glibc/FAQ

352 lines
14 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

Frequently Asked Question on GNU C Library
As every FAQ this one also tries to answer questions the user might have
when using the package. Please make sure you read this before sending
questions or bug reports to the maintainers.
The GNU C Library is very complex. The building process exploits the
features available in tools generally available. But many things can
only be done using GNU tools. Also the code is sometimes hard to
understand because it has to be portable but on the other hand must be
fast. But you need not understand the details to use GNU C Library.
This will only be necessary if you intend to contribute or change it.
If you have any questions you think should be answered in this document,
please let me know.
--drepper@cygnus.com
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q1] ``What systems does the GNU C Library run on?''
[Q2] ``What compiler do I need to build GNU libc?''
[Q3] ``When starting make I get only error messages.
What's wrong?''
[Q4] ``After I changed configure.in I get `Autoconf version X.Y.
or higher is required for this script'. What can I do?''
[Q5] ``Do I need a special linker or archiver?''
[Q6] ``Do I need some more things to compile GNU C Library?''
[Q7] ``When I run `nm -u libc.so' on the produced library I still
find unresolved symbols? Can this be ok?''
[Q8] ``Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?''
[Q9] ``I expect GNU libc to be 100% source code compatible with
the old Linux based GNU libc. Why isn't it like this?''
[Q10] ``Why does getlogin() always return NULL on my Linux box?''
[Q11] ``Where are the DST_* constants found in <sys/time.h> on many
systems?''
[Q12] ``The `gencat' utility cannot process the input which are
successfully used on my Linux libc based system. Why?''
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q1] ``What systems does the GNU C Library run on?''
[A1] {UD} This is difficult to answer. The file `README' lists the
architectures GNU libc is known to run *at some time*. This does not
mean that it still can be compiled and run on them in the moment.
The systems glibc is known to work on in the moment and most probably
in the future are:
*-*-gnu GNU Hurd
i[3456]86-*-linux Linux-2.0 on Intel
m68k-*-linux Linux-2.0 on Motorola 680x0
alpha-*-linux Linux-2.0 on DEC Alpha
Other Linux platforms are also on the way to be supported but I need
some success reports first.
If you have a system not listed above (or in the `README' file) and
you are really interested in porting it, contact
<bug-glibc@prep.ai.mit.edu>
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q2] ``What compiler do I need to build GNU libc?''
[A2] {UD} It is (almost) impossible to compile GNU C Library using a
different compiler than GNU CC. A lot of extensions of GNU CC are
used to increase the portability and speed.
But this does not mean you have to use GNU CC for using the GNU C
Library. In fact you should be able to use the native C compiler
because the success only depends on the binutils: the linker and
archiver.
The GNU CC is found like all other GNU packages on
ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu
or better one of the many mirror sites.
You always should try to use the latest official release. Older
versions might not have all the features GNU libc could use.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q3] ``When starting `make' I get only errors messages.
What's wrong?''
[A3] {UD} You definitely need GNU make to translate GNU libc. No
other make program has the needed functionality.
Versions before 3.74 have bugs which prevent correct execution so you
should upgrade to the latest version before starting the compilation.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q4] ``After I changed configure.in I get `Autoconf version X.Y.
or higher is required for this script'. What can I do?''
[A4] {UD} You have to get the specified autoconf version (or a later)
from your favourite mirror of prep.ai.mit.edu.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q5] ``Do I need a special linker or archiver?''
[A5] {UD} If your native versions are not too buggy you can probably
work with them. But GNU libc works best with GNU binutils.
On systems where the native linker does not support weak symbols you
will not get a really ISO C compliant C library. Generally speaking
you should use the GNU binutils if they provide at least the same
functionality as your system's tools.
Always get the newest release of GNU binutils available.
Older releases are known to have bugs that affect building the GNU C
Library.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q6] ``Do I need some more things to compile GNU C Library?''
[A6] {UD} Yes, there are some more :-).
* GNU gettext; the GNU libc is internationalized and partly localized.
For bringing the messages for the different languages in the needed
form the tools from the GNU gettext package are necessary. See
ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu or better any mirror site.
* lots of diskspace (for i?86-linux this means, e.g., ~70MB).
You should avoid compiling on a NFS mounted device. This is very
slow.
* plenty of time (approx 1h for i?86-linux on i586@133 or 2.5h on
i486@66 or 4.5h on i486@33).
If you have some more measurements let me know.
* Some files depend on special tools. E.g., files ending in .gperf
need a `gperf' program. The GNU version (part of libg++) is known
to work while some vendor versions do not.
* When compiling for Linux:
+ the header files of the Linux kernel must be available in the
search path of the CPP as <linux/*.h> and <asm/*.h>.
* Some files depend on special tools. E.g., files ending in .gperf
need a `gperf' program. The GNU version (part of libg++) is known
to work while some vendor versions do not.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q7] ``When I run `nm -u libc.so' on the produced library I still
find unresolved symbols? Can this be ok?''
[A7] {UD} Yes, this is ok. There can be several kinds of unresolved
symbols:
* magic symbols automatically generated by the linker. Names are
often like __start_* and __stop_*
* symbols starting with _dl_* come from the dynamic linker
* symbols resolved by using libgcc.a
(__udivdi3, __umoddi3, or similar)
* weak symbols, which need not be resolved at all
(currently fabs among others; this gets resolved if the program
is linked against libm, too.)
Generally, you should make sure you find a real program which produces
errors while linking before deciding there is a problem.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q8] ``Can I replace the libc on my Linux system with GNU libc?''
