From 6abca68dbff1cf5122efe429a82eb73896ab6ef6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Jaeger Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 07:25:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed toc. --- FAQ.in | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in index b3b4843589..dd33c6f863 100644 --- a/FAQ.in +++ b/FAQ.in @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ versions of some string functions. These can only be used with GCC. See libc anymore? -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? When I use GNU libc on my Linux system by linking against the libc.so which comes with glibc all I get is a core dump. @@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ completely. the Perl db modules the testsuite is not passed. This did not happen with db-1, gdbm, or ndbm. -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? The pow() inline function I get when including is broken. I get segmentation faults when I run the program. @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ benchmark program for measuring disk access). ?? Programs compiled with glibc 2.1 can't read db files made with glibc 2.0. What has changed that programs like rpm break? -Removed. Does not apply anymore. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore. ?? Autoconf's AC_CHECK_FUNC macro reports that a function exists, but when I try to use it, it always returns -1 and sets errno to ENOSYS. @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ and regulations of the country this effects. glibc behaves correctly. ??make I've build make 3.77 against glibc 2.1 and now make gets segmentation faults. -Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer. +{} Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer. ?? Why do so many programs using math functions fail on my AlphaStation?