linux/net/rose/rose_route.c

1355 lines
31 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* Copyright (C) Jonathan Naylor G4KLX (g4klx@g4klx.demon.co.uk)
* Copyright (C) Terry Dawson VK2KTJ (terry@animats.net)
*/
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/socket.h>
#include <linux/in.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/sockios.h>
#include <linux/net.h>
#include <net/ax25.h>
#include <linux/inet.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <net/arp.h>
#include <linux/if_arp.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/tcp_states.h>
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/fcntl.h>
#include <linux/termios.h> /* For TIOCINQ/OUTQ */
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/netfilter.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <net/rose.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
static unsigned int rose_neigh_no = 1;
static struct rose_node *rose_node_list;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rose_node_list_lock);
static struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh_list;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rose_neigh_list_lock);
static struct rose_route *rose_route_list;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rose_route_list_lock);
[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-08 08:44:17 +02:00
struct rose_neigh *rose_loopback_neigh;
/*
* Add a new route to a node, and in the process add the node and the
* neighbour if it is new.
*/
static int __must_check rose_add_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route,
struct net_device *dev)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node, *rose_tmpn, *rose_tmpp;
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh;
int i, res = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
if ((rose_node->mask == rose_route->mask) &&
(rosecmpm(&rose_route->address, &rose_node->address,
rose_route->mask) == 0))
break;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
}
if (rose_node != NULL && rose_node->loopback) {
res = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
if (ax25cmp(&rose_route->neighbour, &rose_neigh->callsign) == 0
&& rose_neigh->dev == dev)
break;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
}
if (rose_neigh == NULL) {
rose_neigh = kmalloc(sizeof(*rose_neigh), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (rose_neigh == NULL) {
res = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
rose_neigh->callsign = rose_route->neighbour;
rose_neigh->digipeat = NULL;
rose_neigh->ax25 = NULL;
rose_neigh->dev = dev;
rose_neigh->count = 0;
rose_neigh->use = 0;
rose_neigh->dce_mode = 0;
rose_neigh->loopback = 0;
rose_neigh->number = rose_neigh_no++;
rose_neigh->restarted = 0;
skb_queue_head_init(&rose_neigh->queue);
init_timer(&rose_neigh->ftimer);
init_timer(&rose_neigh->t0timer);
if (rose_route->ndigis != 0) {
if ((rose_neigh->digipeat = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) {
kfree(rose_neigh);
res = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
rose_neigh->digipeat->ndigi = rose_route->ndigis;
rose_neigh->digipeat->lastrepeat = -1;
for (i = 0; i < rose_route->ndigis; i++) {
rose_neigh->digipeat->calls[i] =
rose_route->digipeaters[i];
rose_neigh->digipeat->repeated[i] = 0;
}
}
rose_neigh->next = rose_neigh_list;
rose_neigh_list = rose_neigh;
}
/*
* This is a new node to be inserted into the list. Find where it needs
* to be inserted into the list, and insert it. We want to be sure
* to order the list in descending order of mask size to ensure that
* later when we are searching this list the first match will be the
* best match.
*/
if (rose_node == NULL) {
rose_tmpn = rose_node_list;
rose_tmpp = NULL;
while (rose_tmpn != NULL) {
if (rose_tmpn->mask > rose_route->mask) {
rose_tmpp = rose_tmpn;
rose_tmpn = rose_tmpn->next;
} else {
break;
}
}
/* create new node */
rose_node = kmalloc(sizeof(*rose_node), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (rose_node == NULL) {
res = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
rose_node->address = rose_route->address;
rose_node->mask = rose_route->mask;
rose_node->count = 1;
rose_node->loopback = 0;
rose_node->neighbour[0] = rose_neigh;
if (rose_tmpn == NULL) {
if (rose_tmpp == NULL) { /* Empty list */
rose_node_list = rose_node;
rose_node->next = NULL;
} else {
rose_tmpp->next = rose_node;
rose_node->next = NULL;
}
} else {
if (rose_tmpp == NULL) { /* 1st node */
rose_node->next = rose_node_list;
rose_node_list = rose_node;
} else {
rose_tmpp->next = rose_node;
rose_node->next = rose_tmpn;
}
}
rose_neigh->count++;
goto out;
}
/* We have space, slot it in */
if (rose_node->count < 3) {
rose_node->neighbour[rose_node->count] = rose_neigh;
rose_node->count++;
rose_neigh->count++;
}
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return res;
}
/*
* Caller is holding rose_node_list_lock.
*/
static void rose_remove_node(struct rose_node *rose_node)
{
struct rose_node *s;
if ((s = rose_node_list) == rose_node) {
rose_node_list = rose_node->next;
kfree(rose_node);
return;
}
while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
if (s->next == rose_node) {
s->next = rose_node->next;
kfree(rose_node);
return;
}
s = s->next;
}
}
/*
* Caller is holding rose_neigh_list_lock.
*/
static void rose_remove_neigh(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh)
{
struct rose_neigh *s;
rose_stop_ftimer(rose_neigh);
rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh);
skb_queue_purge(&rose_neigh->queue);
if ((s = rose_neigh_list) == rose_neigh) {
rose_neigh_list = rose_neigh->next;
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
}
while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
if (s->next == rose_neigh) {
s->next = rose_neigh->next;
kfree(rose_neigh->digipeat);
kfree(rose_neigh);
return;
}
s = s->next;
}
}
/*
* Caller is holding rose_route_list_lock.
*/
static void rose_remove_route(struct rose_route *rose_route)
{
struct rose_route *s;
if (rose_route->neigh1 != NULL)
rose_route->neigh1->use--;
if (rose_route->neigh2 != NULL)
rose_route->neigh2->use--;
if ((s = rose_route_list) == rose_route) {
rose_route_list = rose_route->next;
kfree(rose_route);
return;
}
while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) {
if (s->next == rose_route) {
s->next = rose_route->next;
kfree(rose_route);
return;
}
s = s->next;
}
}
/*
* "Delete" a node. Strictly speaking remove a route to a node. The node
* is only deleted if no routes are left to it.
*/
static int rose_del_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route,
struct net_device *dev)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node;
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh;
int i, err = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
if ((rose_node->mask == rose_route->mask) &&
(rosecmpm(&rose_route->address, &rose_node->address,
rose_route->mask) == 0))
break;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
}
if (rose_node == NULL || rose_node->loopback) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
if (ax25cmp(&rose_route->neighbour, &rose_neigh->callsign) == 0
&& rose_neigh->dev == dev)
break;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
}
if (rose_neigh == NULL) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < rose_node->count; i++) {
if (rose_node->neighbour[i] == rose_neigh) {
rose_neigh->count--;
if (rose_neigh->count == 0 && rose_neigh->use == 0)
rose_remove_neigh(rose_neigh);
rose_node->count--;
if (rose_node->count == 0) {
rose_remove_node(rose_node);
} else {
switch (i) {
case 0:
rose_node->neighbour[0] =
rose_node->neighbour[1];
case 1:
rose_node->neighbour[1] =
rose_node->neighbour[2];
case 2:
break;
}
}
goto out;
}
}
err = -EINVAL;
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return err;
}
/*
* Add the loopback neighbour.
*/
void rose_add_loopback_neigh(void)
{
[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-08 08:44:17 +02:00
struct rose_neigh *sn;
rose_loopback_neigh = kmalloc(sizeof(struct rose_neigh), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rose_loopback_neigh)
return;
sn = rose_loopback_neigh;
sn->callsign = null_ax25_address;
sn->digipeat = NULL;
sn->ax25 = NULL;
sn->dev = NULL;
sn->count = 0;
sn->use = 0;
sn->dce_mode = 1;
sn->loopback = 1;
sn->number = rose_neigh_no++;
sn->restarted = 1;
skb_queue_head_init(&sn->queue);
init_timer(&sn->ftimer);
init_timer(&sn->t0timer);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
sn->next = rose_neigh_list;
rose_neigh_list = sn;
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
}
/*
* Add a loopback node.
*/
int rose_add_loopback_node(rose_address *address)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node;
int err = 0;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
if ((rose_node->mask == 10) &&
(rosecmpm(address, &rose_node->address, 10) == 0) &&
rose_node->loopback)
break;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
}
if (rose_node != NULL)
goto out;
if ((rose_node = kmalloc(sizeof(*rose_node), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
rose_node->address = *address;
rose_node->mask = 10;
rose_node->count = 1;
rose_node->loopback = 1;
[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-08 08:44:17 +02:00
rose_node->neighbour[0] = rose_loopback_neigh;
/* Insert at the head of list. Address is always mask=10 */
rose_node->next = rose_node_list;
rose_node_list = rose_node;
[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-08 08:44:17 +02:00
rose_loopback_neigh->count++;
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return err;
}
/*
* Delete a loopback node.
*/
void rose_del_loopback_node(rose_address *address)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
if ((rose_node->mask == 10) &&
(rosecmpm(address, &rose_node->address, 10) == 0) &&
rose_node->loopback)
break;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
}
if (rose_node == NULL)
goto out;
rose_remove_node(rose_node);
[ROSE]: Fix rose.ko oops on unload Commit a3d384029aa304f8f3f5355d35f0ae274454f7cd aka "[AX.25]: Fix unchecked rose_add_loopback_neigh uses" transformed rose_loopback_neigh var into statically allocated one. However, on unload it will be kfree's which can't work. Steps to reproduce: modprobe rose rmmod rose BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000008 printing eip: c014c664 *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rose ax25 fan ufs loop usbhid rtc snd_intel8x0 snd_ac97_codec ehci_hcd ac97_bus uhci_hcd thermal usbcore button processor evdev sr_mod cdrom CPU: 0 EIP: 0060:[<c014c664>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210086 (2.6.23-rc9 #3) EIP is at kfree+0x48/0xa1 eax: 00000556 ebx: c1734aa0 ecx: f6a5e000 edx: f7082000 esi: 00000000 edi: f9a55d20 ebp: 00200287 esp: f6a5ef28 ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 0000 gs: 0033 ss: 0068 Process rmmod (pid: 1823, ti=f6a5e000 task=f7082000 task.ti=f6a5e000) Stack: f9a55d20 f9a5200c 00000000 00000000 00000000 f6a5e000 f9a5200c f9a55a00 00000000 bf818cf0 f9a51f3f f9a55a00 00000000 c0132c60 65736f72 00000000 f69f9630 f69f9528 c014244a f6a4e900 00200246 f7082000 c01025e6 00000000 Call Trace: [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a5200c>] rose_rt_free+0x1d/0x49 [rose] [<f9a51f3f>] rose_exit+0x4c/0xd5 [rose] [<c0132c60>] sys_delete_module+0x15e/0x186 [<c014244a>] remove_vma+0x40/0x45 [<c01025e6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x8f/0x99 [<c012bacf>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x118/0x13b [<c01025b6>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 ======================= Code: 05 03 1d 80 db 5b c0 8b 03 25 00 40 02 00 3d 00 40 02 00 75 03 8b 5b 0c 8b 73 10 8b 44 24 18 89 44 24 04 9c 5d fa e8 77 df fd ff <8b> 56 08 89 f8 e8 84 f4 fd ff e8 bd 32 06 00 3b 5c 86 60 75 0f EIP: [<c014c664>] kfree+0x48/0xa1 SS:ESP 0068:f6a5ef28 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-08 08:44:17 +02:00
rose_loopback_neigh->count--;
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
}
/*
* A device has been removed. Remove its routes and neighbours.
*/
void rose_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct rose_neigh *s, *rose_neigh;
struct rose_node *t, *rose_node;
int i;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
s = rose_neigh;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
if (s->dev != dev)
continue;
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
t = rose_node;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
for (i = 0; i < t->count; i++) {
if (t->neighbour[i] != s)
continue;
t->count--;
switch (i) {
case 0:
t->neighbour[0] = t->neighbour[1];
case 1:
t->neighbour[1] = t->neighbour[2];
case 2:
break;
}
}
if (t->count <= 0)
rose_remove_node(t);
}
rose_remove_neigh(s);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
}
#if 0 /* Currently unused */
/*
* A device has been removed. Remove its links.
*/
void rose_route_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct rose_route *s, *rose_route;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
rose_route = rose_route_list;
while (rose_route != NULL) {
s = rose_route;
rose_route = rose_route->next;
if (s->neigh1->dev == dev || s->neigh2->dev == dev)
rose_remove_route(s);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
}
#endif
/*
* Clear all nodes and neighbours out, except for neighbours with
* active connections going through them.
* Do not clear loopback neighbour and nodes.
