) /=
|
|
Base_Type (Designated_Type (R_Type))
|
|
or else not Subtypes_Statically_Match (R_Stm_Type, R_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_No_Match (Subtype_Mark (Subtype_Ind));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- For two anonymous access to subprogram types, the
|
|
-- types themselves must be type conformant.
|
|
|
|
if not Conforming_Types
|
|
(R_Stm_Type, R_Type, Fully_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_No_Match (Subtype_Ind);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("must use anonymous access type", Subtype_Ind);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the return object is of an anonymous access type, then report
|
|
-- an error if the function's result type is not also anonymous.
|
|
|
|
elsif R_Stm_Type_Is_Anon_Access then
|
|
pragma Assert (not R_Type_Is_Anon_Access);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("anonymous access not allowed for function with "
|
|
& "named access result", Subtype_Ind);
|
|
|
|
-- Subtype indication case: check that the return object's type is
|
|
-- covered by the result type, and that the subtypes statically match
|
|
-- when the result subtype is constrained. Also handle record types
|
|
-- with unknown discriminants for which we have built the underlying
|
|
-- record view. Coverage is needed to allow specific-type return
|
|
-- objects when the result type is class-wide (see AI05-32).
|
|
|
|
elsif Covers (Base_Type (R_Type), Base_Type (R_Stm_Type))
|
|
or else (Is_Underlying_Record_View (Base_Type (R_Stm_Type))
|
|
and then
|
|
Covers
|
|
(Base_Type (R_Type),
|
|
Underlying_Record_View (Base_Type (R_Stm_Type))))
|
|
then
|
|
-- A null exclusion may be present on the return type, on the
|
|
-- function specification, on the object declaration or on the
|
|
-- subtype itself.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then
|
|
(Can_Never_Be_Null (R_Type)
|
|
or else Null_Exclusion_Present (Parent (Scope_Id))) /=
|
|
Can_Never_Be_Null (R_Stm_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_No_Match (Subtype_Ind);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- AI05-103: for elementary types, subtypes must statically match
|
|
|
|
if Is_Constrained (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Access_Type (R_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
if not Subtypes_Statically_Match (R_Stm_Type, R_Type) then
|
|
Error_No_Match (Subtype_Ind);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- All remaining cases are illegal
|
|
|
|
-- Note: previous versions of this subprogram allowed the return
|
|
-- value to be the ancestor of the return type if the return type
|
|
-- was a null extension. This was plainly incorrect.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("wrong type for return_subtype_indication", Subtype_Ind);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Return_Subtype_Indication;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Local Variables --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
Obj_Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Function_Return
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Return_Present (Scope_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Simple_Return_Statement then
|
|
Expr := Expression (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Guard against a malformed expression. The parser may have tried to
|
|
-- recover but the node is not analyzable.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Expr) = N_Error then
|
|
Set_Etype (Expr, Any_Type);
|
|
Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set (False);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- The resolution of a controlled [extension] aggregate associated
|
|
-- with a return statement creates a temporary which needs to be
|
|
-- finalized on function exit. Wrap the return statement inside a
|
|
-- block so that the finalization machinery can detect this case.
|
|
-- This early expansion is done only when the return statement is
|
|
-- not part of a handled sequence of statements.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In (Expr, N_Aggregate,
|
|
N_Extension_Aggregate)
|
|
and then Needs_Finalization (R_Type)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Block_Statement (Loc,
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (Relocate_Node (N)))));
|
|
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze (Expr);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-251): If the type of the returned object is
|
|
-- an access to an interface type then we add an implicit type
|
|
-- conversion to force the displacement of the "this" pointer to
|
|
-- reference the secondary dispatch table. We cannot delay the
|
|
-- generation of this implicit conversion until the expansion
|
|
-- because in this case the type resolution changes the decoration
|
|
-- of the expression node to match R_Type; by contrast, if the
|
|
-- returned object is a class-wide interface type then it is too
|
|
-- early to generate here the implicit conversion since the return
|
|
-- statement may be rewritten by the expander into an extended
|
|
-- return statement whose expansion takes care of adding the
|
|
-- implicit type conversion to displace the pointer to the object.
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active
|
|
and then Serious_Errors_Detected = 0
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then Nkind (Expr) /= N_Null
|
|
and then Is_Interface (Designated_Type (R_Type))
|
|
and then Is_Progenitor (Designated_Type (R_Type),
|
|
Designated_Type (Etype (Expr)))
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (Expr, Convert_To (R_Type, Relocate_Node (Expr)));
|
|
Analyze (Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Resolve (Expr, R_Type);
|
|
Check_Limited_Return (N, Expr, R_Type);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Expr) and then Nkind (Expr) = N_Aggregate then
|
|
Check_Aggregate_Accessibility (Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- RETURN only allowed in SPARK as the last statement in function
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements
|
|
and then
|
|
(Nkind (Parent (Parent (N))) /= N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
or else Present (Next (N)))
|
|
then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("RETURN should be the last statement in function", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction ("extended RETURN is not allowed", N);
|
|
Obj_Decl := Last (Return_Object_Declarations (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Analyze parts specific to extended_return_statement:
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Has_Aliased : constant Boolean := Aliased_Present (Obj_Decl);
|
|
HSS : constant Node_Id := Handled_Statement_Sequence (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Expr := Expression (Obj_Decl);
|
|
|
|
-- Note: The check for OK_For_Limited_Init will happen in
|
|
-- Analyze_Object_Declaration; we treat it as a normal
|
|
-- object declaration.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Return_Object (Defining_Identifier (Obj_Decl));
|
|
Analyze (Obj_Decl);
|
|
|
|
Check_Return_Subtype_Indication (Obj_Decl);
|
|
|
|
if Present (HSS) then
|
|
Analyze (HSS);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Exception_Handlers (HSS)) then
|
|
|
|
-- ???Has_Nested_Block_With_Handler needs to be set.
|
|
-- Probably by creating an actual N_Block_Statement.
|
|
-- Probably in Expand.
|
|
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Mark the return object as referenced, since the return is an
|
|
-- implicit reference of the object.
|
|
|
|
Set_Referenced (Defining_Identifier (Obj_Decl));
|
|
|
|
Check_References (Stm_Entity);
|
|
|
|
-- Check RM 6.5 (5.9/3)
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aliased then
|
|
if Ada_Version < Ada_2012 then
|
|
|
|
-- Shouldn't this test Warn_On_Ada_2012_Compatibility ???
|
|
-- Can it really happen (extended return???)
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("aliased only allowed for limited return objects "
|
|
& "in Ada 2012??", N);
|
|
|
|
elsif not Is_Limited_View (R_Type) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("aliased only allowed for limited return objects", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of Expr present
|
|
|
|
if Present (Expr)
|
|
|
|
-- Defend against previous errors
|
|
|
|
and then Nkind (Expr) /= N_Empty
|
|
and then Present (Etype (Expr))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Apply constraint check. Note that this is done before the implicit
|
|
-- conversion of the expression done for anonymous access types to
|
|
-- ensure correct generation of the null-excluding check associated
|
|
-- with null-excluding expressions found in return statements.
|
|
|
|
Apply_Constraint_Check (Expr, R_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-318-02): When the result type is an anonymous access
|
|
-- type, apply an implicit conversion of the expression to that type
|
|
-- to force appropriate static and run-time accessibility checks.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Ekind (R_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (Expr, Convert_To (R_Type, Relocate_Node (Expr)));
|
|
Analyze_And_Resolve (Expr, R_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a local anonymous access to subprogram, the
|
|
-- accessibility check can be applied statically. The return is
|
|
-- illegal if the access type of the return expression is declared
|
|
-- inside of the subprogram (except if it is the subtype indication
|
|
-- of an extended return statement).
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (R_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type then
|
|
if not Comes_From_Source (Current_Scope)
|
|
or else Ekind (Current_Scope) = E_Return_Statement
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif
|
|
Scope_Depth (Scope (Etype (Expr))) >= Scope_Depth (Scope_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("cannot return local access to subprogram", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The expression cannot be of a formal incomplete type
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Etype (Expr)) = E_Incomplete_Type
|
|
and then Is_Generic_Type (Etype (Expr))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("cannot return expression of a formal incomplete type", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the result type is class-wide, then check that the return
|
|
-- expression's type is not declared at a deeper level than the
|
|
-- function (RM05-6.5(5.6/2)).
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (R_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
if Type_Access_Level (Etype (Expr)) >
|
|
Subprogram_Access_Level (Scope_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("level of return expression type is deeper than "
|
|
& "class-wide function!", Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check incorrect use of dynamically tagged expression
|
|
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (R_Type) then
|
|
Check_Dynamically_Tagged_Expression
|
|
(Expr => Expr,
|
|
Typ => R_Type,
|
|
Related_Nod => N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- ??? A real run-time accessibility check is needed in cases
|
|
-- involving dereferences of access parameters. For now we just
|
|
-- check the static cases.
|
|
|
|
if (Ada_Version < Ada_2005 or else Debug_Flag_Dot_L)
|
|
and then Is_Limited_View (Etype (Scope_Id))
|
|
and then Object_Access_Level (Expr) >
|
|
Subprogram_Access_Level (Scope_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Suppress the message in a generic, where the rewriting
|
|
-- is irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
if Inside_A_Generic then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Rewrite (N,
|
|
Make_Raise_Program_Error (Loc,
|
|
Reason => PE_Accessibility_Check_Failed));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := SPARK_Mode /= On;
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("cannot return a local value by reference<<", N);
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("\& [<<", N, Standard_Program_Error);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Known_Null (Expr)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (Scope_Id)) = N_Function_Specification
|
|
and then Null_Exclusion_Present (Parent (Scope_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error
|
|
(N => Expr,
|
|
Msg => "(Ada 2005) null not allowed for "
|
|
& "null-excluding return??",
|
|
Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- RM 6.5 (5.4/3): accessibility checks also apply if the return object
|
|
-- has no initializing expression.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version > Ada_2005 and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (R_Type) then
|
|
if Type_Access_Level (Etype (Defining_Identifier (Obj_Decl))) >
|
|
Subprogram_Access_Level (Scope_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("level of return expression type is deeper than "
|
|
& "class-wide function!", Obj_Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Function_Return;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Gen_Id : Entity_Id)
|
|
is
|
|
Gen_Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (Gen_Id);
|
|
Kind : constant Entity_Kind := Ekind (Gen_Id);
|
|
Body_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_N : Node_Id;
|
|
Spec : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Copy body and disable expansion while analyzing the generic For a
|
|
-- stub, do not copy the stub (which would load the proper body), this
|
|
-- will be done when the proper body is analyzed.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
New_N := Copy_Generic_Node (N, Empty, Instantiating => False);
|
|
Rewrite (N, New_N);
|
|
|
|
-- Once the contents of the generic copy and the template are
|
|
-- swapped, do the same for their respective aspect specifications.
|
|
|
|
Exchange_Aspects (N, New_N);
|
|
|
|
-- Collect all contract-related source pragmas found within the
|
|
-- template and attach them to the contract of the subprogram body.
|
|
-- This contract is used in the capture of global references within
|
|
-- annotations.
|
|
|
|
Create_Generic_Contract (N);
|
|
|
|
Start_Generic;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Spec := Specification (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Within the body of the generic, the subprogram is callable, and
|
|
-- behaves like the corresponding non-generic unit.
|
|
|
|
Body_Id := Defining_Entity (Spec);
|
|
|
|
if Kind = E_Generic_Procedure
|
|
and then Nkind (Spec) /= N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("invalid body for generic procedure ", Body_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = E_Generic_Function
|
|
and then Nkind (Spec) /= N_Function_Specification
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("invalid body for generic function ", Body_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Body (Gen_Decl, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Has_Completion (Gen_Id)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Subunit
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("duplicate generic body", N);
|
|
return;
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Gen_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
Set_Ekind (Defining_Entity (Specification (N)), Kind);
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec (N, Gen_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit then
|
|
Set_Cunit_Entity (Current_Sem_Unit, Defining_Entity (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Make generic parameters immediately visible in the body. They are
|
|
-- needed to process the formals declarations. Then make the formals
|
|
-- visible in a separate step.
|
|
|
|
Push_Scope (Gen_Id);
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
First_Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
First_Ent := First_Entity (Gen_Id);
|
|
|
|
E := First_Ent;
|
|
while Present (E) and then not Is_Formal (E) loop
|
|
Install_Entity (E);
|
|
Next_Entity (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Set_Use (Generic_Formal_Declarations (Gen_Decl));
|
|
|
|
-- Now generic formals are visible, and the specification can be
|
|
-- analyzed, for subsequent conformance check.
|
|
|
|
Body_Id := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Spec);
|
|
|
|
-- Make formal parameters visible
|
|
|
|
if Present (E) then
|
|
|
|
-- E is the first formal parameter, we loop through the formals
|
|
-- installing them so that they will be visible.
|
|
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Gen_Id, E);
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
Install_Entity (E);
|
|
Next_Formal (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Visible generic entity is callable within its own body
|
|
|
|
Set_Ekind (Gen_Id, Ekind (Body_Id));
|
|
Set_Ekind (Body_Id, E_Subprogram_Body);
|
|
Set_Convention (Body_Id, Convention (Gen_Id));
|
|
Set_Is_Obsolescent (Body_Id, Is_Obsolescent (Gen_Id));
|
|
Set_Scope (Body_Id, Scope (Gen_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- Inherit the "ghostness" of the generic spec. Note that this
|
|
-- property is not directly inherited as the body may be subject
|
|
-- to a different Ghost assertion policy.
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None or else Is_Ghost_Entity (Gen_Id) then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration and at
|
|
-- the point of completion must match (SPARK RM 6.9(14)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Completion (Gen_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_Fully_Conformant (Body_Id, Gen_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
|
|
-- No body to analyze, so restore state of generic unit
|
|
|
|
Set_Ekind (Gen_Id, Kind);
|
|
Set_Ekind (Body_Id, Kind);
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Ent) then
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Gen_Id, First_Ent);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a compilation unit, it must be made visible explicitly,
|
|
-- because the compilation of the declaration, unlike other library
|
|
-- unit declarations, does not. If it is not a unit, the following
|
|
-- is redundant but harmless.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (Gen_Id);
|
|
Reference_Body_Formals (Gen_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Child_Unit (Gen_Id) then
|
|
Generate_Reference (Gen_Id, Scope (Gen_Id), 'k', False);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Actual_Subtypes (N, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id, SPARK_Mode_Pragma);
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma_Inherited (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Analyze any aspect specifications that appear on the generic
|
|
-- subprogram body.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications_On_Body_Or_Stub (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Declarations (Declarations (N));
|
|
Check_Completion;
|
|
|
|
-- Process the contract of the subprogram body after all declarations
|
|
-- have been analyzed. This ensures that any contract-related pragmas
|
|
-- are available through the N_Contract node of the body.
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Entry_Or_Subprogram_Body_Contract (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
Analyze (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N));
|
|
Save_Global_References (Original_Node (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Prior to exiting the scope, include generic formals again (if any
|
|
-- are present) in the set of local entities.
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Ent) then
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Gen_Id, First_Ent);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_References (Gen_Id);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
Process_End_Label (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N), 't', Current_Scope);
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
Check_Subprogram_Order (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Outside of its body, unit is generic again
|
|
|
|
Set_Ekind (Gen_Id, Kind);
|
|
Generate_Reference (Gen_Id, Body_Id, 'b', Set_Ref => False);
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check then
|
|
Style.Check_Identifier (Body_Id, Gen_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
End_Generic;
|
|
end Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Null_Procedure --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Null_Procedure
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Is_Completion : out Boolean)
|
|
is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (N);
|
|
Designator : Entity_Id;
|
|
Form : Node_Id;
|
|
Null_Body : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Prev : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Capture the profile of the null procedure before analysis, for
|
|
-- expansion at the freeze point and at each point of call. The body is
|
|
-- used if the procedure has preconditions, or if it is a completion. In
|
|
-- the first case the body is analyzed at the freeze point, in the other
|
|
-- it replaces the null procedure declaration.
|
|
|
|
Null_Body :=
|
|
Make_Subprogram_Body (Loc,
|
|
Specification => New_Copy_Tree (Spec),
|
|
Declarations => New_List,
|
|
Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
|
|
Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
|
|
Statements => New_List (Make_Null_Statement (Loc))));
|
|
|
|
-- Create new entities for body and formals
|
|
|
|
Set_Defining_Unit_Name (Specification (Null_Body),
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier
|
|
(Sloc (Defining_Entity (N)),
|
|
Chars (Defining_Entity (N))));
|
|
|
|
Form := First (Parameter_Specifications (Specification (Null_Body)));
|
|
while Present (Form) loop
|
|
Set_Defining_Identifier (Form,
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier
|
|
(Sloc (Defining_Identifier (Form)),
|
|
Chars (Defining_Identifier (Form))));
|
|
Next (Form);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Determine whether the null procedure may be a completion of a generic
|
|
-- suprogram, in which case we use the new null body as the completion
|
|
-- and set minimal semantic information on the original declaration,
|
|
-- which is rewritten as a null statement.
|
|
|
|
Prev := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Defining_Entity (Spec));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev) and then Is_Generic_Subprogram (Prev) then
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Null_Body);
|
|
Set_Ekind (Defining_Entity (N), Ekind (Prev));
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
|
Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body (Null_Body, Prev);
|
|
Is_Completion := True;
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Resolve the types of the formals now, because the freeze point
|
|
-- may appear in a different context, e.g. an instantiation.
|
|
|
|
Form := First (Parameter_Specifications (Specification (Null_Body)));
|
|
while Present (Form) loop
|
|
if Nkind (Parameter_Type (Form)) /= N_Access_Definition then
|
|
Find_Type (Parameter_Type (Form));
|
|
|
|
elsif
|
|
No (Access_To_Subprogram_Definition (Parameter_Type (Form)))
|
|
then
|
|
Find_Type (Subtype_Mark (Parameter_Type (Form)));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- The case of a null procedure with a formal that is an
|
|
-- access_to_subprogram type, and that is used as an actual
|
|
-- in an instantiation is left to the enthusiastic reader.
|
|
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Form);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there are previous overloadable entities with the same name,
|
|
-- check whether any of them is completed by the null procedure.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev) and then Is_Overloadable (Prev) then
|
|
Designator := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Spec);
|
|
Prev := Find_Corresponding_Spec (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if No (Prev) or else not Comes_From_Source (Prev) then
|
|
Designator := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Spec);
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Designator);
|
|
|
|
-- Signal to caller that this is a procedure declaration
|
|
|
|
Is_Completion := False;
|
|
|
|
-- Null procedures are always inlined, but generic formal subprograms
|
|
-- which appear as such in the internal instance of formal packages,
|
|
-- need no completion and are not marked Inline.
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active
|
|
and then Nkind (N) /= N_Formal_Concrete_Subprogram_Declaration
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Body (N, Defining_Entity (Null_Body));
|
|
Set_Body_To_Inline (N, Null_Body);
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- The null procedure is a completion. We unconditionally rewrite
|
|
-- this as a null body (even if expansion is not active), because
|
|
-- there are various error checks that are applied on this body
|
|
-- when it is analyzed (e.g. correct aspect placement).
|
|
|
|
if Has_Completion (Prev) then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Prev);
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("duplicate body for & declared#", N, Prev);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Is_Completion := True;
|
|
Rewrite (N, Null_Body);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Null_Procedure;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Operator_Symbol --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- An operator symbol such as "+" or "and" may appear in context where the
|
|
-- literal denotes an entity name, such as "+"(x, y) or in context when it
|
|
-- is just a string, as in (conjunction = "or"). In these cases the parser
|
|
-- generates this node, and the semantics does the disambiguation. Other
|
|
-- such case are actuals in an instantiation, the generic unit in an
|
|
-- instantiation, and pragma arguments.
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Operator_Symbol (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Par : constant Node_Id := Parent (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if (Nkind (Par) = N_Function_Call and then N = Name (Par))
|
|
or else Nkind (Par) = N_Function_Instantiation
|
|
or else (Nkind (Par) = N_Indexed_Component and then N = Prefix (Par))
|
|
or else (Nkind (Par) = N_Pragma_Argument_Association
|
|
and then not Is_Pragma_String_Literal (Par))
|
|
or else Nkind (Par) = N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
or else (Nkind (Par) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Attribute_Name (Par) /= Name_Value)
|
|
then
|
|
Find_Direct_Name (N);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Change_Operator_Symbol_To_String_Literal (N);
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Operator_Symbol;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Parameter_Association --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Parameter_Association (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Analyze (Explicit_Actual_Parameter (N));
|
|
end Analyze_Parameter_Association;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Procedure_Call --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Procedure_Call (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
procedure Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
-- Do Analyze and Resolve calls for procedure call
|
|
-- At end, check illegal order dependence.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Call_And_Resolve --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Call_And_Resolve is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement then
|
|
Analyze_Call (N);
|
|
Resolve (N, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
else
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (N);
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
P : constant Node_Id := Name (N);
|
|
Actual : Node_Id;
|
|
New_N : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Save_Ghost_Mode : constant Ghost_Mode_Type := Ghost_Mode;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Procedure_Call
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- The syntactic construct: PREFIX ACTUAL_PARAMETER_PART can denote
|
|
-- a procedure call or an entry call. The prefix may denote an access
|
|
-- to subprogram type, in which case an implicit dereference applies.
|
|
-- If the prefix is an indexed component (without implicit dereference)
|
|
-- then the construct denotes a call to a member of an entire family.
|
|
-- If the prefix is a simple name, it may still denote a call to a
|
|
-- parameterless member of an entry family. Resolution of these various
|
|
-- interpretations is delicate.
|
|
|
|
-- Do not analyze machine code statements to avoid rejecting them in
|
|
-- CodePeer mode.
|
|
|
|
if CodePeer_Mode and then Nkind (P) = N_Qualified_Expression then
|
|
Set_Etype (P, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
else
|
|
Analyze (P);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a call of the form Obj.Op, the call may have been analyzed
|
|
-- and possibly rewritten into a block, in which case we are done.
|
|
|
|
if Analyzed (N) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there is an error analyzing the name (which may have been
|
|
-- rewritten if the original call was in prefix notation) then error
|
|
-- has been emitted already, mark node and return.
|
|
|
|
if Error_Posted (N) or else Etype (Name (N)) = Any_Type then
|
|
Set_Etype (N, Any_Type);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A procedure call is Ghost when its name denotes a Ghost procedure.
|
|
-- Set the mode now to ensure that any nodes generated during analysis
|
|
-- and expansion are properly marked as Ghost.
|
|
|
|
Set_Ghost_Mode (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise analyze the parameters
|
|
|
|
if Present (Actuals) then
|
|
Actual := First (Actuals);
|
|
|
|
while Present (Actual) loop
|
|
Analyze (Actual);
|
|
Check_Parameterless_Call (Actual);
|
|
Next (Actual);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Special processing for Elab_Spec, Elab_Body and Elab_Subp_Body calls
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (P) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Nam_In (Attribute_Name (P), Name_Elab_Spec,
|
|
Name_Elab_Body,
|
|
Name_Elab_Subp_Body)
|
|
then
|
|
if Present (Actuals) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("no parameters allowed for this call", First (Actuals));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Etype (N, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
Set_Analyzed (N);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (P)
|
|
and then Is_Record_Type (Etype (Entity (P)))
|
|
and then Remote_AST_I_Dereference (P)
|
|
then
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (P)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (P)) /= E_Entry_Family
|
|
then
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (P))
|
|
and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Etype (P))) = E_Subprogram_Type
|
|
and then No (Actuals)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("missing explicit dereference in call", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
-- If the prefix is the simple name of an entry family, this is a
|
|
-- parameterless call from within the task body itself.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (P)
|
|
and then Nkind (P) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (P)) = E_Entry_Family
|
|
and then Present (Actuals)
|
|
and then No (Next (First (Actuals)))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Can be call to parameterless entry family. What appears to be the
|
|
-- sole argument is in fact the entry index. Rewrite prefix of node
|
|
-- accordingly. Source representation is unchanged by this
|
|
-- transformation.
|
|
|
|
New_N :=
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix =>
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Occurrence_Of (Scope (Entity (P)), Loc),
|
|
Selector_Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Entity (P), Loc)),
|
|
Expressions => Actuals);
|
|
Set_Name (N, New_N);
|
|
Set_Etype (New_N, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
Set_Parameter_Associations (N, No_List);
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Explicit_Dereference then
|
|
if Ekind (Etype (P)) = E_Subprogram_Type then
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("expect access to procedure in call", P);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The name can be a selected component or an indexed component that
|
|
-- yields an access to subprogram. Such a prefix is legal if the call
|
|
-- has parameter associations.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (P))
|
|
and then Ekind (Designated_Type (Etype (P))) = E_Subprogram_Type
|
|
then
|
|
if Present (Actuals) then
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("missing explicit dereference in call ", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If not an access to subprogram, then the prefix must resolve to the
|
|
-- name of an entry, entry family, or protected operation.
|
|
|
|
-- For the case of a simple entry call, P is a selected component where
|
|
-- the prefix is the task and the selector name is the entry. A call to
|
|
-- a protected procedure will have the same syntax. If the protected
|
|
-- object contains overloaded operations, the entity may appear as a
|
|
-- function, the context will select the operation whose type is Void.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
and then Ekind_In (Entity (Selector_Name (P)), E_Entry,
|
|
E_Procedure,
|
|
E_Function)
|
|
then
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Selector_Name (P))) = E_Entry_Family
|
|
and then Present (Actuals)
|
|
and then No (Next (First (Actuals)))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Can be call to parameterless entry family. What appears to be the
|
|
-- sole argument is in fact the entry index. Rewrite prefix of node
|
|
-- accordingly. Source representation is unchanged by this
|
|
-- transformation.
|
|
|
|
New_N :=
|
|
Make_Indexed_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Copy (P),
|
|
Expressions => Actuals);
|
|
Set_Name (N, New_N);
|
|
Set_Etype (New_N, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
Set_Parameter_Associations (N, No_List);
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
-- For the case of a reference to an element of an entry family, P is
|
|
-- an indexed component whose prefix is a selected component (task and
|
|
-- entry family), and whose index is the entry family index.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
and then Nkind (Prefix (P)) = N_Selected_Component
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Selector_Name (Prefix (P)))) = E_Entry_Family
|
|
then
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
-- If the prefix is the name of an entry family, it is a call from
|
|
-- within the task body itself.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Indexed_Component
|
|
and then Nkind (Prefix (P)) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (Prefix (P))) = E_Entry_Family
|
|
then
|
|
New_N :=
|
|
Make_Selected_Component (Loc,
|
|
Prefix => New_Occurrence_Of (Scope (Entity (Prefix (P))), Loc),
|
|
Selector_Name => New_Occurrence_Of (Entity (Prefix (P)), Loc));
|
|
Rewrite (Prefix (P), New_N);
|
|
Analyze (P);
|
|
Analyze_Call_And_Resolve;
|
|
|
|
-- In Ada 2012. a qualified expression is a name, but it cannot be a
|
|
-- procedure name, so the construct can only be a qualified expression.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (P) = N_Qualified_Expression
|
|
and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
then
|
|
Rewrite (N, Make_Code_Statement (Loc, Expression => P));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Anything else is an error
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("invalid procedure or entry call", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
end Analyze_Procedure_Call;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Return_Statement --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Nkind_In (N, N_Simple_Return_Statement,
|
|
N_Extended_Return_Statement));
|
|
|
|
Returns_Object : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Nkind (N) = N_Extended_Return_Statement
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nkind (N) = N_Simple_Return_Statement
|
|
and then Present (Expression (N)));
|
|
-- True if we're returning something; that is, "return <expression>;"
|
|
-- or "return Result : T [:= ...]". False for "return;". Used for error
|
|
-- checking: If Returns_Object is True, N should apply to a function
|
|
-- body; otherwise N should apply to a procedure body, entry body,
|
|
-- accept statement, or extended return statement.
|
|
|
|
function Find_What_It_Applies_To return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Find the entity representing the innermost enclosing body, accept
|
|
-- statement, or extended return statement. If the result is a callable
|
|
-- construct or extended return statement, then this will be the value
|
|
-- of the Return_Applies_To attribute. Otherwise, the program is
|
|
-- illegal. See RM-6.5(4/2).
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Find_What_It_Applies_To --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Find_What_It_Applies_To return Entity_Id is
|
|
Result : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Loop outward through the Scope_Stack, skipping blocks, loops,
|
|
-- and postconditions.
|
|
|
|
for J in reverse 0 .. Scope_Stack.Last loop
|
|
Result := Scope_Stack.Table (J).Entity;
|
|
exit when not Ekind_In (Result, E_Block, E_Loop)
|
|
and then Chars (Result) /= Name_uPostconditions;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Present (Result));
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Find_What_It_Applies_To;
|
|
|
|
-- Local declarations
|
|
|
|
Scope_Id : constant Entity_Id := Find_What_It_Applies_To;
|
|
Kind : constant Entity_Kind := Ekind (Scope_Id);
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Stm_Entity : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
New_Internal_Entity
|
|
(E_Return_Statement, Current_Scope, Loc, 'R');
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Return_Statement
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Return_Statement_Entity (N, Stm_Entity);
|
|
|
|
Set_Etype (Stm_Entity, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
Set_Return_Applies_To (Stm_Entity, Scope_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Place Return entity on scope stack, to simplify enforcement of 6.5
|
|
-- (4/2): an inner return statement will apply to this extended return.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Extended_Return_Statement then
|
|
Push_Scope (Stm_Entity);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check that pragma No_Return is obeyed. Don't complain about the
|
|
-- implicitly-generated return that is placed at the end.
|
|
|
|
if No_Return (Scope_Id) and then Comes_From_Source (N) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("RETURN statement not allowed (No_Return)", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Warn on any unassigned OUT parameters if in procedure
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scope_Id) = E_Procedure then
|
|
Warn_On_Unassigned_Out_Parameter (N, Scope_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check that functions return objects, and other things do not
|
|
|
|
if Kind = E_Function or else Kind = E_Generic_Function then
|
|
if not Returns_Object then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("missing expression in return from function", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = E_Procedure or else Kind = E_Generic_Procedure then
|
|
if Returns_Object then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("procedure cannot return value (use function)", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = E_Entry or else Kind = E_Entry_Family then
|
|
if Returns_Object then
|
|
if Is_Protected_Type (Scope (Scope_Id)) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("entry body cannot return value", N);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("accept statement cannot return value", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = E_Return_Statement then
|
|
|
|
-- We are nested within another return statement, which must be an
|
|
-- extended_return_statement.
|
|
|
|
if Returns_Object then
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Extended_Return_Statement then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("extended return statement cannot be nested (use `RETURN;`)",
|
|
N);
|
|
|
|
-- Case of a simple return statement with a value inside extended
|
|
-- return statement.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("return nested in extended return statement cannot return "
|
|
& "value (use `RETURN;`)", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("illegal context for return statement", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind_In (Kind, E_Function, E_Generic_Function) then
|
|
Analyze_Function_Return (N);
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind_In (Kind, E_Procedure, E_Generic_Procedure) then
|
|
Set_Return_Present (Scope_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Extended_Return_Statement then
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Kill_Current_Values (Last_Assignment_Only => True);
|
|
Check_Unreachable_Code (N);
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Dimension (N);
|
|
end Analyze_Return_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Simple_Return_Statement --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Simple_Return_Statement (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Expression (N)) then
|
|
Mark_Coextensions (N, Expression (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Return_Statement (N);
|
|
end Analyze_Simple_Return_Statement;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Return_Type --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Return_Type (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Designator : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Normal case where result definition does not indicate an error
|
|
|
|
if Result_Definition (N) /= Error then
|
|
if Nkind (Result_Definition (N)) = N_Access_Definition then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("access result is not allowed", Result_Definition (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-254): Handle anonymous access to subprograms
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
AD : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Access_To_Subprogram_Definition (Result_Definition (N));
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (AD) and then Protected_Present (AD) then
|
|
Typ := Replace_Anonymous_Access_To_Protected_Subprogram (N);
|
|
else
|
|
Typ := Access_Definition (N, Result_Definition (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
Set_Parent (Typ, Result_Definition (N));
|
|
Set_Is_Local_Anonymous_Access (Typ);
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator, Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Ensure proper usage of null exclusion
|
|
|
|
Null_Exclusion_Static_Checks (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Subtype_Mark case
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Find_Type (Result_Definition (N));
|
|
Typ := Entity (Result_Definition (N));
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator, Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- Unconstrained array as result is not allowed in SPARK
|
|
|
|
if Is_Array_Type (Typ) and then not Is_Constrained (Typ) then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("returning an unconstrained array is not allowed",
|
|
Result_Definition (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Ensure proper usage of null exclusion
|
|
|
|
Null_Exclusion_Static_Checks (N);
|
|
|
|
-- If a null exclusion is imposed on the result type, then create
|
|
-- a null-excluding itype (an access subtype) and use it as the
|
|
-- function's Etype. Note that the null exclusion checks are done
|
|
-- right before this, because they don't get applied to types that
|
|
-- do not come from source.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Typ) and then Null_Exclusion_Present (N) then
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator,
|
|
Create_Null_Excluding_Itype
|
|
(T => Typ,
|
|
Related_Nod => N,
|
|
Scope_Id => Scope (Current_Scope)));
|
|
|
|
-- The new subtype must be elaborated before use because
|
|
-- it is visible outside of the function. However its base
|
|
-- type may not be frozen yet, so the reference that will
|
|
-- force elaboration must be attached to the freezing of
|
|
-- the base type.
|
|
|
|
-- If the return specification appears on a proper body,
|
|
-- the subtype will have been created already on the spec.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Frozen (Typ) then
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (Parent (N))) = N_Subunit
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
else
|
|
Build_Itype_Reference (Etype (Designator), Parent (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Ensure_Freeze_Node (Typ);
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
IR : constant Node_Id := Make_Itype_Reference (Sloc (N));
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Itype (IR, Etype (Designator));
|
|
Append_Freeze_Actions (Typ, New_List (IR));
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator, Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Typ) = E_Incomplete_Type
|
|
or else (Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Ekind (Root_Type (Typ)) = E_Incomplete_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
-- AI05-0151: Tagged incomplete types are allowed in all formal
|
|
-- parts. Untagged incomplete types are not allowed in bodies.
|
|
-- As a consequence, limited views cannot appear in a basic
|
|
-- declaration that is itself within a body, because there is
|
|
-- no point at which the non-limited view will become visible.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
if From_Limited_With (Typ) and then In_Package_Body then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("invalid use of incomplete type&",
|
|
Result_Definition (N), Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- The return type of a subprogram body cannot be of a
|
|
-- formal incomplete type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Generic_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("return type cannot be a formal incomplete type",
|
|
Result_Definition (N));
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Generic_Type (Root_Type (Typ))
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("return type cannot be a formal incomplete type",
|
|
Result_Definition (N));
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Tagged_Type (Typ) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- Use is legal in a thunk generated for an operation
|
|
-- inherited from a progenitor.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Thunk (Designator)
|
|
and then Present (Non_Limited_View (Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
or else Nkind_In (Parent (Parent (N)), N_Accept_Statement,
|
|
N_Entry_Body)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("invalid use of untagged incomplete type&",
|
|
Designator, Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The type must be completed in the current package. This
|
|
-- is checked at the end of the package declaration when
|
|
-- Taft-amendment types are identified. If the return type
|
|
-- is class-wide, there is no required check, the type can
|
|
-- be a bona fide TAT.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scope (Current_Scope)) = E_Package
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Scope (Current_Scope))
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Append_Elmt (Designator, Private_Dependents (Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("invalid use of incomplete type&", Designator, Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case where result definition does indicate an error
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator, Any_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Return_Type;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Subprogram_Body --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Subprogram_Body (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Body_Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (N);
|
|
Body_Id : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (Body_Spec);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Debug_Flag_C then
|
|
Write_Str ("==> subprogram body ");
|
|
Write_Name (Chars (Body_Id));
|
|
Write_Str (" from ");
|
|
Write_Location (Loc);
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
Indent;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Trace_Scope (N, Body_Id, " Analyze subprogram: ");
|
|
|
|
-- The real work is split out into the helper, so it can do "return;"
|
|
-- without skipping the debug output:
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper (N);
|
|
|
|
if Debug_Flag_C then
|
|
Outdent;
|
|
Write_Str ("<== subprogram body ");
|
|
Write_Name (Chars (Body_Id));
|
|
Write_Str (" from ");
|
|
Write_Location (Loc);
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Subprogram_Body;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- This procedure is called for regular subprogram bodies, generic bodies,
|
|
-- and for subprogram stubs of both kinds. In the case of stubs, only the
|
|
-- specification matters, and is used to create a proper declaration for
|
|
-- the subprogram, or to perform conformance checks.
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Body_Spec : Node_Id := Specification (N);
|
|
Body_Id : Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (Body_Spec);
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
|
Prev_Id : constant Entity_Id := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
Conformant : Boolean;
|
|
Desig_View : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
Exch_Views : Elist_Id := No_Elist;
|
|
HSS : Node_Id;
|
|
Prot_Typ : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
Spec_Decl : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Spec_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
Last_Real_Spec_Entity : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- When we analyze a separate spec, the entity chain ends up containing
|
|
-- the formals, as well as any itypes generated during analysis of the
|
|
-- default expressions for parameters, or the arguments of associated
|
|
-- precondition/postcondition pragmas (which are analyzed in the context
|
|
-- of the spec since they have visibility on formals).
|
|
--
|
|
-- These entities belong with the spec and not the body. However we do
|
|
-- the analysis of the body in the context of the spec (again to obtain
|
|
-- visibility to the formals), and all the entities generated during
|
|
-- this analysis end up also chained to the entity chain of the spec.
|
|
-- But they really belong to the body, and there is circuitry to move
|
|
-- them from the spec to the body.
|
|
--
|
|
-- However, when we do this move, we don't want to move the real spec
|
|
-- entities (first para above) to the body. The Last_Real_Spec_Entity
|
|
-- variable points to the last real spec entity, so we only move those
|
|
-- chained beyond that point. It is initialized to Empty to deal with
|
|
-- the case where there is no separate spec.
|
|
|
|
function Body_Has_Contract return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check whether unanalyzed body has an aspect or pragma that may
|
|
-- generate a SPARK contract.
|
|
|
|
function Body_Has_SPARK_Mode_On return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check whether SPARK_Mode On applies to the subprogram body, either
|
|
-- because it is specified directly on the body, or because it is
|
|
-- inherited from the enclosing subprogram or package.
|
|
|
|
procedure Build_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
-- Create a matching subprogram declaration for subprogram body N
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Anonymous_Return;
|
|
-- Ada 2005: if a function returns an access type that denotes a task,
|
|
-- or a type that contains tasks, we must create a master entity for
|
|
-- the anonymous type, which typically will be used in an allocator
|
|
-- in the body of the function.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Inline_Pragma (Spec : in out Node_Id);
|
|
-- Look ahead to recognize a pragma that may appear after the body.
|
|
-- If there is a previous spec, check that it appears in the same
|
|
-- declarative part. If the pragma is Inline_Always, perform inlining
|
|
-- unconditionally, otherwise only if Front_End_Inlining is requested.
|
|
-- If the body acts as a spec, and inlining is required, we create a
|
|
-- subprogram declaration for it, in order to attach the body to inline.
|
|
-- If pragma does not appear after the body, check whether there is
|
|
-- an inline pragma before any local declarations.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Missing_Return;
|
|
-- Checks for a function with a no return statements, and also performs
|
|
-- the warning checks implemented by Check_Returns. In formal mode, also
|
|
-- verify that a function ends with a RETURN and that a procedure does
|
|
-- not contain any RETURN.
|
|
|
|
function Disambiguate_Spec return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- When a primitive is declared between the private view and the full
|
|
-- view of a concurrent type which implements an interface, a special
|
|
-- mechanism is used to find the corresponding spec of the primitive
|
|
-- body.
|
|
|
|
function Exchange_Limited_Views (Subp_Id : Entity_Id) return Elist_Id;
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI05-0151): Detect whether the profile of Subp_Id contains
|
|
-- incomplete types coming from a limited context and replace their
|
|
-- limited views with the non-limited ones. Return the list of changes
|
|
-- to be used to undo the transformation.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Private_Concurrent_Primitive
|
|
(Subp_Id : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine whether subprogram Subp_Id is a primitive of a concurrent
|
|
-- type that implements an interface and has a private view.
|
|
|
|
procedure Restore_Limited_Views (Restore_List : Elist_Id);
|
|
-- Undo the transformation done by Exchange_Limited_Views.
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Trivial_Subprogram (N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Sets the Is_Trivial_Subprogram flag in both spec and body of the
|
|
-- subprogram whose body is being analyzed. N is the statement node
|
|
-- causing the flag to be set, if the following statement is a return
|
|
-- of an entity, we mark the entity as set in source to suppress any
|
|
-- warning on the stylized use of function stubs with a dummy return.
|
|
|
|
procedure Verify_Overriding_Indicator;
|
|
-- If there was a previous spec, the entity has been entered in the
|
|
-- current scope previously. If the body itself carries an overriding
|
|
-- indicator, check that it is consistent with the known status of the
|
|
-- entity.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Body_Has_Contract --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Body_Has_Contract return Boolean is
|
|
Decls : constant List_Id := Declarations (N);
|
|
Item : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Check for aspects that may generate a contract
|
|
|
|
if Present (Aspect_Specifications (N)) then
|
|
Item := First (Aspect_Specifications (N));
|
|
while Present (Item) loop
|
|
if Is_Subprogram_Contract_Annotation (Item) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Item);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check for pragmas that may generate a contract
|
|
|
|
if Present (Decls) then
|
|
Item := First (Decls);
|
|
while Present (Item) loop
|
|
if Nkind (Item) = N_Pragma
|
|
and then Is_Subprogram_Contract_Annotation (Item)
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Item);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Body_Has_Contract;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Body_Has_SPARK_Mode_On --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Body_Has_SPARK_Mode_On return Boolean is
|
|
Decls : constant List_Id := Declarations (N);
|
|
Item : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Check for SPARK_Mode aspect
|
|
|
|
if Present (Aspect_Specifications (N)) then
|
|
Item := First (Aspect_Specifications (N));
|
|
while Present (Item) loop
|
|
if Get_Aspect_Id (Item) = Aspect_SPARK_Mode then
|
|
return Get_SPARK_Mode_From_Annotation (Item) = On;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Item);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check for SPARK_Mode pragma
|
|
|
|
if Present (Decls) then
|
|
Item := First (Decls);
|
|
while Present (Item) loop
|
|
|
|
-- Pragmas that apply to a subprogram body are usually grouped
|
|
-- together. Look for a potential pragma SPARK_Mode among them.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Item) = N_Pragma then
|
|
if Get_Pragma_Id (Item) = Pragma_SPARK_Mode then
|
|
return Get_SPARK_Mode_From_Annotation (Item) = On;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise the first non-pragma declarative item terminates
|
|
-- the region where pragma SPARK_Mode may appear.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Item);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise, the applicable SPARK_Mode is inherited from the
|
|
-- enclosing subprogram or package.
|
|
|
|
return SPARK_Mode = On;
|
|
end Body_Has_SPARK_Mode_On;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
-- Build_Subprogram_Declaration --
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Build_Subprogram_Declaration is
|
|
procedure Move_Pragmas (From : Node_Id; To : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Relocate certain categorization pragmas from the declarative list
|
|
-- of subprogram body From and insert them after node To. The pragmas
|
|
-- in question are:
|
|
-- Ghost
|
|
-- SPARK_Mode
|
|
-- Volatile_Function
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
-- Move_Pragmas --
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Move_Pragmas (From : Node_Id; To : Node_Id) is
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Next_Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
pragma Assert (Nkind (From) = N_Subprogram_Body);
|
|
|
|
-- The destination node must be part of a list, as the pragmas are
|
|
-- inserted after it.
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_List_Member (To));
|
|
|
|
-- Inspect the declarations of the subprogram body looking for
|
|
-- specific pragmas.
|
|
|
|
Decl := First (Declarations (N));
|
|
while Present (Decl) loop
|
|
Next_Decl := Next (Decl);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Decl) = N_Pragma
|
|
and then Nam_In (Pragma_Name (Decl), Name_Ghost,
|
|
Name_SPARK_Mode,
|
|
Name_Volatile_Function)
|
|
then
|
|
Remove (Decl);
|
|
Insert_After (To, Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Decl := Next_Decl;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Move_Pragmas;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Subp_Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Build_Subprogram_Declaration
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Create a matching subprogram spec using the profile of the body.
|
|
-- The structure of the tree is identical, but has new entities for
|
|
-- the defining unit name and formal parameters.
|
|
|
|
Subp_Decl :=
|
|
Make_Subprogram_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Specification => Copy_Subprogram_Spec (Body_Spec));
|
|
Set_Comes_From_Source (Subp_Decl, True);
|
|
|
|
-- Relocate the aspects and relevant pragmas from the subprogram body
|
|
-- to the generated spec because it acts as the initial declaration.
|
|
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Subp_Decl);
|
|
Move_Aspects (N, To => Subp_Decl);
|
|
Move_Pragmas (N, To => Subp_Decl);
|
|
|
|
Analyze (Subp_Decl);
|
|
|
|
-- Propagate the attributes Rewritten_For_C and Corresponding_Proc to
|
|
-- the body since the expander may generate calls using that entity.
|
|
-- Required to ensure that Expand_Call rewrites calls to this
|
|
-- function by calls to the built procedure.
|
|
|
|
if Modify_Tree_For_C
|
|
and then Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Function_Specification
|
|
and then
|
|
Rewritten_For_C (Defining_Entity (Specification (Subp_Decl)))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Rewritten_For_C (Defining_Entity (Body_Spec));
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Procedure (Defining_Entity (Body_Spec),
|
|
Corresponding_Procedure
|
|
(Defining_Entity (Specification (Subp_Decl))));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Analyze any relocated source pragmas or pragmas created for aspect
|
|
-- specifications.
|
|
|
|
Decl := Next (Subp_Decl);
|
|
while Present (Decl) loop
|
|
|
|
-- Stop the search for pragmas once the body has been reached as
|
|
-- this terminates the region where pragmas may appear.
|
|
|
|
if Decl = N then
|
|
exit;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Decl) = N_Pragma then
|
|
Analyze (Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Decl);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Spec_Id := Defining_Entity (Subp_Decl);
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Mark the generated spec as a source construct to ensure that all
|
|
-- calls to it are properly registered in ALI files for GNATprove.
|
|
|
|
Set_Comes_From_Source (Spec_Id, True);
|
|
|
|
-- Ensure that the specs of the subprogram declaration and its body
|
|
-- are identical, otherwise they will appear non-conformant due to
|
|
-- rewritings in the default values of formal parameters.
|
|
|
|
Body_Spec := Copy_Subprogram_Spec (Body_Spec);
|
|
Set_Specification (N, Body_Spec);
|
|
Body_Id := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Body_Spec);
|
|
|
|
-- Ensure that the generated corresponding spec and original body
|
|
-- share the same Ghost and SPARK_Mode attributes.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Checked_Ghost_Entity
|
|
(Body_Id, Is_Checked_Ghost_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Is_Ignored_Ghost_Entity
|
|
(Body_Id, Is_Ignored_Ghost_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id, SPARK_Pragma (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma_Inherited
|
|
(Body_Id, SPARK_Pragma_Inherited (Spec_Id));
|
|
end Build_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Anonymous_Return --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Anonymous_Return is
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Par : Node_Id;
|
|
Scop : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Scop := Spec_Id;
|
|
else
|
|
Scop := Body_Id;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scop) = E_Function
|
|
and then Ekind (Etype (Scop)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then not Is_Thunk (Scop)
|
|
|
|
-- Skip internally built functions which handle the case of
|
|
-- a null access (see Expand_Interface_Conversion)
|
|
|
|
and then not (Is_Interface (Designated_Type (Etype (Scop)))
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (Parent (Scop)))
|
|
|
|
and then (Has_Task (Designated_Type (Etype (Scop)))
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_Class_Wide_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (Scop)))
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Limited_Record (Designated_Type (Etype (Scop)))))
|
|
and then Expander_Active
|
|
|
|
-- Avoid cases with no tasking support
|
|
|
|
and then RTE_Available (RE_Current_Master)
|
|
and then not Restriction_Active (No_Task_Hierarchy)
|
|
then
|
|
Decl :=
|
|
Make_Object_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier =>
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Loc, Name_uMaster),
|
|
Constant_Present => True,
|
|
Object_Definition =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (RTE (RE_Master_Id), Loc),
|
|
Expression =>
|
|
Make_Explicit_Dereference (Loc,
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (RTE (RE_Current_Master), Loc)));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Declarations (N)) then
|
|
Prepend (Decl, Declarations (N));
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Declarations (N, New_List (Decl));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Master_Id (Etype (Scop), Defining_Identifier (Decl));
|
|
Set_Has_Master_Entity (Scop);
|
|
|
|
-- Now mark the containing scope as a task master
|
|
|
|
Par := N;
|
|
while Nkind (Par) /= N_Compilation_Unit loop
|
|
Par := Parent (Par);
|
|
pragma Assert (Present (Par));
|
|
|
|
-- If we fall off the top, we are at the outer level, and
|
|
-- the environment task is our effective master, so nothing
|
|
-- to mark.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In
|
|
(Par, N_Task_Body, N_Block_Statement, N_Subprogram_Body)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Task_Master (Par, True);
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Anonymous_Return;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Inline_Pragma --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Inline_Pragma (Spec : in out Node_Id) is
|
|
Prag : Node_Id;
|
|
Plist : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Is_Inline_Pragma (N : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- True when N is a pragma Inline or Inline_Always that applies
|
|
-- to this subprogram.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Is_Inline_Pragma --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Inline_Pragma (N : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Pragma
|
|
and then
|
|
(Pragma_Name (N) = Name_Inline_Always
|
|
or else (Pragma_Name (N) = Name_Inline
|
|
and then
|
|
(Front_End_Inlining or else Optimization_Level > 0)))
|
|
and then Present (Pragma_Argument_Associations (N))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Pragma_Arg : Node_Id :=
|
|
Expression (First (Pragma_Argument_Associations (N)));
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Pragma_Arg) = N_Selected_Component then
|
|
Pragma_Arg := Selector_Name (Pragma_Arg);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Chars (Pragma_Arg) = Chars (Body_Id);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_Inline_Pragma;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Inline_Pragma
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not Expander_Active then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_List_Member (N)
|
|
and then Present (Next (N))
|
|
and then Is_Inline_Pragma (Next (N))
|
|
then
|
|
Prag := Next (N);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub
|
|
and then Present (Declarations (N))
|
|
and then Is_Inline_Pragma (First (Declarations (N)))
|
|
then
|
|
Prag := First (Declarations (N));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Prag := Empty;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prag) then
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
if Is_List_Member (N)
|
|
and then Is_List_Member (Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id))
|
|
and then In_Same_List (N, Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Analyze (Prag);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Create a subprogram declaration, to make treatment uniform.
|
|
-- Make the sloc of the subprogram name that of the entity in
|
|
-- the body, so that style checks find identical strings.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Subp : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier
|
|
(Sloc (Body_Id), Chars (Body_Id));
|
|
Decl : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Make_Subprogram_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Specification =>
|
|
New_Copy_Tree (Specification (N)));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Defining_Unit_Name (Specification (Decl), Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- To ensure proper coverage when body is inlined, indicate
|
|
-- whether the subprogram comes from source.
|
|
|
|
Set_Comes_From_Source (Subp, Comes_From_Source (N));
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Formal (Body_Id)) then
|
|
Plist := Copy_Parameter_List (Body_Id);
|
|
Set_Parameter_Specifications
|
|
(Specification (Decl), Plist);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Move aspects to the new spec
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Move_Aspects (N, To => Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Insert_Before (N, Decl);
|
|
Analyze (Decl);
|
|
Analyze (Prag);
|
|
Set_Has_Pragma_Inline (Subp);
|
|
|
|
if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Inline_Always then
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Subp);
|
|
Set_Has_Pragma_Inline_Always (Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Prior to copying the subprogram body to create a template
|
|
-- for it for subsequent inlining, remove the pragma from
|
|
-- the current body so that the copy that will produce the
|
|
-- new body will start from a completely unanalyzed tree.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (Prag)) = N_Subprogram_Body then
|
|
Rewrite (Prag, Make_Null_Statement (Sloc (Prag)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Spec := Subp;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Inline_Pragma;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Missing_Return --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Missing_Return is
|
|
Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Missing_Ret : Boolean;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Id := Spec_Id;
|
|
else
|
|
Id := Body_Id;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Return_Present (Id) then
|
|
Check_Returns (HSS, 'F', Missing_Ret);
|
|
|
|
if Missing_Ret then
|
|
Set_Has_Missing_Return (Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Within a premature instantiation of a package with no body, we
|
|
-- build completions of the functions therein, with a Raise
|
|
-- statement. No point in complaining about a missing return in
|
|
-- this case.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Id) = E_Function
|
|
and then In_Instance
|
|
and then Present (Statements (HSS))
|
|
and then Nkind (First (Statements (HSS))) = N_Raise_Program_Error
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Generic_Subprogram (Id)
|
|
or else not Is_Machine_Code_Subprogram (Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("missing RETURN statement in function body", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If procedure with No_Return, check returns
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then No_Return (Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Returns (HSS, 'P', Missing_Ret, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Special checks in SPARK mode
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
|
|
-- In SPARK mode, last statement of a function should be a return
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Stat : constant Node_Id := Last_Source_Statement (HSS);
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Stat)
|
|
and then not Nkind_In (Stat, N_Simple_Return_Statement,
|
|
N_Extended_Return_Statement)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("last statement in function should be RETURN", Stat);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- In SPARK mode, verify that a procedure has no return
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Procedure_Specification then
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Id := Spec_Id;
|
|
else
|
|
Id := Body_Id;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Would be nice to point to return statement here, can we
|
|
-- borrow the Check_Returns procedure here ???
|
|
|
|
if Return_Present (Id) then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("procedure should not have RETURN", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Missing_Return;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Disambiguate_Spec --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Disambiguate_Spec return Entity_Id is
|
|
Priv_Spec : Entity_Id;
|
|
Spec_N : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
procedure Replace_Types (To_Corresponding : Boolean);
|
|
-- Depending on the flag, replace the type of formal parameters of
|
|
-- Body_Id if it is a concurrent type implementing interfaces with
|
|
-- the corresponding record type or the other way around.
|
|
|
|
procedure Replace_Types (To_Corresponding : Boolean) is
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
Formal_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (Body_Id);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
Formal_Typ := Etype (Formal);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Formal_Typ) then
|
|
Formal_Typ := Root_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- From concurrent type to corresponding record
|
|
|
|
if To_Corresponding then
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Record_Type (Formal_Typ))
|
|
and then
|
|
Present (Interfaces
|
|
(Corresponding_Record_Type (Formal_Typ)))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Etype (Formal,
|
|
Corresponding_Record_Type (Formal_Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- From corresponding record to concurrent type
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Record_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Interfaces (Formal_Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Etype (Formal,
|
|
Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Formal_Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Replace_Types;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Disambiguate_Spec
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Try to retrieve the specification of the body as is. All error
|
|
-- messages are suppressed because the body may not have a spec in
|
|
-- its current state.
|
|
|
|
Spec_N := Find_Corresponding_Spec (N, False);
|
|
|
|
-- It is possible that this is the body of a primitive declared
|
|
-- between a private and a full view of a concurrent type. The
|
|
-- controlling parameter of the spec carries the concurrent type,
|
|
-- not the corresponding record type as transformed by Analyze_
|
|
-- Subprogram_Specification. In such cases, we undo the change
|
|
-- made by the analysis of the specification and try to find the
|
|
-- spec again.
|
|
|
|
-- Note that wrappers already have their corresponding specs and
|
|
-- bodies set during their creation, so if the candidate spec is
|
|
-- a wrapper, then we definitely need to swap all types to their
|
|
-- original concurrent status.
|
|
|
|
if No (Spec_N)
|
|
or else Is_Primitive_Wrapper (Spec_N)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Restore all references of corresponding record types to the
|
|
-- original concurrent types.
|
|
|
|
Replace_Types (To_Corresponding => False);
|
|
Priv_Spec := Find_Corresponding_Spec (N, False);
|
|
|
|
-- The current body truly belongs to a primitive declared between
|
|
-- a private and a full view. We leave the modified body as is,
|
|
-- and return the true spec.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Priv_Spec)
|
|
and then Is_Private_Primitive (Priv_Spec)
|
|
then
|
|
return Priv_Spec;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In case that this is some sort of error, restore the original
|
|
-- state of the body.
|
|
|
|
Replace_Types (To_Corresponding => True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Spec_N;
|
|
end Disambiguate_Spec;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Exchange_Limited_Views --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Exchange_Limited_Views (Subp_Id : Entity_Id) return Elist_Id is
|
|
Result : Elist_Id := No_Elist;
|
|
|
|
procedure Detect_And_Exchange (Id : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Determine whether Id's type denotes an incomplete type associated
|
|
-- with a limited with clause and exchange the limited view with the
|
|
-- non-limited one when available. Note that the non-limited view
|
|
-- may exist because of a with_clause in another unit in the context,
|
|
-- but cannot be used because the current view of the enclosing unit
|
|
-- is still a limited view.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Detect_And_Exchange --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Detect_And_Exchange (Id : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Id);
|
|
begin
|
|
if From_Limited_With (Typ)
|
|
and then Has_Non_Limited_View (Typ)
|
|
and then not From_Limited_With (Scope (Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
if No (Result) then
|
|
Result := New_Elmt_List;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Prepend_Elmt (Typ, Result);
|
|
Prepend_Elmt (Id, Result);
|
|
Set_Etype (Id, Non_Limited_View (Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Detect_And_Exchange;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Exchange_Limited_Views
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Do not process subprogram bodies as they already use the non-
|
|
-- limited view of types.
|
|
|
|
if not Ekind_In (Subp_Id, E_Function, E_Procedure) then
|
|
return No_Elist;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Examine all formals and swap views when applicable
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (Subp_Id);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
Detect_And_Exchange (Formal);
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Process the return type of a function
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Subp_Id) = E_Function then
|
|
Detect_And_Exchange (Subp_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Exchange_Limited_Views;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Private_Concurrent_Primitive --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Private_Concurrent_Primitive
|
|
(Subp_Id : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Formal_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (First_Formal (Subp_Id)) then
|
|
Formal_Typ := Etype (First_Formal (Subp_Id));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Record_Type (Formal_Typ) then
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Formal_Typ) then
|
|
Formal_Typ := Root_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal_Typ := Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The type of the first formal is a concurrent tagged type with
|
|
-- a private view.
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Concurrent_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Has_Private_Declaration (Formal_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Is_Private_Concurrent_Primitive;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Restore_Limited_Views --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Restore_Limited_Views (Restore_List : Elist_Id) is
|
|
Elmt : Elmt_Id := First_Elmt (Restore_List);
|
|
Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Elmt) loop
|
|
Id := Node (Elmt);
|
|
Next_Elmt (Elmt);
|
|
Set_Etype (Id, Node (Elmt));
|
|
Next_Elmt (Elmt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Restore_Limited_Views;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Set_Trivial_Subprogram --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Trivial_Subprogram (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Nxt : constant Node_Id := Next (N);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Set_Is_Trivial_Subprogram (Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Nxt)
|
|
and then Nkind (Nxt) = N_Simple_Return_Statement
|
|
and then No (Next (Nxt))
|
|
and then Present (Expression (Nxt))
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (Expression (Nxt))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (Entity (Expression (Nxt)), False);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Set_Trivial_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
-- Verify_Overriding_Indicator --
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Verify_Overriding_Indicator is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Must_Override (Body_Spec) then
|
|
if Nkind (Spec_Id) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
and then Operator_Matches_Spec (Spec_Id, Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Present (Overridden_Operation (Spec_Id)) then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("subprogram& is not overriding", Body_Spec, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Overriding indicators aren't allowed for protected subprogram
|
|
-- bodies (see the Confirmation in Ada Comment AC95-00213). Change
|
|
-- this to a warning if -gnatd.E is enabled.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Scope (Spec_Id)) = E_Protected_Type then
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := Error_To_Warning;
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("<<overriding indicator not allowed for protected "
|
|
& "subprogram body", Body_Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Must_Not_Override (Body_Spec) then
|
|
if Present (Overridden_Operation (Spec_Id)) then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("subprogram& overrides inherited operation",
|
|
Body_Spec, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Spec_Id) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
and then Operator_Matches_Spec (Spec_Id, Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("subprogram& overrides predefined operator ",
|
|
Body_Spec, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Overriding indicators aren't allowed for protected subprogram
|
|
-- bodies (see the Confirmation in Ada Comment AC95-00213). Change
|
|
-- this to a warning if -gnatd.E is enabled.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Scope (Spec_Id)) = E_Protected_Type then
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := Error_To_Warning;
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("<<overriding indicator not allowed "
|
|
& "for protected subprogram body", Body_Spec);
|
|
|
|
-- If this is not a primitive operation, then the overriding
|
|
-- indicator is altogether illegal.
|
|
|
|
elsif not Is_Primitive (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("overriding indicator only allowed "
|
|
& "if subprogram is primitive", Body_Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If checking the style rule and the operation overrides, then
|
|
-- issue a warning about a missing overriding_indicator. Protected
|
|
-- subprogram bodies are excluded from this style checking, since
|
|
-- they aren't primitives (even though their declarations can
|
|
-- override) and aren't allowed to have an overriding_indicator.
|
|
|
|
elsif Style_Check
|
|
and then Present (Overridden_Operation (Spec_Id))
|
|
and then Ekind (Scope (Spec_Id)) /= E_Protected_Type
|
|
then
|
|
pragma Assert (Unit_Declaration_Node (Body_Id) = N);
|
|
Style.Missing_Overriding (N, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
elsif Style_Check
|
|
and then Can_Override_Operator (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then not Is_Predefined_File_Name
|
|
(Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (Spec_Id)))
|
|
then
|
|
pragma Assert (Unit_Declaration_Node (Body_Id) = N);
|
|
Style.Missing_Overriding (N, Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Verify_Overriding_Indicator;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Save_Ghost_Mode : constant Ghost_Mode_Type := Ghost_Mode;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- A [generic] subprogram body "freezes" the contract of the nearest
|
|
-- enclosing package body and all other contracts encountered in the
|
|
-- same declarative part up to and excluding the subprogram body:
|
|
|
|
-- package body Nearest_Enclosing_Package
|
|
-- with Refined_State => (State => Constit)
|
|
-- is
|
|
-- Constit : ...;
|
|
|
|
-- procedure Freezes_Enclosing_Package_Body
|
|
-- with Refined_Depends => (Input => Constit) ...
|
|
|
|
-- This ensures that any annotations referenced by the contract of the
|
|
-- [generic] subprogram body are available. This form of "freezing" is
|
|
-- decoupled from the usual Freeze_xxx mechanism because it must also
|
|
-- work in the context of generics where normal freezing is disabled.
|
|
|
|
-- Only bodies coming from source should cause this type of "freezing".
|
|
-- Expression functions that act as bodies and complete an initial
|
|
-- declaration must be included in this category, hence the use of
|
|
-- Original_Node.
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Original_Node (N)) then
|
|
Analyze_Previous_Contracts (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Generic subprograms are handled separately. They always have a
|
|
-- generic specification. Determine whether current scope has a
|
|
-- previous declaration.
|
|
|
|
-- If the subprogram body is defined within an instance of the same
|
|
-- name, the instance appears as a package renaming, and will be hidden
|
|
-- within the subprogram.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Prev_Id)
|
|
and then not Is_Overloadable (Prev_Id)
|
|
and then (Nkind (Parent (Prev_Id)) /= N_Package_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
or else Comes_From_Source (Prev_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
if Is_Generic_Subprogram (Prev_Id) then
|
|
Spec_Id := Prev_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body is Ghost when it is stand alone and subject
|
|
-- to pragma Ghost or when the corresponding spec is Ghost. Set
|
|
-- the mode now to ensure that any nodes generated during analysis
|
|
-- and expansion are properly marked as Ghost.
|
|
|
|
Set_Ghost_Mode (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
Set_Is_Compilation_Unit (Body_Id, Is_Compilation_Unit (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Is_Child_Unit (Body_Id, Is_Child_Unit (Spec_Id));
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Generic_Subprogram_Body (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body then
|
|
HSS := Handled_Statement_Sequence (N);
|
|
Check_Missing_Return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Previous entity conflicts with subprogram name. Attempting to
|
|
-- enter name will post error.
|
|
|
|
Enter_Name (Body_Id);
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Non-generic case, find the subprogram declaration, if one was seen,
|
|
-- or enter new overloaded entity in the current scope. If the
|
|
-- Current_Entity is the Body_Id itself, the unit is being analyzed as
|
|
-- part of the context of one of its subunits. No need to redo the
|
|
-- analysis.
|
|
|
|
elsif Prev_Id = Body_Id and then Has_Completion (Body_Id) then
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Body_Id := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Body_Spec);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub
|
|
or else No (Corresponding_Spec (N))
|
|
then
|
|
if Is_Private_Concurrent_Primitive (Body_Id) then
|
|
Spec_Id := Disambiguate_Spec;
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body is Ghost when it is stand alone and
|
|
-- subject to pragma Ghost or when the corresponding spec is
|
|
-- Ghost. Set the mode now to ensure that any nodes generated
|
|
-- during analysis and expansion are properly marked as Ghost.
|
|
|
|
Set_Ghost_Mode (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Spec_Id := Find_Corresponding_Spec (N);
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body is Ghost when it is stand alone and
|
|
-- subject to pragma Ghost or when the corresponding spec is
|
|
-- Ghost. Set the mode now to ensure that any nodes generated
|
|
-- during analysis and expansion are properly marked as Ghost.
|
|
|
|
Set_Ghost_Mode (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- In GNATprove mode, if the body has no previous spec, create
|
|
-- one so that the inlining machinery can operate properly.
|
|
-- Transfer aspects, if any, to the new spec, so that they
|
|
-- are legal and can be processed ahead of the body.
|
|
-- We make two copies of the given spec, one for the new
|
|
-- declaration, and one for the body.
|
|
|
|
if No (Spec_Id) and then GNATprove_Mode
|
|
|
|
-- Inlining does not apply during pre-analysis of code
|
|
|
|
and then Full_Analysis
|
|
|
|
-- Inlining only applies to full bodies, not stubs
|
|
|
|
and then Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub
|
|
|
|
-- Inlining only applies to bodies in the source code, not to
|
|
-- those generated by the compiler. In particular, expression
|
|
-- functions, whose body is generated by the compiler, are
|
|
-- treated specially by GNATprove.
|
|
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Body_Id)
|
|
|
|
-- This cannot be done for a compilation unit, which is not
|
|
-- in a context where we can insert a new spec.
|
|
|
|
and then Is_List_Member (N)
|
|
|
|
-- Inlining only applies to subprograms without contracts,
|
|
-- as a contract is a sign that GNATprove should perform a
|
|
-- modular analysis of the subprogram instead of a contextual
|
|
-- analysis at each call site. The same test is performed in
|
|
-- Inline.Can_Be_Inlined_In_GNATprove_Mode. It is repeated
|
|
-- here in another form (because the contract has not been
|
|
-- attached to the body) to avoid front-end errors in case
|
|
-- pragmas are used instead of aspects, because the
|
|
-- corresponding pragmas in the body would not be transferred
|
|
-- to the spec, leading to legality errors.
|
|
|
|
and then not Body_Has_Contract
|
|
and then not Inside_A_Generic
|
|
then
|
|
Build_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a function that returns a constrained array, and
|
|
-- we are generating SPARK_For_C, create subprogram declaration
|
|
-- to simplify subsequent C generation.
|
|
|
|
elsif No (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Modify_Tree_For_C
|
|
and then Nkind (Body_Spec) = N_Function_Specification
|
|
and then Is_Array_Type (Etype (Body_Id))
|
|
and then Is_Constrained (Etype (Body_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Build_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a duplicate body, no point in analyzing it
|
|
|
|
if Error_Posted (N) then
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body should cause freezing of its own declaration,
|
|
-- but if there was no previous explicit declaration, then the
|
|
-- subprogram will get frozen too late (there may be code within
|
|
-- the body that depends on the subprogram having been frozen,
|
|
-- such as uses of extra formals), so we force it to be frozen
|
|
-- here. Same holds if the body and spec are compilation units.
|
|
-- Finally, if the return type is an anonymous access to protected
|
|
-- subprogram, it must be frozen before the body because its
|
|
-- expansion has generated an equivalent type that is used when
|
|
-- elaborating the body.
|
|
|
|
-- An exception in the case of Ada 2012, AI05-177: The bodies
|
|
-- created for expression functions do not freeze.
|
|
|
|
if No (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Nkind (Original_Node (N)) /= N_Expression_Function
|
|
then
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit then
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Subprogram_Type (Etype (Body_Id)) then
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Etype (Body_Id));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Spec_Id := Corresponding_Spec (N);
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body is Ghost when it is stand alone and subject
|
|
-- to pragma Ghost or when the corresponding spec is Ghost. Set
|
|
-- the mode now to ensure that any nodes generated during analysis
|
|
-- and expansion are properly marked as Ghost.
|
|
|
|
Set_Ghost_Mode (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Previously we scanned the body to look for nested subprograms, and
|
|
-- rejected an inline directive if nested subprograms were present,
|
|
-- because the back-end would generate conflicting symbols for the
|
|
-- nested bodies. This is now unnecessary.
|
|
|
|
-- Look ahead to recognize a pragma Inline that appears after the body
|
|
|
|
Check_Inline_Pragma (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with special case of a fully private operation in the body of
|
|
-- the protected type. We must create a declaration for the subprogram,
|
|
-- in order to attach the protected subprogram that will be used in
|
|
-- internal calls. We exclude compiler generated bodies from the
|
|
-- expander since the issue does not arise for those cases.
|
|
|
|
if No (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then Is_Protected_Type (Current_Scope)
|
|
then
|
|
Spec_Id := Build_Private_Protected_Declaration (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If we are generating C and this is a function returning a constrained
|
|
-- array type for which we must create a procedure with an extra out
|
|
-- parameter, build and analyze the body now. The procedure declaration
|
|
-- has already been created. We reuse the source body of the function,
|
|
-- because in an instance it may contain global references that cannot
|
|
-- be reanalyzed. The source function itself is not used any further,
|
|
-- so we mark it as having a completion. If the subprogram is a stub the
|
|
-- transformation is done later, when the proper body is analyzed.
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active
|
|
and then Modify_Tree_For_C
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Ekind (Spec_Id) = E_Function
|
|
and then Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub
|
|
and then Rewritten_For_C (Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
Rewrite (N, Build_Procedure_Body_Form (Spec_Id, N));
|
|
Analyze (N);
|
|
|
|
-- The entity for the created procedure must remain invisible, so it
|
|
-- does not participate in resolution of subsequent references to the
|
|
-- function.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (Corresponding_Spec (N), False);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If a separate spec is present, then deal with freezing issues
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Spec_Decl := Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id);
|
|
Verify_Overriding_Indicator;
|
|
|
|
-- In general, the spec will be frozen when we start analyzing the
|
|
-- body. However, for internally generated operations, such as
|
|
-- wrapper functions for inherited operations with controlling
|
|
-- results, the spec may not have been frozen by the time we expand
|
|
-- the freeze actions that include the bodies. In particular, extra
|
|
-- formals for accessibility or for return-in-place may need to be
|
|
-- generated. Freeze nodes, if any, are inserted before the current
|
|
-- body. These freeze actions are also needed in ASIS mode and in
|
|
-- Compile_Only mode to enable the proper back-end type annotations.
|
|
-- They are necessary in any case to insure order of elaboration
|
|
-- in gigi.
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Frozen (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then (Expander_Active
|
|
or else ASIS_Mode
|
|
or else (Operating_Mode = Check_Semantics
|
|
and then Serious_Errors_Detected = 0))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Spec_Id);
|
|
Freeze_Before (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Place subprogram on scope stack, and make formals visible. If there
|
|
-- is a spec, the visible entity remains that of the spec.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Generate_Reference (Spec_Id, Body_Id, 'b', Set_Ref => False);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Child_Unit (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Generate_Reference (Spec_Id, Scope (Spec_Id), 'k', False);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check then
|
|
Style.Check_Identifier (Body_Id, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Compilation_Unit (Body_Id, Is_Compilation_Unit (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Is_Child_Unit (Body_Id, Is_Child_Unit (Spec_Id));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("an abstract subprogram cannot have a body", N);
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Convention (Body_Id, Convention (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Inherit the "ghostness" of the subprogram spec. Note that this
|
|
-- property is not directly inherited as the body may be subject
|
|
-- to a different Ghost assertion policy.