[A8] {UD} You cannot replace any existing libc for Linux with GNU
libc. There are different versions of C libraries and you can run
libcs with different major version independently.
For Linux there are today two libc versions:
libc-4 old a.out libc
libc-5 current ELF libc
GNU libc will have the major number 6 and therefore you can have this
additionally installed. For more information consult documentation for
shared library handling. The Makefiles of GNU libc will automatically
generate the needed symbolic links which the linker will use.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q9] ``I expect GNU libc to be 100% source code compatible with
the old Linux based GNU libc. Why isn't it like this?''
[A9] {DMT,UD} Not every extension in Linux libc's history was well
thought-out. In fact it had a lot of problems with standards compliance
and with cleanliness. With the introduction of a new version number these
errors now can be corrected. Here is a list of the known source code
incompatibilities:
* _GNU_SOURCE: glibc does not automatically define _GNU_SOURCE. Thus,
if a program depends on GNU extensions or some other non-standard
functionality, it is necessary to compile it with C compiler option
-D_GNU_SOURCE, or better, to put `#define _GNU_SOURCE' at the beginning
of your source files, before any C library header files are included.
This difference normally manifests itself in the form of missing
prototypes and/or data type definitions. Thus, if you get such errors,
the first thing you should do is try defining _GNU_SOURCE and see if
that makes the problem go away.
For more information consult the file `NOTES' part of the GNU C
library sources.
* reboot(): GNU libc sanitizes the interface of reboot() to be more
compatible with the interface used on other OSes. In particular,
reboot() as implemented in glibc takes just one argument. This argument
corresponds to the third argument of the Linux reboot system call.
That is, a call of the form reboot(a, b, c) needs to be changed into
reboot(c).
Beside this the header <sys/reboot.h> defines the needed constants
for the argument. These RB_* constants should be used instead of the
cryptic magic numbers.
* swapon(): the interface of this function didn't changed, but the
prototype is in a separate header file <sys/swap.h>. For the additional
argument of of swapon() you should use the SWAP_* constants from
<linux/swap.h>, which get defined when <sys/swap.h> is included.
* errno: If a program uses variable "errno", then it _must_ include header
file <errno.h>. The old libc often (erroneously) declared this variable
implicitly as a side-effect of including other libc header files. glibc
is careful to avoid such namespace pollution, which, in turn, means that
you really need to include the header files that you depend on. This
difference normally manifests itself in the form of the compiler
complaining about the references of the undeclared symbol "errno".
* Linux-specific syscalls: All Linux system calls now have appropriate
library wrappers and corresponding declarations in various header files.
This is because the syscall() macro that was traditionally used to
work around missing syscall wrappers are inherently non-portable and
error-prone. The following tables lists all the new syscall stubs,
the header-file declaring their interface and the system call name.
syscall name: wrapper name: declaring header file:
------------- ------------- ----------------------
bdflush bdflush <sys/kdaemon.h>
create_module create_module <sys/module.h>
delete_module delete_module <sys/module.h>
get_kernel_syms get_kernel_syms <sys/module.h>
init_module init_module <sys/module.h>
syslog ksyslog_ctl <sys/klog.h>
* lpd: Older versions of lpd depend on a routine called _validuser().
The library does not provide this function, but instead provides
__ivaliduser() which has a slightly different interfaces. Simply
upgrading to a newer lpd should fix this problem (e.g., the 4.4BSD
lpd is known to be working).
* resolver functions/BIND: like on many other systems the functions of
the resolver library are not included in the libc itself. There is
a separate library libresolv. If you find some symbols starting with
`res_*' undefined simply add -lresolv to your call of the linker.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q10] ``Why does getlogin() always return NULL on my Linux box?''
[A10] {UD} The GNU C library has a format for the UTMP and WTMP file
which differs from what your system currently has. It was extended to
fulfill the needs of the next years when IPv6 is introduced. So the
record size is different, fields might have a different position and
so reading the files written by functions from the one library cannot
be read by functions from the other library. Sorry, but this is what
a major release is for. It's better to have a cut now than having no
means to support the new techniques later.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q11] ``Where are the DST_* constants found in <sys/time.h> on many
systems?''
[A11] {UD} These constants come from the old BSD days and are not used
today anymore (even the Linux based glibc does not implement the handling
although the constants are defined).
Instead GNU libc contains the zone database handling and compatibility
code for POSIX TZ environment variable handling.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[Q12] ``The `gencat' utility cannot process the input which are
successfully used on my Linux libc based system. Why?''
[A12] {UD} Unlike the author of the `gencat' program which is distributed
with Linux libc I have read the underlying standards before writing the
code. It is completely compatible with the specification given in
X/Open Portability Guide.
To ease the transition from the Linux version some of the non-standard
features are also present in the `gencat' program of GNU libc. This
mainly includes the use of symbols for the message number and the automatic
generation of header files which contain the needed #defines to map the
symbols to integers.
Here is a simple SED script to convert at least some Linux specific
catalog files to the XPG4 form:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Change catalog source in Linux specific format to standard XPG format.
# Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>, 1996.
#
/^\$ #/ {
h
s/\$ #\([^ ]*\).*/\1/
x
s/\$ #[^ ]* *\(.*\)/\$ \1/
}
/^# / {
s/^# \(.*\)/\1/
G
s/\(.*\)\n\(.*\)/\2 \1/
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Answers were given by:
{UD} Ulrich Drepper, <drepper@cygnus.com>
{DMT} David Mosberger-Tang, <davidm@AZStarNet.com>
Amended by:
{RM} Roland McGrath, <roland@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Local Variables:
mode:text
End: