Fix incorrect getaddrinfo assertion trigger

[BZ #9954]

With the following /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1       www.my-domain.es
127.0.1.1       www.my-domain.es
192.168.0.1     www.my-domain.es

Using getaddrinfo() on www.my-domain.es, trigger the following assertion:
../sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c:1473: rfc3484_sort: Assertion
`src->results[i].native == -1 || src->results[i].native == a1_native' failed.

This is due to two different bugs:
- In rfc3484_sort() rule 7, src->results[i].native is assigned even if
src->results[i].index is -1, meaning that no interface is associated.
- In getaddrinfo() the source IP address used with the lo interface needs a
special case, as it can be any IP within 127.X.Y.Z.
This commit is contained in:
Allan McRae 2013-10-25 14:25:38 +10:00
parent b85545a671
commit 894f3f1049
2 changed files with 18 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
2013-10-25 Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
[BZ #9954]
* sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c (rfc3484_sort): do not assign native
result if the result has no associated interface.
* sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c (getaddrinfo): correctly detect
interface for all 127.X.Y.Z addresses.
2013-10-24 Chris Leonard <cjl@sugarlabs.org>
* locale/iso-639.def: Add Ligurian (lij)

View File

@ -1666,13 +1666,13 @@ rfc3484_sort (const void *p1, const void *p2, void *arg)
/* Fill in the results in all the records. */
for (int i = 0; i < src->nresults; ++i)
if (src->results[i].index == a1_index)
if (a1_index != -1 && src->results[i].index == a1_index)
{
assert (src->results[i].native == -1
|| src->results[i].native == a1_native);
src->results[i].native = a1_native;
}
else if (src->results[i].index == a2_index)
else if (a2_index != -1 && src->results[i].index == a2_index)
{
assert (src->results[i].native == -1
|| src->results[i].native == a2_native);
@ -2532,7 +2532,14 @@ getaddrinfo (const char *name, const char *service,
tmp.addr[0] = 0;
tmp.addr[1] = 0;
tmp.addr[2] = htonl (0xffff);
tmp.addr[3] = sinp->sin_addr.s_addr;
/* Special case for lo interface, the source address
being possibly different than the interface
address. */
if ((ntohl(sinp->sin_addr.s_addr) & 0xff000000)
== 0x7f000000)
tmp.addr[3] = htonl(0x7f000001);
else
tmp.addr[3] = sinp->sin_addr.s_addr;
}
else
{