linux/arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c

436 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992 Linus Torvalds
* Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002 Andi Kleen, SuSE Labs
* Copyright (C) 2011 Don Zickus Red Hat, Inc.
*
* Pentium III FXSR, SSE support
* Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>, May 2000
*/
/*
* Handle hardware traps and faults.
*/
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/kdebug.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/mca.h>
#if defined(CONFIG_EDAC)
#include <linux/edac.h>
#endif
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <asm/traps.h>
#include <asm/mach_traps.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
#include <asm/nmi.h>
#include <asm/x86_init.h>
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
#define NMI_MAX_NAMELEN 16
struct nmiaction {
struct list_head list;
nmi_handler_t handler;
unsigned int flags;
char *name;
};
struct nmi_desc {
spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head head;
};
static struct nmi_desc nmi_desc[NMI_MAX] =
{
{
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[0].lock),
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[0].head),
},
{
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&nmi_desc[1].lock),
.head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(nmi_desc[1].head),
},
};
struct nmi_stats {
unsigned int normal;
unsigned int unknown;
unsigned int external;
unsigned int swallow;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct nmi_stats, nmi_stats);
static int ignore_nmis;
int unknown_nmi_panic;
/*
* Prevent NMI reason port (0x61) being accessed simultaneously, can
* only be used in NMI handler.
*/
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(nmi_reason_lock);
static int __init setup_unknown_nmi_panic(char *str)
{
unknown_nmi_panic = 1;
return 1;
}
__setup("unknown_nmi_panic", setup_unknown_nmi_panic);
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
#define nmi_to_desc(type) (&nmi_desc[type])
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
static int notrace __kprobes nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs, bool b2b)
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
struct nmiaction *a;
int handled=0;
rcu_read_lock();
/*
* NMIs are edge-triggered, which means if you have enough
* of them concurrently, you can lose some because only one
* can be latched at any given time. Walk the whole list
* to handle those situations.
*/
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
list_for_each_entry_rcu(a, &desc->head, list)
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
handled += a->handler(type, regs);
rcu_read_unlock();
/* return total number of NMI events handled */
return handled;
}
static int __setup_nmi(unsigned int type, struct nmiaction *action)
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
/*
* most handlers of type NMI_UNKNOWN never return because
* they just assume the NMI is theirs. Just a sanity check
* to manage expectations
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(type == NMI_UNKNOWN && !list_empty(&desc->head));
x86, nmi: Create new NMI handler routines The NMI handlers used to rely on the notifier infrastructure. This worked great until we wanted to support handling multiple events better. One of the key ideas to the nmi handling is to process _all_ the handlers for each NMI. The reason behind this switch is because NMIs are edge triggered. If enough NMIs are triggered, then they could be lost because the cpu can only latch at most one NMI (besides the one currently being processed). In order to deal with this we have decided to process all the NMI handlers for each NMI. This allows the handlers to determine if they recieved an event or not (the ones that can not determine this will be left to fend for themselves on the unknown NMI list). As a result of this change it is now possible to have an extra NMI that was destined to be received for an already processed event. Because the event was processed in the previous NMI, this NMI gets dropped and becomes an 'unknown' NMI. This of course will cause printks that scare people. However, we prefer to have extra NMIs as opposed to losing NMIs and as such are have developed a basic mechanism to catch most of them. That will be a later patch. To accomplish this idea, I unhooked the nmi handlers from the notifier routines and created a new mechanism loosely based on doIRQ. The reason for this is the notifier routines have a couple of shortcomings. One we could't guarantee all future NMI handlers used NOTIFY_OK instead of NOTIFY_STOP. Second, we couldn't keep track of the number of events being handled in each routine (most only handle one, perf can handle more than one). Third, I wanted to eventually display which nmi handlers are registered in the system in /proc/interrupts to help see who is generating NMIs. The patch below just implements the new infrastructure but doesn't wire it up yet (that is the next patch). Its design is based on doIRQ structs and the atomic notifier routines. So the rcu stuff in the patch isn't entirely untested (as the notifier routines have soaked it) but it should be double checked in case I copied the code wrong. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:20 +02:00