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None or else Is_Ghost_Entity (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration and
|
|
-- at the point of completion must match (SPARK RM 6.9(14)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Completion (Spec_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Protected_Type (Scope (Spec_Id)) then
|
|
Prot_Typ := Scope (Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a body generated for a renaming, do not check for
|
|
-- full conformance. The check is redundant, because the spec of
|
|
-- the body is a copy of the spec in the renaming declaration,
|
|
-- and the test can lead to spurious errors on nested defaults.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Decl)
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then
|
|
(Nkind (Original_Node (Spec_Decl)) =
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
or else (Present (Corresponding_Body (Spec_Decl))
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Spec_Decl))) =
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration))
|
|
then
|
|
Conformant := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Conversely, the spec may have been generated for specless body
|
|
-- with an inline pragma. The entity comes from source, which is
|
|
-- both semantically correct and necessary for proper inlining.
|
|
-- The subprogram declaration itself is not in the source.
|
|
|
|
elsif Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Decl)
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (Spec_Decl)
|
|
and then Has_Pragma_Inline (Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformant := True;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(Body_Id, Spec_Id,
|
|
Fully_Conformant, True, Conformant, Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the body is not fully conformant, we have to decide if we
|
|
-- should analyze it or not. If it has a really messed up profile
|
|
-- then we probably should not analyze it, since we will get too
|
|
-- many bogus messages.
|
|
|
|
-- Our decision is to go ahead in the non-fully conformant case
|
|
-- only if it is at least mode conformant with the spec. Note
|
|
-- that the call to Check_Fully_Conformant has issued the proper
|
|
-- error messages to complain about the lack of conformance.
|
|
|
|
if not Conformant
|
|
and then not Mode_Conformant (Body_Id, Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Spec_Id /= Body_Id then
|
|
Reference_Body_Formals (Spec_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Ekind (Body_Id, E_Subprogram_Body);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec_Of_Stub (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Regular body
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-345): If the operation is a primitive operation
|
|
-- of a concurrent type, the type of the first parameter has been
|
|
-- replaced with the corresponding record, which is the proper
|
|
-- run-time structure to use. However, within the body there may
|
|
-- be uses of the formals that depend on primitive operations
|
|
-- of the type (in particular calls in prefixed form) for which
|
|
-- we need the original concurrent type. The operation may have
|
|
-- several controlling formals, so the replacement must be done
|
|
-- for all of them.
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Present (First_Entity (Spec_Id))
|
|
and then Ekind (Etype (First_Entity (Spec_Id))) = E_Record_Type
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Etype (First_Entity (Spec_Id)))
|
|
and then Present (Interfaces (Etype (First_Entity (Spec_Id))))
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Concurrent_Type
|
|
(Etype (First_Entity (Spec_Id))))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (First_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
Form : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Form := First_Formal (Spec_Id);
|
|
while Present (Form) loop
|
|
if Etype (Form) = Typ then
|
|
Set_Etype (Form, Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Form);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Make the formals visible, and place subprogram on scope stack.
|
|
-- This is also the point at which we set Last_Real_Spec_Entity
|
|
-- to mark the entities which will not be moved to the body.
|
|
|
|
Install_Formals (Spec_Id);
|
|
Last_Real_Spec_Entity := Last_Entity (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Within an instance, add local renaming declarations so that
|
|
-- gdb can retrieve the values of actuals more easily. This is
|
|
-- only relevant if generating code (and indeed we definitely
|
|
-- do not want these definitions -gnatc mode, because that would
|
|
-- confuse ASIS).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Generic_Instance (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Is_Wrapper_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then Expander_Active
|
|
then
|
|
Build_Subprogram_Instance_Renamings (N, Current_Scope);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Push_Scope (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Make sure that the subprogram is immediately visible. For
|
|
-- child units that have no separate spec this is indispensable.
|
|
-- Otherwise it is safe albeit redundant.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Body (Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id), Body_Id);
|
|
Set_Is_Obsolescent (Body_Id, Is_Obsolescent (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Scope (Body_Id, Scope (Spec_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- Case of subprogram body with no previous spec
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Check for style warning required
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check
|
|
|
|
-- Only apply check for source level subprograms for which checks
|
|
-- have not been suppressed.
|
|
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Body_Id)
|
|
and then not Suppress_Style_Checks (Body_Id)
|
|
|
|
-- No warnings within an instance
|
|
|
|
and then not In_Instance
|
|
|
|
-- No warnings for expression functions
|
|
|
|
and then Nkind (Original_Node (N)) /= N_Expression_Function
|
|
then
|
|
Style.Body_With_No_Spec (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
New_Overloaded_Entity (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body declared within a Ghost region is automatically
|
|
-- Ghost (SPARK RM 6.9(2)).
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
Set_Acts_As_Spec (N);
|
|
Generate_Definition (Body_Id);
|
|
Generate_Reference
|
|
(Body_Id, Body_Id, 'b', Set_Ref => False, Force => True);
|
|
Install_Formals (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
Push_Scope (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For stubs and bodies with no previous spec, generate references to
|
|
-- formals.
|
|
|
|
Generate_Reference_To_Formals (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Entry barrier functions are generated outside the protected type and
|
|
-- should not carry the SPARK_Mode of the enclosing context.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Is_Entry_Barrier_Function (N)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- The body is generated as part of expression function expansion. When
|
|
-- the expression function appears in the visible declarations of a
|
|
-- package, the body is added to the private declarations. Since both
|
|
-- declarative lists may be subject to a different SPARK_Mode, inherit
|
|
-- the mode of the spec.
|
|
|
|
-- package P with SPARK_Mode is
|
|
-- function Expr_Func ... is (...); -- original
|
|
-- [function Expr_Func ...;] -- generated spec
|
|
-- -- mode is ON
|
|
-- private
|
|
-- pragma SPARK_Mode (Off);
|
|
-- [function Expr_Func ... is return ...;] -- generated body
|
|
-- end P; -- mode is ON
|
|
|
|
elsif not Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then Present (Prev_Id)
|
|
and then Is_Expression_Function (Prev_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id, SPARK_Pragma (Prev_Id));
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma_Inherited
|
|
(Body_Id, SPARK_Pragma_Inherited (Prev_Id));
|
|
|
|
-- Set the SPARK_Mode from the current context (may be overwritten later
|
|
-- with explicit pragma). Exclude the case where the SPARK_Mode appears
|
|
-- initially on a stand-alone subprogram body, but is then relocated to
|
|
-- a generated corresponding spec. In this scenario the mode is shared
|
|
-- between the spec and body.
|
|
|
|
elsif No (SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id)) then
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id, SPARK_Mode_Pragma);
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma_Inherited (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is the proper body of a stub, we must verify that the stub
|
|
-- conforms to the body, and to the previous spec if one was present.
|
|
-- We know already that the body conforms to that spec. This test is
|
|
-- only required for subprograms that come from source.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subunit
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then not Error_Posted (Body_Id)
|
|
and then Nkind (Corresponding_Stub (Parent (N))) =
|
|
N_Subprogram_Body_Stub
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Old_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Defining_Entity
|
|
(Specification (Corresponding_Stub (Parent (N))));
|
|
|
|
Conformant : Boolean := False;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if No (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Check_Fully_Conformant (Body_Id, Old_Id);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(Body_Id, Old_Id, Fully_Conformant, False, Conformant);
|
|
|
|
if not Conformant then
|
|
|
|
-- The stub was taken to be a new declaration. Indicate that
|
|
-- it lacks a body.
|
|
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Old_Id, False);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Body_Id);
|
|
Check_Eliminated (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Analyze any aspect specifications that appear on the subprogram body
|
|
-- stub. Stop the analysis now as the stub does not have a declarative
|
|
-- or a statement part, and it cannot be inlined.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications_On_Body_Or_Stub (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Handle inlining
|
|
|
|
-- Note: Normally we don't do any inlining if expansion is off, since
|
|
-- we won't generate code in any case. An exception arises in GNATprove
|
|
-- mode where we want to expand some calls in place, even with expansion
|
|
-- disabled, since the inlining eases formal verification.
|
|
|
|
if not GNATprove_Mode
|
|
and then Expander_Active
|
|
and then Serious_Errors_Detected = 0
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Has_Pragma_Inline (Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Legacy implementation (relying on front-end inlining)
|
|
|
|
if not Back_End_Inlining then
|
|
if (Has_Pragma_Inline_Always (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then not Opt.Disable_FE_Inline_Always)
|
|
or else (Front_End_Inlining
|
|
and then not Opt.Disable_FE_Inline)
|
|
then
|
|
Build_Body_To_Inline (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- New implementation (relying on back-end inlining)
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Has_Pragma_Inline_Always (Spec_Id)
|
|
or else Optimization_Level > 0
|
|
then
|
|
-- Handle function returning an unconstrained type
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Body_Id)
|
|
and then Ekind (Spec_Id) = E_Function
|
|
and then Returns_Unconstrained_Type (Spec_Id)
|
|
|
|
-- If function builds in place, i.e. returns a limited type,
|
|
-- inlining cannot be done.
|
|
|
|
and then not Is_Limited_Type (Etype (Spec_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Check_And_Split_Unconstrained_Function (N, Spec_Id, Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
Subp_Body : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Unit_Declaration_Node (Body_Id);
|
|
Subp_Decl : constant List_Id := Declarations (Subp_Body);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Do not pass inlining to the backend if the subprogram
|
|
-- has declarations or statements which cannot be inlined
|
|
-- by the backend. This check is done here to emit an
|
|
-- error instead of the generic warning message reported
|
|
-- by the GCC backend (ie. "function might not be
|
|
-- inlinable").
|
|
|
|
if Present (Subp_Decl)
|
|
and then Has_Excluded_Declaration (Spec_Id, Subp_Decl)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Excluded_Statement
|
|
(Spec_Id,
|
|
Statements
|
|
(Handled_Statement_Sequence (Subp_Body)))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- If the backend inlining is available then at this
|
|
-- stage we only have to mark the subprogram as inlined.
|
|
-- The expander will take care of registering it in the
|
|
-- table of subprograms inlined by the backend a part of
|
|
-- processing calls to it (cf. Expand_Call)
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined (Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In GNATprove mode, inline only when there is a separate subprogram
|
|
-- declaration for now, as inlining of subprogram bodies acting as
|
|
-- declarations, or subprogram stubs, are not supported by front-end
|
|
-- inlining. This inlining should occur after analysis of the body, so
|
|
-- that it is known whether the value of SPARK_Mode, which can be
|
|
-- defined by a pragma inside the body, is applicable to the body.
|
|
|
|
elsif GNATprove_Mode
|
|
and then Full_Analysis
|
|
and then not Inside_A_Generic
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id)) = N_Subprogram_Declaration
|
|
and then Body_Has_SPARK_Mode_On
|
|
and then Can_Be_Inlined_In_GNATprove_Mode (Spec_Id, Body_Id)
|
|
and then not Body_Has_Contract
|
|
then
|
|
Build_Body_To_Inline (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- When generating code, inherited pre/postconditions are handled when
|
|
-- expanding the corresponding contract.
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-262): In library subprogram bodies, after the analysis
|
|
-- of the specification we have to install the private withed units.
|
|
-- This holds for child units as well.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Compilation_Unit (Body_Id)
|
|
or else Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit
|
|
then
|
|
Install_Private_With_Clauses (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_Anonymous_Return;
|
|
|
|
-- Set the Protected_Formal field of each extra formal of the protected
|
|
-- subprogram to reference the corresponding extra formal of the
|
|
-- subprogram that implements it. For regular formals this occurs when
|
|
-- the protected subprogram's declaration is expanded, but the extra
|
|
-- formals don't get created until the subprogram is frozen. We need to
|
|
-- do this before analyzing the protected subprogram's body so that any
|
|
-- references to the original subprogram's extra formals will be changed
|
|
-- refer to the implementing subprogram's formals (see Expand_Formal).
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Is_Protected_Type (Scope (Spec_Id))
|
|
and then Present (Protected_Body_Subprogram (Spec_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Impl_Subp : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Protected_Body_Subprogram (Spec_Id);
|
|
Prot_Ext_Formal : Entity_Id := Extra_Formals (Spec_Id);
|
|
Impl_Ext_Formal : Entity_Id := Extra_Formals (Impl_Subp);
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Prot_Ext_Formal) loop
|
|
pragma Assert (Present (Impl_Ext_Formal));
|
|
Set_Protected_Formal (Prot_Ext_Formal, Impl_Ext_Formal);
|
|
Next_Formal_With_Extras (Prot_Ext_Formal);
|
|
Next_Formal_With_Extras (Impl_Ext_Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Now we can go on to analyze the body
|
|
|
|
HSS := Handled_Statement_Sequence (N);
|
|
Set_Actual_Subtypes (N, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
-- Add a declaration for the Protection object, renaming declarations
|
|
-- for discriminals and privals and finally a declaration for the entry
|
|
-- family index (if applicable). This form of early expansion is done
|
|
-- when the Expander is active because Install_Private_Data_Declarations
|
|
-- references entities which were created during regular expansion. The
|
|
-- subprogram entity must come from source, and not be an internally
|
|
-- generated subprogram.
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active
|
|
and then Present (Prot_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Spec_Id)
|
|
and then not Is_Eliminated (Spec_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Install_Private_Data_Declarations
|
|
(Sloc (N), Spec_Id, Prot_Typ, N, Declarations (N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI05-0151): Incomplete types coming from a limited context
|
|
-- may now appear in parameter and result profiles. Since the analysis
|
|
-- of a subprogram body may use the parameter and result profile of the
|
|
-- spec, swap any limited views with their non-limited counterpart.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 and then Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Exch_Views := Exchange_Limited_Views (Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the return type is an anonymous access type whose designated type
|
|
-- is the limited view of a class-wide type and the non-limited view is
|
|
-- available, update the return type accordingly.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005 and then Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Etyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
Rtyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Rtyp := Etype (Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Rtyp) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
Etyp := Directly_Designated_Type (Rtyp);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etyp)
|
|
and then From_Limited_With (Etyp)
|
|
then
|
|
Desig_View := Etyp;
|
|
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Rtyp, Available_View (Etyp));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Analyze any aspect specifications that appear on the subprogram body
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications_On_Body_Or_Stub (N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Declarations (Declarations (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Verify that the SPARK_Mode of the body agrees with that of its spec
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) and then Present (SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id)) then
|
|
if Present (SPARK_Pragma (Spec_Id)) then
|
|
if Get_SPARK_Mode_From_Annotation (SPARK_Pragma (Spec_Id)) = Off
|
|
and then
|
|
Get_SPARK_Mode_From_Annotation (SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id)) = On
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id));
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("incorrect application of SPARK_Mode#", N);
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (SPARK_Pragma (Spec_Id));
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("\value Off was set for SPARK_Mode on & #", N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Parent (Parent (Spec_Id))) = N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (SPARK_Pragma (Body_Id));
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("incorrect application of SPARK_Mode #", N);
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Spec_Id);
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("\no value was set for SPARK_Mode on & #", N, Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram body "freezes" its own contract. Analyze the contract
|
|
-- after the declarations of the body have been processed as pragmas
|
|
-- are now chained on the contract of the subprogram body.
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Entry_Or_Subprogram_Body_Contract (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- Check completion, and analyze the statements
|
|
|
|
Check_Completion;
|
|
Inspect_Deferred_Constant_Completion (Declarations (N));
|
|
Analyze (HSS);
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with end of scope processing for the body
|
|
|
|
Process_End_Label (HSS, 't', Current_Scope);
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
Check_Subprogram_Order (N);
|
|
Set_Analyzed (Body_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- If we have a separate spec, then the analysis of the declarations
|
|
-- caused the entities in the body to be chained to the spec id, but
|
|
-- we want them chained to the body id. Only the formal parameters
|
|
-- end up chained to the spec id in this case.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
|
|
-- We must conform to the categorization of our spec
|
|
|
|
Validate_Categorization_Dependency (N, Spec_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- And if this is a child unit, the parent units must conform
|
|
|
|
if Is_Child_Unit (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Validate_Categorization_Dependency
|
|
(Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id), Spec_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Here is where we move entities from the spec to the body
|
|
|
|
-- Case where there are entities that stay with the spec
|
|
|
|
if Present (Last_Real_Spec_Entity) then
|
|
|
|
-- No body entities (happens when the only real spec entities come
|
|
-- from precondition and postcondition pragmas).
|
|
|
|
if No (Last_Entity (Body_Id)) then
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Body_Id, Next_Entity (Last_Real_Spec_Entity));
|
|
|
|
-- Body entities present (formals), so chain stuff past them
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Next_Entity
|
|
(Last_Entity (Body_Id), Next_Entity (Last_Real_Spec_Entity));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Next_Entity (Last_Real_Spec_Entity, Empty);
|
|
Set_Last_Entity (Body_Id, Last_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Last_Entity (Spec_Id, Last_Real_Spec_Entity);
|
|
|
|
-- Case where there are no spec entities, in this case there can be
|
|
-- no body entities either, so just move everything.
|
|
|
|
-- If the body is generated for an expression function, it may have
|
|
-- been preanalyzed already, if 'access was applied to it.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (Spec_Id))) /=
|
|
N_Expression_Function
|
|
then
|
|
pragma Assert (No (Last_Entity (Body_Id)));
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Body_Id, First_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_Last_Entity (Body_Id, Last_Entity (Spec_Id));
|
|
Set_First_Entity (Spec_Id, Empty);
|
|
Set_Last_Entity (Spec_Id, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_Missing_Return;
|
|
|
|
-- Now we are going to check for variables that are never modified in
|
|
-- the body of the procedure. But first we deal with a special case
|
|
-- where we want to modify this check. If the body of the subprogram
|
|
-- starts with a raise statement or its equivalent, or if the body
|
|
-- consists entirely of a null statement, then it is pretty obvious that
|
|
-- it is OK to not reference the parameters. For example, this might be
|
|
-- the following common idiom for a stubbed function: statement of the
|
|
-- procedure raises an exception. In particular this deals with the
|
|
-- common idiom of a stubbed function, which appears something like:
|
|
|
|
-- function F (A : Integer) return Some_Type;
|
|
-- X : Some_Type;
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- raise Program_Error;
|
|
-- return X;
|
|
-- end F;
|
|
|
|
-- Here the purpose of X is simply to satisfy the annoying requirement
|
|
-- in Ada that there be at least one return, and we certainly do not
|
|
-- want to go posting warnings on X that it is not initialized. On
|
|
-- the other hand, if X is entirely unreferenced that should still
|
|
-- get a warning.
|
|
|
|
-- What we do is to detect these cases, and if we find them, flag the
|
|
-- subprogram as being Is_Trivial_Subprogram and then use that flag to
|
|
-- suppress unwanted warnings. For the case of the function stub above
|
|
-- we have a special test to set X as apparently assigned to suppress
|
|
-- the warning.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Stm : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Skip initial labels (for one thing this occurs when we are in
|
|
-- front-end ZCX mode, but in any case it is irrelevant), and also
|
|
-- initial Push_xxx_Error_Label nodes, which are also irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Stm := First (Statements (HSS));
|
|
while Nkind (Stm) = N_Label
|
|
or else Nkind (Stm) in N_Push_xxx_Label
|
|
loop
|
|
Next (Stm);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Do the test on the original statement before expansion
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Ostm : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Stm);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If explicit raise statement, turn on flag
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Ostm) = N_Raise_Statement then
|
|
Set_Trivial_Subprogram (Stm);
|
|
|
|
-- If null statement, and no following statements, turn on flag
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Stm) = N_Null_Statement
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Stm)
|
|
and then No (Next (Stm))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Trivial_Subprogram (Stm);
|
|
|
|
-- Check for explicit call cases which likely raise an exception
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Ostm) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement then
|
|
if Is_Entity_Name (Name (Ostm)) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Ent : constant Entity_Id := Entity (Name (Ostm));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If the procedure is marked No_Return, then likely it
|
|
-- raises an exception, but in any case it is not coming
|
|
-- back here, so turn on the flag.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Ent)
|
|
and then Ekind (Ent) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then No_Return (Ent)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Trivial_Subprogram (Stm);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Check for variables that are never modified
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
E1, E2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If there is a separate spec, then transfer Never_Set_In_Source
|
|
-- flags from out parameters to the corresponding entities in the
|
|
-- body. The reason we do that is we want to post error flags on
|
|
-- the body entities, not the spec entities.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
E1 := First_Entity (Spec_Id);
|
|
while Present (E1) loop
|
|
if Ekind (E1) = E_Out_Parameter then
|
|
E2 := First_Entity (Body_Id);
|
|
while Present (E2) loop
|
|
exit when Chars (E1) = Chars (E2);
|
|
Next_Entity (E2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (E2) then
|
|
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (E2, Never_Set_In_Source (E1));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Entity (E1);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check references in body
|
|
|
|
Check_References (Body_Id);
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Check for nested subprogram, and mark outer level subprogram if so
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (Spec_Id) then
|
|
Ent := Spec_Id;
|
|
else
|
|
Ent := Body_Id;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
loop
|
|
Ent := Enclosing_Subprogram (Ent);
|
|
exit when No (Ent) or else Is_Subprogram (Ent);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Ent) then
|
|
Set_Has_Nested_Subprogram (Ent);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Restore the limited views in the spec, if any, to let the back end
|
|
-- process it without running into circularities.
|
|
|
|
if Exch_Views /= No_Elist then
|
|
Restore_Limited_Views (Exch_Views);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Desig_View) then
|
|
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Etype (Spec_Id), Desig_View);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Ghost_Mode := Save_Ghost_Mode;
|
|
end Analyze_Subprogram_Body_Helper;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Subprogram_Declaration --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Analyze_Subprogram_Declaration (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
Scop : constant Entity_Id := Current_Scope;
|
|
Designator : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
Is_Completion : Boolean;
|
|
-- Indicates whether a null procedure declaration is a completion
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Null procedures are not allowed in SPARK
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Specification (N)) = N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
and then Null_Present (Specification (N))
|
|
then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction ("null procedure is not allowed", N);
|
|
|
|
-- Null procedures are allowed in protected types, following the
|
|
-- recent AI12-0147.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Protected_Type (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then Ada_Version < Ada_2012
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("protected operation cannot be a null procedure", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Null_Procedure (N, Is_Completion);
|
|
|
|
-- The null procedure acts as a body, nothing further is needed
|
|
|
|
if Is_Completion then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Designator := Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (Specification (N));
|
|
|
|
-- A reference may already have been generated for the unit name, in
|
|
-- which case the following call is redundant. However it is needed for
|
|
-- declarations that are the rewriting of an expression function.
|
|
|
|
Generate_Definition (Designator);
|
|
|
|
-- Set the SPARK mode from the current context (may be overwritten later
|
|
-- with explicit pragma). This is not done for entry barrier functions
|
|
-- because they are generated outside the protected type and should not
|
|
-- carry the mode of the enclosing context.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Declaration
|
|
and then Is_Entry_Barrier_Function (N)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
else
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma (Designator, SPARK_Mode_Pragma);
|
|
Set_SPARK_Pragma_Inherited (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A subprogram declared within a Ghost region is automatically Ghost
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(2)).
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Debug_Flag_C then
|
|
Write_Str ("==> subprogram spec ");
|
|
Write_Name (Chars (Designator));
|
|
Write_Str (" from ");
|
|
Write_Location (Sloc (N));
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
Indent;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Validate_RCI_Subprogram_Declaration (N);
|
|
New_Overloaded_Entity (Designator);
|
|
Check_Delayed_Subprogram (Designator);
|
|
|
|
-- If the type of the first formal of the current subprogram is a non-
|
|
-- generic tagged private type, mark the subprogram as being a private
|
|
-- primitive. Ditto if this is a function with controlling result, and
|
|
-- the return type is currently private. In both cases, the type of the
|
|
-- controlling argument or result must be in the current scope for the
|
|
-- operation to be primitive.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Controlling_Result (Designator)
|
|
and then Is_Private_Type (Etype (Designator))
|
|
and then Scope (Etype (Designator)) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Etype (Designator))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Private_Primitive (Designator);
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (First_Formal (Designator)) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Formal_Typ : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Etype (First_Formal (Designator));
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Is_Private_Primitive (Designator,
|
|
Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Scope (Formal_Typ) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then Is_Private_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Formal_Typ));
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-251): Abstract interface primitives must be abstract
|
|
-- or null.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (Designator)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
Etyp : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Has_Controlling_Result (Designator) then
|
|
Etyp := Etype (Designator);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
E := First_Entity (Designator);
|
|
while Present (E)
|
|
and then Is_Formal (E)
|
|
and then not Is_Controlling_Formal (E)
|
|
loop
|
|
Next_Entity (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Etyp := Etype (E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Etyp) then
|
|
Etyp := Directly_Designated_Type (Etyp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Interface (Etyp)
|
|
and then not Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Designator)
|
|
and then not (Ekind (Designator) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then Null_Present (Specification (N)))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (Defining_Entity (N));
|
|
|
|
-- Specialize error message based on procedures vs. functions,
|
|
-- since functions can't be null subprograms.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Designator) = E_Procedure then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("interface procedure % must be abstract or null", N);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("interface function % must be abstract", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- What is the following code for, it used to be
|
|
|
|
-- ??? Set_Suppress_Elaboration_Checks
|
|
-- ??? (Designator, Elaboration_Checks_Suppressed (Designator));
|
|
|
|
-- The following seems equivalent, but a bit dubious
|
|
|
|
if Elaboration_Checks_Suppressed (Designator) then
|
|
Set_Kill_Elaboration_Checks (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Scop /= Standard_Standard and then not Is_Child_Unit (Designator) then
|
|
Set_Categorization_From_Scope (Designator, Scop);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- For a compilation unit, check for library-unit pragmas
|
|
|
|
Push_Scope (Designator);
|
|
Set_Categorization_From_Pragmas (N);
|
|
Validate_Categorization_Dependency (N, Designator);
|
|
Pop_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For a compilation unit, set body required. This flag will only be
|
|
-- reset if a valid Import or Interface pragma is processed later on.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Compilation_Unit then
|
|
Set_Body_Required (Parent (N), True);
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Nkind (Specification (N)) = N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
and then Null_Present (Specification (N))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("null procedure cannot be declared at library level", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Generate_Reference_To_Formals (Designator);
|
|
Check_Eliminated (Designator);
|
|
|
|
if Debug_Flag_C then
|
|
Outdent;
|
|
Write_Str ("<== subprogram spec ");
|
|
Write_Name (Chars (Designator));
|
|
Write_Str (" from ");
|
|
Write_Location (Sloc (N));
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Protected_Type (Current_Scope) then
|
|
|
|
-- Indicate that this is a protected operation, because it may be
|
|
-- used in subsequent declarations within the protected type.
|
|
|
|
Set_Convention (Designator, Convention_Protected);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
List_Inherited_Pre_Post_Aspects (Designator);
|
|
|
|
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
|
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications (N, Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Analyze_Subprogram_Declaration;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
-- Analyze_Subprogram_Specification --
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- Reminder: N here really is a subprogram specification (not a subprogram
|
|
-- declaration). This procedure is called to analyze the specification in
|
|
-- both subprogram bodies and subprogram declarations (specs).
|
|
|
|
function Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (N : Node_Id) return Entity_Id is
|
|
function Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine whether entity E denotes the spec or body of an invariant
|
|
-- procedure.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (E);
|
|
Spec : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Decl) = N_Subprogram_Body then
|
|
Spec := Corresponding_Spec (Decl);
|
|
else
|
|
Spec := E;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
Present (Spec)
|
|
and then Ekind (Spec) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then (Is_Partial_Invariant_Procedure (Spec)
|
|
or else Is_Invariant_Procedure (Spec));
|
|
end Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Designator : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (N);
|
|
Formals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Specifications (N);
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Analyze_Subprogram_Specification
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- User-defined operator is not allowed in SPARK, except as a renaming
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Defining_Unit_Name (N)) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("user-defined operator is not allowed", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Proceed with analysis. Do not emit a cross-reference entry if the
|
|
-- specification comes from an expression function, because it may be
|
|
-- the completion of a previous declaration. It is not, the cross-
|
|
-- reference entry will be emitted for the new subprogram declaration.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (N)) /= N_Expression_Function then
|
|
Generate_Definition (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
Set_Ekind (Designator, E_Function);
|
|
Set_Mechanism (Designator, Default_Mechanism);
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Ekind (Designator, E_Procedure);
|
|
Set_Etype (Designator, Standard_Void_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Flag Is_Inlined_Always is True by default, and reversed to False for
|
|
-- those subprograms which could be inlined in GNATprove mode (because
|
|
-- Body_To_Inline is non-Empty) but should not be inlined.
|
|
|
|
if GNATprove_Mode then
|
|
Set_Is_Inlined_Always (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Introduce new scope for analysis of the formals and the return type
|
|
|
|
Set_Scope (Designator, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Formals) then
|
|
Push_Scope (Designator);
|
|
Process_Formals (Formals, N);
|
|
|
|
-- Check dimensions in N for formals with default expression
|
|
|
|
Analyze_Dimension_Formals (N, Formals);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-345): If this is an overriding operation of an
|
|
-- inherited interface operation, and the controlling type is
|
|
-- a synchronized type, replace the type with its corresponding
|
|
-- record, to match the proper signature of an overriding operation.
|
|
-- Same processing for an access parameter whose designated type is
|
|
-- derived from a synchronized interface.
|
|
|
|
-- This modification is not done for invariant procedures because
|
|
-- the corresponding record may not necessarely be visible when the
|
|
-- concurrent type acts as the full view of a private type.
|
|
|
|
-- package Pack is
|
|
-- type Prot is private with Type_Invariant => ...;
|
|
-- procedure ConcInvariant (Obj : Prot);
|
|
-- private
|
|
-- protected type Prot is ...;
|
|
-- type Concurrent_Record_Prot is record ...;
|
|
-- procedure ConcInvariant (Obj : Prot) is
|
|
-- ...
|
|
-- end ConcInvariant;
|
|
-- end Pack;
|
|
|
|
-- In the example above, both the spec and body of the invariant
|
|
-- procedure must utilize the private type as the controlling type.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then not Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body (Designator)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
Formal_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Rec_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Desig_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (Designator);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
Formal_Typ := Etype (Formal);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Type (Formal_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Record_Type (Formal_Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Rec_Typ := Corresponding_Record_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Interfaces (Rec_Typ)) then
|
|
Set_Etype (Formal, Rec_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal_Typ) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
Desig_Typ := Designated_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Type (Desig_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Record_Type (Desig_Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Rec_Typ := Corresponding_Record_Type (Desig_Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Interfaces (Rec_Typ)) then
|
|
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Formal_Typ, Rec_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
|
|
-- The subprogram scope is pushed and popped around the processing of
|
|
-- the return type for consistency with call above to Process_Formals
|
|
-- (which itself can call Analyze_Return_Type), and to ensure that any
|
|
-- itype created for the return type will be associated with the proper
|
|
-- scope.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (N) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
Push_Scope (Designator);
|
|
Analyze_Return_Type (N);
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Function case
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with operator symbol case
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Designator) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol then
|
|
Valid_Operator_Definition (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
May_Need_Actuals (Designator);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-251): If the return type is abstract, verify that
|
|
-- the subprogram is abstract also. This does not apply to renaming
|
|
-- declarations, where abstractness is inherited, and to subprogram
|
|
-- bodies generated for stream operations, which become renamings as
|
|
-- bodies.
|
|
|
|
-- In case of primitives associated with abstract interface types
|
|
-- the check is applied later (see Analyze_Subprogram_Declaration).
|
|
|
|
if not Nkind_In (Original_Node (Parent (N)),
|
|
N_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration,
|
|
N_Formal_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration,
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration)
|
|
then
|
|
if Is_Abstract_Type (Etype (Designator))
|
|
and then not Is_Interface (Etype (Designator))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("function that returns abstract type must be abstract", N);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI-0073): Extend this test to subprograms with an
|
|
-- access result whose designated type is abstract.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
and then Nkind (Result_Definition (N)) = N_Access_Definition
|
|
and then
|
|
not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (Designator)))
|
|
and then Is_Abstract_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (Designator)))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("function whose access result designates abstract type "
|
|
& "must be abstract", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Designator;
|
|
end Analyze_Subprogram_Specification;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Check_Conformance --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ctype : Conformance_Type;
|
|
Errmsg : Boolean;
|
|
Conforms : out Boolean;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Get_Inst : Boolean := False;
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals : Boolean := False)
|
|
is
|
|
procedure Conformance_Error (Msg : String; N : Node_Id := New_Id);
|
|
-- Sets Conforms to False. If Errmsg is False, then that's all it does.
|
|
-- If Errmsg is True, then processing continues to post an error message
|
|
-- for conformance error on given node. Two messages are output. The
|
|
-- first message points to the previous declaration with a general "no
|
|
-- conformance" message. The second is the detailed reason, supplied as
|
|
-- Msg. The parameter N provide information for a possible & insertion
|
|
-- in the message, and also provides the location for posting the
|
|
-- message in the absence of a specified Err_Loc location.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Conformance_Error --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Conformance_Error (Msg : String; N : Node_Id := New_Id) is
|
|
Enode : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Conforms := False;
|
|
|
|
if Errmsg then
|
|
if No (Err_Loc) then
|
|
Enode := N;
|
|
else
|
|
Enode := Err_Loc;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Old_Id);
|
|
|
|
case Ctype is
|
|
when Type_Conformant =>
|
|
Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
|
|
("not type conformant with declaration#!", Enode);
|
|
|
|
when Mode_Conformant =>
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (Old_Id)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("not mode conformant with operation inherited#!",
|
|
Enode);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("not mode conformant with declaration#!", Enode);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
when Subtype_Conformant =>
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (Old_Id)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("not subtype conformant with operation inherited#!",
|
|
Enode);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("not subtype conformant with declaration#!", Enode);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
when Fully_Conformant =>
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (Old_Id)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration then
|
|
Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
|
|
("not fully conformant with operation inherited#!",
|
|
Enode);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
|
|
("not fully conformant with declaration#!", Enode);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end case;
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_NE (Msg, Enode, N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Conformance_Error;
|
|
|
|
-- Local Variables
|
|
|
|
Old_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Old_Id);
|
|
New_Type : constant Entity_Id := Etype (New_Id);
|
|
Old_Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
Access_Types_Match : Boolean;
|
|
Old_Formal_Base : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_Formal_Base : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Conformance
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Conforms := True;
|
|
|
|
-- We need a special case for operators, since they don't appear
|
|
-- explicitly.
|
|
|
|
if Ctype = Type_Conformant then
|
|
if Ekind (New_Id) = E_Operator
|
|
and then Operator_Matches_Spec (New_Id, Old_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If both are functions/operators, check return types conform
|
|
|
|
if Old_Type /= Standard_Void_Type
|
|
and then
|
|
New_Type /= Standard_Void_Type
|
|
then
|
|
-- If we are checking interface conformance we omit controlling
|
|
-- arguments and result, because we are only checking the conformance
|
|
-- of the remaining parameters.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Controlling_Result (Old_Id)
|
|
and then Has_Controlling_Result (New_Id)
|
|
and then Skip_Controlling_Formals
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Conforming_Types (Old_Type, New_Type, Ctype, Get_Inst) then
|
|
if Ctype >= Subtype_Conformant
|
|
and then not Predicates_Match (Old_Type, New_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\predicate of return type does not match!", New_Id);
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\return type does not match!", New_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): In case of anonymous access types check the
|
|
-- null-exclusion and access-to-constant attributes match.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Ekind (Etype (Old_Type)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then
|
|
(Can_Never_Be_Null (Old_Type) /= Can_Never_Be_Null (New_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Old_Type)) /=
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (New_Type)))
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\return type does not match!", New_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If either is a function/operator and the other isn't, error
|
|
|
|
elsif Old_Type /= Standard_Void_Type
|
|
or else New_Type /= Standard_Void_Type
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\functions can only match functions!", New_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In subtype conformant case, conventions must match (RM 6.3.1(16)).
|
|
-- If this is a renaming as body, refine error message to indicate that
|
|
-- the conflict is with the original declaration. If the entity is not
|
|
-- frozen, the conventions don't have to match, the one of the renamed
|
|
-- entity is inherited.
|
|
|
|
if Ctype >= Subtype_Conformant then
|
|
if Convention (Old_Id) /= Convention (New_Id) then
|
|
if not Is_Frozen (New_Id) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Err_Loc)
|
|
and then Nkind (Err_Loc) = N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Spec (Err_Loc))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (New_Id);
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_2 :=
|
|
Name_Ada + Convention_Id'Pos (Convention (New_Id));
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\prior declaration for% has convention %!");
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\calling conventions do not match!");
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Formal_Subprogram (Old_Id)
|
|
or else Is_Formal_Subprogram (New_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\formal subprograms not allowed!");
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with parameters
|
|
|
|
-- Note: we use the entity information, rather than going directly
|
|
-- to the specification in the tree. This is not only simpler, but
|
|
-- absolutely necessary for some cases of conformance tests between
|
|
-- operators, where the declaration tree simply does not exist.
|
|
|
|
Old_Formal := First_Formal (Old_Id);
|
|
New_Formal := First_Formal (New_Id);
|
|
while Present (Old_Formal) and then Present (New_Formal) loop
|
|
if Is_Controlling_Formal (Old_Formal)
|
|
and then Is_Controlling_Formal (New_Formal)
|
|
and then Skip_Controlling_Formals
|
|
then
|
|
-- The controlling formals will have different types when
|
|
-- comparing an interface operation with its match, but both
|
|
-- or neither must be access parameters.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (Old_Formal))
|
|
=
|
|
Is_Access_Type (Etype (New_Formal))
|
|
then
|
|
goto Skip_Controlling_Formal;
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\access parameter does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012: Mode conformance also requires that formal parameters
|
|
-- be both aliased, or neither.
|
|
|
|
if Ctype >= Mode_Conformant and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
if Is_Aliased (Old_Formal) /= Is_Aliased (New_Formal) then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\aliased parameter mismatch!", New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ctype = Fully_Conformant then
|
|
|
|
-- Names must match. Error message is more accurate if we do
|
|
-- this before checking that the types of the formals match.
|
|
|
|
if Chars (Old_Formal) /= Chars (New_Formal) then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\name& does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
-- Set error posted flag on new formal as well to stop
|
|
-- junk cascaded messages in some cases.
|
|
|
|
Set_Error_Posted (New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Null exclusion must match
|
|
|
|
if Null_Exclusion_Present (Parent (Old_Formal))
|
|
/=
|
|
Null_Exclusion_Present (Parent (New_Formal))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Only give error if both come from source. This should be
|
|
-- investigated some time, since it should not be needed ???