*/
static int rose_clear_routes(void)
{
struct rose_neigh *s, *rose_neigh;
struct rose_node *t, *rose_node;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
rose_node = rose_node_list;
while (rose_node != NULL) {
t = rose_node;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
if (!t->loopback)
rose_remove_node(t);
}
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
s = rose_neigh;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
if (s->use == 0 && !s->loopback) {
s->count = 0;
rose_remove_neigh(s);
}
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return 0;
}
/*
* Check that the device given is a valid AX.25 interface that is "up".
*/
static struct net_device *rose_ax25_dev_get(char *devname)
{
struct net_device *dev;
[NET]: Make the device list and device lookups per namespace. This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-09-17 20:56:21 +02:00
if ((dev = dev_get_by_name(&init_net, devname)) == NULL)
return NULL;
if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && dev->type == ARPHRD_AX25)
return dev;
dev_put(dev);
return NULL;
}
/*
* Find the first active ROSE device, usually "rose0".
*/
struct net_device *rose_dev_first(void)
{
struct net_device *dev, *first = NULL;
read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
[NET]: Make the device list and device lookups per namespace. This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-09-17 20:56:21 +02:00
for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && dev->type == ARPHRD_ROSE)
if (first == NULL || strncmp(dev->name, first->name, 3) < 0)
first = dev;
}
read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
return first;
}
/*
* Find the ROSE device for the given address.
*/
struct net_device *rose_dev_get(rose_address *addr)
{
struct net_device *dev;
read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
[NET]: Make the device list and device lookups per namespace. This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-09-17 20:56:21 +02:00
for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && dev->type == ARPHRD_ROSE && rosecmp(addr, (rose_address *)dev->dev_addr) == 0) {
dev_hold(dev);
goto out;
}
}
dev = NULL;
out:
read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
return dev;
}
static int rose_dev_exists(rose_address *addr)
{
struct net_device *dev;
read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
[NET]: Make the device list and device lookups per namespace. This patch makes most of the generic device layer network namespace safe. This patch makes dev_base_head a network namespace variable, and then it picks up a few associated variables. The functions: dev_getbyhwaddr dev_getfirsthwbytype dev_get_by_flags dev_get_by_name __dev_get_by_name dev_get_by_index __dev_get_by_index dev_ioctl dev_ethtool dev_load wireless_process_ioctl were modified to take a network namespace argument, and deal with it. vlan_ioctl_set and brioctl_set were modified so their hooks will receive a network namespace argument. So basically anthing in the core of the network stack that was affected to by the change of dev_base was modified to handle multiple network namespaces. The rest of the network stack was simply modified to explicitly use &init_net the initial network namespace. This can be fixed when those components of the network stack are modified to handle multiple network namespaces. For now the ifindex generator is left global. Fundametally ifindex numbers are per namespace, or else we will have corner case problems with migration when we get that far. At the same time there are assumptions in the network stack that the ifindex of a network device won't change. Making the ifindex number global seems a good compromise until the network stack can cope with ifindex changes when you change namespaces, and the like. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-09-17 20:56:21 +02:00
for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
if ((dev->flags & IFF_UP) && dev->type == ARPHRD_ROSE && rosecmp(addr, (rose_address *)dev->dev_addr) == 0)
goto out;
}
dev = NULL;
out:
read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
return dev != NULL;
}
struct rose_route *rose_route_free_lci(unsigned int lci, struct rose_neigh *neigh)
{
struct rose_route *rose_route;
for (rose_route = rose_route_list; rose_route != NULL; rose_route = rose_route->next)
if ((rose_route->neigh1 == neigh && rose_route->lci1 == lci) ||
(rose_route->neigh2 == neigh && rose_route->lci2 == lci))
return rose_route;
return NULL;
}
/*
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
* Find a neighbour or a route given a ROSE address.
*/
struct rose_neigh *rose_get_neigh(rose_address *addr, unsigned char *cause,
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
unsigned char *diagnostic, int new)
{
struct rose_neigh *res = NULL;
struct rose_node *node;
int failed = 0;
int i;
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
if (!new) spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
for (node = rose_node_list; node != NULL; node = node->next) {
if (rosecmpm(addr, &node->address, node->mask) == 0) {
for (i = 0; i < node->count; i++) {
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
if (new) {
if (node->neighbour[i]->restarted) {
res = node->neighbour[i];
goto out;
}
}
else {
if (!rose_ftimer_running(node->neighbour[i])) {
res = node->neighbour[i];
goto out;
} else
failed = 1;
}
}
}
}
if (failed) {
*cause = ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER;
*diagnostic = 0;
} else {
*cause = ROSE_NOT_OBTAINABLE;
*diagnostic = 0;
}
out:
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
if (!new) spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
return res;
}
/*
* Handle the ioctls that control the routing functions.