/*
* some handlers need to be executed first otherwise a fake
* event confuses some handlers (kdump uses this flag)
*/
if (action->flags & NMI_FLAG_FIRST)
list_add_rcu(&action->list, &desc->head);
else
list_add_tail_rcu(&action->list, &desc->head);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
static struct nmiaction *__free_nmi(unsigned int type, const char *name)
{
struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type);
struct nmiaction *n;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &desc->head, list) {
/*
* the name passed in to describe the nmi handler
* is used as the lookup key
*/
if (!strcmp(n->name, name)) {
WARN(in_nmi(),
"Trying to free NMI (%s) from NMI context!\n", n->name);
list_del_rcu(&n->list);
break;
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
synchronize_rcu();
return (n);
}
int register_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, nmi_handler_t handler,
unsigned long nmiflags, const char *devname)
{
struct nmiaction *action;
int retval = -ENOMEM;
if (!handler)
return -EINVAL;
action = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nmiaction), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!action)
goto fail_action;
action->handler = handler;
action->flags = nmiflags;
action->name = kstrndup(devname, NMI_MAX_NAMELEN, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!action->name)
goto fail_action_name;
retval = __setup_nmi(type, action);
if (retval)
goto fail_setup_nmi;
return retval;
fail_setup_nmi:
kfree(action->name);
fail_action_name:
kfree(action);
fail_action:
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_nmi_handler);
void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name)
{
struct nmiaction *a;
a = __free_nmi(type, name);
if (a) {
kfree(a->name);
kfree(a);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_nmi_handler);
static notrace __kprobes void
pci_serr_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
pr_emerg("NMI: PCI system error (SERR) for reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
/*
* On some machines, PCI SERR line is used to report memory
* errors. EDAC makes use of it.
*/
#if defined(CONFIG_EDAC)
if (edac_handler_set()) {
edac_atomic_assert_error();
return;
}
#endif
if (panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
panic("NMI: Not continuing");
pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
/* Clear and disable the PCI SERR error line. */
reason = (reason & NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK) | NMI_REASON_CLEAR_SERR;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
}
static notrace __kprobes void
io_check_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long i;
pr_emerg(
"NMI: IOCK error (debug interrupt?) for reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
show_registers(regs);
if (panic_on_io_nmi)
panic("NMI IOCK error: Not continuing");
/* Re-enable the IOCK line, wait for a few seconds */
reason = (reason & NMI_REASON_CLEAR_MASK) | NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
i = 20000;
while (--i) {
touch_nmi_watchdog();
udelay(100);
}
reason &= ~NMI_REASON_CLEAR_IOCHK;
outb(reason, NMI_REASON_PORT);
}
static notrace __kprobes void
unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int handled;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
/*
* Use 'false' as back-to-back NMIs are dealt with one level up.
* Of course this makes having multiple 'unknown' handlers useless
* as only the first one is ever run (unless it can actually determine
* if it caused the NMI)
*/
handled = nmi_handle(NMI_UNKNOWN, regs, false);
if (handled) {
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.unknown, handled);
return;
}
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.unknown, 1);
#ifdef CONFIG_MCA
/*
* Might actually be able to figure out what the guilty party
* is:
*/
if (MCA_bus) {
mca_handle_nmi();
return;
}
#endif
pr_emerg("Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason %02x on CPU %d.\n",
reason, smp_processor_id());
pr_emerg("Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?\n");
if (unknown_nmi_panic || panic_on_unrecovered_nmi)
panic("NMI: Not continuing");
pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
}
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, swallow_nmi);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, last_nmi_rip);
static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned char reason = 0;
int handled;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
bool b2b = false;
/*
* CPU-specific NMI must be processed before non-CPU-specific
* NMI, otherwise we may lose it, because the CPU-specific
* NMI can not be detected/processed on other CPUs.