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Old_Formal)
|
|
and then
|
|
Comes_From_Source (New_Formal)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\null exclusion for& does not match", New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
-- Mark error posted on the new formal to avoid duplicated
|
|
-- complaint about types not matching.
|
|
|
|
Set_Error_Posted (New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-423): Possible access [sub]type and itype match. This
|
|
-- case occurs whenever a subprogram is being renamed and one of its
|
|
-- parameters imposes a null exclusion. For example:
|
|
|
|
-- type T is null record;
|
|
-- type Acc_T is access T;
|
|
-- subtype Acc_T_Sub is Acc_T;
|
|
|
|
-- procedure P (Obj : not null Acc_T_Sub); -- itype
|
|
-- procedure Ren_P (Obj : Acc_T_Sub) -- subtype
|
|
-- renames P;
|
|
|
|
Old_Formal_Base := Etype (Old_Formal);
|
|
New_Formal_Base := Etype (New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
if Get_Inst then
|
|
Old_Formal_Base := Get_Instance_Of (Old_Formal_Base);
|
|
New_Formal_Base := Get_Instance_Of (New_Formal_Base);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Access_Types_Match := Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
|
|
-- Ensure that this rule is only applied when New_Id is a
|
|
-- renaming of Old_Id.
|
|
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (Parent (New_Id))) =
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
and then Nkind (Name (Parent (Parent (New_Id)))) in N_Has_Entity
|
|
and then Present (Entity (Name (Parent (Parent (New_Id)))))
|
|
and then Entity (Name (Parent (Parent (New_Id)))) = Old_Id
|
|
|
|
-- Now handle the allowed access-type case
|
|
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Old_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
|
|
-- The type kinds must match. The only exception occurs with
|
|
-- multiple generics of the form:
|
|
|
|
-- generic generic
|
|
-- type F is private; type A is private;
|
|
-- type F_Ptr is access F; type A_Ptr is access A;
|
|
-- with proc F_P (X : F_Ptr); with proc A_P (X : A_Ptr);
|
|
-- package F_Pack is ... package A_Pack is
|
|
-- package F_Inst is
|
|
-- new F_Pack (A, A_Ptr, A_P);
|
|
|
|
-- When checking for conformance between the parameters of A_P
|
|
-- and F_P, the type kinds of F_Ptr and A_Ptr will not match
|
|
-- because the compiler has transformed A_Ptr into a subtype of
|
|
-- F_Ptr. We catch this case in the code below.
|
|
|
|
and then (Ekind (Old_Formal_Base) = Ekind (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_Generic_Type (Old_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Is_Generic_Type (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Is_Internal (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Etype (Etype (New_Formal_Base)) =
|
|
Old_Formal_Base))
|
|
and then Directly_Designated_Type (Old_Formal_Base) =
|
|
Directly_Designated_Type (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then ((Is_Itype (Old_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Old_Formal_Base))
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_Itype (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
and then Can_Never_Be_Null (New_Formal_Base)));
|
|
|
|
-- Types must always match. In the visible part of an instance,
|
|
-- usual overloading rules for dispatching operations apply, and
|
|
-- we check base types (not the actual subtypes).
|
|
|
|
if In_Instance_Visible_Part
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (New_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
if not Conforming_Types
|
|
(T1 => Base_Type (Etype (Old_Formal)),
|
|
T2 => Base_Type (Etype (New_Formal)),
|
|
Ctype => Ctype,
|
|
Get_Inst => Get_Inst)
|
|
and then not Access_Types_Match
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\type of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Conforming_Types
|
|
(T1 => Old_Formal_Base,
|
|
T2 => New_Formal_Base,
|
|
Ctype => Ctype,
|
|
Get_Inst => Get_Inst)
|
|
and then not Access_Types_Match
|
|
then
|
|
-- Don't give error message if old type is Any_Type. This test
|
|
-- avoids some cascaded errors, e.g. in case of a bad spec.
|
|
|
|
if Errmsg and then Old_Formal_Base = Any_Type then
|
|
Conforms := False;
|
|
else
|
|
if Ctype >= Subtype_Conformant
|
|
and then
|
|
not Predicates_Match (Old_Formal_Base, New_Formal_Base)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\predicate of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\type of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For mode conformance, mode must match
|
|
|
|
if Ctype >= Mode_Conformant then
|
|
if Parameter_Mode (Old_Formal) /= Parameter_Mode (New_Formal) then
|
|
if not Ekind_In (New_Id, E_Function, E_Procedure)
|
|
or else not Is_Primitive_Wrapper (New_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\mode of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
T : constant Entity_Id := Find_Dispatching_Type (New_Id);
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Protected_Type (Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (T))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_PT (New_Id, Ultimate_Alias (Old_Id));
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\mode of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Part of mode conformance for access types is having the same
|
|
-- constant modifier.
|
|
|
|
elsif Access_Types_Match
|
|
and then Is_Access_Constant (Old_Formal_Base) /=
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (New_Formal_Base)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\constant modifier does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ctype >= Subtype_Conformant then
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): In case of anonymous access types check
|
|
-- the null-exclusion and access-to-constant attributes must
|
|
-- match. For null exclusion, we test the types rather than the
|
|
-- formals themselves, since the attribute is only set reliably
|
|
-- on the formals in the Ada 95 case, and we exclude the case
|
|
-- where Old_Formal is marked as controlling, to avoid errors
|
|
-- when matching completing bodies with dispatching declarations
|
|
-- (access formals in the bodies aren't marked Can_Never_Be_Null).
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Ekind (Etype (Old_Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Ekind (Etype (New_Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then
|
|
((Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Old_Formal)) /=
|
|
Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (New_Formal))
|
|
and then
|
|
not Is_Controlling_Formal (Old_Formal))
|
|
or else
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Old_Formal)) /=
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (New_Formal)))
|
|
|
|
-- Do not complain if error already posted on New_Formal. This
|
|
-- avoids some redundant error messages.
|
|
|
|
and then not Error_Posted (New_Formal)
|
|
then
|
|
-- It is allowed to omit the null-exclusion in case of stream
|
|
-- attribute subprograms. We recognize stream subprograms
|
|
-- through their TSS-generated suffix.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
TSS_Name : constant TSS_Name_Type := Get_TSS_Name (New_Id);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if TSS_Name /= TSS_Stream_Read
|
|
and then TSS_Name /= TSS_Stream_Write
|
|
and then TSS_Name /= TSS_Stream_Input
|
|
and then TSS_Name /= TSS_Stream_Output
|
|
then
|
|
-- Here we have a definite conformance error. It is worth
|
|
-- special casing the error message for the case of a
|
|
-- controlling formal (which excludes null).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Controlling_Formal (New_Formal) then
|
|
Error_Msg_Node_2 := Scope (New_Formal);
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\controlling formal & of & excludes null, "
|
|
& "declaration must exclude null as well",
|
|
New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
-- Normal case (couldn't we give more detail here???)
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\type of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Full conformance checks
|
|
|
|
if Ctype = Fully_Conformant then
|
|
|
|
-- We have checked already that names match
|
|
|
|
if Parameter_Mode (Old_Formal) = E_In_Parameter then
|
|
|
|
-- Check default expressions for in parameters
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
NewD : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Present (Default_Value (New_Formal));
|
|
OldD : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Present (Default_Value (Old_Formal));
|
|
begin
|
|
if NewD or OldD then
|
|
|
|
-- The old default value has been analyzed because the
|
|
-- current full declaration will have frozen everything
|
|
-- before. The new default value has not been analyzed,
|
|
-- so analyze it now before we check for conformance.
|
|
|
|
if NewD then
|
|
Push_Scope (New_Id);
|
|
Preanalyze_Spec_Expression
|
|
(Default_Value (New_Formal), Etype (New_Formal));
|
|
End_Scope;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not (NewD and OldD)
|
|
or else not Fully_Conformant_Expressions
|
|
(Default_Value (Old_Formal),
|
|
Default_Value (New_Formal))
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\default expression for & does not match!",
|
|
New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A couple of special checks for Ada 83 mode. These checks are
|
|
-- skipped if either entity is an operator in package Standard,
|
|
-- or if either old or new instance is not from the source program.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version = Ada_83
|
|
and then Sloc (Old_Id) > Standard_Location
|
|
and then Sloc (New_Id) > Standard_Location
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Old_Id)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (New_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Old_Param : constant Node_Id := Declaration_Node (Old_Formal);
|
|
New_Param : constant Node_Id := Declaration_Node (New_Formal);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Explicit IN must be present or absent in both cases. This
|
|
-- test is required only in the full conformance case.
|
|
|
|
if In_Present (Old_Param) /= In_Present (New_Param)
|
|
and then Ctype = Fully_Conformant
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\(Ada 83) IN must appear in both declarations",
|
|
New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Grouping (use of comma in param lists) must be the same
|
|
-- This is where we catch a misconformance like:
|
|
|
|
-- A, B : Integer
|
|
-- A : Integer; B : Integer
|
|
|
|
-- which are represented identically in the tree except
|
|
-- for the setting of the flags More_Ids and Prev_Ids.
|
|
|
|
if More_Ids (Old_Param) /= More_Ids (New_Param)
|
|
or else Prev_Ids (Old_Param) /= Prev_Ids (New_Param)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("\grouping of & does not match!", New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- This label is required when skipping controlling formals
|
|
|
|
<<Skip_Controlling_Formal>>
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Old_Formal);
|
|
Next_Formal (New_Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Old_Formal) then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\too few parameters!");
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (New_Formal) then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("\too many parameters!", New_Formal);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Conformance;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Check_Conventions --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Conventions (Typ : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Ifaces_List : Elist_Id;
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Convention (Op : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Verify that the convention of inherited dispatching operation Op is
|
|
-- consistent among all subprograms it overrides. In order to minimize
|
|
-- the search, Search_From is utilized to designate a specific point in
|
|
-- the list rather than iterating over the whole list once more.
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Check_Convention --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Convention (Op : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Op_Conv : constant Convention_Id := Convention (Op);
|
|
Iface_Conv : Convention_Id;
|
|
Iface_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
|
|
Iface_Prim_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
|
|
Iface_Prim : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Iface_Elmt := First_Elmt (Ifaces_List);
|
|
while Present (Iface_Elmt) loop
|
|
Iface_Prim_Elmt :=
|
|
First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Node (Iface_Elmt)));
|
|
while Present (Iface_Prim_Elmt) loop
|
|
Iface_Prim := Node (Iface_Prim_Elmt);
|
|
Iface_Conv := Convention (Iface_Prim);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Interface_Conformant (Typ, Iface_Prim, Op)
|
|
and then Iface_Conv /= Op_Conv
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("inconsistent conventions in primitive operations", Typ);
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (Op);
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_2 := Get_Convention_Name (Op_Conv);
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Op);
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (Op) or else No (Alias (Op)) then
|
|
if not Present (Overridden_Operation (Op)) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\\primitive % defined #", Typ);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\\overriding operation % with "
|
|
& "convention % defined #", Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else pragma Assert (Present (Alias (Op)));
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Alias (Op));
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\\inherited operation % with "
|
|
& "convention % defined #", Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_1 := Chars (Op);
|
|
Error_Msg_Name_2 := Get_Convention_Name (Iface_Conv);
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Iface_Prim);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\\overridden operation % with "
|
|
& "convention % defined #", Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- Avoid cascading errors
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Elmt (Iface_Prim_Elmt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Next_Elmt (Iface_Elmt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Check_Convention;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Prim_Op : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prim_Op_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Conventions
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not Has_Interfaces (Typ) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Collect_Interfaces (Typ, Ifaces_List);
|
|
|
|
-- The algorithm checks every overriding dispatching operation against
|
|
-- all the corresponding overridden dispatching operations, detecting
|
|
-- differences in conventions.
|
|
|
|
Prim_Op_Elmt := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (Typ));
|
|
while Present (Prim_Op_Elmt) loop
|
|
Prim_Op := Node (Prim_Op_Elmt);
|
|
|
|
-- A small optimization: skip the predefined dispatching operations
|
|
-- since they always have the same convention.
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Predefined_Dispatching_Operation (Prim_Op) then
|
|
Check_Convention (Prim_Op);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Elmt (Prim_Op_Elmt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Check_Conventions;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Delayed_Subprogram --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Delayed_Subprogram (Designator : Entity_Id) is
|
|
F : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
procedure Possible_Freeze (T : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- T is the type of either a formal parameter or of the return type.
|
|
-- If T is not yet frozen and needs a delayed freeze, then the
|
|
-- subprogram itself must be delayed.
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Possible_Freeze --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Possible_Freeze (T : Entity_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Has_Delayed_Freeze (T) and then not Is_Frozen (T) then
|
|
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Designator);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Type (T)
|
|
and then Has_Delayed_Freeze (Designated_Type (T))
|
|
and then not Is_Frozen (Designated_Type (T))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
end Possible_Freeze;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Delayed_Subprogram
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- All subprograms, including abstract subprograms, may need a freeze
|
|
-- node if some formal type or the return type needs one.
|
|
|
|
Possible_Freeze (Etype (Designator));
|
|
Possible_Freeze (Base_Type (Etype (Designator))); -- needed ???
|
|
|
|
-- Need delayed freeze if any of the formal types themselves need
|
|
-- a delayed freeze and are not yet frozen.
|
|
|
|
F := First_Formal (Designator);
|
|
while Present (F) loop
|
|
Possible_Freeze (Etype (F));
|
|
Possible_Freeze (Base_Type (Etype (F))); -- needed ???
|
|
Next_Formal (F);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Mark functions that return by reference. Note that it cannot be
|
|
-- done for delayed_freeze subprograms because the underlying
|
|
-- returned type may not be known yet (for private types)
|
|
|
|
if not Has_Delayed_Freeze (Designator) and then Expander_Active then
|
|
declare
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (Designator);
|
|
Utyp : constant Entity_Id := Underlying_Type (Typ);
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Limited_View (Typ) then
|
|
Set_Returns_By_Ref (Designator);
|
|
elsif Present (Utyp) and then CW_Or_Has_Controlled_Part (Utyp) then
|
|
Set_Returns_By_Ref (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Delayed_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Discriminant_Conformance --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Discriminant_Conformance
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Prev : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prev_Loc : Node_Id)
|
|
is
|
|
Old_Discr : Entity_Id := First_Discriminant (Prev);
|
|
New_Discr : Node_Id := First (Discriminant_Specifications (N));
|
|
New_Discr_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_Discr_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
procedure Conformance_Error (Msg : String; N : Node_Id);
|
|
-- Post error message for conformance error on given node. Two messages
|
|
-- are output. The first points to the previous declaration with a
|
|
-- general "no conformance" message. The second is the detailed reason,
|
|
-- supplied as Msg. The parameter N provide information for a possible
|
|
-- & insertion in the message.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Conformance_Error --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Conformance_Error (Msg : String; N : Node_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Prev_Loc);
|
|
Error_Msg_N -- CODEFIX
|
|
("not fully conformant with declaration#!", N);
|
|
Error_Msg_NE (Msg, N, N);
|
|
end Conformance_Error;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Discriminant_Conformance
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Old_Discr) and then Present (New_Discr) loop
|
|
New_Discr_Id := Defining_Identifier (New_Discr);
|
|
|
|
-- The subtype mark of the discriminant on the full type has not
|
|
-- been analyzed so we do it here. For an access discriminant a new
|
|
-- type is created.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Discriminant_Type (New_Discr)) = N_Access_Definition then
|
|
New_Discr_Type :=
|
|
Access_Definition (N, Discriminant_Type (New_Discr));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Analyze (Discriminant_Type (New_Discr));
|
|
New_Discr_Type := Etype (Discriminant_Type (New_Discr));
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005: if the discriminant definition carries a null
|
|
-- exclusion, create an itype to check properly for consistency
|
|
-- with partial declaration.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (New_Discr_Type)
|
|
and then Null_Exclusion_Present (New_Discr)
|
|
then
|
|
New_Discr_Type :=
|
|
Create_Null_Excluding_Itype
|
|
(T => New_Discr_Type,
|
|
Related_Nod => New_Discr,
|
|
Scope_Id => Current_Scope);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not Conforming_Types
|
|
(Etype (Old_Discr), New_Discr_Type, Fully_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("type of & does not match!", New_Discr_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
else
|
|
-- Treat the new discriminant as an occurrence of the old one,
|
|
-- for navigation purposes, and fill in some semantic
|
|
-- information, for completeness.
|
|
|
|
Generate_Reference (Old_Discr, New_Discr_Id, 'r');
|
|
Set_Etype (New_Discr_Id, Etype (Old_Discr));
|
|
Set_Scope (New_Discr_Id, Scope (Old_Discr));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Names must match
|
|
|
|
if Chars (Old_Discr) /= Chars (Defining_Identifier (New_Discr)) then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("name & does not match!", New_Discr_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Default expressions must match
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
NewD : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Present (Expression (New_Discr));
|
|
OldD : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Present (Expression (Parent (Old_Discr)));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if NewD or OldD then
|
|
|
|
-- The old default value has been analyzed and expanded,
|
|
-- because the current full declaration will have frozen
|
|
-- everything before. The new default values have not been
|
|
-- expanded, so expand now to check conformance.
|
|
|
|
if NewD then
|
|
Preanalyze_Spec_Expression
|
|
(Expression (New_Discr), New_Discr_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not (NewD and OldD)
|
|
or else not Fully_Conformant_Expressions
|
|
(Expression (Parent (Old_Discr)),
|
|
Expression (New_Discr))
|
|
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("default expression for & does not match!",
|
|
New_Discr_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- In Ada 83 case, grouping must match: (A,B : X) /= (A : X; B : X)
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version = Ada_83 then
|
|
declare
|
|
Old_Disc : constant Node_Id := Declaration_Node (Old_Discr);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Grouping (use of comma in param lists) must be the same
|
|
-- This is where we catch a misconformance like:
|
|
|
|
-- A, B : Integer
|
|
-- A : Integer; B : Integer
|
|
|
|
-- which are represented identically in the tree except
|
|
-- for the setting of the flags More_Ids and Prev_Ids.
|
|
|
|
if More_Ids (Old_Disc) /= More_Ids (New_Discr)
|
|
or else Prev_Ids (Old_Disc) /= Prev_Ids (New_Discr)
|
|
then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("grouping of & does not match!", New_Discr_Id);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Discriminant (Old_Discr);
|
|
Next (New_Discr);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Old_Discr) then
|
|
Conformance_Error ("too few discriminants!", Defining_Identifier (N));
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (New_Discr) then
|
|
Conformance_Error
|
|
("too many discriminants!", Defining_Identifier (New_Discr));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Discriminant_Conformance;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Fully_Conformant --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Fully_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty)
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
pragma Warnings (Off, Result);
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id, Old_Id, Fully_Conformant, True, Result, Err_Loc);
|
|
end Check_Fully_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Limited_Return --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Limited_Return
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Expr : Node_Id;
|
|
R_Type : Entity_Id)
|
|
is
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-318-02): Return-by-reference types have been removed and
|
|
-- replaced by anonymous access results. This is an incompatibility with
|
|
-- Ada 95. Not clear whether this should be enforced yet or perhaps
|
|
-- controllable with special switch. ???
|
|
|
|
-- A limited interface that is not immutably limited is OK
|
|
|
|
if Is_Limited_Interface (R_Type)
|
|
and then
|
|
not (Is_Task_Interface (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Protected_Interface (R_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Synchronized_Interface (R_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Limited_Type (R_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Interface (R_Type)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then not In_Instance_Body
|
|
and then not OK_For_Limited_Init_In_05 (R_Type, Expr)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Error in Ada 2005
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then not Debug_Flag_Dot_L
|
|
and then not GNAT_Mode
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("(Ada 2005) cannot copy object of a limited type "
|
|
& "(RM-2005 6.5(5.5/2))", Expr);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Limited_View (R_Type) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\return by reference not permitted in Ada 2005", Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Warn in Ada 95 mode, to give folks a heads up about this
|
|
-- incompatibility.
|
|
|
|
-- In GNAT mode, this is just a warning, to allow it to be evilly
|
|
-- turned off. Otherwise it is a real error.
|
|
|
|
-- In a generic context, simplify the warning because it makes no
|
|
-- sense to discuss pass-by-reference or copy.
|
|
|
|
elsif Warn_On_Ada_2005_Compatibility or GNAT_Mode then
|
|
if Inside_A_Generic then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("return of limited object not permitted in Ada 2005 "
|
|
& "(RM-2005 6.5(5.5/2))?y?", Expr);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Limited_View (R_Type) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("return by reference not permitted in Ada 2005 "
|
|
& "(RM-2005 6.5(5.5/2))?y?", Expr);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("cannot copy object of a limited type in Ada 2005 "
|
|
& "(RM-2005 6.5(5.5/2))?y?", Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 95 mode, compatibility warnings disabled
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return; -- skip continuation messages below
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not Inside_A_Generic then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\consider switching to return of access type", Expr);
|
|
Explain_Limited_Type (R_Type, Expr);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Limited_Return;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Mode_Conformant --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Mode_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Get_Inst : Boolean := False)
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
pragma Warnings (Off, Result);
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id, Old_Id, Mode_Conformant, True, Result, Err_Loc, Get_Inst);
|
|
end Check_Mode_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Overriding_Indicator --
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Overriding_Indicator
|
|
(Subp : Entity_Id;
|
|
Overridden_Subp : Entity_Id;
|
|
Is_Primitive : Boolean)
|
|
is
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Spec : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- No overriding indicator for literals
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Subp) = E_Enumeration_Literal then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Subp) = E_Entry then
|
|
Decl := Parent (Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- No point in analyzing a malformed operator
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Subp) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
and then Error_Posted (Subp)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Decl := Unit_Declaration_Node (Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In (Decl, N_Subprogram_Body,
|
|
N_Subprogram_Body_Stub,
|
|
N_Subprogram_Declaration,
|
|
N_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration,
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration)
|
|
then
|
|
Spec := Specification (Decl);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Decl) = N_Entry_Declaration then
|
|
Spec := Decl;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The overriding operation is type conformant with the overridden one,
|
|
-- but the names of the formals are not required to match. If the names
|
|
-- appear permuted in the overriding operation, this is a possible
|
|
-- source of confusion that is worth diagnosing. Controlling formals
|
|
-- often carry names that reflect the type, and it is not worthwhile
|
|
-- requiring that their names match.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Overridden_Subp)
|
|
and then Nkind (Subp) /= N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Form1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Form2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Form1 := First_Formal (Subp);
|
|
Form2 := First_Formal (Overridden_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- If the overriding operation is a synchronized operation, skip
|
|
-- the first parameter of the overridden operation, which is
|
|
-- implicit in the new one. If the operation is declared in the
|
|
-- body it is not primitive and all formals must match.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Type (Scope (Subp))
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Scope (Subp))
|
|
and then not Has_Completion (Scope (Subp))
|
|
then
|
|
Form2 := Next_Formal (Form2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Form1) then
|
|
Form1 := Next_Formal (Form1);
|
|
Form2 := Next_Formal (Form2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
while Present (Form1) loop
|
|
if not Is_Controlling_Formal (Form1)
|
|
and then Present (Next_Formal (Form2))
|
|
and then Chars (Form1) = Chars (Next_Formal (Form2))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Node_2 := Alias (Overridden_Subp);
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Error_Msg_Node_2);
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("& does not match corresponding formal of&#",
|
|
Form1, Form1);
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Form1);
|
|
Next_Formal (Form2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there is an overridden subprogram, then check that there is no
|
|
-- "not overriding" indicator, and mark the subprogram as overriding.
|
|
-- This is not done if the overridden subprogram is marked as hidden,
|
|
-- which can occur for the case of inherited controlled operations
|
|
-- (see Derive_Subprogram), unless the inherited subprogram's parent
|
|
-- subprogram is not itself hidden. (Note: This condition could probably
|
|
-- be simplified, leaving out the testing for the specific controlled
|
|
-- cases, but it seems safer and clearer this way, and echoes similar
|
|
-- special-case tests of this kind in other places.)
|
|
|
|
if Present (Overridden_Subp)
|
|
and then (not Is_Hidden (Overridden_Subp)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nam_In (Chars (Overridden_Subp), Name_Initialize,
|
|
Name_Adjust,
|
|
Name_Finalize)
|
|
and then Present (Alias (Overridden_Subp))
|
|
and then not Is_Hidden (Alias (Overridden_Subp))))
|
|
then
|
|
if Must_Not_Override (Spec) then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Overridden_Subp);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Subp) = E_Entry then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("entry & overrides inherited operation #", Spec, Subp);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("subprogram & overrides inherited operation #", Spec, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Special-case to fix a GNAT oddity: Limited_Controlled is declared
|
|
-- as an extension of Root_Controlled, and thus has a useless Adjust
|
|
-- operation. This operation should not be inherited by other limited
|
|
-- controlled types. An explicit Adjust for them is not overriding.
|
|
|
|
elsif Must_Override (Spec)
|
|
and then Chars (Overridden_Subp) = Name_Adjust
|
|
and then Is_Limited_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Subp)))
|
|
and then Present (Alias (Overridden_Subp))
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Predefined_File_Name
|
|
(Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (Alias (Overridden_Subp))))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("subprogram & is not overriding", Spec, Subp);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Subprogram (Subp) then
|
|
if Is_Init_Proc (Subp) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif No (Overridden_Operation (Subp)) then
|
|
|
|
-- For entities generated by Derive_Subprograms the overridden
|
|
-- operation is the inherited primitive (which is available
|
|
-- through the attribute alias)
|
|
|
|
if (Is_Dispatching_Operation (Subp)
|
|
or else Is_Dispatching_Operation (Overridden_Subp))
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (Overridden_Subp)
|
|
and then Find_Dispatching_Type (Overridden_Subp) =
|
|
Find_Dispatching_Type (Subp)
|
|
and then Present (Alias (Overridden_Subp))
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Alias (Overridden_Subp))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (Subp, Alias (Overridden_Subp));
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (Subp, Alias (Overridden_Subp));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (Subp, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (Subp, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If primitive flag is set or this is a protected operation, then
|
|
-- the operation is overriding at the point of its declaration, so
|
|
-- warn if necessary. Otherwise it may have been declared before the
|
|
-- operation it overrides and no check is required.
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check
|
|
and then not Must_Override (Spec)
|
|
and then (Is_Primitive
|
|
or else Ekind (Scope (Subp)) = E_Protected_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Style.Missing_Overriding (Decl, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If Subp is an operator, it may override a predefined operation, if
|
|
-- it is defined in the same scope as the type to which it applies.
|
|
-- In that case Overridden_Subp is empty because of our implicit
|
|
-- representation for predefined operators. We have to check whether the
|
|
-- signature of Subp matches that of a predefined operator. Note that
|
|
-- first argument provides the name of the operator, and the second
|
|
-- argument the signature that may match that of a standard operation.
|
|
-- If the indicator is overriding, then the operator must match a
|
|
-- predefined signature, because we know already that there is no
|
|
-- explicit overridden operation.
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Subp) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol then
|
|
if Must_Not_Override (Spec) then
|
|
|
|
-- If this is not a primitive or a protected subprogram, then
|
|
-- "not overriding" is illegal.
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Primitive
|
|
and then Ekind (Scope (Subp)) /= E_Protected_Type
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("overriding indicator only allowed "
|
|
& "if subprogram is primitive", Subp);
|
|
|
|
elsif Can_Override_Operator (Subp) then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("subprogram& overrides predefined operator ", Spec, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Must_Override (Spec) then
|
|
if No (Overridden_Operation (Subp))
|
|
and then not Can_Override_Operator (Subp)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("subprogram & is not overriding", Spec, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Error_Posted (Subp)
|
|
and then Style_Check
|
|
and then Can_Override_Operator (Subp)
|
|
and then
|
|
not Is_Predefined_File_Name
|
|
(Unit_File_Name (Get_Source_Unit (Subp)))
|
|
then
|
|
-- If style checks are enabled, indicate that the indicator is
|
|
-- missing. However, at the point of declaration, the type of
|
|
-- which this is a primitive operation may be private, in which
|
|
-- case the indicator would be premature.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Private_Declaration (Etype (Subp))
|
|
or else Has_Private_Declaration (Etype (First_Formal (Subp)))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
else
|
|
Style.Missing_Overriding (Decl, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Must_Override (Spec) then
|
|
if Ekind (Subp) = E_Entry then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("entry & is not overriding", Spec, Subp);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("subprogram & is not overriding", Spec, Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the operation is marked "not overriding" and it's not primitive
|
|
-- then an error is issued, unless this is an operation of a task or
|
|
-- protected type (RM05-8.3.1(3/2-4/2)). Error cases where "overriding"
|
|
-- has been specified have already been checked above.
|
|
|
|
elsif Must_Not_Override (Spec)
|
|
and then not Is_Primitive
|
|
and then Ekind (Subp) /= E_Entry
|
|
and then Ekind (Scope (Subp)) /= E_Protected_Type
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("overriding indicator only allowed if subprogram is primitive",
|
|
Subp);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Overriding_Indicator;
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
-- Check_Returns --
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
-- Note: this procedure needs to know far too much about how the expander
|
|
-- messes with exceptions. The use of the flag Exception_Junk and the
|
|
-- incorporation of knowledge of Exp_Ch11.Expand_Local_Exception_Handlers
|
|
-- works, but is not very clean. It would be better if the expansion
|
|
-- routines would leave Original_Node working nicely, and we could use
|
|
-- Original_Node here to ignore all the peculiar expander messing ???
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Returns
|
|
(HSS : Node_Id;
|
|
Mode : Character;
|
|
Err : out Boolean;
|
|
Proc : Entity_Id := Empty)
|
|
is
|
|
Handler : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Statement_Sequence (L : List_Id);
|
|
-- Internal recursive procedure to check a list of statements for proper
|
|
-- termination by a return statement (or a transfer of control or a
|
|
-- compound statement that is itself internally properly terminated).
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Statement_Sequence --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Statement_Sequence (L : List_Id) is
|
|
Last_Stm : Node_Id;
|
|
Stm : Node_Id;
|
|
Kind : Node_Kind;
|
|
|
|
function Assert_False return Boolean;
|
|
-- Returns True if Last_Stm is a pragma Assert (False) that has been
|
|
-- rewritten as a null statement when assertions are off. The assert
|
|
-- is not active, but it is still enough to kill the warning.
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
-- Assert_False --
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
function Assert_False return Boolean is
|
|
Orig : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Last_Stm);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Orig) = N_Pragma
|
|
and then Pragma_Name (Orig) = Name_Assert
|
|
and then not Error_Posted (Orig)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Arg : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
First (Pragma_Argument_Associations (Orig));
|
|
Exp : constant Node_Id := Expression (Arg);
|
|
begin
|
|
return Nkind (Exp) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Chars (Exp) = Name_False;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Assert_False;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Raise_Exception_Call : Boolean;
|
|
-- Set True if statement sequence terminated by Raise_Exception call
|
|
-- or a Reraise_Occurrence call.
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Statement_Sequence
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Raise_Exception_Call := False;
|
|
|
|
-- Get last real statement
|
|
|
|
Last_Stm := Last (L);
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with digging out exception handler statement sequences that
|
|
-- have been transformed by the local raise to goto optimization.
|
|
-- See Exp_Ch11.Expand_Local_Exception_Handlers for details. If this
|
|
-- optimization has occurred, we are looking at something like:
|
|
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- original stmts in block
|
|
|
|
-- exception \
|
|
-- when excep1 => |
|
|
-- goto L1; | omitted if No_Exception_Propagation
|
|
-- when excep2 => |
|
|
-- goto L2; /
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- goto L3; -- skip handler when exception not raised
|
|
|
|
-- <<L1>> -- target label for local exception
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- estmts1
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- goto L3;
|
|
|
|
-- <<L2>>
|
|
-- begin
|
|
-- estmts2
|
|
-- end;
|
|
|
|
-- <<L3>>
|
|
|
|
-- and what we have to do is to dig out the estmts1 and estmts2
|
|
-- sequences (which were the original sequences of statements in
|
|
-- the exception handlers) and check them.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Last_Stm) = N_Label and then Exception_Junk (Last_Stm) then
|
|
Stm := Last_Stm;
|
|
loop
|
|
Prev (Stm);
|
|
exit when No (Stm);
|
|
exit when Nkind (Stm) /= N_Block_Statement;
|
|
exit when not Exception_Junk (Stm);
|
|
Prev (Stm);
|
|
exit when No (Stm);
|
|
exit when Nkind (Stm) /= N_Label;
|
|
exit when not Exception_Junk (Stm);
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence
|
|
(Statements (Handled_Statement_Sequence (Next (Stm))));
|
|
|
|
Prev (Stm);
|
|
Last_Stm := Stm;
|
|
exit when No (Stm);
|
|
exit when Nkind (Stm) /= N_Goto_Statement;
|
|
exit when not Exception_Junk (Stm);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Don't count pragmas
|
|
|
|
while Nkind (Last_Stm) = N_Pragma
|
|
|
|
-- Don't count call to SS_Release (can happen after Raise_Exception)
|
|
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nkind (Last_Stm) = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Name (Last_Stm)) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_RTE (Entity (Name (Last_Stm)), RE_SS_Release))
|
|
|
|
-- Don't count exception junk
|
|
|
|
or else
|
|
(Nkind_In (Last_Stm, N_Goto_Statement,
|
|
N_Label,
|
|
N_Object_Declaration)
|
|
and then Exception_Junk (Last_Stm))
|
|
or else Nkind (Last_Stm) in N_Push_xxx_Label
|
|
or else Nkind (Last_Stm) in N_Pop_xxx_Label
|
|
|
|
-- Inserted code, such as finalization calls, is irrelevant: we only
|
|
-- need to check original source.
|
|
|
|
or else Is_Rewrite_Insertion (Last_Stm)
|
|
loop
|
|
Prev (Last_Stm);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Here we have the "real" last statement
|
|
|
|
Kind := Nkind (Last_Stm);
|
|
|
|
-- Transfer of control, OK. Note that in the No_Return procedure
|
|
-- case, we already diagnosed any explicit return statements, so
|
|
-- we can treat them as OK in this context.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Transfer (Last_Stm) then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Check cases of explicit non-indirect procedure calls
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Procedure_Call_Statement
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (Name (Last_Stm))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Check call to Raise_Exception procedure which is treated
|
|
-- specially, as is a call to Reraise_Occurrence.
|
|
|
|
-- We suppress the warning in these cases since it is likely that
|
|
-- the programmer really does not expect to deal with the case
|
|
-- of Null_Occurrence, and thus would find a warning about a
|
|
-- missing return curious, and raising Program_Error does not
|
|
-- seem such a bad behavior if this does occur.
|
|
|
|
-- Note that in the Ada 2005 case for Raise_Exception, the actual
|
|
-- behavior will be to raise Constraint_Error (see AI-329).
|
|
|
|
if Is_RTE (Entity (Name (Last_Stm)), RE_Raise_Exception)
|
|
or else
|
|
Is_RTE (Entity (Name (Last_Stm)), RE_Reraise_Occurrence)
|
|
then
|
|
Raise_Exception_Call := True;
|
|
|
|
-- For Raise_Exception call, test first argument, if it is
|
|
-- an attribute reference for a 'Identity call, then we know
|
|
-- that the call cannot possibly return.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Arg : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Original_Node (First_Actual (Last_Stm));
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Arg) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Attribute_Name (Arg) = Name_Identity
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If statement, need to look inside if there is an else and check
|
|
-- each constituent statement sequence for proper termination.
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_If_Statement
|
|
and then Present (Else_Statements (Last_Stm))
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Then_Statements (Last_Stm));
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Else_Statements (Last_Stm));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Elsif_Parts (Last_Stm)) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Elsif_Part : Node_Id := First (Elsif_Parts (Last_Stm));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Elsif_Part) loop
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Then_Statements (Elsif_Part));
|
|
Next (Elsif_Part);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Case statement, check each case for proper termination
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Case_Statement then
|
|
declare
|
|
Case_Alt : Node_Id;
|
|
begin
|
|
Case_Alt := First_Non_Pragma (Alternatives (Last_Stm));
|
|
while Present (Case_Alt) loop
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (Case_Alt));
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (Case_Alt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Block statement, check its handled sequence of statements
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Block_Statement then
|
|
declare
|
|
Err1 : Boolean;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Returns
|
|
(Handled_Statement_Sequence (Last_Stm), Mode, Err1);
|
|
|
|
if Err1 then
|
|
Err := True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Loop statement. If there is an iteration scheme, we can definitely
|
|
-- fall out of the loop. Similarly if there is an exit statement, we
|
|
-- can fall out. In either case we need a following return.
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Loop_Statement then
|
|
if Present (Iteration_Scheme (Last_Stm))
|
|
or else Has_Exit (Entity (Identifier (Last_Stm)))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- A loop with no exit statement or iteration scheme is either
|
|
-- an infinite loop, or it has some other exit (raise/return).
|
|
-- In either case, no warning is required.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Timed entry call, check entry call and delay alternatives
|
|
|
|
-- Note: in expanded code, the timed entry call has been converted
|
|
-- to a set of expanded statements on which the check will work
|
|
-- correctly in any case.
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Timed_Entry_Call then
|
|
declare
|
|
ECA : constant Node_Id := Entry_Call_Alternative (Last_Stm);
|
|
DCA : constant Node_Id := Delay_Alternative (Last_Stm);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If statement sequence of entry call alternative is missing,
|
|
-- then we can definitely fall through, and we post the error
|
|
-- message on the entry call alternative itself.
|
|
|
|
if No (Statements (ECA)) then
|
|
Last_Stm := ECA;
|
|
|
|
-- If statement sequence of delay alternative is missing, then
|
|
-- we can definitely fall through, and we post the error
|
|
-- message on the delay alternative itself.
|
|
|
|
-- Note: if both ECA and DCA are missing the return, then we
|
|
-- post only one message, should be enough to fix the bugs.
|
|
-- If not we will get a message next time on the DCA when the
|
|
-- ECA is fixed.
|
|
|
|
elsif No (Statements (DCA)) then
|
|
Last_Stm := DCA;
|
|
|
|
-- Else check both statement sequences
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (ECA));
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (DCA));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Conditional entry call, check entry call and else part
|
|
|
|
-- Note: in expanded code, the conditional entry call has been
|
|
-- converted to a set of expanded statements on which the check
|
|
-- will work correctly in any case.
|
|
|
|
elsif Kind = N_Conditional_Entry_Call then
|
|
declare
|
|
ECA : constant Node_Id := Entry_Call_Alternative (Last_Stm);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If statement sequence of entry call alternative is missing,
|
|
-- then we can definitely fall through, and we post the error
|
|
-- message on the entry call alternative itself.
|
|
|
|
if No (Statements (ECA)) then
|
|
Last_Stm := ECA;
|
|
|
|
-- Else check statement sequence and else part
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (ECA));
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Else_Statements (Last_Stm));
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If we fall through, issue appropriate message
|
|
|
|
if Mode = 'F' then
|
|
|
|
-- Kill warning if last statement is a raise exception call,
|
|
-- or a pragma Assert (False). Note that with assertions enabled,
|
|
-- such a pragma has been converted into a raise exception call
|
|
-- already, so the Assert_False is for the assertions off case.
|
|
|
|
if not Raise_Exception_Call and then not Assert_False then
|
|
|
|
-- In GNATprove mode, it is an error to have a missing return
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := SPARK_Mode /= On;
|
|
|
|
-- Issue error message or warning
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("RETURN statement missing following this statement<<!",
|
|
Last_Stm);
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\Program_Error ]<<!", Last_Stm);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Note: we set Err even though we have not issued a warning
|
|
-- because we still have a case of a missing return. This is
|
|
-- an extremely marginal case, probably will never be noticed
|
|
-- but we might as well get it right.
|
|
|
|
Err := True;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise we have the case of a procedure marked No_Return
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if not Raise_Exception_Call then
|
|
if GNATprove_Mode then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("implied return after this statement "
|
|
& "would have raised Program_Error", Last_Stm);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("implied return after this statement "
|
|
& "will raise Program_Error??", Last_Stm);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := SPARK_Mode /= On;
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("\procedure & is marked as No_Return<<!", Last_Stm, Proc);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
RE : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Make_Raise_Program_Error (Sloc (Last_Stm),
|
|
Reason => PE_Implicit_Return);
|
|
begin
|
|
Insert_After (Last_Stm, RE);
|
|
Analyze (RE);
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Statement_Sequence;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Returns
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Err := False;
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (HSS));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Exception_Handlers (HSS)) then
|
|
Handler := First_Non_Pragma (Exception_Handlers (HSS));
|
|
while Present (Handler) loop
|
|
Check_Statement_Sequence (Statements (Handler));
|
|
Next_Non_Pragma (Handler);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Returns;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Subprogram_Order --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Subprogram_Order (N : Node_Id) is
|
|
|
|
function Subprogram_Name_Greater (S1, S2 : String) return Boolean;
|
|
-- This is used to check if S1 > S2 in the sense required by this test,
|
|
-- for example nameab < namec, but name2 < name10.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Subprogram_Name_Greater --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Subprogram_Name_Greater (S1, S2 : String) return Boolean is
|
|
L1, L2 : Positive;
|
|
N1, N2 : Natural;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Deal with special case where names are identical except for a
|
|
-- numerical suffix. These are handled specially, taking the numeric
|
|
-- ordering from the suffix into account.
|
|
|
|
L1 := S1'Last;
|
|
while S1 (L1) in '0' .. '9' loop
|
|
L1 := L1 - 1;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
L2 := S2'Last;
|
|
while S2 (L2) in '0' .. '9' loop
|
|
L2 := L2 - 1;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If non-numeric parts non-equal, do straight compare
|
|
|
|
if S1 (S1'First .. L1) /= S2 (S2'First .. L2) then
|
|
return S1 > S2;
|
|
|
|
-- If non-numeric parts equal, compare suffixed numeric parts. Note
|
|
-- that a missing suffix is treated as numeric zero in this test.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
N1 := 0;
|
|
while L1 < S1'Last loop
|
|
L1 := L1 + 1;
|
|
N1 := N1 * 10 + Character'Pos (S1 (L1)) - Character'Pos ('0');
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
N2 := 0;
|
|
while L2 < S2'Last loop
|
|
L2 := L2 + 1;
|
|
N2 := N2 * 10 + Character'Pos (S2 (L2)) - Character'Pos ('0');
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return N1 > N2;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Subprogram_Name_Greater;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Subprogram_Order
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Check body in alpha order if this is option
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check
|
|
and then Style_Check_Order_Subprograms
|
|
and then Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (N)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
LSN : String_Ptr
|
|
renames Scope_Stack.Table
|
|
(Scope_Stack.Last).Last_Subprogram_Name;
|
|
|
|
Body_Id : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Defining_Entity (Specification (N));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Get_Decoded_Name_String (Chars (Body_Id));
|
|
|
|
if LSN /= null then
|
|
if Subprogram_Name_Greater
|
|
(LSN.all, Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len))
|
|
then
|
|
Style.Subprogram_Not_In_Alpha_Order (Body_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Free (LSN);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
LSN := new String'(Name_Buffer (1 .. Name_Len));
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Subprogram_Order;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Subtype_Conformant --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Subtype_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals : Boolean := False;
|
|
Get_Inst : Boolean := False)
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
pragma Warnings (Off, Result);
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id, Old_Id, Subtype_Conformant, True, Result, Err_Loc,
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals => Skip_Controlling_Formals,
|
|
Get_Inst => Get_Inst);
|
|
end Check_Subtype_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Synchronized_Overriding --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Synchronized_Overriding
|
|
(Def_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Overridden_Subp : out Entity_Id)
|
|
is
|
|
Ifaces_List : Elist_Id;
|
|
In_Scope : Boolean;
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile
|
|
(Prim_Params : List_Id;
|
|
Iface_Params : List_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine whether a subprogram's parameter profile Prim_Params
|
|
-- matches that of a potentially overridden interface subprogram
|
|
-- Iface_Params. Also determine if the type of first parameter of
|
|
-- Iface_Params is an implemented interface.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
-- Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile --
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile
|
|
(Prim_Params : List_Id;
|
|
Iface_Params : List_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
function Is_Implemented
|
|
(Ifaces_List : Elist_Id;
|
|
Iface : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine if Iface is implemented by the current task or
|
|
-- protected type.
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
-- Is_Implemented --
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Implemented
|
|
(Ifaces_List : Elist_Id;
|
|
Iface : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Iface_Elmt : Elmt_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Iface_Elmt := First_Elmt (Ifaces_List);
|
|
while Present (Iface_Elmt) loop
|
|
if Node (Iface_Elmt) = Iface then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Elmt (Iface_Elmt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Is_Implemented;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Iface_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Iface_Param : Node_Id;
|
|
Iface_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prim_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prim_Param : Node_Id;
|
|
Prim_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Iface_Param := First (Iface_Params);
|
|
Iface_Typ := Etype (Defining_Identifier (Iface_Param));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Iface_Typ) then
|
|
Iface_Typ := Designated_Type (Iface_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Prim_Param := First (Prim_Params);
|
|
|
|
-- The first parameter of the potentially overridden subprogram must
|
|
-- be an interface implemented by Prim.
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Interface (Iface_Typ)
|
|
or else not Is_Implemented (Ifaces_List, Iface_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The checks on the object parameters are done, so move on to the
|
|
-- rest of the parameters.
|
|
|
|
if not In_Scope then
|
|
Prim_Param := Next (Prim_Param);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Iface_Param := Next (Iface_Param);
|
|
while Present (Iface_Param) and then Present (Prim_Param) loop
|
|
Iface_Id := Defining_Identifier (Iface_Param);
|
|
Iface_Typ := Find_Parameter_Type (Iface_Param);
|
|
|
|
Prim_Id := Defining_Identifier (Prim_Param);
|
|
Prim_Typ := Find_Parameter_Type (Prim_Param);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Iface_Typ) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Ekind (Prim_Typ) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Is_Concurrent_Type (Designated_Type (Prim_Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Iface_Typ := Designated_Type (Iface_Typ);
|
|
Prim_Typ := Designated_Type (Prim_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of multiple interface types inside a parameter profile
|
|
|
|
-- (Obj_Param : in out Iface; ...; Param : Iface)
|
|
|
|
-- If the interface type is implemented, then the matching type in
|
|
-- the primitive should be the implementing record type.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Iface_Typ) = E_Record_Type
|
|
and then Is_Interface (Iface_Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Implemented (Ifaces_List, Iface_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
if Prim_Typ /= Typ then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The two parameters must be both mode and subtype conformant
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Iface_Id) /= Ekind (Prim_Id)
|
|
or else not
|
|
Conforming_Types (Iface_Typ, Prim_Typ, Subtype_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Iface_Param);
|
|
Next (Prim_Param);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- One of the two lists contains more parameters than the other
|
|
|
|
if Present (Iface_Param) or else Present (Prim_Param) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return True;
|
|
end Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Synchronized_Overriding
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Overridden_Subp := Empty;
|
|
|
|
-- Def_Id must be an entry or a subprogram. We should skip predefined
|
|
-- primitives internally generated by the front end; however at this
|
|
-- stage predefined primitives are still not fully decorated. As a
|
|
-- minor optimization we skip here internally generated subprograms.
|
|
|
|
if (Ekind (Def_Id) /= E_Entry
|
|
and then Ekind (Def_Id) /= E_Function
|
|
and then Ekind (Def_Id) /= E_Procedure)
|
|
or else not Comes_From_Source (Def_Id)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Search for the concurrent declaration since it contains the list of
|
|
-- all implemented interfaces. In this case, the subprogram is declared
|
|
-- within the scope of a protected or a task type.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Scope (Def_Id))
|
|
and then Is_Concurrent_Type (Scope (Def_Id))
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Scope (Def_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Typ := Scope (Def_Id);
|
|
In_Scope := True;
|
|
|
|
-- The enclosing scope is not a synchronized type and the subprogram
|
|
-- has no formals.
|
|
|
|
elsif No (First_Formal (Def_Id)) then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- The subprogram has formals and hence it may be a primitive of a
|
|
-- concurrent type.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Typ := Etype (First_Formal (Def_Id));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Typ) then
|
|
Typ := Directly_Designated_Type (Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Concurrent_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
In_Scope := False;
|
|
|
|
-- This case occurs when the concurrent type is declared within a
|
|
-- generic unit. As a result the corresponding record has been built
|
|
-- and used as the type of the first formal, we just have to retrieve
|
|
-- the corresponding concurrent type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Concurrent_Record_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Typ))
|
|
then
|
|
Typ := Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Typ);
|
|
In_Scope := False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- There is no overriding to check if this is an inherited operation in
|
|
-- a type derivation for a generic actual.
|
|
|
|
Collect_Interfaces (Typ, Ifaces_List);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Empty_Elmt_List (Ifaces_List) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Determine whether entry or subprogram Def_Id overrides a primitive
|
|
-- operation that belongs to one of the interfaces in Ifaces_List.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Candidate : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
Hom : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
Subp : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Traverse the homonym chain, looking for a potentially overridden
|
|
-- subprogram that belongs to an implemented interface.
|
|
|
|
Hom := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Def_Id);
|
|
while Present (Hom) loop
|
|
Subp := Hom;
|
|
|
|
if Subp = Def_Id
|
|
or else not Is_Overloadable (Subp)
|
|
or else not Is_Primitive (Subp)
|
|
or else not Is_Dispatching_Operation (Subp)
|
|
or else not Present (Find_Dispatching_Type (Subp))
|
|
or else not Is_Interface (Find_Dispatching_Type (Subp))
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- Entries and procedures can override abstract or null interface
|
|
-- procedures.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind_In (Def_Id, E_Entry, E_Procedure)
|
|
and then Ekind (Subp) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile
|
|
(Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Def_Id)),
|
|
Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Subp)))
|
|
then
|
|
Candidate := Subp;
|
|
|
|
-- For an overridden subprogram Subp, check whether the mode
|
|
-- of its first parameter is correct depending on the kind of
|
|
-- synchronized type.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Formal : constant Node_Id := First_Formal (Candidate);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In order for an entry or a protected procedure to
|
|
-- override, the first parameter of the overridden routine
|
|
-- must be of mode "out", "in out", or access-to-variable.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind_In (Candidate, E_Entry, E_Procedure)
|
|
and then Is_Protected_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Ekind (Formal) /= E_In_Out_Parameter
|
|
and then Ekind (Formal) /= E_Out_Parameter
|
|
and then Nkind (Parameter_Type (Parent (Formal))) /=
|
|
N_Access_Definition
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- All other cases are OK since a task entry or routine does
|
|
-- not have a restriction on the mode of the first parameter
|
|
-- of the overridden interface routine.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Overridden_Subp := Candidate;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Functions can override abstract interface functions
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Def_Id) = E_Function
|
|
and then Ekind (Subp) = E_Function
|
|
and then Matches_Prefixed_View_Profile
|
|
(Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Def_Id)),
|
|
Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Subp)))
|
|
and then Etype (Def_Id) = Etype (Subp)
|
|
then
|
|
Candidate := Subp;
|
|
|
|
-- If an inherited subprogram is implemented by a protected
|
|
-- function, then the first parameter of the inherited
|
|
-- subprogram shall be of mode in, but not an access-to-
|
|
-- variable parameter (RM 9.4(11/9)).
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Formal (Subp))
|
|
and then Ekind (First_Formal (Subp)) = E_In_Parameter
|
|
and then
|
|
(not Is_Access_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Subp)))
|
|
or else
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (Etype (First_Formal (Subp))))
|
|
then
|
|
Overridden_Subp := Subp;
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Hom := Homonym (Hom);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- After examining all candidates for overriding, we are left with
|
|
-- the best match, which is a mode-incompatible interface routine.
|
|
|
|
if In_Scope and then Present (Candidate) then
|
|
Error_Msg_PT (Def_Id, Candidate);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Overridden_Subp := Candidate;
|
|
return;
|
|
end;
|
|
end Check_Synchronized_Overriding;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Type_Conformant --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Type_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Err_Loc : Node_Id := Empty)
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
pragma Warnings (Off, Result);
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id, Old_Id, Type_Conformant, True, Result, Err_Loc);
|
|
end Check_Type_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Can_Override_Operator --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Can_Override_Operator (Subp : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Subp) /= N_Defining_Operator_Symbol then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Typ := Base_Type (Etype (First_Formal (Subp)));
|
|
|
|
-- Check explicitly that the operation is a primitive of the type
|
|
|
|
return Operator_Matches_Spec (Subp, Subp)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Scope (Subp) = Scope (Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Can_Override_Operator;
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Conforming_Types --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Conforming_Types
|
|
(T1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
T2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ctype : Conformance_Type;
|
|
Get_Inst : Boolean := False) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
function Base_Types_Match
|
|
(Typ_1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ_2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- If neither Typ_1 nor Typ_2 are generic actual types, or if they are
|
|
-- in different scopes (e.g. parent and child instances), then verify
|
|
-- that the base types are equal. Otherwise Typ_1 and Typ_2 must be on
|
|
-- the same subtype chain. The whole purpose of this procedure is to
|
|
-- prevent spurious ambiguities in an instantiation that may arise if
|
|
-- two distinct generic types are instantiated with the same actual.
|
|
|
|
function Find_Designated_Type (Typ : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- An access parameter can designate an incomplete type. If the
|
|
-- incomplete type is the limited view of a type from a limited_
|
|
-- with_clause, check whether the non-limited view is available.
|
|
-- If it is a (non-limited) incomplete type, get the full view.
|
|
|
|
function Matches_Limited_With_View
|
|
(Typ_1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ_2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Returns True if and only if either Typ_1 denotes a limited view of
|
|
-- Typ_2 or Typ_2 denotes a limited view of Typ_1. This can arise when
|
|
-- the limited with view of a type is used in a subprogram declaration
|
|
-- and the subprogram body is in the scope of a regular with clause for
|
|
-- the same unit. In such a case, the two type entities are considered
|
|
-- identical for purposes of conformance checking.
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Base_Types_Match --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Base_Types_Match
|
|
(Typ_1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ_2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Base_1 : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Typ_1);
|
|
Base_2 : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Typ_2);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Typ_1 = Typ_2 then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Base_1 = Base_2 then
|
|
|
|
-- The following is too permissive. A more precise test should
|
|
-- check that the generic actual is an ancestor subtype of the
|
|
-- other ???.
|
|
|
|
-- See code in Find_Corresponding_Spec that applies an additional
|
|
-- filter to handle accidental amiguities in instances.
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Typ_1)
|
|
or else not Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Typ_2)
|
|
or else Scope (Typ_1) /= Scope (Typ_2);
|
|
|
|
-- If Typ_2 is a generic actual type it is declared as the subtype of
|
|
-- the actual. If that actual is itself a subtype we need to use its
|
|
-- own base type to check for compatibility.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Base_2) = Ekind (Typ_2)
|
|
and then Base_1 = Base_Type (Base_2)
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Base_1) = Ekind (Typ_1)
|
|
and then Base_2 = Base_Type (Base_1)
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Base_Types_Match;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Find_Designated_Type --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Find_Designated_Type (Typ : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id is
|
|
Desig : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Desig := Directly_Designated_Type (Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Desig) = E_Incomplete_Type then
|
|
|
|
-- If regular incomplete type, get full view if available
|
|
|
|
if Present (Full_View (Desig)) then
|
|
Desig := Full_View (Desig);
|
|
|
|
-- If limited view of a type, get non-limited view if available,
|
|
-- and check again for a regular incomplete type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Non_Limited_View (Desig)) then
|
|
Desig := Get_Full_View (Non_Limited_View (Desig));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Desig;
|
|
end Find_Designated_Type;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
-- Matches_Limited_With_View --
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matches_Limited_With_View
|
|
(Typ_1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ_2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
function Is_Matching_Limited_View
|
|
(Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
View : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine whether non-limited view View denotes type Typ in some
|
|
-- conformant fashion.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Matching_Limited_View --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Matching_Limited_View
|
|
(Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
View : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Root_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Root_View : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- The non-limited view directly denotes the type
|
|
|
|
if Typ = View then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
-- The type is a subtype of the non-limited view
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Subtype_Of (Typ, View) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
-- Both the non-limited view and the type denote class-wide types
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (View)
|
|
then
|
|
Root_Typ := Root_Type (Typ);
|
|
Root_View := Root_Type (View);
|
|
|
|
if Root_Typ = Root_View then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
-- An incomplete tagged type and its full view may receive two
|
|
-- distinct class-wide types when the related package has not
|
|
-- been analyzed yet.
|
|
|
|
-- package Pack is
|
|
-- type T is tagged; -- CW_1
|
|
-- type T is tagged null record; -- CW_2
|
|
-- end Pack;
|
|
|
|
-- This is because the package lacks any semantic information
|
|
-- that may eventually link both views of T. As a consequence,
|
|
-- a client of the limited view of Pack will see CW_2 while a
|
|
-- client of the non-limited view of Pack will see CW_1.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Incomplete_Type (Root_Typ)
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (Root_Typ))
|
|
and then Full_View (Root_Typ) = Root_View
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Incomplete_Type (Root_View)
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (Root_View))
|
|
and then Full_View (Root_View) = Root_Typ
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Is_Matching_Limited_View;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Matches_Limited_With_View
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In some cases a type imported through a limited_with clause, and
|
|
-- its non-limited view are both visible, for example in an anonymous
|
|
-- access-to-class-wide type in a formal, or when building the body
|
|
-- for a subprogram renaming after the subprogram has been frozen.
|
|
-- In these cases both entities designate the same type. In addition,
|
|
-- if one of them is an actual in an instance, it may be a subtype of
|
|
-- the non-limited view of the other.
|
|
|
|
if From_Limited_With (Typ_1)
|
|
and then From_Limited_With (Typ_2)
|
|
and then Available_View (Typ_1) = Available_View (Typ_2)
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif From_Limited_With (Typ_1) then
|
|
return Is_Matching_Limited_View (Typ_2, Available_View (Typ_1));
|
|
|
|
elsif From_Limited_With (Typ_2) then
|
|
return Is_Matching_Limited_View (Typ_1, Available_View (Typ_2));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Matches_Limited_With_View;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Are_Anonymous_Access_To_Subprogram_Types : Boolean := False;
|
|
|
|
Type_1 : Entity_Id := T1;
|
|
Type_2 : Entity_Id := T2;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Conforming_Types
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- The context is an instance association for a formal access-to-
|
|
-- subprogram type; the formal parameter types require mapping because
|
|
-- they may denote other formal parameters of the generic unit.
|
|
|
|
if Get_Inst then
|
|
Type_1 := Get_Instance_Of (T1);
|
|
Type_2 := Get_Instance_Of (T2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If one of the types is a view of the other introduced by a limited
|
|
-- with clause, treat these as conforming for all purposes.
|
|
|
|
if Matches_Limited_With_View (T1, T2) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Base_Types_Match (Type_1, Type_2) then
|
|
return Ctype <= Mode_Conformant
|
|
or else Subtypes_Statically_Match (Type_1, Type_2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Incomplete_Or_Private_Type (Type_1)
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (Type_1))
|
|
and then Base_Types_Match (Full_View (Type_1), Type_2)
|
|
then
|
|
return Ctype <= Mode_Conformant
|
|
or else Subtypes_Statically_Match (Full_View (Type_1), Type_2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Type_2) = E_Incomplete_Type
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (Type_2))
|
|
and then Base_Types_Match (Type_1, Full_View (Type_2))
|
|
then
|
|
return Ctype <= Mode_Conformant
|
|
or else Subtypes_Statically_Match (Type_1, Full_View (Type_2));
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Private_Type (Type_2)
|
|
and then In_Instance
|
|
and then Present (Full_View (Type_2))
|
|
and then Base_Types_Match (Type_1, Full_View (Type_2))
|
|
then
|
|
return Ctype <= Mode_Conformant
|
|
or else Subtypes_Statically_Match (Type_1, Full_View (Type_2));
|
|
|
|
-- In Ada 2012, incomplete types (including limited views) can appear
|
|
-- as actuals in instantiations.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Incomplete_Type (Type_1)
|
|
and then Is_Incomplete_Type (Type_2)
|
|
and then (Used_As_Generic_Actual (Type_1)
|
|
or else Used_As_Generic_Actual (Type_2))
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-254): Anonymous access-to-subprogram types must be
|
|
-- treated recursively because they carry a signature. As far as
|
|
-- conformance is concerned, convention plays no role, and either
|
|
-- or both could be access to protected subprograms.
|
|
|
|
Are_Anonymous_Access_To_Subprogram_Types :=
|
|
Ekind_In (Type_1, E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type)
|
|
and then
|
|
Ekind_In (Type_2, E_Anonymous_Access_Subprogram_Type,
|
|
E_Anonymous_Access_Protected_Subprogram_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Test anonymous access type case. For this case, static subtype
|
|
-- matching is required for mode conformance (RM 6.3.1(15)). We check
|
|
-- the base types because we may have built internal subtype entities
|
|
-- to handle null-excluding types (see Process_Formals).
|
|
|
|
if (Ekind (Base_Type (Type_1)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then
|
|
Ekind (Base_Type (Type_2)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type)
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-254)
|
|
|
|
or else Are_Anonymous_Access_To_Subprogram_Types
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Desig_1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
Desig_2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In Ada 2005, access constant indicators must match for
|
|
-- subtype conformance.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Ctype >= Subtype_Conformant
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Access_Constant (Type_1) /= Is_Access_Constant (Type_2)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Desig_1 := Find_Designated_Type (Type_1);
|
|
Desig_2 := Find_Designated_Type (Type_2);
|
|
|
|
-- If the context is an instance association for a formal
|
|
-- access-to-subprogram type; formal access parameter designated
|
|
-- types require mapping because they may denote other formal
|
|
-- parameters of the generic unit.
|
|
|
|
if Get_Inst then
|
|
Desig_1 := Get_Instance_Of (Desig_1);
|
|
Desig_2 := Get_Instance_Of (Desig_2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- It is possible for a Class_Wide_Type to be introduced for an
|
|
-- incomplete type, in which case there is a separate class_ wide
|
|
-- type for the full view. The types conform if their Etypes
|
|
-- conform, i.e. one may be the full view of the other. This can
|
|
-- only happen in the context of an access parameter, other uses
|
|
-- of an incomplete Class_Wide_Type are illegal.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Desig_1)
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Class_Wide_Type (Desig_2)
|
|
then
|
|
return
|
|
Conforming_Types
|
|
(Etype (Base_Type (Desig_1)),
|
|
Etype (Base_Type (Desig_2)), Ctype);
|
|
|
|
elsif Are_Anonymous_Access_To_Subprogram_Types then
|
|
if Ada_Version < Ada_2005 then
|
|
return Ctype = Type_Conformant
|
|
or else
|
|
Subtypes_Statically_Match (Desig_1, Desig_2);
|
|
|
|
-- We must check the conformance of the signatures themselves
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
Conformant : Boolean;
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(Desig_1, Desig_2, Ctype, False, Conformant);
|
|
return Conformant;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A limited view of an actual matches the corresponding
|
|
-- incomplete formal.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Desig_2) = E_Incomplete_Subtype
|
|
and then From_Limited_With (Desig_2)
|
|
and then Used_As_Generic_Actual (Etype (Desig_2))
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return Base_Type (Desig_1) = Base_Type (Desig_2)
|
|
and then (Ctype = Type_Conformant
|
|
or else
|
|
Subtypes_Statically_Match (Desig_1, Desig_2));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise definitely no match
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if ((Ekind (Type_1) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Type_2))
|
|
or else (Ekind (Type_2) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Type_1)))
|
|
and then
|
|
Conforming_Types
|
|
(Designated_Type (Type_1), Designated_Type (Type_2), Ctype)
|
|
then
|
|
May_Hide_Profile := True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Conforming_Types;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Create_Extra_Formals --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Create_Extra_Formals (E : Entity_Id) is
|
|
First_Extra : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
Last_Extra : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
function Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(Assoc_Entity : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Scope : Entity_Id;
|
|
Suffix : String) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Add an extra formal to the current list of formals and extra formals.
|
|
-- The extra formal is added to the end of the list of extra formals,
|
|
-- and also returned as the result. These formals are always of mode IN.
|
|
-- The new formal has the type Typ, is declared in Scope, and its name
|
|
-- is given by a concatenation of the name of Assoc_Entity and Suffix.
|
|
-- The following suffixes are currently used. They should not be changed
|
|
-- without coordinating with CodePeer, which makes use of these to
|
|
-- provide better messages.
|
|
|
|
-- O denotes the Constrained bit.
|
|
-- L denotes the accessibility level.
|
|
-- BIP_xxx denotes an extra formal for a build-in-place function. See
|
|
-- the full list in exp_ch6.BIP_Formal_Kind.
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Add_Extra_Formal --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(Assoc_Entity : Entity_Id;
|
|
Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Scope : Entity_Id;
|
|
Suffix : String) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
EF : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Sloc (Assoc_Entity),
|
|
Chars => New_External_Name (Chars (Assoc_Entity),
|
|
Suffix => Suffix));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- A little optimization. Never generate an extra formal for the
|
|
-- _init operand of an initialization procedure, since it could
|
|
-- never be used.
|
|
|
|
if Chars (Formal) = Name_uInit then
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Ekind (EF, E_In_Parameter);
|
|
Set_Actual_Subtype (EF, Typ);
|
|
Set_Etype (EF, Typ);
|
|
Set_Scope (EF, Scope);
|
|
Set_Mechanism (EF, Default_Mechanism);
|
|
Set_Formal_Validity (EF);
|
|
|
|
if No (First_Extra) then
|
|
First_Extra := EF;
|
|
Set_Extra_Formals (Scope, First_Extra);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Last_Extra) then
|
|
Set_Extra_Formal (Last_Extra, EF);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Last_Extra := EF;
|
|
|
|
return EF;
|
|
end Add_Extra_Formal;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Formal_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
P_Formal : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Create_Extra_Formals
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- We never generate extra formals if expansion is not active because we
|
|
-- don't need them unless we are generating code.
|
|
|
|
if not Expander_Active then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- No need to generate extra formals in interface thunks whose target
|
|
-- primitive has no extra formals.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Thunk (E) and then No (Extra_Formals (Thunk_Entity (E))) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a derived subprogram then the subtypes of the parent
|
|
-- subprogram's formal parameters will be used to determine the need
|
|
-- for extra formals.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Overloadable (E) and then Present (Alias (E)) then
|
|
P_Formal := First_Formal (Alias (E));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (E);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
Last_Extra := Formal;
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If Extra_Formals were already created, don't do it again. This
|
|
-- situation may arise for subprogram types created as part of
|
|
-- dispatching calls (see Expand_Dispatching_Call)
|
|
|
|
if Present (Last_Extra) and then Present (Extra_Formal (Last_Extra)) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the subprogram is a predefined dispatching subprogram then don't
|
|
-- generate any extra constrained or accessibility level formals. In
|
|
-- general we suppress these for internal subprograms (by not calling
|
|
-- Freeze_Subprogram and Create_Extra_Formals at all), but internally
|
|
-- generated stream attributes do get passed through because extra
|
|
-- build-in-place formals are needed in some cases (limited 'Input).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Predefined_Internal_Operation (E) then
|
|
goto Test_For_Func_Result_Extras;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (E);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
|
|
-- Create extra formal for supporting the attribute 'Constrained.
|
|
-- The case of a private type view without discriminants also
|
|
-- requires the extra formal if the underlying type has defaulted
|
|
-- discriminants.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Formal) /= E_In_Parameter then
|
|
if Present (P_Formal) then
|
|
Formal_Type := Etype (P_Formal);
|
|
else
|
|
Formal_Type := Etype (Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Do not produce extra formals for Unchecked_Union parameters.
|
|
-- Jump directly to the end of the loop.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Unchecked_Union (Base_Type (Formal_Type)) then
|
|
goto Skip_Extra_Formal_Generation;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not Has_Discriminants (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Ekind (Formal_Type) in Private_Kind
|
|
and then Present (Underlying_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
Formal_Type := Underlying_Type (Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Suppress the extra formal if formal's subtype is constrained or
|
|
-- indefinite, or we're compiling for Ada 2012 and the underlying
|
|
-- type is tagged and limited. In Ada 2012, a limited tagged type
|
|
-- can have defaulted discriminants, but 'Constrained is required
|
|
-- to return True, so the formal is never needed (see AI05-0214).
|
|
-- Note that this ensures consistency of calling sequences for
|
|
-- dispatching operations when some types in a class have defaults
|
|
-- on discriminants and others do not (and requiring the extra
|
|
-- formal would introduce distributed overhead).
|
|
|
|
-- If the type does not have a completion yet, treat as prior to
|
|
-- Ada 2012 for consistency.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Discriminants (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Constrained (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Is_Definite_Subtype (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then (Ada_Version < Ada_2012
|
|
or else No (Underlying_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
or else not
|
|
(Is_Limited_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then
|
|
(Is_Tagged_Type
|
|
(Underlying_Type (Formal_Type)))))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Extra_Constrained
|
|
(Formal, Add_Extra_Formal (Formal, Standard_Boolean, E, "O"));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Create extra formal for supporting accessibility checking. This
|
|
-- is done for both anonymous access formals and formals of named
|
|
-- access types that are marked as controlling formals. The latter
|
|
-- case can occur when Expand_Dispatching_Call creates a subprogram
|
|
-- type and substitutes the types of access-to-class-wide actuals
|
|
-- for the anonymous access-to-specific-type of controlling formals.
|
|
-- Base_Type is applied because in cases where there is a null
|
|
-- exclusion the formal may have an access subtype.
|
|
|
|
-- This is suppressed if we specifically suppress accessibility
|
|
-- checks at the package level for either the subprogram, or the
|
|
-- package in which it resides. However, we do not suppress it
|
|
-- simply if the scope has accessibility checks suppressed, since
|
|
-- this could cause trouble when clients are compiled with a
|
|
-- different suppression setting. The explicit checks at the
|
|
-- package level are safe from this point of view.
|
|
|
|
if (Ekind (Base_Type (Etype (Formal))) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
or else (Is_Controlling_Formal (Formal)
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Base_Type (Etype (Formal)))))
|
|
and then not
|
|
(Explicit_Suppress (E, Accessibility_Check)
|
|
or else
|
|
Explicit_Suppress (Scope (E), Accessibility_Check))
|
|
and then
|
|
(No (P_Formal)
|
|
or else Present (Extra_Accessibility (P_Formal)))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Extra_Accessibility
|
|
(Formal, Add_Extra_Formal (Formal, Standard_Natural, E, "L"));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- This label is required when skipping extra formal generation for
|
|
-- Unchecked_Union parameters.
|
|
|
|
<<Skip_Extra_Formal_Generation>>
|
|
|
|
if Present (P_Formal) then
|
|
Next_Formal (P_Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
<<Test_For_Func_Result_Extras>>
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI05-234): "the accessibility level of the result of a
|
|
-- function call is ... determined by the point of call ...".
|
|
|
|
if Needs_Result_Accessibility_Level (E) then
|
|
Set_Extra_Accessibility_Of_Result
|
|
(E, Add_Extra_Formal (E, Standard_Natural, E, "L"));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-318-02): In the case of build-in-place functions, add
|
|
-- appropriate extra formals. See type Exp_Ch6.BIP_Formal_Kind.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005 and then Is_Build_In_Place_Function (E) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Result_Subt : constant Entity_Id := Etype (E);
|
|
Full_Subt : constant Entity_Id := Available_View (Result_Subt);
|
|
Formal_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Subp_Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
Discard : Entity_Id;
|
|
pragma Warnings (Off, Discard);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In the case of functions with unconstrained result subtypes,
|
|
-- add a 4-state formal indicating whether the return object is
|
|
-- allocated by the caller (1), or should be allocated by the
|
|
-- callee on the secondary stack (2), in the global heap (3), or
|
|
-- in a user-defined storage pool (4). For the moment we just use
|
|
-- Natural for the type of this formal. Note that this formal
|
|
-- isn't usually needed in the case where the result subtype is
|
|
-- constrained, but it is needed when the function has a tagged
|
|
-- result, because generally such functions can be called in a
|
|
-- dispatching context and such calls must be handled like calls
|
|
-- to a class-wide function.
|
|
|
|
if Needs_BIP_Alloc_Form (E) then
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, Standard_Natural,
|
|
E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Alloc_Form));
|
|
|
|
-- Add BIP_Storage_Pool, in case BIP_Alloc_Form indicates to
|
|
-- use a user-defined pool. This formal is not added on
|
|
-- ZFP as those targets do not support pools.
|
|
|
|
if RTE_Available (RE_Root_Storage_Pool_Ptr) then
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, RTE (RE_Root_Storage_Pool_Ptr),
|
|
E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Storage_Pool));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In the case of functions whose result type needs finalization,
|
|
-- add an extra formal which represents the finalization master.
|
|
|
|
if Needs_BIP_Finalization_Master (E) then
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, RTE (RE_Finalization_Master_Ptr),
|
|
E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Finalization_Master));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- When the result type contains tasks, add two extra formals: the
|
|
-- master of the tasks to be created, and the caller's activation
|
|
-- chain.
|
|
|
|
if Has_Task (Full_Subt) then
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, RTE (RE_Master_Id),
|
|
E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Task_Master));
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, RTE (RE_Activation_Chain_Access),
|
|
E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Activation_Chain));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- All build-in-place functions get an extra formal that will be
|
|
-- passed the address of the return object within the caller.
|
|
|
|
Formal_Typ :=
|
|
Create_Itype (E_Anonymous_Access_Type, E, Scope_Id => Scope (E));
|
|
|
|
Set_Directly_Designated_Type (Formal_Typ, Result_Subt);
|
|
Set_Etype (Formal_Typ, Formal_Typ);
|
|
Set_Depends_On_Private
|
|
(Formal_Typ, Has_Private_Component (Formal_Typ));
|
|
Set_Is_Public (Formal_Typ, Is_Public (Scope (Formal_Typ)));
|
|
Set_Is_Access_Constant (Formal_Typ, False);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-50217): Propagate the attribute that indicates
|
|
-- the designated type comes from the limited view (for back-end
|
|
-- purposes).
|
|
|
|
Set_From_Limited_With
|
|
(Formal_Typ, From_Limited_With (Result_Subt));
|
|
|
|
Layout_Type (Formal_Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- Force the definition of the Itype in case of internal function
|
|
-- calls within the same or nested scope.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Subprogram_Or_Generic_Subprogram (E) then
|
|
Subp_Decl := Parent (E);
|
|
|
|
-- The insertion point for an Itype reference should be after
|
|
-- the unit declaration node of the subprogram. An exception
|
|
-- to this are inherited operations from a parent type in which
|
|
-- case the derived type acts as their parent.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In (Subp_Decl, N_Function_Specification,
|
|
N_Procedure_Specification)
|
|
then
|
|
Subp_Decl := Parent (Subp_Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Build_Itype_Reference (Formal_Typ, Subp_Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Discard :=
|
|
Add_Extra_Formal
|
|
(E, Formal_Typ, E, BIP_Formal_Suffix (BIP_Object_Access));
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Create_Extra_Formals;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Enter_Overloaded_Entity --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S : Entity_Id) is
|
|
function Matches_Predefined_Op return Boolean;
|
|
-- This returns an approximation of whether S matches a predefined
|
|
-- operator, based on the operator symbol, and the parameter and result
|
|
-- types. The rules are scattered throughout chapter 4 of the Ada RM.
