OpenE2K/libc-rs
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Document what is wrong with sighandler_t

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
gnzlbg 2019-05-23 16:06:37 +02:00
parent 3efe23b1c0
commit 7f8b946cc2
1 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
libc-test/build.rs
View File

@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ fn test_android(target: &str) {
s if s.ends_with("_nsec") && struct_.starts_with("stat") => {
s.to_string()
}
// FIXME: appears that `epoll_event.data` is an union
"u64" if struct_ == "epoll_event" => "data.u64".to_string(),
s => s.to_string(),
}
@ -1355,8 +1356,8 @@ fn test_android(target: &str) {
cfg.skip_type(move |ty| {
match ty {
// sighandler_t is crazy across platforms
// FIXME: still necessary?
// FIXME: `sighandler_t` type is incorrect, see:
// https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/issues/1359
"sighandler_t" => true,
_ => false,
}
@ -1425,8 +1426,15 @@ fn test_android(target: &str) {
// this is actually a union on linux, so we can't represent it well and
// just insert some padding.
(struct_ == "siginfo_t" && field == "_pad") ||
// FIXME: `sa_sigaction` has type `sighandler_t` but that type is
// incorrect, see: https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/issues/1359
(struct_ == "sigaction" && field == "sa_sigaction") ||
// sigev_notify_thread_id is actually part of a sigev_un union
(struct_ == "sigevent" && field == "sigev_notify_thread_id")
(struct_ == "sigevent" && field == "sigev_notify_thread_id") ||
// signalfd had SIGSYS fields added in Android 4.19, but CI does not have that version yet.
(struct_ == "signalfd_siginfo" && (field == "ssi_syscall" ||
field == "ssi_call_addr" ||
field == "ssi_arch"))
});
cfg.generate("../src/lib.rs", "main.rs");