*/
int rose_rt_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg)
{
struct rose_route_struct rose_route;
struct net_device *dev;
int err;
switch (cmd) {
case SIOCADDRT:
if (copy_from_user(&rose_route, arg, sizeof(struct rose_route_struct)))
return -EFAULT;
if ((dev = rose_ax25_dev_get(rose_route.device)) == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
if (rose_dev_exists(&rose_route.address)) { /* Can't add routes to ourself */
dev_put(dev);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (rose_route.mask > 10) /* Mask can't be more than 10 digits */
return -EINVAL;
if (rose_route.ndigis > AX25_MAX_DIGIS)
return -EINVAL;
err = rose_add_node(&rose_route, dev);
dev_put(dev);
return err;
case SIOCDELRT:
if (copy_from_user(&rose_route, arg, sizeof(struct rose_route_struct)))
return -EFAULT;
if ((dev = rose_ax25_dev_get(rose_route.device)) == NULL)
return -EINVAL;
err = rose_del_node(&rose_route, dev);
dev_put(dev);
return err;
case SIOCRSCLRRT:
return rose_clear_routes();
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static void rose_del_route_by_neigh(struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh)
{
struct rose_route *rose_route, *s;
rose_neigh->restarted = 0;
rose_stop_t0timer(rose_neigh);
rose_start_ftimer(rose_neigh);
skb_queue_purge(&rose_neigh->queue);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
rose_route = rose_route_list;
while (rose_route != NULL) {
if ((rose_route->neigh1 == rose_neigh && rose_route->neigh2 == rose_neigh) ||
(rose_route->neigh1 == rose_neigh && rose_route->neigh2 == NULL) ||
(rose_route->neigh2 == rose_neigh && rose_route->neigh1 == NULL)) {
s = rose_route->next;
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
rose_route = s;
continue;
}
if (rose_route->neigh1 == rose_neigh) {
rose_route->neigh1->use--;
rose_route->neigh1 = NULL;
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_route->neigh2, rose_route->lci2, ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER, 0);
}
if (rose_route->neigh2 == rose_neigh) {
rose_route->neigh2->use--;
rose_route->neigh2 = NULL;
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_route->neigh1, rose_route->lci1, ROSE_OUT_OF_ORDER, 0);
}
rose_route = rose_route->next;
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
}
/*
* A level 2 link has timed out, therefore it appears to be a poor link,
* then don't use that neighbour until it is reset. Blow away all through
* routes and connections using this route.
*/
void rose_link_failed(ax25_cb *ax25, int reason)
{
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
if (rose_neigh->ax25 == ax25)
break;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
}
if (rose_neigh != NULL) {
rose_neigh->ax25 = NULL;
rose_del_route_by_neigh(rose_neigh);
rose_kill_by_neigh(rose_neigh);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
}
/*
* A device has been "downed" remove its link status. Blow away all
* through routes and connections that use this device.
*/
void rose_link_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh;
for (rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list; rose_neigh != NULL; rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next) {
if (rose_neigh->dev == dev) {
rose_del_route_by_neigh(rose_neigh);
rose_kill_by_neigh(rose_neigh);
}
}
}
/*
* Route a frame to an appropriate AX.25 connection.
*/
int rose_route_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, ax25_cb *ax25)
{
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh, *new_neigh;
struct rose_route *rose_route;
struct rose_facilities_struct facilities;
rose_address *src_addr, *dest_addr;
struct sock *sk;
unsigned short frametype;
unsigned int lci, new_lci;
unsigned char cause, diagnostic;
struct net_device *dev;
int len, res = 0;
char buf[11];
#if 0
if (call_in_firewall(PF_ROSE, skb->dev, skb->data, NULL, &skb) != FW_ACCEPT)
return res;
#endif
frametype = skb->data[2];
lci = ((skb->data[0] << 8) & 0xF00) + ((skb->data[1] << 0) & 0x0FF);
src_addr = (rose_address *)(skb->data + 9);
dest_addr = (rose_address *)(skb->data + 4);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
if (ax25cmp(&ax25->dest_addr, &rose_neigh->callsign) == 0 &&
ax25->ax25_dev->dev == rose_neigh->dev)
break;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
}
if (rose_neigh == NULL) {
printk("rose_route : unknown neighbour or device %s\n",
ax2asc(buf, &ax25->dest_addr));
goto out;
}
/*
* Obviously the link is working, halt the ftimer.