*/
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
/*
* Back-to-back NMIs are interesting because they can either
* be two NMI or more than two NMIs (any thing over two is dropped
* due to NMI being edge-triggered). If this is the second half
* of the back-to-back NMI, assume we dropped things and process
* more handlers. Otherwise reset the 'swallow' NMI behaviour
*/
if (regs->ip == __this_cpu_read(last_nmi_rip))
b2b = true;
else
__this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, false);
__this_cpu_write(last_nmi_rip, regs->ip);
handled = nmi_handle(NMI_LOCAL, regs, b2b);
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.normal, handled);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
if (handled) {
/*
* There are cases when a NMI handler handles multiple
* events in the current NMI. One of these events may
* be queued for in the next NMI. Because the event is
* already handled, the next NMI will result in an unknown
* NMI. Instead lets flag this for a potential NMI to
* swallow.
*/
if (handled > 1)
__this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, true);
return;
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
}
/* Non-CPU-specific NMI: NMI sources can be processed on any CPU */
raw_spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock);
reason = x86_platform.get_nmi_reason();
if (reason & NMI_REASON_MASK) {
if (reason & NMI_REASON_SERR)
pci_serr_error(reason, regs);
else if (reason & NMI_REASON_IOCHK)
io_check_error(reason, regs);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
/*
* Reassert NMI in case it became active
* meanwhile as it's edge-triggered:
*/
reassert_nmi();
#endif
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.external, 1);
raw_spin_unlock(&nmi_reason_lock);
return;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&nmi_reason_lock);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
/*
* Only one NMI can be latched at a time. To handle
* this we may process multiple nmi handlers at once to
* cover the case where an NMI is dropped. The downside
* to this approach is we may process an NMI prematurely,
* while its real NMI is sitting latched. This will cause
* an unknown NMI on the next run of the NMI processing.
*
* We tried to flag that condition above, by setting the
* swallow_nmi flag when we process more than one event.
* This condition is also only present on the second half
* of a back-to-back NMI, so we flag that condition too.
*
* If both are true, we assume we already processed this
* NMI previously and we swallow it. Otherwise we reset
* the logic.
*
* There are scenarios where we may accidentally swallow
* a 'real' unknown NMI. For example, while processing
* a perf NMI another perf NMI comes in along with a
* 'real' unknown NMI. These two NMIs get combined into
* one (as descibed above). When the next NMI gets
* processed, it will be flagged by perf as handled, but
* noone will know that there was a 'real' unknown NMI sent
* also. As a result it gets swallowed. Or if the first
* perf NMI returns two events handled then the second
* NMI will get eaten by the logic below, again losing a
* 'real' unknown NMI. But this is the best we can do
* for now.
*/
if (b2b && __this_cpu_read(swallow_nmi))
__this_cpu_add(nmi_stats.swallow, 1);
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
else
unknown_nmi_error(reason, regs);
}
dotraplinkage notrace __kprobes void
do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
{
nmi_enter();
inc_irq_stat(__nmi_count);
if (!ignore_nmis)
default_do_nmi(regs);
nmi_exit();
}
void stop_nmi(void)
{
ignore_nmis++;
}
void restart_nmi(void)
{
ignore_nmis--;
}
x86, nmi: Add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Previous patches allow the NMI subsystem to process multipe NMI events in one NMI. As previously discussed this can cause issues when an event triggered another NMI but is processed in the current NMI. This causes the next NMI to go unprocessed and become an 'unknown' NMI. To handle this, we first have to flag whether or not the NMI handler handled more than one event or not. If it did, then there exists a chance that the next NMI might be already processed. Once the NMI is flagged as a candidate to be swallowed, we next look for a back-to-back NMI condition. This is determined by looking at the %rip from pt_regs. If it is the same as the previous NMI, it is assumed the cpu did not have a chance to jump back into a non-NMI context and execute code and instead handled another NMI. If both of those conditions are true then we will swallow any unknown NMI. There still exists a chance that we accidentally swallow a real unknown NMI, but for now things seem better. An optimization has also been added to the nmi notifier rountine. Because x86 can latch up to one NMI while currently processing an NMI, we don't have to worry about executing _all_ the handlers in a standalone NMI. The idea is if multiple NMIs come in, the second NMI will represent them. For those back-to-back NMI cases, we have the potentail to drop NMIs. Therefore only execute all the handlers in the second half of a detected back-to-back NMI. Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1317409584-23662-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-09-30 21:06:22 +02:00
/* reset the back-to-back NMI logic */
void local_touch_nmi(void)
{
__this_cpu_write(last_nmi_rip, 0);
}