Regenerated: /usr/bin/perl scripts/gen-FAQ.pl FAQ.in
This commit is contained in:
parent
158bfac450
commit
d32a40205f
2
FAQ
2
FAQ
@ -491,6 +491,8 @@ There are some failures which are not directly related to the GNU libc:
|
||||
the test cases in the math subdirectory will fail. Linux 2.2 has
|
||||
fixes for the floating point support on Alpha. The Linux/SPARC kernel has
|
||||
also some bugs in the FPU emulation code (as of Linux 2.2.0).
|
||||
- Other tools might have problems. For example bash 2.03 gives a
|
||||
segmentation fault running the tst-rpmatch.sh test script.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1.17. What is symbol versioning good for? Do I need it?
|
||||
|
2
FAQ.in
2
FAQ.in
@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ There are some failures which are not directly related to the GNU libc:
|
||||
the test cases in the math subdirectory will fail. Linux 2.2 has
|
||||
fixes for the floating point support on Alpha. The Linux/SPARC kernel has
|
||||
also some bugs in the FPU emulation code (as of Linux 2.2.0).
|
||||
- Other tools might have problems. For example bash 2.03 gives a
|
||||
segmentation fault running the tst-rpmatch.sh test script.
|
||||
|
||||
?? What is symbol versioning good for? Do I need it?
|
||||
|
||||
|
2
configure
vendored
2
configure
vendored
@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ echo "configure:1273: checking version of $CC" >&5
|
||||
ac_prog_version=`$CC -v 2>&1 | sed -n 's/^.*version \([egcygnustp-]*[0-9.]*\).*$/\1/p'`
|
||||
case $ac_prog_version in
|
||||
'') ac_prog_version="v. ?.??, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
|
||||
egcs-2.9[1-9].*|egcs-2.90.2[789]|egcs-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|pgcc-2.9[1-9].*|pgcc-2.90.2[789]|pgcc-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*2.8.[1-9]*|*2.9|*2.9.[0-9]*|cygnus-2.9[1-9].*)
|
||||
egcs-2.9[1-9].*|egcs-2.90.2[789]|egcs-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*gcc-2.9[1-9].*|pgcc-2.90.2[789]|pgcc-2.90.[3-9][0-9]|*2.8.[1-9]*|*2.9|*2.9.[0-9]*|cygnus-2.9[1-9].*|gcc-2.9[5-9]|gcc-2.1[0-9][0-9])
|
||||
ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, ok"; ac_verc_fail=no;;
|
||||
*) ac_prog_version="$ac_prog_version, bad"; ac_verc_fail=yes;;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user