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Matches_Predefined_Op --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matches_Predefined_Op return Boolean is
|
|
Formal_1 : constant Entity_Id := First_Formal (S);
|
|
Formal_2 : constant Entity_Id := Next_Formal (Formal_1);
|
|
Op : constant Name_Id := Chars (S);
|
|
Result_Type : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Etype (S));
|
|
Type_1 : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Etype (Formal_1));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Binary operator
|
|
|
|
if Present (Formal_2) then
|
|
declare
|
|
Type_2 : constant Entity_Id := Base_Type (Etype (Formal_2));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- All but "&" and "**" have same-types parameters
|
|
|
|
case Op is
|
|
when Name_Op_Concat |
|
|
Name_Op_Expon =>
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
if Type_1 /= Type_2 then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end case;
|
|
|
|
-- Check parameter and result types
|
|
|
|
case Op is
|
|
when Name_Op_And |
|
|
Name_Op_Or |
|
|
Name_Op_Xor =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Boolean_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1;
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Mod |
|
|
Name_Op_Rem =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Integer_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1;
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Add |
|
|
Name_Op_Divide |
|
|
Name_Op_Multiply |
|
|
Name_Op_Subtract =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Numeric_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1;
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Eq |
|
|
Name_Op_Ne =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Boolean_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Limited_Type (Type_1);
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Ge |
|
|
Name_Op_Gt |
|
|
Name_Op_Le |
|
|
Name_Op_Lt =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Boolean_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then (Is_Array_Type (Type_1)
|
|
or else Is_Scalar_Type (Type_1));
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Concat =>
|
|
return Is_Array_Type (Result_Type);
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Expon =>
|
|
return
|
|
(Is_Integer_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Floating_Point_Type (Result_Type))
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1
|
|
and then Type_2 = Standard_Integer;
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
|
end case;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Unary operator
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
case Op is
|
|
when Name_Op_Abs |
|
|
Name_Op_Add |
|
|
Name_Op_Subtract =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Numeric_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1;
|
|
|
|
when Name_Op_Not =>
|
|
return
|
|
Is_Boolean_Type (Result_Type)
|
|
and then Result_Type = Type_1;
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
raise Program_Error;
|
|
end case;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Matches_Predefined_Op;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
E : Entity_Id := Current_Entity_In_Scope (S);
|
|
C_E : Entity_Id := Current_Entity (S);
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Enter_Overloaded_Entity
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (E) then
|
|
Set_Has_Homonym (E);
|
|
Set_Has_Homonym (S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (S);
|
|
Set_Scope (S, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
-- Chain new entity if front of homonym in current scope, so that
|
|
-- homonyms are contiguous.
|
|
|
|
if Present (E) and then E /= C_E then
|
|
while Homonym (C_E) /= E loop
|
|
C_E := Homonym (C_E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Set_Homonym (C_E, S);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
E := C_E;
|
|
Set_Current_Entity (S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Homonym (S, E);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Inherited_Operation (S) then
|
|
Append_Inherited_Subprogram (S);
|
|
else
|
|
Append_Entity (S, Current_Scope);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Public_Status (S);
|
|
|
|
if Debug_Flag_E then
|
|
Write_Str ("New overloaded entity chain: ");
|
|
Write_Name (Chars (S));
|
|
|
|
E := S;
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
Write_Str (" "); Write_Int (Int (E));
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Generate warning for hiding
|
|
|
|
if Warn_On_Hiding
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (S)
|
|
and then In_Extended_Main_Source_Unit (S)
|
|
then
|
|
E := S;
|
|
loop
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
exit when No (E);
|
|
|
|
-- Warn unless genuine overloading. Do not emit warning on
|
|
-- hiding predefined operators in Standard (these are either an
|
|
-- (artifact of our implicit declarations, or simple noise) but
|
|
-- keep warning on a operator defined on a local subtype, because
|
|
-- of the real danger that different operators may be applied in
|
|
-- various parts of the program.
|
|
|
|
-- Note that if E and S have the same scope, there is never any
|
|
-- hiding. Either the two conflict, and the program is illegal,
|
|
-- or S is overriding an implicit inherited subprogram.
|
|
|
|
if Scope (E) /= Scope (S)
|
|
and then (not Is_Overloadable (E)
|
|
or else Subtype_Conformant (E, S))
|
|
and then (Is_Immediately_Visible (E)
|
|
or else Is_Potentially_Use_Visible (S))
|
|
then
|
|
if Scope (E) = Standard_Standard then
|
|
if Nkind (S) = N_Defining_Operator_Symbol
|
|
and then Scope (Base_Type (Etype (First_Formal (S)))) /=
|
|
Scope (S)
|
|
and then Matches_Predefined_Op
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("declaration of & hides predefined operator?h?", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- E not immediately within Standard
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("declaration of & hides one #?h?", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Enter_Overloaded_Entity;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Untagged_Equality --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Untagged_Equality (Eq_Op : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Etype (First_Formal (Eq_Op));
|
|
Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (Eq_Op);
|
|
Obj_Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- This check applies only if we have a subprogram declaration with an
|
|
-- untagged record type.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Decl) /= N_Subprogram_Declaration
|
|
or else not Is_Record_Type (Typ)
|
|
or else Is_Tagged_Type (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In Ada 2012 case, we will output errors or warnings depending on
|
|
-- the setting of debug flag -gnatd.E.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
Error_Msg_Warn := Debug_Flag_Dot_EE;
|
|
|
|
-- In earlier versions of Ada, nothing to do unless we are warning on
|
|
-- Ada 2012 incompatibilities (Warn_On_Ada_2012_Incompatibility set).
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if not Warn_On_Ada_2012_Compatibility then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Cases where the type has already been frozen
|
|
|
|
if Is_Frozen (Typ) then
|
|
|
|
-- If the type is not declared in a package, or if we are in the body
|
|
-- of the package or in some other scope, the new operation is not
|
|
-- primitive, and therefore legal, though suspicious. Should we
|
|
-- generate a warning in this case ???
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Scope (Typ)) /= E_Package
|
|
or else Scope (Typ) /= Current_Scope
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If the type is a generic actual (sub)type, the operation is not
|
|
-- primitive either because the base type is declared elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Generic_Actual_Type (Typ) then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Here we have a definite error of declaration after freezing
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("equality operator must be declared before type & is "
|
|
& "frozen (RM 4.5.2 (9.8)) (Ada 2012)<<", Eq_Op, Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- In Ada 2012 mode with error turned to warning, output one
|
|
-- more warning to warn that the equality operation may not
|
|
-- compose. This is the consequence of ignoring the error.
|
|
|
|
if Error_Msg_Warn then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\equality operation may not compose??", Eq_Op);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("equality operator must be declared before type& is "
|
|
& "frozen (RM 4.5.2 (9.8)) (Ada 2012)?y?", Eq_Op, Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If we are in the package body, we could just move the
|
|
-- declaration to the package spec, so add a message saying that.
|
|
|
|
if In_Package_Body (Scope (Typ)) then
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\move declaration to package spec<<", Eq_Op);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\move declaration to package spec (Ada 2012)?y?", Eq_Op);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise try to find the freezing point
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Obj_Decl := Next (Parent (Typ));
|
|
while Present (Obj_Decl) and then Obj_Decl /= Decl loop
|
|
if Nkind (Obj_Decl) = N_Object_Declaration
|
|
and then Etype (Defining_Identifier (Obj_Decl)) = Typ
|
|
then
|
|
-- Freezing point, output warnings
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("type& is frozen by declaration??", Obj_Decl, Typ);
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\an equality operator cannot be declared after "
|
|
& "this point??",
|
|
Obj_Decl);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("type& is frozen by declaration (Ada 2012)?y?",
|
|
Obj_Decl, Typ);
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\an equality operator cannot be declared after "
|
|
& "this point (Ada 2012)?y?",
|
|
Obj_Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Obj_Decl);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Here if type is not frozen yet. It is illegal to have a primitive
|
|
-- equality declared in the private part if the type is visible.
|
|
|
|
elsif not In_Same_List (Parent (Typ), Decl)
|
|
and then not Is_Limited_Type (Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
-- Shouldn't we give an RM reference here???
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("equality operator appears too late<<", Eq_Op);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("equality operator appears too late (Ada 2012)?y?", Eq_Op);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- No error detected
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Untagged_Equality;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Find_Corresponding_Spec --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Find_Corresponding_Spec
|
|
(N : Node_Id;
|
|
Post_Error : Boolean := True) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
Spec : constant Node_Id := Specification (N);
|
|
Designator : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Entity (Spec);
|
|
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Different_Generic_Profile (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Even if fully conformant, a body may depend on a generic actual when
|
|
-- the spec does not, or vice versa, in which case they were distinct
|
|
-- entities in the generic.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
-- Different_Generic_Profile --
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Different_Generic_Profile (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
F1, F2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Same_Generic_Actual (T1, T2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check that the types of corresponding formals have the same
|
|
-- generic actual if any. We have to account for subtypes of a
|
|
-- generic formal, declared between a spec and a body, which may
|
|
-- appear distinct in an instance but matched in the generic, and
|
|
-- the subtype may be used either in the spec or the body of the
|
|
-- subprogram being checked.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Same_Generic_Actual --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Same_Generic_Actual (T1, T2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
|
|
function Is_Declared_Subtype (S1, S2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Predicate to check whether S1 is a subtype of S2 in the source
|
|
-- of the instance.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Declared_Subtype --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Declared_Subtype (S1, S2 : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return Comes_From_Source (Parent (S1))
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (S1)) = N_Subtype_Declaration
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (Subtype_Indication (Parent (S1)))
|
|
and then Entity (Subtype_Indication (Parent (S1))) = S2;
|
|
end Is_Declared_Subtype;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Same_Generic_Actual
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
return Is_Generic_Actual_Type (T1) = Is_Generic_Actual_Type (T2)
|
|
or else Is_Declared_Subtype (T1, T2)
|
|
or else Is_Declared_Subtype (T2, T1);
|
|
end Same_Generic_Actual;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Different_Generic_Profile
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not In_Instance then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (E) = E_Function
|
|
and then not Same_Generic_Actual (Etype (E), Etype (Designator))
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
F1 := First_Formal (Designator);
|
|
F2 := First_Formal (E);
|
|
while Present (F1) loop
|
|
if not Same_Generic_Actual (Etype (F1), Etype (F2)) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (F1);
|
|
Next_Formal (F2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Different_Generic_Profile;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Find_Corresponding_Spec
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
E := Current_Entity (Designator);
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
|
|
-- We are looking for a matching spec. It must have the same scope,
|
|
-- and the same name, and either be type conformant, or be the case
|
|
-- of a library procedure spec and its body (which belong to one
|
|
-- another regardless of whether they are type conformant or not).
|
|
|
|
if Scope (E) = Current_Scope then
|
|
if Current_Scope = Standard_Standard
|
|
or else (Ekind (E) = Ekind (Designator)
|
|
and then Type_Conformant (E, Designator))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Within an instantiation, we know that spec and body are
|
|
-- subtype conformant, because they were subtype conformant in
|
|
-- the generic. We choose the subtype-conformant entity here as
|
|
-- well, to resolve spurious ambiguities in the instance that
|
|
-- were not present in the generic (i.e. when two different
|
|
-- types are given the same actual). If we are looking for a
|
|
-- spec to match a body, full conformance is expected.
|
|
|
|
if In_Instance then
|
|
|
|
-- Inherit the convention and "ghostness" of the matching
|
|
-- spec to ensure proper full and subtype conformance.
|
|
|
|
Set_Convention (Designator, Convention (E));
|
|
|
|
if Is_Ghost_Entity (E) then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Skip past subprogram bodies and subprogram renamings that
|
|
-- may appear to have a matching spec, but that aren't fully
|
|
-- conformant with it. That can occur in cases where an
|
|
-- actual type causes unrelated homographs in the instance.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In (N, N_Subprogram_Body,
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration)
|
|
and then Present (Homonym (E))
|
|
and then not Fully_Conformant (Designator, E)
|
|
then
|
|
goto Next_Entity;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Subtype_Conformant (Designator, E) then
|
|
goto Next_Entity;
|
|
|
|
elsif Different_Generic_Profile (E) then
|
|
goto Next_Entity;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI05-0165): For internally generated bodies of
|
|
-- null procedures locate the internally generated spec. We
|
|
-- enforce mode conformance since a tagged type may inherit
|
|
-- from interfaces several null primitives which differ only
|
|
-- in the mode of the formals.
|
|
|
|
if not (Comes_From_Source (E))
|
|
and then Is_Null_Procedure (E)
|
|
and then not Mode_Conformant (Designator, E)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- For null procedures coming from source that are completions,
|
|
-- analysis of the generated body will establish the link.
|
|
|
|
elsif Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Nkind (Spec) = N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
and then Null_Present (Spec)
|
|
then
|
|
return E;
|
|
|
|
-- Expression functions can be completions, but cannot be
|
|
-- completed by an explicit body.
|
|
|
|
elsif Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (N)
|
|
and then Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (E))) =
|
|
N_Expression_Function
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("body conflicts with expression function#", N);
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Has_Completion (E) then
|
|
if Nkind (N) /= N_Subprogram_Body_Stub then
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Spec (N, E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (E);
|
|
return E;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subunit then
|
|
|
|
-- If this is the proper body of a subunit, the completion
|
|
-- flag is set when analyzing the stub.
|
|
|
|
return E;
|
|
|
|
-- If E is an internal function with a controlling result that
|
|
-- was created for an operation inherited by a null extension,
|
|
-- it may be overridden by a body without a previous spec (one
|
|
-- more reason why these should be shunned). In that case we
|
|
-- remove the generated body if present, because the current
|
|
-- one is the explicit overriding.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (E) = E_Function
|
|
and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Has_Controlling_Result (E)
|
|
and then Is_Null_Extension (Etype (E))
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Spec)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (E, False);
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (E)) = N_Function_Specification
|
|
then
|
|
Remove
|
|
(Unit_Declaration_Node
|
|
(Corresponding_Body (Unit_Declaration_Node (E))));
|
|
|
|
return E;
|
|
|
|
-- If expansion is disabled, or if the wrapper function has
|
|
-- not been generated yet, this a late body overriding an
|
|
-- inherited operation, or it is an overriding by some other
|
|
-- declaration before the controlling result is frozen. In
|
|
-- either case this is a declaration of a new entity.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the body already exists, then this is an error unless
|
|
-- the previous declaration is the implicit declaration of a
|
|
-- derived subprogram. It is also legal for an instance to
|
|
-- contain type conformant overloadable declarations (but the
|
|
-- generic declaration may not), per 8.3(26/2).
|
|
|
|
elsif No (Alias (E))
|
|
and then not Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (E)
|
|
and then not In_Instance
|
|
and then Post_Error
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Imported (E) then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("body not allowed for imported subprogram & declared#",
|
|
N, E);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("duplicate body for & declared#", N, E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Child units cannot be overloaded, so a conformance mismatch
|
|
-- between body and a previous spec is an error.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Child_Unit (E)
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (Designator)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Parent (Unit_Declaration_Node (Designator))) =
|
|
N_Compilation_Unit
|
|
and then Post_Error
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("body of child unit does not match previous declaration", N);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
<<Next_Entity>>
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- On exit, we know that no previous declaration of subprogram exists
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Find_Corresponding_Spec;
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Fully_Conformant --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Fully_Conformant (New_Id, Old_Id : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance (New_Id, Old_Id, Fully_Conformant, False, Result);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Fully_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
-- Fully_Conformant_Expressions --
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Fully_Conformant_Expressions
|
|
(Given_E1 : Node_Id;
|
|
Given_E2 : Node_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
E1 : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Given_E1);
|
|
E2 : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Given_E2);
|
|
-- We always test conformance on original nodes, since it is possible
|
|
-- for analysis and/or expansion to make things look as though they
|
|
-- conform when they do not, e.g. by converting 1+2 into 3.
|
|
|
|
function FCE (Given_E1, Given_E2 : Node_Id) return Boolean
|
|
renames Fully_Conformant_Expressions;
|
|
|
|
function FCL (L1, L2 : List_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Compare elements of two lists for conformance. Elements have to be
|
|
-- conformant, and actuals inserted as default parameters do not match
|
|
-- explicit actuals with the same value.
|
|
|
|
function FCO (Op_Node, Call_Node : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Compare an operator node with a function call
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
-- FCL --
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
function FCL (L1, L2 : List_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
N1, N2 : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if L1 = No_List then
|
|
N1 := Empty;
|
|
else
|
|
N1 := First (L1);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if L2 = No_List then
|
|
N2 := Empty;
|
|
else
|
|
N2 := First (L2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Compare two lists, skipping rewrite insertions (we want to compare
|
|
-- the original trees, not the expanded versions).
|
|
|
|
loop
|
|
if Is_Rewrite_Insertion (N1) then
|
|
Next (N1);
|
|
elsif Is_Rewrite_Insertion (N2) then
|
|
Next (N2);
|
|
elsif No (N1) then
|
|
return No (N2);
|
|
elsif No (N2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
elsif not FCE (N1, N2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
else
|
|
Next (N1);
|
|
Next (N2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end FCL;
|
|
|
|
---------
|
|
-- FCO --
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
function FCO (Op_Node, Call_Node : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Actuals : constant List_Id := Parameter_Associations (Call_Node);
|
|
Act : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if No (Actuals)
|
|
or else Entity (Op_Node) /= Entity (Name (Call_Node))
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Act := First (Actuals);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Op_Node) in N_Binary_Op then
|
|
if not FCE (Left_Opnd (Op_Node), Act) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Act);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Present (Act)
|
|
and then FCE (Right_Opnd (Op_Node), Act)
|
|
and then No (Next (Act));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end FCO;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Fully_Conformant_Expressions
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Non-conformant if paren count does not match. Note: if some idiot
|
|
-- complains that we don't do this right for more than 3 levels of
|
|
-- parentheses, they will be treated with the respect they deserve.
|
|
|
|
if Paren_Count (E1) /= Paren_Count (E2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- If same entities are referenced, then they are conformant even if
|
|
-- they have different forms (RM 8.3.1(19-20)).
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (E1) and then Is_Entity_Name (E2) then
|
|
if Present (Entity (E1)) then
|
|
return Entity (E1) = Entity (E2)
|
|
or else (Chars (Entity (E1)) = Chars (Entity (E2))
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (E1)) = E_Discriminant
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (E2)) = E_In_Parameter);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E1) = N_Expanded_Name
|
|
and then Nkind (E2) = N_Expanded_Name
|
|
and then Nkind (Selector_Name (E1)) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
and then Nkind (Selector_Name (E2)) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
then
|
|
return Chars (Selector_Name (E1)) = Chars (Selector_Name (E2));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Identifiers in component associations don't always have
|
|
-- entities, but their names must conform.
|
|
|
|
return Nkind (E1) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Nkind (E2) = N_Identifier
|
|
and then Chars (E1) = Chars (E2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E1) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
and then Nkind (E2) = N_Expanded_Name
|
|
then
|
|
return Nkind (Selector_Name (E2)) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
and then Chars (E1) = Chars (Selector_Name (E2));
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E2) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
and then Nkind (E1) = N_Expanded_Name
|
|
then
|
|
return Nkind (Selector_Name (E1)) = N_Character_Literal
|
|
and then Chars (E2) = Chars (Selector_Name (E1));
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E1) in N_Op and then Nkind (E2) = N_Function_Call then
|
|
return FCO (E1, E2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E2) in N_Op and then Nkind (E1) = N_Function_Call then
|
|
return FCO (E2, E1);
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise we must have the same syntactic entity
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (E1) /= Nkind (E2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- At this point, we specialize by node type
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
case Nkind (E1) is
|
|
|
|
when N_Aggregate =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCL (Expressions (E1), Expressions (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCL (Component_Associations (E1),
|
|
Component_Associations (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Allocator =>
|
|
if Nkind (Expression (E1)) = N_Qualified_Expression
|
|
or else
|
|
Nkind (Expression (E2)) = N_Qualified_Expression
|
|
then
|
|
return FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2));
|
|
|
|
-- Check that the subtype marks and any constraints
|
|
-- are conformant
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
Indic1 : constant Node_Id := Expression (E1);
|
|
Indic2 : constant Node_Id := Expression (E2);
|
|
Elt1 : Node_Id;
|
|
Elt2 : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (Indic1) /= N_Subtype_Indication then
|
|
return
|
|
Nkind (Indic2) /= N_Subtype_Indication
|
|
and then Entity (Indic1) = Entity (Indic2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (Indic2) /= N_Subtype_Indication then
|
|
return
|
|
Nkind (Indic1) /= N_Subtype_Indication
|
|
and then Entity (Indic1) = Entity (Indic2);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Entity (Subtype_Mark (Indic1)) /=
|
|
Entity (Subtype_Mark (Indic2))
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Elt1 := First (Constraints (Constraint (Indic1)));
|
|
Elt2 := First (Constraints (Constraint (Indic2)));
|
|
while Present (Elt1) and then Present (Elt2) loop
|
|
if not FCE (Elt1, Elt2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Elt1);
|
|
Next (Elt2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
when N_Attribute_Reference =>
|
|
return
|
|
Attribute_Name (E1) = Attribute_Name (E2)
|
|
and then FCL (Expressions (E1), Expressions (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Binary_Op =>
|
|
return
|
|
Entity (E1) = Entity (E2)
|
|
and then FCE (Left_Opnd (E1), Left_Opnd (E2))
|
|
and then FCE (Right_Opnd (E1), Right_Opnd (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Short_Circuit | N_Membership_Test =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Left_Opnd (E1), Left_Opnd (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Right_Opnd (E1), Right_Opnd (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Case_Expression =>
|
|
declare
|
|
Alt1 : Node_Id;
|
|
Alt2 : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2)) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Alt1 := First (Alternatives (E1));
|
|
Alt2 := First (Alternatives (E2));
|
|
loop
|
|
if Present (Alt1) /= Present (Alt2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
elsif No (Alt1) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not FCE (Expression (Alt1), Expression (Alt2))
|
|
or else not FCL (Discrete_Choices (Alt1),
|
|
Discrete_Choices (Alt2))
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Alt1);
|
|
Next (Alt2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
when N_Character_Literal =>
|
|
return
|
|
Char_Literal_Value (E1) = Char_Literal_Value (E2);
|
|
|
|
when N_Component_Association =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCL (Choices (E1), Choices (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Explicit_Dereference =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Prefix (E1), Prefix (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Extension_Aggregate =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCL (Expressions (E1), Expressions (E2))
|
|
and then Null_Record_Present (E1) =
|
|
Null_Record_Present (E2)
|
|
and then FCL (Component_Associations (E1),
|
|
Component_Associations (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Function_Call =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Name (E1), Name (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCL (Parameter_Associations (E1),
|
|
Parameter_Associations (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_If_Expression =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCL (Expressions (E1), Expressions (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Indexed_Component =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Prefix (E1), Prefix (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCL (Expressions (E1), Expressions (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Integer_Literal =>
|
|
return (Intval (E1) = Intval (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Null =>
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
when N_Operator_Symbol =>
|
|
return
|
|
Chars (E1) = Chars (E2);
|
|
|
|
when N_Others_Choice =>
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
when N_Parameter_Association =>
|
|
return
|
|
Chars (Selector_Name (E1)) = Chars (Selector_Name (E2))
|
|
and then FCE (Explicit_Actual_Parameter (E1),
|
|
Explicit_Actual_Parameter (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Qualified_Expression =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Subtype_Mark (E1), Subtype_Mark (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Quantified_Expression =>
|
|
if not FCE (Condition (E1), Condition (E2)) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Loop_Parameter_Specification (E1))
|
|
and then Present (Loop_Parameter_Specification (E2))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
L1 : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Loop_Parameter_Specification (E1);
|
|
L2 : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Loop_Parameter_Specification (E2);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
Reverse_Present (L1) = Reverse_Present (L2)
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Defining_Identifier (L1),
|
|
Defining_Identifier (L2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Discrete_Subtype_Definition (L1),
|
|
Discrete_Subtype_Definition (L2));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Iterator_Specification (E1))
|
|
and then Present (Iterator_Specification (E2))
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
I1 : constant Node_Id := Iterator_Specification (E1);
|
|
I2 : constant Node_Id := Iterator_Specification (E2);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Defining_Identifier (I1),
|
|
Defining_Identifier (I2))
|
|
and then
|
|
Of_Present (I1) = Of_Present (I2)
|
|
and then
|
|
Reverse_Present (I1) = Reverse_Present (I2)
|
|
and then FCE (Name (I1), Name (I2))
|
|
and then FCE (Subtype_Indication (I1),
|
|
Subtype_Indication (I2));
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- The quantified expressions used different specifications to
|
|
-- walk their respective ranges.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
when N_Range =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Low_Bound (E1), Low_Bound (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (High_Bound (E1), High_Bound (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Real_Literal =>
|
|
return (Realval (E1) = Realval (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Selected_Component =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Prefix (E1), Prefix (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Selector_Name (E1), Selector_Name (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Slice =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Prefix (E1), Prefix (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Discrete_Range (E1), Discrete_Range (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_String_Literal =>
|
|
declare
|
|
S1 : constant String_Id := Strval (E1);
|
|
S2 : constant String_Id := Strval (E2);
|
|
L1 : constant Nat := String_Length (S1);
|
|
L2 : constant Nat := String_Length (S2);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if L1 /= L2 then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
for J in 1 .. L1 loop
|
|
if Get_String_Char (S1, J) /=
|
|
Get_String_Char (S2, J)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
when N_Type_Conversion =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Subtype_Mark (E1), Subtype_Mark (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Unary_Op =>
|
|
return
|
|
Entity (E1) = Entity (E2)
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Right_Opnd (E1), Right_Opnd (E2));
|
|
|
|
when N_Unchecked_Type_Conversion =>
|
|
return
|
|
FCE (Subtype_Mark (E1), Subtype_Mark (E2))
|
|
and then
|
|
FCE (Expression (E1), Expression (E2));
|
|
|
|
-- All other node types cannot appear in this context. Strictly
|
|
-- we should raise a fatal internal error. Instead we just ignore
|
|
-- the nodes. This means that if anyone makes a mistake in the
|
|
-- expander and mucks an expression tree irretrievably, the result
|
|
-- will be a failure to detect a (probably very obscure) case
|
|
-- of non-conformance, which is better than bombing on some
|
|
-- case where two expressions do in fact conform.
|
|
|
|
when others =>
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
end case;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Fully_Conformant_Expressions;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
-- Fully_Conformant_Discrete_Subtypes --
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Fully_Conformant_Discrete_Subtypes
|
|
(Given_S1 : Node_Id;
|
|
Given_S2 : Node_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
S1 : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Given_S1);
|
|
S2 : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (Given_S2);
|
|
|
|
function Conforming_Bounds (B1, B2 : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Special-case for a bound given by a discriminant, which in the body
|
|
-- is replaced with the discriminal of the enclosing type.
|
|
|
|
function Conforming_Ranges (R1, R2 : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check both bounds
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Conforming_Bounds --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Conforming_Bounds (B1, B2 : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Entity_Name (B1)
|
|
and then Is_Entity_Name (B2)
|
|
and then Ekind (Entity (B1)) = E_Discriminant
|
|
then
|
|
return Chars (B1) = Chars (B2);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return Fully_Conformant_Expressions (B1, B2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Conforming_Bounds;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Conforming_Ranges --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Conforming_Ranges (R1, R2 : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return
|
|
Conforming_Bounds (Low_Bound (R1), Low_Bound (R2))
|
|
and then
|
|
Conforming_Bounds (High_Bound (R1), High_Bound (R2));
|
|
end Conforming_Ranges;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Fully_Conformant_Discrete_Subtypes
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Nkind (S1) /= Nkind (S2) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Entity_Name (S1) then
|
|
return Entity (S1) = Entity (S2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (S1) = N_Range then
|
|
return Conforming_Ranges (S1, S2);
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind (S1) = N_Subtype_Indication then
|
|
return
|
|
Entity (Subtype_Mark (S1)) = Entity (Subtype_Mark (S2))
|
|
and then
|
|
Conforming_Ranges
|
|
(Range_Expression (Constraint (S1)),
|
|
Range_Expression (Constraint (S2)));
|
|
else
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Fully_Conformant_Discrete_Subtypes;
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
-- Install_Entity --
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Install_Entity (E : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Prev : constant Entity_Id := Current_Entity (E);
|
|
begin
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (E);
|
|
Set_Current_Entity (E);
|
|
Set_Homonym (E, Prev);
|
|
end Install_Entity;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Install_Formals --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Install_Formals (Id : Entity_Id) is
|
|
F : Entity_Id;
|
|
begin
|
|
F := First_Formal (Id);
|
|
while Present (F) loop
|
|
Install_Entity (F);
|
|
Next_Formal (F);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Install_Formals;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Interface_Conformant --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Interface_Conformant
|
|
(Tagged_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Iface_Prim : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prim : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
-- The operation may in fact be an inherited (implicit) operation
|
|
-- rather than the original interface primitive, so retrieve the
|
|
-- ultimate ancestor.
|
|
|
|
Iface : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Find_Dispatching_Type (Ultimate_Alias (Iface_Prim));
|
|
Typ : constant Entity_Id := Find_Dispatching_Type (Prim);
|
|
|
|
function Controlling_Formal (Prim : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Return the controlling formal of Prim
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Controlling_Formal --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Controlling_Formal (Prim : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id is
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
E := First_Entity (Prim);
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
if Is_Formal (E) and then Is_Controlling_Formal (E) then
|
|
return E;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Entity (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Controlling_Formal;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Iface_Ctrl_F : constant Entity_Id := Controlling_Formal (Iface_Prim);
|
|
Prim_Ctrl_F : constant Entity_Id := Controlling_Formal (Prim);
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Is_Interface_Conformant
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Subprogram (Iface_Prim)
|
|
and then Is_Subprogram (Prim)
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (Iface_Prim)
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (Prim));
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Interface (Iface)
|
|
or else (Present (Alias (Iface_Prim))
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Interface
|
|
(Find_Dispatching_Type (Ultimate_Alias (Iface_Prim)))));
|
|
|
|
if Prim = Iface_Prim
|
|
or else not Is_Subprogram (Prim)
|
|
or else Ekind (Prim) /= Ekind (Iface_Prim)
|
|
or else not Is_Dispatching_Operation (Prim)
|
|
or else Scope (Prim) /= Scope (Tagged_Type)
|
|
or else No (Typ)
|
|
or else Base_Type (Typ) /= Base_Type (Tagged_Type)
|
|
or else not Primitive_Names_Match (Iface_Prim, Prim)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- The mode of the controlling formals must match
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Iface_Ctrl_F)
|
|
and then Present (Prim_Ctrl_F)
|
|
and then Ekind (Iface_Ctrl_F) /= Ekind (Prim_Ctrl_F)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
|
|
-- Case of a procedure, or a function whose result type matches the
|
|
-- result type of the interface primitive, or a function that has no
|
|
-- controlling result (I or access I).