*/
rose_stop_ftimer(rose_neigh);
/*
* LCI of zero is always for us, and its always a restart
* frame.
*/
if (lci == 0) {
rose_link_rx_restart(skb, rose_neigh, frametype);
goto out;
}
/*
* Find an existing socket.
*/
if ((sk = rose_find_socket(lci, rose_neigh)) != NULL) {
if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST) {
struct rose_sock *rose = rose_sk(sk);
/* Remove an existing unused socket */
rose_clear_queues(sk);
rose->cause = ROSE_NETWORK_CONGESTION;
rose->diagnostic = 0;
rose->neighbour->use--;
rose->neighbour = NULL;
rose->lci = 0;
rose->state = ROSE_STATE_0;
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sk->sk_err = 0;
sk->sk_shutdown |= SEND_SHUTDOWN;
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
}
}
else {
skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
res = rose_process_rx_frame(sk, skb);
goto out;
}
}
/*
* Is is a Call Request and is it for us ?
*/
if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST)
if ((dev = rose_dev_get(dest_addr)) != NULL) {
res = rose_rx_call_request(skb, dev, rose_neigh, lci);
dev_put(dev);
goto out;
}
if (!sysctl_rose_routing_control) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, ROSE_NOT_OBTAINABLE, 0);
goto out;
}
/*
* Route it to the next in line if we have an entry for it.
*/
rose_route = rose_route_list;
while (rose_route != NULL) {
if (rose_route->lci1 == lci &&
rose_route->neigh1 == rose_neigh) {
if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST) {
/* F6FBB - Remove an existing unused route */
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
break;
} else if (rose_route->neigh2 != NULL) {
skb->data[0] &= 0xF0;
skb->data[0] |= (rose_route->lci2 >> 8) & 0x0F;
skb->data[1] = (rose_route->lci2 >> 0) & 0xFF;
rose_transmit_link(skb, rose_route->neigh2);
if (frametype == ROSE_CLEAR_CONFIRMATION)
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
res = 1;
goto out;
} else {
if (frametype == ROSE_CLEAR_CONFIRMATION)
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
goto out;
}
}
if (rose_route->lci2 == lci &&
rose_route->neigh2 == rose_neigh) {
if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST) {
/* F6FBB - Remove an existing unused route */
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
break;
} else if (rose_route->neigh1 != NULL) {
skb->data[0] &= 0xF0;
skb->data[0] |= (rose_route->lci1 >> 8) & 0x0F;
skb->data[1] = (rose_route->lci1 >> 0) & 0xFF;
rose_transmit_link(skb, rose_route->neigh1);
if (frametype == ROSE_CLEAR_CONFIRMATION)
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
res = 1;
goto out;
} else {
if (frametype == ROSE_CLEAR_CONFIRMATION)
rose_remove_route(rose_route);
goto out;
}
}
rose_route = rose_route->next;
}
/*
* We know that:
* 1. The frame isn't for us,
* 2. It isn't "owned" by any existing route.
*/
if (frametype != ROSE_CALL_REQUEST) { /* XXX */
res = 0;
goto out;
}
len = (((skb->data[3] >> 4) & 0x0F) + 1) >> 1;
len += (((skb->data[3] >> 0) & 0x0F) + 1) >> 1;
memset(&facilities, 0x00, sizeof(struct rose_facilities_struct));
if (!rose_parse_facilities(skb->data + len + 4, &facilities)) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, ROSE_INVALID_FACILITY, 76);
goto out;
}
/*
* Check for routing loops.