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Iface_Prim) = E_Procedure
|
|
or else Etype (Prim) = Etype (Iface_Prim)
|
|
or else not Has_Controlling_Result (Prim)
|
|
then
|
|
return Type_Conformant
|
|
(Iface_Prim, Prim, Skip_Controlling_Formals => True);
|
|
|
|
-- Case of a function returning an interface, or an access to one. Check
|
|
-- that the return types correspond.
|
|
|
|
elsif Implements_Interface (Typ, Iface) then
|
|
if (Ekind (Etype (Prim)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type)
|
|
/=
|
|
(Ekind (Etype (Iface_Prim)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
else
|
|
return
|
|
Type_Conformant (Prim, Ultimate_Alias (Iface_Prim),
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals => True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_Interface_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Non_Overriding_Operation --
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Non_Overriding_Operation
|
|
(Prev_E : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
F_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
G_Typ : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
|
|
function Get_Generic_Parent_Type (F_Typ : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- If F_Type is a derived type associated with a generic actual subtype,
|
|
-- then return its Generic_Parent_Type attribute, else return Empty.
|
|
|
|
function Types_Correspond
|
|
(P_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
N_Type : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Returns true if and only if the types (or designated types in the
|
|
-- case of anonymous access types) are the same or N_Type is derived
|
|
-- directly or indirectly from P_Type.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
-- Get_Generic_Parent_Type --
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Get_Generic_Parent_Type (F_Typ : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id is
|
|
G_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Defn : Node_Id;
|
|
Indic : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Derived_Type (F_Typ)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (F_Typ)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration
|
|
then
|
|
-- The tree must be traversed to determine the parent subtype in
|
|
-- the generic unit, which unfortunately isn't always available
|
|
-- via semantic attributes. ??? (Note: The use of Original_Node
|
|
-- is needed for cases where a full derived type has been
|
|
-- rewritten.)
|
|
|
|
-- If the parent type is a scalar type, the derivation creates
|
|
-- an anonymous base type for it, and the source type is its
|
|
-- first subtype.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Scalar_Type (F_Typ)
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (F_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Defn :=
|
|
Type_Definition
|
|
(Original_Node (Parent (First_Subtype (F_Typ))));
|
|
else
|
|
Defn := Type_Definition (Original_Node (Parent (F_Typ)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
if Nkind (Defn) = N_Derived_Type_Definition then
|
|
Indic := Subtype_Indication (Defn);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Indic) = N_Subtype_Indication then
|
|
G_Typ := Entity (Subtype_Mark (Indic));
|
|
else
|
|
G_Typ := Entity (Indic);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (G_Typ)) = N_Subtype_Declaration
|
|
and then Present (Generic_Parent_Type (Parent (G_Typ)))
|
|
then
|
|
return Generic_Parent_Type (Parent (G_Typ));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Get_Generic_Parent_Type;
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- Types_Correspond --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Types_Correspond
|
|
(P_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
N_Type : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Prev_Type : Entity_Id := Base_Type (P_Type);
|
|
New_Type : Entity_Id := Base_Type (N_Type);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Ekind (Prev_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
Prev_Type := Designated_Type (Prev_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (New_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
New_Type := Designated_Type (New_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Prev_Type = New_Type then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Is_Class_Wide_Type (New_Type) then
|
|
while Etype (New_Type) /= New_Type loop
|
|
New_Type := Etype (New_Type);
|
|
|
|
if New_Type = Prev_Type then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Types_Correspond;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Is_Non_Overriding_Operation
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In the case where both operations are implicit derived subprograms
|
|
-- then neither overrides the other. This can only occur in certain
|
|
-- obscure cases (e.g., derivation from homographs created in a generic
|
|
-- instantiation).
|
|
|
|
if Present (Alias (Prev_E)) and then Present (Alias (New_E)) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Current_Scope) = E_Package
|
|
and then Is_Generic_Instance (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (New_E)
|
|
then
|
|
-- We examine the formals and result type of the inherited operation,
|
|
-- to determine whether their type is derived from (the instance of)
|
|
-- a generic type. The first such formal or result type is the one
|
|
-- tested.
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (Prev_E);
|
|
F_Typ := Empty;
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
F_Typ := Base_Type (Etype (Formal));
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (F_Typ) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
F_Typ := Designated_Type (F_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
G_Typ := Get_Generic_Parent_Type (F_Typ);
|
|
exit when Present (G_Typ);
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If the function dispatches on result check the result type
|
|
|
|
if No (G_Typ) and then Ekind (Prev_E) = E_Function then
|
|
G_Typ := Get_Generic_Parent_Type (Base_Type (Etype (Prev_E)));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if No (G_Typ) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If the generic type is a private type, then the original operation
|
|
-- was not overriding in the generic, because there was no primitive
|
|
-- operation to override.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parent (G_Typ)) = N_Formal_Type_Declaration
|
|
and then Nkind (Formal_Type_Definition (Parent (G_Typ))) =
|
|
N_Formal_Private_Type_Definition
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
-- The generic parent type is the ancestor of a formal derived
|
|
-- type declaration. We need to check whether it has a primitive
|
|
-- operation that should be overridden by New_E in the generic.
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
declare
|
|
P_Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
N_Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
P_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
N_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
P_Prim : Entity_Id;
|
|
Prim_Elt : Elmt_Id := First_Elmt (Primitive_Operations (G_Typ));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Prim_Elt) loop
|
|
P_Prim := Node (Prim_Elt);
|
|
|
|
if Chars (P_Prim) = Chars (New_E)
|
|
and then Ekind (P_Prim) = Ekind (New_E)
|
|
then
|
|
P_Formal := First_Formal (P_Prim);
|
|
N_Formal := First_Formal (New_E);
|
|
while Present (P_Formal) and then Present (N_Formal) loop
|
|
P_Typ := Etype (P_Formal);
|
|
N_Typ := Etype (N_Formal);
|
|
|
|
if not Types_Correspond (P_Typ, N_Typ) then
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Entity (P_Formal);
|
|
Next_Entity (N_Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Found a matching primitive operation belonging to the
|
|
-- formal ancestor type, so the new subprogram is
|
|
-- overriding.
|
|
|
|
if No (P_Formal)
|
|
and then No (N_Formal)
|
|
and then (Ekind (New_E) /= E_Function
|
|
or else
|
|
Types_Correspond
|
|
(Etype (P_Prim), Etype (New_E)))
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Elmt (Prim_Elt);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If no match found, then the new subprogram does not override
|
|
-- in the generic (nor in the instance).
|
|
|
|
-- If the type in question is not abstract, and the subprogram
|
|
-- is, this will be an error if the new operation is in the
|
|
-- private part of the instance. Emit a warning now, which will
|
|
-- make the subsequent error message easier to understand.
|
|
|
|
if Present (F_Typ) and then not Is_Abstract_Type (F_Typ)
|
|
and then Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Prev_E)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_Node_2 := F_Typ;
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("private operation& in generic unit does not override "
|
|
& "any primitive operation of& (RM 12.3 (18))??",
|
|
New_E, New_E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return True;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_Non_Overriding_Operation;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- List_Inherited_Pre_Post_Aspects --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure List_Inherited_Pre_Post_Aspects (E : Entity_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
if Opt.List_Inherited_Aspects
|
|
and then Is_Subprogram_Or_Generic_Subprogram (E)
|
|
then
|
|
declare
|
|
Subps : constant Subprogram_List := Inherited_Subprograms (E);
|
|
Items : Node_Id;
|
|
Prag : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
for Index in Subps'Range loop
|
|
Items := Contract (Subps (Index));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Items) then
|
|
Prag := Pre_Post_Conditions (Items);
|
|
while Present (Prag) loop
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Prag);
|
|
|
|
if Class_Present (Prag)
|
|
and then not Split_PPC (Prag)
|
|
then
|
|
if Pragma_Name (Prag) = Name_Precondition then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("info: & inherits `Pre''Class` aspect from "
|
|
& "#?L?", E);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("info: & inherits `Post''Class` aspect from "
|
|
& "#?L?", E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Prag := Next_Pragma (Prag);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end List_Inherited_Pre_Post_Aspects;
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Make_Inequality_Operator --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
-- S is the defining identifier of an equality operator. We build a
|
|
-- subprogram declaration with the right signature. This operation is
|
|
-- intrinsic, because it is always expanded as the negation of the
|
|
-- call to the equality function.
|
|
|
|
procedure Make_Inequality_Operator (S : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (S);
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Formals : List_Id;
|
|
Op_Name : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
FF : constant Entity_Id := First_Formal (S);
|
|
NF : constant Entity_Id := Next_Formal (FF);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Check that equality was properly defined, ignore call if not
|
|
|
|
if No (NF) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
A : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Sloc (FF),
|
|
Chars => Chars (FF));
|
|
|
|
B : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Make_Defining_Identifier (Sloc (NF),
|
|
Chars => Chars (NF));
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Op_Name := Make_Defining_Operator_Symbol (Loc, Name_Op_Ne);
|
|
|
|
Formals := New_List (
|
|
Make_Parameter_Specification (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => A,
|
|
Parameter_Type =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Etype (First_Formal (S)),
|
|
Sloc (Etype (First_Formal (S))))),
|
|
|
|
Make_Parameter_Specification (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Identifier => B,
|
|
Parameter_Type =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (S))),
|
|
Sloc (Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (S)))))));
|
|
|
|
Decl :=
|
|
Make_Subprogram_Declaration (Loc,
|
|
Specification =>
|
|
Make_Function_Specification (Loc,
|
|
Defining_Unit_Name => Op_Name,
|
|
Parameter_Specifications => Formals,
|
|
Result_Definition =>
|
|
New_Occurrence_Of (Standard_Boolean, Loc)));
|
|
|
|
-- Insert inequality right after equality if it is explicit or after
|
|
-- the derived type when implicit. These entities are created only
|
|
-- for visibility purposes, and eventually replaced in the course
|
|
-- of expansion, so they do not need to be attached to the tree and
|
|
-- seen by the back-end. Keeping them internal also avoids spurious
|
|
-- freezing problems. The declaration is inserted in the tree for
|
|
-- analysis, and removed afterwards. If the equality operator comes
|
|
-- from an explicit declaration, attach the inequality immediately
|
|
-- after. Else the equality is inherited from a derived type
|
|
-- declaration, so insert inequality after that declaration.
|
|
|
|
if No (Alias (S)) then
|
|
Insert_After (Unit_Declaration_Node (S), Decl);
|
|
elsif Is_List_Member (Parent (S)) then
|
|
Insert_After (Parent (S), Decl);
|
|
else
|
|
Insert_After (Parent (Etype (First_Formal (S))), Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Decl);
|
|
Set_Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (Op_Name);
|
|
Analyze (Decl);
|
|
Remove (Decl);
|
|
Set_Has_Completion (Op_Name);
|
|
Set_Corresponding_Equality (Op_Name, S);
|
|
Set_Is_Abstract_Subprogram (Op_Name, Is_Abstract_Subprogram (S));
|
|
end;
|
|
end Make_Inequality_Operator;
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
-- May_Need_Actuals --
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure May_Need_Actuals (Fun : Entity_Id) is
|
|
F : Entity_Id;
|
|
B : Boolean;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
F := First_Formal (Fun);
|
|
B := True;
|
|
while Present (F) loop
|
|
if No (Default_Value (F)) then
|
|
B := False;
|
|
exit;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (F);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Set_Needs_No_Actuals (Fun, B);
|
|
end May_Need_Actuals;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Mode_Conformant --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
function Mode_Conformant (New_Id, Old_Id : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance (New_Id, Old_Id, Mode_Conformant, False, Result);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Mode_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- New_Overloaded_Entity --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure New_Overloaded_Entity
|
|
(S : Entity_Id;
|
|
Derived_Type : Entity_Id := Empty)
|
|
is
|
|
Overridden_Subp : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Set if the current scope has an operation that is type-conformant
|
|
-- with S, and becomes hidden by S.
|
|
|
|
Is_Primitive_Subp : Boolean;
|
|
-- Set to True if the new subprogram is primitive
|
|
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Entity that S overrides
|
|
|
|
Prev_Vis : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Predecessor of E in Homonym chain
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram
|
|
(Is_Primitive : out Boolean;
|
|
Is_Overriding : Boolean := False);
|
|
-- If the subprogram being analyzed is a primitive operation of the type
|
|
-- of a formal or result, set the Has_Primitive_Operations flag on the
|
|
-- type, and set Is_Primitive to True (otherwise set to False). Set the
|
|
-- corresponding flag on the entity itself for later use.
|
|
|
|
function Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- True if a) E is a subprogram whose first formal is a concurrent type
|
|
-- defined in the scope of E that has some entry or subprogram whose
|
|
-- profile matches E, or b) E is an internally built dispatching
|
|
-- subprogram of a protected type and there is a matching subprogram
|
|
-- defined in the enclosing scope of the protected type, or c) E is
|
|
-- an entry of a synchronized type and a matching procedure has been
|
|
-- previously defined in the enclosing scope of the synchronized type.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Private_Declaration (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check that E is declared in the private part of the current package,
|
|
-- or in the package body, where it may hide a previous declaration.
|
|
-- We can't use In_Private_Part by itself because this flag is also
|
|
-- set when freezing entities, so we must examine the place of the
|
|
-- declaration in the tree, and recognize wrapper packages as well.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Overriding_Alias
|
|
(Old_E : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check whether new subprogram and old subprogram are both inherited
|
|
-- from subprograms that have distinct dispatch table entries. This can
|
|
-- occur with derivations from instances with accidental homonyms. The
|
|
-- function is conservative given that the converse is only true within
|
|
-- instances that contain accidental overloadings.
|
|
|
|
procedure Report_Conflict (S : Entity_Id; E : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Report conflict between entities S and E
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram --
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram
|
|
(Is_Primitive : out Boolean;
|
|
Is_Overriding : Boolean := False)
|
|
is
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
F_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
B_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
function Visible_Part_Type (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Returns true if T is declared in the visible part of the current
|
|
-- package scope; otherwise returns false. Assumes that T is declared
|
|
-- in a package.
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Private_Overriding (T : Entity_Id);
|
|
-- Checks that if a primitive abstract subprogram of a visible
|
|
-- abstract type is declared in a private part, then it must override
|
|
-- an abstract subprogram declared in the visible part. Also checks
|
|
-- that if a primitive function with a controlling result is declared
|
|
-- in a private part, then it must override a function declared in
|
|
-- the visible part.
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Private_Overriding --
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Check_Private_Overriding (T : Entity_Id) is
|
|
function Overrides_Private_Part_Op return Boolean;
|
|
-- This detects the special case where the overriding subprogram
|
|
-- is overriding a subprogram that was declared in the same
|
|
-- private part. That case is illegal by 3.9.3(10).
|
|
|
|
function Overrides_Visible_Function
|
|
(Partial_View : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- True if S overrides a function in the visible part. The
|
|
-- overridden function could be explicitly or implicitly declared.
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
-- Overrides_Private_Part_Op --
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Overrides_Private_Part_Op return Boolean is
|
|
Over_Decl : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Unit_Declaration_Node (Overridden_Operation (S));
|
|
Subp_Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (S);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Overriding);
|
|
pragma Assert
|
|
(Nkind (Over_Decl) = N_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration);
|
|
pragma Assert
|
|
(Nkind (Subp_Decl) = N_Abstract_Subprogram_Declaration);
|
|
|
|
return In_Same_List (Over_Decl, Subp_Decl);
|
|
end Overrides_Private_Part_Op;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
-- Overrides_Visible_Function --
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Overrides_Visible_Function
|
|
(Partial_View : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
begin
|
|
if not Is_Overriding or else not Has_Homonym (S) then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not Present (Partial_View) then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Search through all the homonyms H of S in the current
|
|
-- package spec, and return True if we find one that matches.
|
|
-- Note that Parent (H) will be the declaration of the
|
|
-- partial view of T for a match.
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
H : Entity_Id := S;
|
|
begin
|
|
loop
|
|
H := Homonym (H);
|
|
exit when not Present (H) or else Scope (H) /= Scope (S);
|
|
|
|
if Nkind_In
|
|
(Parent (H),
|
|
N_Private_Extension_Declaration,
|
|
N_Private_Type_Declaration)
|
|
and then Defining_Identifier (Parent (H)) = Partial_View
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Overrides_Visible_Function;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_Private_Overriding
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then Visible_Part_Type (T)
|
|
and then not In_Instance
|
|
then
|
|
if Is_Abstract_Type (T)
|
|
and then Is_Abstract_Subprogram (S)
|
|
and then (not Is_Overriding
|
|
or else not Is_Abstract_Subprogram (E)
|
|
or else Overrides_Private_Part_Op)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("abstract subprograms must be visible (RM 3.9.3(10))!",
|
|
S);
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (S) = E_Function then
|
|
declare
|
|
Partial_View : constant Entity_Id :=
|
|
Incomplete_Or_Partial_View (T);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if not Overrides_Visible_Function (Partial_View) then
|
|
|
|
-- Here, S is "function ... return T;" declared in
|
|
-- the private part, not overriding some visible
|
|
-- operation. That's illegal in the tagged case
|
|
-- (but not if the private type is untagged).
|
|
|
|
if ((Present (Partial_View)
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Partial_View))
|
|
or else (not Present (Partial_View)
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (T)))
|
|
and then T = Base_Type (Etype (S))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("private function with tagged result must"
|
|
& " override visible-part function", S);
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\move subprogram to the visible part"
|
|
& " (RM 3.9.3(10))", S);
|
|
|
|
-- AI05-0073: extend this test to the case of a
|
|
-- function with a controlling access result.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Etype (S)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then Is_Tagged_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (S)))
|
|
and then
|
|
not Is_Class_Wide_Type
|
|
(Designated_Type (Etype (S)))
|
|
and then Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("private function with controlling access "
|
|
& "result must override visible-part function",
|
|
S);
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("\move subprogram to the visible part"
|
|
& " (RM 3.9.3(10))", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_Private_Overriding;
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
-- Visible_Part_Type --
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
function Visible_Part_Type (T : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
P : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (Scope (T));
|
|
N : Node_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If the entity is a private type, then it must be declared in a
|
|
-- visible part.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (T) in Private_Kind then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Otherwise, we traverse the visible part looking for its
|
|
-- corresponding declaration. We cannot use the declaration
|
|
-- node directly because in the private part the entity of a
|
|
-- private type is the one in the full view, which does not
|
|
-- indicate that it is the completion of something visible.
|
|
|
|
N := First (Visible_Declarations (Specification (P)));
|
|
while Present (N) loop
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Full_Type_Declaration
|
|
and then Present (Defining_Identifier (N))
|
|
and then T = Defining_Identifier (N)
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind_In (N, N_Private_Type_Declaration,
|
|
N_Private_Extension_Declaration)
|
|
and then Present (Defining_Identifier (N))
|
|
and then T = Full_View (Defining_Identifier (N))
|
|
then
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (N);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Visible_Part_Type;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Is_Primitive := False;
|
|
|
|
if not Comes_From_Source (S) then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- If subprogram is at library level, it is not primitive operation
|
|
|
|
elsif Current_Scope = Standard_Standard then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif (Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then not In_Package_Body (Current_Scope))
|
|
or else Is_Overriding
|
|
then
|
|
-- For function, check return type
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (S) = E_Function then
|
|
if Ekind (Etype (S)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
F_Typ := Designated_Type (Etype (S));
|
|
else
|
|
F_Typ := Etype (S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
B_Typ := Base_Type (F_Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Scope (B_Typ) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (B_Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Type (B_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Is_Primitive := True;
|
|
Set_Has_Primitive_Operations (B_Typ);
|
|
Set_Is_Primitive (S);
|
|
Check_Private_Overriding (B_Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration of
|
|
-- a tagged type and a primitive operation must match
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(16)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Primitive (S, B_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For all subprograms, check formals
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (S);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
if Ekind (Etype (Formal)) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type then
|
|
F_Typ := Designated_Type (Etype (Formal));
|
|
else
|
|
F_Typ := Etype (Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
B_Typ := Base_Type (F_Typ);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (B_Typ) = E_Access_Subtype then
|
|
B_Typ := Base_Type (B_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Scope (B_Typ) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (B_Typ)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Type (B_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Is_Primitive := True;
|
|
Set_Is_Primitive (S);
|
|
Set_Has_Primitive_Operations (B_Typ);
|
|
Check_Private_Overriding (B_Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration of
|
|
-- a tagged type and a primitive operation must match
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(16)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Primitive (S, B_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Special case: An equality function can be redefined for a type
|
|
-- occurring in a declarative part, and won't otherwise be treated as
|
|
-- a primitive because it doesn't occur in a package spec and doesn't
|
|
-- override an inherited subprogram. It's important that we mark it
|
|
-- primitive so it can be returned by Collect_Primitive_Operations
|
|
-- and be used in composing the equality operation of later types
|
|
-- that have a component of the type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Chars (S) = Name_Op_Eq
|
|
and then Etype (S) = Standard_Boolean
|
|
then
|
|
B_Typ := Base_Type (Etype (First_Formal (S)));
|
|
|
|
if Scope (B_Typ) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then
|
|
Base_Type (Etype (Next_Formal (First_Formal (S)))) = B_Typ
|
|
and then not Is_Limited_Type (B_Typ)
|
|
then
|
|
Is_Primitive := True;
|
|
Set_Is_Primitive (S);
|
|
Set_Has_Primitive_Operations (B_Typ);
|
|
Check_Private_Overriding (B_Typ);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration of a
|
|
-- tagged type and a primitive operation must match
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(16)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Primitive (S, B_Typ);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
-- Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram --
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
(E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
function Check_Conforming_Parameters
|
|
(E1_Param : Node_Id;
|
|
E2_Param : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Starting from the given parameters, check that all the parameters
|
|
-- of two entries or subprograms are subtype conformant. Used to skip
|
|
-- the check on the controlling argument.
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
(Conc_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Return the first entry or subprogram of the given concurrent type
|
|
-- whose name matches the name of Subp and has a profile conformant
|
|
-- with Subp; return Empty if not found.
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram
|
|
(Conc_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Return the first dispatching primitive of Conc_Type defined in the
|
|
-- enclosing scope of Conc_Type (i.e. before the full definition of
|
|
-- this concurrent type) whose name matches the entry Ent and has a
|
|
-- profile conformant with the profile of the corresponding (not yet
|
|
-- built) dispatching primitive of Ent; return Empty if not found.
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram
|
|
(Prot_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id;
|
|
-- Return the first subprogram defined in the enclosing scope of
|
|
-- Prot_Typ (before the full definition of this protected type)
|
|
-- whose name matches the original name of Subp and has a profile
|
|
-- conformant with the profile of Subp; return Empty if not found.
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
-- Check_Confirming_Parameters --
|
|
---------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Check_Conforming_Parameters
|
|
(E1_Param : Node_Id;
|
|
E2_Param : Node_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Param_E1 : Node_Id := E1_Param;
|
|
Param_E2 : Node_Id := E2_Param;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
while Present (Param_E1) and then Present (Param_E2) loop
|
|
if Ekind (Defining_Identifier (Param_E1)) /=
|
|
Ekind (Defining_Identifier (Param_E2))
|
|
or else not
|
|
Conforming_Types
|
|
(Find_Parameter_Type (Param_E1),
|
|
Find_Parameter_Type (Param_E2),
|
|
Subtype_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next (Param_E1);
|
|
Next (Param_E2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- The candidate is not valid if one of the two lists contains
|
|
-- more parameters than the other
|
|
|
|
return No (Param_E1) and then No (Param_E2);
|
|
end Check_Conforming_Parameters;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
-- Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram --
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
(Conc_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
E := First_Entity (Conc_Typ);
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
if Chars (Subp) = Chars (E)
|
|
and then (Ekind (E) = E_Entry or else Is_Subprogram (E))
|
|
and then
|
|
Check_Conforming_Parameters
|
|
(First (Parameter_Specifications (Parent (E))),
|
|
Next (First (Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Subp)))))
|
|
then
|
|
return E;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Entity (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
-- Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram --
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram
|
|
(Conc_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Ent : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Search for entities in the enclosing scope of this synchonized
|
|
-- type.
|
|
|
|
pragma Assert (Is_Concurrent_Type (Conc_Typ));
|
|
Push_Scope (Scope (Conc_Typ));
|
|
E := Current_Entity_In_Scope (Ent);
|
|
Pop_Scope;
|
|
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
if Scope (E) = Scope (Conc_Typ)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Ekind (E) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then Present (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Etype (First_Entity (E)) = Conc_Typ
|
|
and then
|
|
Check_Conforming_Parameters
|
|
(First (Parameter_Specifications (Parent (Ent))),
|
|
Next (First (Parameter_Specifications (Parent (E)))))
|
|
then
|
|
return E;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
-- Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram --
|
|
--------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram
|
|
(Prot_Typ : Entity_Id;
|
|
Subp : Entity_Id) return Entity_Id
|
|
is
|
|
ICF : constant Boolean :=
|
|
Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (Subp));
|
|
E : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Temporarily decorate the first parameter of Subp as controlling
|
|
-- formal, required to invoke Subtype_Conformant.
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (Subp));
|
|
|
|
E :=
|
|
Current_Entity_In_Scope (Original_Protected_Subprogram (Subp));
|
|
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
if Scope (E) = Scope (Prot_Typ)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Ekind (Subp) = Ekind (E)
|
|
and then Present (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Etype (First_Entity (E)) = Prot_Typ
|
|
and then Subtype_Conformant (Subp, E,
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals => True)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (Subp), ICF);
|
|
return E;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
Set_Is_Controlling_Formal (First_Entity (Subp), ICF);
|
|
|
|
return Empty;
|
|
end Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Case 1: E is a subprogram whose first formal is a concurrent type
|
|
-- defined in the scope of E that has an entry or subprogram whose
|
|
-- profile matches E.
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Is_Subprogram (E)
|
|
and then Present (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Is_Concurrent_Record_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E)))
|
|
then
|
|
if Scope (E) =
|
|
Scope (Corresponding_Concurrent_Type
|
|
(Etype (First_Entity (E))))
|
|
and then
|
|
Present
|
|
(Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
(Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E))),
|
|
Subp => E))
|
|
then
|
|
Report_Conflict (E,
|
|
Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram
|
|
(Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E))),
|
|
Subp => E));
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Case 2: E is an internally built dispatching subprogram of a
|
|
-- protected type and there is a subprogram defined in the enclosing
|
|
-- scope of the protected type that has the original name of E and
|
|
-- its profile is conformant with the profile of E. We check the
|
|
-- name of the original protected subprogram associated with E since
|
|
-- the expander builds dispatching primitives of protected functions
|
|
-- and procedures with other names (see Exp_Ch9.Build_Selected_Name).
|
|
|
|
elsif not Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Is_Subprogram (E)
|
|
and then Present (First_Entity (E))
|
|
and then Is_Concurrent_Record_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E)))
|
|
and then Present (Original_Protected_Subprogram (E))
|
|
and then
|
|
Present
|
|
(Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram
|
|
(Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E))),
|
|
Subp => E))
|
|
then
|
|
Report_Conflict (E,
|
|
Matching_Original_Protected_Subprogram
|
|
(Corresponding_Concurrent_Type (Etype (First_Entity (E))),
|
|
Subp => E));
|
|
return True;
|
|
|
|
-- Case 3: E is an entry of a synchronized type and a matching
|
|
-- procedure has been previously defined in the enclosing scope
|
|
-- of the synchronized type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then Ekind (E) = E_Entry
|
|
and then
|
|
Present (Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram (Current_Scope, E))
|
|
then
|
|
Report_Conflict (E,
|
|
Matching_Dispatching_Subprogram (Current_Scope, E));
|
|
return True;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return False;
|
|
end Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Private_Declaration --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Private_Declaration (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Decl : constant Node_Id := Unit_Declaration_Node (E);
|
|
Priv_Decls : List_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
then
|
|
Priv_Decls :=
|
|
Private_Declarations (Package_Specification (Current_Scope));
|
|
|
|
return In_Package_Body (Current_Scope)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_List_Member (Decl)
|
|
and then List_Containing (Decl) = Priv_Decls)
|
|
or else (Nkind (Parent (Decl)) = N_Package_Specification
|
|
and then not
|
|
Is_Compilation_Unit
|
|
(Defining_Entity (Parent (Decl)))
|
|
and then List_Containing (Parent (Parent (Decl))) =
|
|
Priv_Decls);
|
|
else
|
|
return False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Is_Private_Declaration;
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Overriding_Alias --
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Overriding_Alias
|
|
(Old_E : Entity_Id;
|
|
New_E : Entity_Id) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
AO : constant Entity_Id := Alias (Old_E);
|
|
AN : constant Entity_Id := Alias (New_E);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
return Scope (AO) /= Scope (AN)
|
|
or else No (DTC_Entity (AO))
|
|
or else No (DTC_Entity (AN))
|
|
or else DT_Position (AO) = DT_Position (AN);
|
|
end Is_Overriding_Alias;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Report_Conflict --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Report_Conflict (S : Entity_Id; E : Entity_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
|
|
|
|
-- Generate message, with useful additional warning if in generic
|
|
|
|
if Is_Generic_Unit (E) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("previous generic unit cannot be overloaded", S);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\& conflicts with declaration#", S);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("& conflicts with declaration#", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Report_Conflict;
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for New_Overloaded_Entity
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- We need to look for an entity that S may override. This must be a
|
|
-- homonym in the current scope, so we look for the first homonym of
|
|
-- S in the current scope as the starting point for the search.
|
|
|
|
E := Current_Entity_In_Scope (S);
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-251): Derivation of abstract interface primitives.
|
|
-- They are directly added to the list of primitive operations of
|
|
-- Derived_Type, unless this is a rederivation in the private part
|
|
-- of an operation that was already derived in the visible part of
|
|
-- the current package.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Present (Derived_Type)
|
|
and then Present (Alias (S))
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (Alias (S))
|
|
and then Present (Find_Dispatching_Type (Alias (S)))
|
|
and then Is_Interface (Find_Dispatching_Type (Alias (S)))
|
|
then
|
|
-- For private types, when the full-view is processed we propagate to
|
|
-- the full view the non-overridden entities whose attribute "alias"
|
|
-- references an interface primitive. These entities were added by
|
|
-- Derive_Subprograms to ensure that interface primitives are
|
|
-- covered.
|
|
|
|
-- Inside_Freeze_Actions is non zero when S corresponds with an
|
|
-- internal entity that links an interface primitive with its
|
|
-- covering primitive through attribute Interface_Alias (see
|
|
-- Add_Internal_Interface_Entities).
|
|
|
|
if Inside_Freezing_Actions = 0
|
|
and then Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (E)) = N_Private_Extension_Declaration
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (S)) = N_Full_Type_Declaration
|
|
and then Full_View (Defining_Identifier (Parent (E)))
|
|
= Defining_Identifier (Parent (S))
|
|
and then Alias (E) = Alias (S)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Operation_From_Private_View (S, E);
|
|
Set_Is_Dispatching_Operation (S);
|
|
|
|
-- Common case
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram (Is_Primitive_Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- For synchronized types check conflicts of this entity with previously
|
|
-- defined entities.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Has_Matching_Entry_Or_Subprogram (S)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there is no homonym then this is definitely not overriding
|
|
|
|
if No (E) then
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram (Is_Primitive_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- If subprogram has an explicit declaration, check whether it has an
|
|
-- overriding indicator.