*/
rose_route = rose_route_list;
while (rose_route != NULL) {
if (rose_route->rand == facilities.rand &&
rosecmp(src_addr, &rose_route->src_addr) == 0 &&
ax25cmp(&facilities.dest_call, &rose_route->src_call) == 0 &&
ax25cmp(&facilities.source_call, &rose_route->dest_call) == 0) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, ROSE_NOT_OBTAINABLE, 120);
goto out;
}
rose_route = rose_route->next;
}
rose: improving AX25 routing frames via ROSE network ROSE network is organized through nodes connected via hamradio or Internet. AX25 packet radio frames sent to a remote ROSE address destination are routed through these nodes. Without the present patch, automatic routing mechanism did not work optimally due to an improper parameter checking. rose_get_neigh() function is called either by rose_connect() or by rose_route_frame(). In the case of a call from rose_connect(), f0 timer is checked to find if a connection is already pending. In that case it returns the address of the neighbour, or returns a NULL otherwise. When called by rose_route_frame() the purpose was to route a packet AX25 frame through an adjacent node given a destination rose address. However, in that case, t0 timer checked does not indicate if the adjacent node is actually connected even if the timer is not null. Thus, for each frame sent, the function often tried to start a new connexion even if the adjacent node was already connected. The patch adds a "new" parameter that is true when the function is called by rose route_frame(). This instructs rose_get_neigh() to check node parameter "restarted". If restarted is true it means that the route to the destination address is opened via a neighbour node already connected. If "restarted" is false the function returns a NULL. In that case the calling function will initiate a new connection as before. This results in a fast routing of frames, from nodes to nodes, until destination is reached, as originaly specified by ROSE protocole. Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2008-06-18 02:08:32 +02:00
if ((new_neigh = rose_get_neigh(dest_addr, &cause, &diagnostic, 1)) == NULL) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, cause, diagnostic);
goto out;
}
if ((new_lci = rose_new_lci(new_neigh)) == 0) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, ROSE_NETWORK_CONGESTION, 71);
goto out;
}
if ((rose_route = kmalloc(sizeof(*rose_route), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) {
rose_transmit_clear_request(rose_neigh, lci, ROSE_NETWORK_CONGESTION, 120);
goto out;
}
rose_route->lci1 = lci;
rose_route->src_addr = *src_addr;
rose_route->dest_addr = *dest_addr;
rose_route->src_call = facilities.dest_call;
rose_route->dest_call = facilities.source_call;
rose_route->rand = facilities.rand;
rose_route->neigh1 = rose_neigh;
rose_route->lci2 = new_lci;
rose_route->neigh2 = new_neigh;
rose_route->neigh1->use++;
rose_route->neigh2->use++;
rose_route->next = rose_route_list;
rose_route_list = rose_route;
skb->data[0] &= 0xF0;
skb->data[0] |= (rose_route->lci2 >> 8) & 0x0F;
skb->data[1] = (rose_route->lci2 >> 0) & 0xFF;
rose_transmit_link(skb, rose_route->neigh2);
res = 1;
out:
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
return res;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static void *rose_node_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(rose_node_list_lock)
{
struct rose_node *rose_node;
int i = 1;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
for (rose_node = rose_node_list; rose_node && i < *pos;
rose_node = rose_node->next, ++i);
return (i == *pos) ? rose_node : NULL;
}
static void *rose_node_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
++*pos;
return (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) ? rose_node_list
: ((struct rose_node *)v)->next;
}
static void rose_node_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
__releases(rose_node_list_lock)
{
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
}
static int rose_node_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
int i;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
seq_puts(seq, "address mask n neigh neigh neigh\n");
else {
const struct rose_node *rose_node = v;
/* if (rose_node->loopback) {
seq_printf(seq, "%-10s %04d 1 loopback\n",
rose2asc(&rose_node->address),
rose_node->mask);
} else { */
seq_printf(seq, "%-10s %04d %d",
rose2asc(&rose_node->address),
rose_node->mask,
rose_node->count);
for (i = 0; i < rose_node->count; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %05d",
rose_node->neighbour[i]->number);
seq_puts(seq, "\n");
/* } */
}
return 0;
}
static const struct seq_operations rose_node_seqops = {
.start = rose_node_start,
.next = rose_node_next,
.stop = rose_node_stop,
.show = rose_node_show,
};
static int rose_nodes_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return seq_open(file, &rose_node_seqops);