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (S) then
|
|
Check_Synchronized_Overriding (S, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- (Ada 2012: AI05-0125-1): If S is a dispatching operation then
|
|
-- it may have overridden some hidden inherited primitive. Update
|
|
-- Overridden_Subp to avoid spurious errors when checking the
|
|
-- overriding indicator.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
and then No (Overridden_Subp)
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (S)
|
|
and then Present (Overridden_Operation (S))
|
|
then
|
|
Overridden_Subp := Overridden_Operation (S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_Overriding_Indicator
|
|
(S, Overridden_Subp, Is_Primitive => Is_Primitive_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration of a
|
|
-- parent subprogram and an overriding subprogram must match
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(17)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Overriding (S, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If there is a homonym that is not overloadable, then we have an
|
|
-- error, except for the special cases checked explicitly below.
|
|
|
|
elsif not Is_Overloadable (E) then
|
|
|
|
-- Check for spurious conflict produced by a subprogram that has the
|
|
-- same name as that of the enclosing generic package. The conflict
|
|
-- occurs within an instance, between the subprogram and the renaming
|
|
-- declaration for the package. After the subprogram, the package
|
|
-- renaming declaration becomes hidden.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (E) = E_Package
|
|
and then Present (Renamed_Object (E))
|
|
and then Renamed_Object (E) = Current_Scope
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (Renamed_Object (E))) =
|
|
N_Package_Specification
|
|
and then Present (Generic_Parent (Parent (Renamed_Object (E))))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Hidden (E);
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (E, False);
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
Set_Homonym (S, Homonym (E));
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
Check_Overriding_Indicator (S, Empty, Is_Primitive => False);
|
|
|
|
-- If the subprogram is implicit it is hidden by the previous
|
|
-- declaration. However if it is dispatching, it must appear in the
|
|
-- dispatch table anyway, because it can be dispatched to even if it
|
|
-- cannot be called directly.
|
|
|
|
elsif Present (Alias (S)) and then not Comes_From_Source (S) then
|
|
Set_Scope (S, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Dispatching_Operation (Alias (S)) then
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Report_Conflict (S, E);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- E exists and is overloadable
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Synchronized_Overriding (S, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- Loop through E and its homonyms to determine if any of them is
|
|
-- the candidate for overriding by S.
|
|
|
|
while Present (E) loop
|
|
|
|
-- Definitely not interesting if not in the current scope
|
|
|
|
if Scope (E) /= Current_Scope then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- A function can overload the name of an abstract state. The
|
|
-- state can be viewed as a function with a profile that cannot
|
|
-- be matched by anything.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (S) = E_Function
|
|
and then Ekind (E) = E_Abstract_State
|
|
then
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI05-0165): For internally generated bodies of null
|
|
-- procedures locate the internally generated spec. We enforce
|
|
-- mode conformance since a tagged type may inherit from
|
|
-- interfaces several null primitives which differ only in
|
|
-- the mode of the formals.
|
|
|
|
elsif not Comes_From_Source (S)
|
|
and then Is_Null_Procedure (S)
|
|
and then not Mode_Conformant (E, S)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- Check if we have type conformance
|
|
|
|
elsif Type_Conformant (E, S) then
|
|
|
|
-- If the old and new entities have the same profile and one
|
|
-- is not the body of the other, then this is an error, unless
|
|
-- one of them is implicitly declared.
|
|
|
|
-- There are some cases when both can be implicit, for example
|
|
-- when both a literal and a function that overrides it are
|
|
-- inherited in a derivation, or when an inherited operation
|
|
-- of a tagged full type overrides the inherited operation of
|
|
-- a private extension. Ada 83 had a special rule for the
|
|
-- literal case. In Ada 95, the later implicit operation hides
|
|
-- the former, and the literal is always the former. In the
|
|
-- odd case where both are derived operations declared at the
|
|
-- same point, both operations should be declared, and in that
|
|
-- case we bypass the following test and proceed to the next
|
|
-- part. This can only occur for certain obscure cases in
|
|
-- instances, when an operation on a type derived from a formal
|
|
-- private type does not override a homograph inherited from
|
|
-- the actual. In subsequent derivations of such a type, the
|
|
-- DT positions of these operations remain distinct, if they
|
|
-- have been set.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Alias (S))
|
|
and then (No (Alias (E))
|
|
or else Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
or else Is_Abstract_Subprogram (S)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_Dispatching_Operation (E)
|
|
and then Is_Overriding_Alias (E, S)))
|
|
and then Ekind (E) /= E_Enumeration_Literal
|
|
then
|
|
-- When an derived operation is overloaded it may be due to
|
|
-- the fact that the full view of a private extension
|
|
-- re-inherits. It has to be dealt with.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Package_Or_Generic_Package (Current_Scope)
|
|
and then In_Private_Part (Current_Scope)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Operation_From_Private_View (S, E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- In any case the implicit operation remains hidden by the
|
|
-- existing declaration, which is overriding. Indicate that
|
|
-- E overrides the operation from which S is inherited.
|
|
|
|
if Present (Alias (S)) then
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (E, Alias (S));
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (E, Alias (S));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (E, S);
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (E, S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (E) then
|
|
Check_Overriding_Indicator (E, S, Is_Primitive => False);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration
|
|
-- of a parent subprogram and an overriding subprogram
|
|
-- must match (SPARK RM 6.9(17)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Overriding (E, S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- Within an instance, the renaming declarations for actual
|
|
-- subprograms may become ambiguous, but they do not hide each
|
|
-- other.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (E) /= E_Entry
|
|
and then not Comes_From_Source (E)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Instance (E)
|
|
and then (Present (Alias (E))
|
|
or else Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (E))
|
|
and then (not In_Instance
|
|
or else No (Parent (E))
|
|
or else Nkind (Unit_Declaration_Node (E)) /=
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration)
|
|
then
|
|
-- A subprogram child unit is not allowed to override an
|
|
-- inherited subprogram (10.1.1(20)).
|
|
|
|
if Is_Child_Unit (S) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("child unit overrides inherited subprogram in parent",
|
|
S);
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Non_Overriding_Operation (E, S) then
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
|
|
if No (Derived_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Tagged_Type (Derived_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- E is a derived operation or an internal operator which
|
|
-- is being overridden. Remove E from further visibility.
|
|
-- Furthermore, if E is a dispatching operation, it must be
|
|
-- replaced in the list of primitive operations of its type
|
|
-- (see Override_Dispatching_Operation).
|
|
|
|
Overridden_Subp := E;
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Prev : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
Prev := First_Entity (Current_Scope);
|
|
while Present (Prev) and then Next_Entity (Prev) /= E loop
|
|
Next_Entity (Prev);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- It is possible for E to be in the current scope and
|
|
-- yet not in the entity chain. This can only occur in a
|
|
-- generic context where E is an implicit concatenation
|
|
-- in the formal part, because in a generic body the
|
|
-- entity chain starts with the formals.
|
|
|
|
-- In GNATprove mode, a wrapper for an operation with
|
|
-- axiomatization may be a homonym of another declaration
|
|
-- for an actual subprogram (needs refinement ???).
|
|
|
|
if No (Prev) then
|
|
if In_Instance
|
|
and then GNATprove_Mode
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Original_Node (Unit_Declaration_Node (S))) =
|
|
N_Subprogram_Renaming_Declaration
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
else
|
|
pragma Assert (Chars (E) = Name_Op_Concat);
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- E must be removed both from the entity_list of the
|
|
-- current scope, and from the visibility chain.
|
|
|
|
if Debug_Flag_E then
|
|
Write_Str ("Override implicit operation ");
|
|
Write_Int (Int (E));
|
|
Write_Eol;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If E is a predefined concatenation, it stands for four
|
|
-- different operations. As a result, a single explicit
|
|
-- declaration does not hide it. In a possible ambiguous
|
|
-- situation, Disambiguate chooses the user-defined op,
|
|
-- so it is correct to retain the previous internal one.
|
|
|
|
if Chars (E) /= Name_Op_Concat
|
|
or else Ekind (E) /= E_Operator
|
|
then
|
|
-- For nondispatching derived operations that are
|
|
-- overridden by a subprogram declared in the private
|
|
-- part of a package, we retain the derived subprogram
|
|
-- but mark it as not immediately visible. If the
|
|
-- derived operation was declared in the visible part
|
|
-- then this ensures that it will still be visible
|
|
-- outside the package with the proper signature
|
|
-- (calls from outside must also be directed to this
|
|
-- version rather than the overriding one, unlike the
|
|
-- dispatching case). Calls from inside the package
|
|
-- will still resolve to the overriding subprogram
|
|
-- since the derived one is marked as not visible
|
|
-- within the package.
|
|
|
|
-- If the private operation is dispatching, we achieve
|
|
-- the overriding by keeping the implicit operation
|
|
-- but setting its alias to be the overriding one. In
|
|
-- this fashion the proper body is executed in all
|
|
-- cases, but the original signature is used outside
|
|
-- of the package.
|
|
|
|
-- If the overriding is not in the private part, we
|
|
-- remove the implicit operation altogether.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Private_Declaration (S) then
|
|
if not Is_Dispatching_Operation (E) then
|
|
Set_Is_Immediately_Visible (E, False);
|
|
else
|
|
-- Work done in Override_Dispatching_Operation,
|
|
-- so nothing else needs to be done here.
|
|
|
|
null;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- Find predecessor of E in Homonym chain
|
|
|
|
if E = Current_Entity (E) then
|
|
Prev_Vis := Empty;
|
|
else
|
|
Prev_Vis := Current_Entity (E);
|
|
while Homonym (Prev_Vis) /= E loop
|
|
Prev_Vis := Homonym (Prev_Vis);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Prev_Vis /= Empty then
|
|
|
|
-- Skip E in the visibility chain
|
|
|
|
Set_Homonym (Prev_Vis, Homonym (E));
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Name_Entity_Id (Chars (E), Homonym (E));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Next_Entity (Prev, Next_Entity (E));
|
|
|
|
if No (Next_Entity (Prev)) then
|
|
Set_Last_Entity (Current_Scope, Prev);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
|
|
-- For entities generated by Derive_Subprograms the
|
|
-- overridden operation is the inherited primitive
|
|
-- (which is available through the attribute alias).
|
|
|
|
if not (Comes_From_Source (E))
|
|
and then Is_Dispatching_Operation (E)
|
|
and then Find_Dispatching_Type (E) =
|
|
Find_Dispatching_Type (S)
|
|
and then Present (Alias (E))
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Alias (E))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (S, Alias (E));
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (S, Alias (E));
|
|
|
|
-- Normal case of setting entity as overridden
|
|
|
|
-- Note: Static_Initialization and Overridden_Operation
|
|
-- attributes use the same field in subprogram entities.
|
|
-- Static_Initialization is only defined for internal
|
|
-- initialization procedures, where Overridden_Operation
|
|
-- is irrelevant. Therefore the setting of this attribute
|
|
-- must check whether the target is an init_proc.
|
|
|
|
elsif not Is_Init_Proc (S) then
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (S, E);
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (S, E);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_Overriding_Indicator (S, E, Is_Primitive => True);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration
|
|
-- of a parent subprogram and an overriding subprogram
|
|
-- must match (SPARK RM 6.9(17)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Overriding (S, E);
|
|
|
|
-- If S is a user-defined subprogram or a null procedure
|
|
-- expanded to override an inherited null procedure, or a
|
|
-- predefined dispatching primitive then indicate that E
|
|
-- overrides the operation from which S is inherited.
|
|
|
|
if Comes_From_Source (S)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Present (Parent (S))
|
|
and then
|
|
Nkind (Parent (S)) = N_Procedure_Specification
|
|
and then
|
|
Null_Present (Parent (S)))
|
|
or else
|
|
(Present (Alias (E))
|
|
and then
|
|
Is_Predefined_Dispatching_Operation (Alias (E)))
|
|
then
|
|
if Present (Alias (E)) then
|
|
Set_Overridden_Operation (S, Alias (E));
|
|
Inherit_Subprogram_Contract (S, Alias (E));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Dispatching_Operation (E) then
|
|
|
|
-- An overriding dispatching subprogram inherits the
|
|
-- convention of the overridden subprogram (AI-117).
|
|
|
|
Set_Convention (S, Convention (E));
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, E);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram
|
|
(Is_Primitive_Subp, Is_Overriding => True);
|
|
goto Check_Inequality;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
-- Apparent redeclarations in instances can occur when two
|
|
-- formal types get the same actual type. The subprograms in
|
|
-- in the instance are legal, even if not callable from the
|
|
-- outside. Calls from within are disambiguated elsewhere.
|
|
-- For dispatching operations in the visible part, the usual
|
|
-- rules apply, and operations with the same profile are not
|
|
-- legal (B830001).
|
|
|
|
elsif (In_Instance_Visible_Part
|
|
and then not Is_Dispatching_Operation (E))
|
|
or else In_Instance_Not_Visible
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
-- Here we have a real error (identical profile)
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (E);
|
|
|
|
-- Avoid cascaded errors if the entity appears in
|
|
-- subsequent calls.
|
|
|
|
Set_Scope (S, Current_Scope);
|
|
|
|
-- Generate error, with extra useful warning for the case
|
|
-- of a generic instance with no completion.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Generic_Instance (S)
|
|
and then not Has_Completion (E)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("instantiation cannot provide body for&", S);
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("\& conflicts with declaration#", S);
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("& conflicts with declaration#", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
-- If one subprogram has an access parameter and the other
|
|
-- a parameter of an access type, calls to either might be
|
|
-- ambiguous. Verify that parameters match except for the
|
|
-- access parameter.
|
|
|
|
if May_Hide_Profile then
|
|
declare
|
|
F1 : Entity_Id;
|
|
F2 : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
F1 := First_Formal (S);
|
|
F2 := First_Formal (E);
|
|
while Present (F1) and then Present (F2) loop
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Etype (F1)) then
|
|
if not Is_Access_Type (Etype (F2))
|
|
or else not Conforming_Types
|
|
(Designated_Type (Etype (F1)),
|
|
Designated_Type (Etype (F2)),
|
|
Type_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
May_Hide_Profile := False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif
|
|
not Conforming_Types
|
|
(Etype (F1), Etype (F2), Type_Conformant)
|
|
then
|
|
May_Hide_Profile := False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (F1);
|
|
Next_Formal (F2);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if May_Hide_Profile
|
|
and then No (F1)
|
|
and then No (F2)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE ("calls to& may be ambiguous??", S, S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
E := Homonym (E);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- On exit, we know that S is a new entity
|
|
|
|
Enter_Overloaded_Entity (S);
|
|
Check_For_Primitive_Subprogram (Is_Primitive_Subp);
|
|
Check_Overriding_Indicator
|
|
(S, Overridden_Subp, Is_Primitive => Is_Primitive_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- The Ghost policy in effect at the point of declaration of a parent
|
|
-- subprogram and an overriding subprogram must match
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.9(17)).
|
|
|
|
Check_Ghost_Overriding (S, Overridden_Subp);
|
|
|
|
-- Overloading is not allowed in SPARK, except for operators
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (S) /= N_Defining_Operator_Symbol then
|
|
Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Homonym (S));
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("overloading not allowed with entity#", S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If S is a derived operation for an untagged type then by
|
|
-- definition it's not a dispatching operation (even if the parent
|
|
-- operation was dispatching), so Check_Dispatching_Operation is not
|
|
-- called in that case.
|
|
|
|
if No (Derived_Type)
|
|
or else Is_Tagged_Type (Derived_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
Check_Dispatching_Operation (S, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is a user-defined equality operator that is not a derived
|
|
-- subprogram, create the corresponding inequality. If the operation is
|
|
-- dispatching, the expansion is done elsewhere, and we do not create
|
|
-- an explicit inequality operation.
|
|
|
|
<<Check_Inequality>>
|
|
if Chars (S) = Name_Op_Eq
|
|
and then Etype (S) = Standard_Boolean
|
|
and then Present (Parent (S))
|
|
and then not Is_Dispatching_Operation (S)
|
|
then
|
|
Make_Inequality_Operator (S);
|
|
Check_Untagged_Equality (S);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end New_Overloaded_Entity;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Process_Formals --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Process_Formals
|
|
(T : List_Id;
|
|
Related_Nod : Node_Id)
|
|
is
|
|
function Designates_From_Limited_With (Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Determine whether an access type designates a type coming from a
|
|
-- limited view.
|
|
|
|
function Is_Class_Wide_Default (D : Node_Id) return Boolean;
|
|
-- Check whether the default has a class-wide type. After analysis the
|
|
-- default has the type of the formal, so we must also check explicitly
|
|
-- for an access attribute.
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
-- Designates_From_Limited_With --
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Designates_From_Limited_With (Typ : Entity_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
Desig : Entity_Id := Typ;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Access_Type (Desig) then
|
|
Desig := Directly_Designated_Type (Desig);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Is_Class_Wide_Type (Desig) then
|
|
Desig := Root_Type (Desig);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
Ekind (Desig) = E_Incomplete_Type
|
|
and then From_Limited_With (Desig);
|
|
end Designates_From_Limited_With;
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
-- Is_Class_Wide_Default --
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Is_Class_Wide_Default (D : Node_Id) return Boolean is
|
|
begin
|
|
return Is_Class_Wide_Type (Designated_Type (Etype (D)))
|
|
or else (Nkind (D) = N_Attribute_Reference
|
|
and then Attribute_Name (D) = Name_Access
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (Etype (Prefix (D))));
|
|
end Is_Class_Wide_Default;
|
|
|
|
-- Local variables
|
|
|
|
Context : constant Node_Id := Parent (Parent (T));
|
|
Default : Node_Id;
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
Formal_Type : Entity_Id;
|
|
Param_Spec : Node_Id;
|
|
Ptype : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
Num_Out_Params : Nat := 0;
|
|
First_Out_Param : Entity_Id := Empty;
|
|
-- Used for setting Is_Only_Out_Parameter
|
|
|
|
-- Start of processing for Process_Formals
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- In order to prevent premature use of the formals in the same formal
|
|
-- part, the Ekind is left undefined until all default expressions are
|
|
-- analyzed. The Ekind is established in a separate loop at the end.
|
|
|
|
Param_Spec := First (T);
|
|
while Present (Param_Spec) loop
|
|
Formal := Defining_Identifier (Param_Spec);
|
|
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (Formal, True);
|
|
Enter_Name (Formal);
|
|
|
|
-- Case of ordinary parameters
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parameter_Type (Param_Spec)) /= N_Access_Definition then
|
|
Find_Type (Parameter_Type (Param_Spec));
|
|
Ptype := Parameter_Type (Param_Spec);
|
|
|
|
if Ptype = Error then
|
|
goto Continue;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal_Type := Entity (Ptype);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Incomplete_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
or else
|
|
(Is_Class_Wide_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Is_Incomplete_Type (Root_Type (Formal_Type)))
|
|
then
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-326): Tagged incomplete types allowed in
|
|
-- primitive operations, as long as their completion is
|
|
-- in the same declarative part. If in the private part
|
|
-- this means that the type cannot be a Taft-amendment type.
|
|
-- Check is done on package exit. For access to subprograms,
|
|
-- the use is legal for Taft-amendment types.
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012: tagged incomplete types are allowed as generic
|
|
-- formal types. They do not introduce dependencies and the
|
|
-- corresponding generic subprogram does not have a delayed
|
|
-- freeze, because it does not need a freeze node. However,
|
|
-- it is still the case that untagged incomplete types cannot
|
|
-- be Taft-amendment types and must be completed in private
|
|
-- part, so the subprogram must appear in the list of private
|
|
-- dependents of the type.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
or else (Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
and then not From_Limited_With (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
if Ekind (Scope (Current_Scope)) = E_Package
|
|
and then not Is_Generic_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
then
|
|
if not Nkind_In
|
|
(Parent (T), N_Access_Function_Definition,
|
|
N_Access_Procedure_Definition)
|
|
then
|
|
Append_Elmt (Current_Scope,
|
|
Private_Dependents (Base_Type (Formal_Type)));
|
|
|
|
-- Freezing is delayed to ensure that Register_Prim
|
|
-- will get called for this operation, which is needed
|
|
-- in cases where static dispatch tables aren't built.
|
|
-- (Note that the same is done for controlling access
|
|
-- parameter cases in function Access_Definition.)
|
|
|
|
if not Is_Thunk (Current_Scope) then
|
|
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Current_Scope);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif not Nkind_In (Parent (T), N_Access_Function_Definition,
|
|
N_Access_Procedure_Definition)
|
|
then
|
|
-- AI05-0151: Tagged incomplete types are allowed in all
|
|
-- formal parts. Untagged incomplete types are not allowed
|
|
-- in bodies. Limited views of either kind are not allowed
|
|
-- if there is no place at which the non-limited view can
|
|
-- become available.
|
|
|
|
-- Incomplete formal untagged types are not allowed in
|
|
-- subprogram bodies (but are legal in their declarations).
|
|
-- This excludes bodies created for null procedures, which
|
|
-- are basic declarations.
|
|
|
|
if Is_Generic_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then not Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Nkind (Parent (Related_Nod)) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("invalid use of formal incomplete type", Param_Spec);
|
|
|
|
elsif Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then (not From_Limited_With (Formal_Type)
|
|
or else not In_Package_Body)
|
|
then
|
|
null;
|
|
|
|
elsif Nkind_In (Context, N_Accept_Statement,
|
|
N_Accept_Alternative,
|
|
N_Entry_Body)
|
|
or else (Nkind (Context) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Context))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("invalid use of untagged incomplete type &",
|
|
Ptype, Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("invalid use of incomplete type&",
|
|
Param_Spec, Formal_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- Further checks on the legality of incomplete types
|
|
-- in formal parts are delayed until the freeze point
|
|
-- of the enclosing subprogram or access to subprogram.
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal_Type) = E_Void then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("premature use of&",
|
|
Parameter_Type (Param_Spec), Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2012 (AI-142): Handle aliased parameters
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012
|
|
and then Aliased_Present (Param_Spec)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Aliased (Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Create and decorate an internal subtype
|
|
-- declaration corresponding to the null-excluding type of the
|
|
-- formal in the enclosing scope. Finally, replace the parameter
|
|
-- type of the formal with the internal subtype.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Null_Exclusion_Present (Param_Spec)
|
|
then
|
|
if not Is_Access_Type (Formal_Type) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("`NOT NULL` allowed only for an access type", Param_Spec);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
if Can_Never_Be_Null (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Comes_From_Source (Related_Nod)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_NE
|
|
("`NOT NULL` not allowed (& already excludes null)",
|
|
Param_Spec, Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal_Type :=
|
|
Create_Null_Excluding_Itype
|
|
(T => Formal_Type,
|
|
Related_Nod => Related_Nod,
|
|
Scope_Id => Scope (Current_Scope));
|
|
|
|
-- If the designated type of the itype is an itype that is
|
|
-- not frozen yet, we set the Has_Delayed_Freeze attribute
|
|
-- on the access subtype, to prevent order-of-elaboration
|
|
-- issues in the backend.
|
|
|
|
-- Example:
|
|
-- type T is access procedure;
|
|
-- procedure Op (O : not null T);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Itype (Directly_Designated_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
and then
|
|
not Is_Frozen (Directly_Designated_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Delayed_Freeze (Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- An access formal type
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Formal_Type :=
|
|
Access_Definition (Related_Nod, Parameter_Type (Param_Spec));
|
|
|
|
-- No need to continue if we already notified errors
|
|
|
|
if not Present (Formal_Type) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-254)
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
AD : constant Node_Id :=
|
|
Access_To_Subprogram_Definition
|
|
(Parameter_Type (Param_Spec));
|
|
begin
|
|
if Present (AD) and then Protected_Present (AD) then
|
|
Formal_Type :=
|
|
Replace_Anonymous_Access_To_Protected_Subprogram
|
|
(Param_Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Etype (Formal, Formal_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- A formal parameter declared within a Ghost region is automatically
|
|
-- Ghost (SPARK RM 6.9(2)).
|
|
|
|
if Ghost_Mode > None then
|
|
Set_Is_Ghost_Entity (Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Deal with default expression if present
|
|
|
|
Default := Expression (Param_Spec);
|
|
|
|
if Present (Default) then
|
|
Check_SPARK_05_Restriction
|
|
("default expression is not allowed", Default);
|
|
|
|
if Out_Present (Param_Spec) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("default initialization only allowed for IN parameters",
|
|
Param_Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Do the special preanalysis of the expression (see section on
|
|
-- "Handling of Default Expressions" in the spec of package Sem).
|
|
|
|
Preanalyze_Spec_Expression (Default, Formal_Type);
|
|
|
|
-- An access to constant cannot be the default for
|
|
-- an access parameter that is an access to variable.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Formal_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then not Is_Access_Constant (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Etype (Default))
|
|
and then Is_Access_Constant (Etype (Default))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("formal that is access to variable cannot be initialized "
|
|
& "with an access-to-constant expression", Default);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check that the designated type of an access parameter's default
|
|
-- is not a class-wide type unless the parameter's designated type
|
|
-- is also class-wide.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Formal_Type) = E_Anonymous_Access_Type
|
|
and then not Designates_From_Limited_With (Formal_Type)
|
|
and then Is_Class_Wide_Default (Default)
|
|
and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Designated_Type (Formal_Type))
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("access to class-wide expression not allowed here", Default);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Check incorrect use of dynamically tagged expressions
|
|
|
|
if Is_Tagged_Type (Formal_Type) then
|
|
Check_Dynamically_Tagged_Expression
|
|
(Expr => Default,
|
|
Typ => Formal_Type,
|
|
Related_Nod => Default);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Static checks
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2005
|
|
and then Is_Access_Type (Etype (Formal))
|
|
and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Formal))
|
|
then
|
|
Null_Exclusion_Static_Checks (Param_Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The following checks are relevant only when SPARK_Mode is on as
|
|
-- these are not standard Ada legality rules.
|
|
|
|
if SPARK_Mode = On then
|
|
if Ekind_In (Scope (Formal), E_Function, E_Generic_Function) then
|
|
|
|
-- A function cannot have a parameter of mode IN OUT or OUT
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 6.1).
|
|
|
|
if Ekind_In (Formal, E_In_Out_Parameter, E_Out_Parameter) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("function cannot have parameter of mode `OUT` or "
|
|
& "`IN OUT`", Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- A procedure cannot have an effectively volatile formal
|
|
-- parameter of mode IN because it behaves as a constant
|
|
-- (SPARK RM 7.1.3(6)). -- ??? maybe 7.1.3(4)
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Scope (Formal)) = E_Procedure
|
|
and then Ekind (Formal) = E_In_Parameter
|
|
and then Is_Effectively_Volatile (Formal)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("formal parameter of mode `IN` cannot be volatile", Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
<<Continue>>
|
|
Next (Param_Spec);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- If this is the formal part of a function specification, analyze the
|
|
-- subtype mark in the context where the formals are visible but not
|
|
-- yet usable, and may hide outer homographs.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Related_Nod) = N_Function_Specification then
|
|
Analyze_Return_Type (Related_Nod);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Now set the kind (mode) of each formal
|
|
|
|
Param_Spec := First (T);
|
|
while Present (Param_Spec) loop
|
|
Formal := Defining_Identifier (Param_Spec);
|
|
Set_Formal_Mode (Formal);
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Formal) = E_In_Parameter then
|
|
Set_Default_Value (Formal, Expression (Param_Spec));
|
|
|
|
if Present (Expression (Param_Spec)) then
|
|
Default := Expression (Param_Spec);
|
|
|
|
if Is_Scalar_Type (Etype (Default)) then
|
|
if Nkind (Parameter_Type (Param_Spec)) /=
|
|
N_Access_Definition
|
|
then
|
|
Formal_Type := Entity (Parameter_Type (Param_Spec));
|
|
else
|
|
Formal_Type :=
|
|
Access_Definition
|
|
(Related_Nod, Parameter_Type (Param_Spec));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Apply_Scalar_Range_Check (Default, Formal_Type);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal) = E_Out_Parameter then
|
|
Num_Out_Params := Num_Out_Params + 1;
|
|
|
|
if Num_Out_Params = 1 then
|
|
First_Out_Param := Formal;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal) = E_In_Out_Parameter then
|
|
Num_Out_Params := Num_Out_Params + 1;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Skip remaining processing if formal type was in error
|
|
|
|
if Etype (Formal) = Any_Type or else Error_Posted (Formal) then
|
|
goto Next_Parameter;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Force call by reference if aliased
|
|
|
|
declare
|
|
Conv : constant Convention_Id := Convention (Etype (Formal));
|
|
begin
|
|
if Is_Aliased (Formal) then
|
|
Set_Mechanism (Formal, By_Reference);
|
|
|
|
-- Warn if user asked this to be passed by copy
|
|
|
|
if Conv = Convention_Ada_Pass_By_Copy then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("cannot pass aliased parameter & by copy??", Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Force mechanism if type has Convention Ada_Pass_By_Ref/Copy
|
|
|
|
elsif Conv = Convention_Ada_Pass_By_Copy then
|
|
Set_Mechanism (Formal, By_Copy);
|
|
|
|
elsif Conv = Convention_Ada_Pass_By_Reference then
|
|
Set_Mechanism (Formal, By_Reference);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
<<Next_Parameter>>
|
|
Next (Param_Spec);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Out_Param) and then Num_Out_Params = 1 then
|
|
Set_Is_Only_Out_Parameter (First_Out_Param);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Process_Formals;
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
-- Reference_Body_Formals --
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Reference_Body_Formals (Spec : Entity_Id; Bod : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Fs : Entity_Id;
|
|
Fb : Entity_Id;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
if Error_Posted (Spec) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Iterate over both lists. They may be of different lengths if the two
|
|
-- specs are not conformant.
|
|
|
|
Fs := First_Formal (Spec);
|
|
Fb := First_Formal (Bod);
|
|
while Present (Fs) and then Present (Fb) loop
|
|
Generate_Reference (Fs, Fb, 'b');
|
|
|
|
if Style_Check then
|
|
Style.Check_Identifier (Fb, Fs);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Spec_Entity (Fb, Fs);
|
|
Set_Referenced (Fs, False);
|
|
Next_Formal (Fs);
|
|
Next_Formal (Fb);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Reference_Body_Formals;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Set_Actual_Subtypes --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Actual_Subtypes (N : Node_Id; Subp : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Decl : Node_Id;
|
|
Formal : Entity_Id;
|
|
T : Entity_Id;
|
|
First_Stmt : Node_Id := Empty;
|
|
AS_Needed : Boolean;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If this is an empty initialization procedure, no need to create
|
|
-- actual subtypes (small optimization).
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Subp) = E_Procedure and then Is_Null_Init_Proc (Subp) then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The subtype declarations may freeze the formals. The body generated
|
|
-- for an expression function is not a freeze point, so do not emit
|
|
-- these declarations (small loss of efficiency in rare cases).
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body
|
|
and then Was_Expression_Function (N)
|
|
then
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Formal := First_Formal (Subp);
|
|
while Present (Formal) loop
|
|
T := Etype (Formal);
|
|
|
|
-- We never need an actual subtype for a constrained formal
|
|
|
|
if Is_Constrained (T) then
|
|
AS_Needed := False;
|
|
|
|
-- If we have unknown discriminants, then we do not need an actual
|
|
-- subtype, or more accurately we cannot figure it out. Note that
|
|
-- all class-wide types have unknown discriminants.
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Unknown_Discriminants (T) then
|
|
AS_Needed := False;
|
|
|
|
-- At this stage we have an unconstrained type that may need an
|
|
-- actual subtype. For sure the actual subtype is needed if we have
|
|
-- an unconstrained array type. However, in an instance, the type
|
|
-- may appear as a subtype of the full view, while the actual is
|
|
-- in fact private (in which case no actual subtype is needed) so
|
|
-- check the kind of the base type.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Array_Type (Base_Type (T)) then
|
|
AS_Needed := True;
|
|
|
|
-- The only other case needing an actual subtype is an unconstrained
|
|
-- record type which is an IN parameter (we cannot generate actual
|
|
-- subtypes for the OUT or IN OUT case, since an assignment can
|
|
-- change the discriminant values. However we exclude the case of
|
|
-- initialization procedures, since discriminants are handled very
|
|
-- specially in this context, see the section entitled "Handling of
|
|
-- Discriminants" in Einfo.
|
|
|
|
-- We also exclude the case of Discrim_SO_Functions (functions used
|
|
-- in front-end layout mode for size/offset values), since in such
|
|
-- functions only discriminants are referenced, and not only are such
|
|
-- subtypes not needed, but they cannot always be generated, because
|
|
-- of order of elaboration issues.
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Record_Type (T)
|
|
and then Ekind (Formal) = E_In_Parameter
|
|
and then Chars (Formal) /= Name_uInit
|
|
and then not Is_Unchecked_Union (T)
|
|
and then not Is_Discrim_SO_Function (Subp)
|
|
then
|
|
AS_Needed := True;
|
|
|
|
-- All other cases do not need an actual subtype
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
AS_Needed := False;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Generate actual subtypes for unconstrained arrays and
|
|
-- unconstrained discriminated records.
|
|
|
|
if AS_Needed then
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Accept_Statement then
|
|
|
|
-- If expansion is active, the formal is replaced by a local
|
|
-- variable that renames the corresponding entry of the
|
|
-- parameter block, and it is this local variable that may
|
|
-- require an actual subtype.
|
|
|
|
if Expander_Active then
|
|
Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype (T, Renamed_Object (Formal));
|
|
else
|
|
Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype (T, Formal);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N)) then
|
|
First_Stmt :=
|
|
First (Statements (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N)));
|
|
Prepend (Decl, Statements (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N)));
|
|
Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Decl);
|
|
else
|
|
-- If the accept statement has no body, there will be no
|
|
-- reference to the actuals, so no need to compute actual
|
|
-- subtypes.
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype (T, Formal);
|
|
Prepend (Decl, Declarations (N));
|
|
Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Decl);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- The declaration uses the bounds of an existing object, and
|
|
-- therefore needs no constraint checks.
|
|
|
|
Analyze (Decl, Suppress => All_Checks);
|
|
Set_Is_Actual_Subtype (Defining_Identifier (Decl));
|
|
|
|
-- We need to freeze manually the generated type when it is
|
|
-- inserted anywhere else than in a declarative part.
|
|
|
|
if Present (First_Stmt) then
|
|
Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (First_Stmt,
|
|
Freeze_Entity (Defining_Identifier (Decl), N));
|
|
|
|
-- Ditto if the type has a dynamic predicate, because the
|
|
-- generated function will mention the actual subtype. The
|
|
-- predicate may come from an explicit aspect of be inherited.
|
|
|
|
elsif Has_Predicates (T) then
|
|
Insert_List_Before_And_Analyze (Decl,
|
|
Freeze_Entity (Defining_Identifier (Decl), N));
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (N) = N_Accept_Statement
|
|
and then Expander_Active
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Actual_Subtype (Renamed_Object (Formal),
|
|
Defining_Identifier (Decl));
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Actual_Subtype (Formal, Defining_Identifier (Decl));
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (Formal);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
end Set_Actual_Subtypes;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Set_Formal_Mode --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Formal_Mode (Formal_Id : Entity_Id) is
|
|
Spec : constant Node_Id := Parent (Formal_Id);
|
|
Id : constant Entity_Id := Scope (Formal_Id);
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
-- Note: we set Is_Known_Valid for IN parameters and IN OUT parameters
|
|
-- since we ensure that corresponding actuals are always valid at the
|
|
-- point of the call.
|
|
|
|
if Out_Present (Spec) then
|
|
if Ekind_In (Id, E_Entry, E_Entry_Family)
|
|
or else Is_Subprogram_Or_Generic_Subprogram (Id)
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Has_Out_Or_In_Out_Parameter (Id, True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Ekind_In (Id, E_Function, E_Generic_Function) then
|
|
|
|
-- [IN] OUT parameters allowed for functions in Ada 2012
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version >= Ada_2012 then
|
|
|
|
-- Even in Ada 2012 operators can only have IN parameters
|
|
|
|
if Is_Operator_Symbol_Name (Chars (Scope (Formal_Id))) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("operators can only have IN parameters", Spec);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if In_Present (Spec) then
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_In_Out_Parameter);
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_Out_Parameter);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- But not in earlier versions of Ada
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("functions can only have IN parameters", Spec);
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_In_Parameter);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
elsif In_Present (Spec) then
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_In_Out_Parameter);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_Out_Parameter);
|
|
Set_Never_Set_In_Source (Formal_Id, True);
|
|
Set_Is_True_Constant (Formal_Id, False);
|
|
Set_Current_Value (Formal_Id, Empty);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
Set_Ekind (Formal_Id, E_In_Parameter);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Set Is_Known_Non_Null for access parameters since the language
|
|
-- guarantees that access parameters are always non-null. We also set
|
|
-- Can_Never_Be_Null, since there is no way to change the value.
|
|
|
|
if Nkind (Parameter_Type (Spec)) = N_Access_Definition then
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): In Ada 95, access parameters are always non-
|
|
-- null; In Ada 2005, only if then null_exclusion is explicit.
|
|
|
|
if Ada_Version < Ada_2005
|
|
or else Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Formal_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Non_Null (Formal_Id);
|
|
Set_Can_Never_Be_Null (Formal_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
-- Ada 2005 (AI-231): Null-exclusion access subtype
|
|
|
|
elsif Is_Access_Type (Etype (Formal_Id))
|
|
and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Etype (Formal_Id))
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Non_Null (Formal_Id);
|
|
|
|
-- We can also set Can_Never_Be_Null (thus preventing some junk
|
|
-- access checks) for the case of an IN parameter, which cannot
|
|
-- be changed, or for an IN OUT parameter, which can be changed but
|
|
-- not to a null value. But for an OUT parameter, the initial value
|
|
-- passed in can be null, so we can't set this flag in that case.
|
|
|
|
if Ekind (Formal_Id) /= E_Out_Parameter then
|
|
Set_Can_Never_Be_Null (Formal_Id);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Set_Mechanism (Formal_Id, Default_Mechanism);
|
|
Set_Formal_Validity (Formal_Id);
|
|
end Set_Formal_Mode;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
-- Set_Formal_Validity --
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Set_Formal_Validity (Formal_Id : Entity_Id) is
|
|
begin
|
|
-- If no validity checking, then we cannot assume anything about the
|
|
-- validity of parameters, since we do not know there is any checking
|
|
-- of the validity on the call side.
|
|
|
|
if not Validity_Checks_On then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If validity checking for parameters is enabled, this means we are
|
|
-- not supposed to make any assumptions about argument values.
|
|
|
|
elsif Validity_Check_Parameters then
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
-- If we are checking in parameters, we will assume that the caller is
|
|
-- also checking parameters, so we can assume the parameter is valid.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal_Id) = E_In_Parameter
|
|
and then Validity_Check_In_Params
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Valid (Formal_Id, True);
|
|
|
|
-- Similar treatment for IN OUT parameters
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (Formal_Id) = E_In_Out_Parameter
|
|
and then Validity_Check_In_Out_Params
|
|
then
|
|
Set_Is_Known_Valid (Formal_Id, True);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Set_Formal_Validity;
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
-- Subtype_Conformant --
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
function Subtype_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals : Boolean := False) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
begin
|
|
Check_Conformance (New_Id, Old_Id, Subtype_Conformant, False, Result,
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals => Skip_Controlling_Formals);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Subtype_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
---------------------
|
|
-- Type_Conformant --
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
function Type_Conformant
|
|
(New_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Old_Id : Entity_Id;
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals : Boolean := False) return Boolean
|
|
is
|
|
Result : Boolean;
|
|
begin
|
|
May_Hide_Profile := False;
|
|
Check_Conformance
|
|
(New_Id, Old_Id, Type_Conformant, False, Result,
|
|
Skip_Controlling_Formals => Skip_Controlling_Formals);
|
|
return Result;
|
|
end Type_Conformant;
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
-- Valid_Operator_Definition --
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
procedure Valid_Operator_Definition (Designator : Entity_Id) is
|
|
N : Integer := 0;
|
|
F : Entity_Id;
|
|
Id : constant Name_Id := Chars (Designator);
|
|
N_OK : Boolean;
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
F := First_Formal (Designator);
|
|
while Present (F) loop
|
|
N := N + 1;
|
|
|
|
if Present (Default_Value (F)) then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("default values not allowed for operator parameters",
|
|
Parent (F));
|
|
|
|
-- For function instantiations that are operators, we must check
|
|
-- separately that the corresponding generic only has in-parameters.
|
|
-- For subprogram declarations this is done in Set_Formal_Mode. Such
|
|
-- an error could not arise in earlier versions of the language.
|
|
|
|
elsif Ekind (F) /= E_In_Parameter then
|
|
Error_Msg_N ("operators can only have IN parameters", F);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
Next_Formal (F);
|
|
end loop;
|
|
|
|
-- Verify that user-defined operators have proper number of arguments
|
|
-- First case of operators which can only be unary
|
|
|
|
if Nam_In (Id, Name_Op_Not, Name_Op_Abs) then
|
|
N_OK := (N = 1);
|
|
|
|
-- Case of operators which can be unary or binary
|
|
|
|
elsif Nam_In (Id, Name_Op_Add, Name_Op_Subtract) then
|
|
N_OK := (N in 1 .. 2);
|
|
|
|
-- All other operators can only be binary
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
N_OK := (N = 2);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if not N_OK then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("incorrect number of arguments for operator", Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
|
|
if Id = Name_Op_Ne
|
|
and then Base_Type (Etype (Designator)) = Standard_Boolean
|
|
and then not Is_Intrinsic_Subprogram (Designator)
|
|
then
|
|
Error_Msg_N
|
|
("explicit definition of inequality not allowed", Designator);
|
|
end if;
|
|
end Valid_Operator_Definition;
|
|
|
|
end Sem_Ch6;
|