}
const struct file_operations rose_nodes_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = rose_nodes_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
};
static void *rose_neigh_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(rose_neigh_list_lock)
{
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh;
int i = 1;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
for (rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list; rose_neigh && i < *pos;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next, ++i);
return (i == *pos) ? rose_neigh : NULL;
}
static void *rose_neigh_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
++*pos;
return (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) ? rose_neigh_list
: ((struct rose_neigh *)v)->next;
}
static void rose_neigh_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
__releases(rose_neigh_list_lock)
{
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
}
static int rose_neigh_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
char buf[11];
int i;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
seq_puts(seq,
"addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters\n");
else {
struct rose_neigh *rose_neigh = v;
/* if (!rose_neigh->loopback) { */
seq_printf(seq, "%05d %-9s %-4s %3d %3d %3s %3s %3lu %3lu",
rose_neigh->number,
(rose_neigh->loopback) ? "RSLOOP-0" : ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->callsign),
rose_neigh->dev ? rose_neigh->dev->name : "???",
rose_neigh->count,
rose_neigh->use,
(rose_neigh->dce_mode) ? "DCE" : "DTE",
(rose_neigh->restarted) ? "yes" : "no",
ax25_display_timer(&rose_neigh->t0timer) / HZ,
ax25_display_timer(&rose_neigh->ftimer) / HZ);
if (rose_neigh->digipeat != NULL) {
for (i = 0; i < rose_neigh->digipeat->ndigi; i++)
seq_printf(seq, " %s", ax2asc(buf, &rose_neigh->digipeat->calls[i]));
}
seq_puts(seq, "\n");
}
return 0;
}
static const struct seq_operations rose_neigh_seqops = {
.start = rose_neigh_start,
.next = rose_neigh_next,
.stop = rose_neigh_stop,
.show = rose_neigh_show,
};
static int rose_neigh_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return seq_open(file, &rose_neigh_seqops);
}
const struct file_operations rose_neigh_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = rose_neigh_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
};
static void *rose_route_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
__acquires(rose_route_list_lock)
{
struct rose_route *rose_route;
int i = 1;
spin_lock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
if (*pos == 0)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
for (rose_route = rose_route_list; rose_route && i < *pos;
rose_route = rose_route->next, ++i);
return (i == *pos) ? rose_route : NULL;
}
static void *rose_route_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
++*pos;
return (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) ? rose_route_list
: ((struct rose_route *)v)->next;
}
static void rose_route_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
__releases(rose_route_list_lock)
{
spin_unlock_bh(&rose_route_list_lock);
}
static int rose_route_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
char buf[11];
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
seq_puts(seq,
"lci address callsign neigh <-> lci address callsign neigh\n");
else {
struct rose_route *rose_route = v;
if (rose_route->neigh1)
seq_printf(seq,
"%3.3X %-10s %-9s %05d ",
rose_route->lci1,
rose2asc(&rose_route->src_addr),
ax2asc(buf, &rose_route->src_call),
rose_route->neigh1->number);
else
seq_puts(seq,
"000 * * 00000 ");
if (rose_route->neigh2)
seq_printf(seq,
"%3.3X %-10s %-9s %05d\n",
rose_route->lci2,
rose2asc(&rose_route->dest_addr),
ax2asc(buf, &rose_route->dest_call),
rose_route->neigh2->number);
else
seq_puts(seq,
"000 * * 00000\n");
}
return 0;
}
static const struct seq_operations rose_route_seqops = {
.start = rose_route_start,
.next = rose_route_next,
.stop = rose_route_stop,
.show = rose_route_show,
};
static int rose_route_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return seq_open(file, &rose_route_seqops);
}
const struct file_operations rose_routes_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.open = rose_route_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
/*
* Release all memory associated with ROSE routing structures.
*/
void __exit rose_rt_free(void)
{
struct rose_neigh *s, *rose_neigh = rose_neigh_list;
struct rose_node *t, *rose_node = rose_node_list;
struct rose_route *u, *rose_route = rose_route_list;
while (rose_neigh != NULL) {
s = rose_neigh;
rose_neigh = rose_neigh->next;
rose_remove_neigh(s);
}
while (rose_node != NULL) {
t = rose_node;
rose_node = rose_node->next;
rose_remove_node(t);
}
while (rose_route != NULL) {
u = rose_route;
rose_route = rose_route->next;
rose_remove_route(u);
}
}