linux/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c

133 lines
3.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) support for Armada XP
*
* Copyright (C) 2012 Marvell
*
* Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
* Yehuda Yitschak <yehuday@marvell.com>
* Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
* Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
*
* This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
* warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
*
* The Armada XP SoC has 4 ARMv7 PJ4B CPUs running in full HW coherency
* This file implements the routines for preparing the SMP infrastructure
* and waking up the secondary CPUs
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/mbus.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
#include "common.h"
#include "armada-370-xp.h"
#include "pmsu.h"
#include "coherency.h"
#define AXP_BOOTROM_BASE 0xfff00000
#define AXP_BOOTROM_SIZE 0x100000
static struct clk *__init get_cpu_clk(int cpu)
{
struct clk *cpu_clk;
struct device_node *np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
if (WARN(!np, "missing cpu node\n"))
return NULL;
cpu_clk = of_clk_get(np, 0);
if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(cpu_clk)))
return NULL;
return cpu_clk;
}
ARM: mvebu: fix some sparse warnings This patch fixes conflicting types for 'set_cpu_coherent' and fixes the following sparse warnings. arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:42:38: warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:49:38: warning: symbol 'orion_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'mvebu_restart' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:31:15: warning: symbol 'coherency_phys_base' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:48:5: warning: symbol 'set_cpu_coherent' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:123:12: warning: symbol 'coherency_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:38:5: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_boot_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:61:12: warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_pmsu_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:49:13: warning: symbol 'set_secondary_cpus_clock' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:97:13: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/hotplug.c:24:12: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
2013-11-07 10:02:38 +01:00
static void __init set_secondary_cpus_clock(void)
{
int thiscpu, cpu;
unsigned long rate;
struct clk *cpu_clk;
thiscpu = smp_processor_id();
cpu_clk = get_cpu_clk(thiscpu);
if (!cpu_clk)
return;
clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
rate = clk_get_rate(cpu_clk);
/* set all the other CPU clk to the same rate than the boot CPU */
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
if (cpu == thiscpu)
continue;
cpu_clk = get_cpu_clk(cpu);
if (!cpu_clk)
return;
clk_set_rate(cpu_clk, rate);
}
}
arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code, and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous" section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-06-17 21:43:14 +02:00
static void armada_xp_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
{
armada_xp_mpic_smp_cpu_init();
}
arm: delete __cpuinit/__CPUINIT usage from all ARM users The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time") is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created with improper use of the various __init prefixes. After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone, we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h. Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c) and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings. As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless. This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code, and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous" section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT (aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589 Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
2013-06-17 21:43:14 +02:00
static int armada_xp_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
{
pr_info("Booting CPU %d\n", cpu);
armada_xp_boot_cpu(cpu, armada_xp_secondary_startup);
return 0;
}
static void __init armada_xp_smp_init_cpus(void)
{
unsigned int ncores = num_possible_cpus();
if (ncores == 0 || ncores > ARMADA_XP_MAX_CPUS)
panic("Invalid number of CPUs in DT\n");
set_smp_cross_call(armada_mpic_send_doorbell);
}
ARM: mvebu: fix some sparse warnings This patch fixes conflicting types for 'set_cpu_coherent' and fixes the following sparse warnings. arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:42:38: warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:49:38: warning: symbol 'orion_system_controller' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/system-controller.c:67:6: warning: symbol 'mvebu_restart' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:31:15: warning: symbol 'coherency_phys_base' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:48:5: warning: symbol 'set_cpu_coherent' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c:123:12: warning: symbol 'coherency_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:38:5: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_boot_cpu' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pmsu.c:61:12: warning: symbol 'armada_370_xp_pmsu_init' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:49:13: warning: symbol 'set_secondary_cpus_clock' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c:97:13: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static? arch/arm/mach-mvebu/hotplug.c:24:12: warning: symbol 'armada_xp_cpu_die' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com> Acked-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
2013-11-07 10:02:38 +01:00
static void __init armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
struct device_node *node;
struct resource res;
int err;
set_secondary_cpus_clock();
flush_cache_all();
set_cpu_coherent(cpu_logical_map(smp_processor_id()), 0);
/*
* In order to boot the secondary CPUs we need to ensure
* the bootROM is mapped at the correct address.
*/
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "marvell,bootrom");
if (!node)
panic("Cannot find 'marvell,bootrom' compatible node");
err = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
if (err < 0)
panic("Cannot get 'bootrom' node address");
if (res.start != AXP_BOOTROM_BASE ||
resource_size(&res) != AXP_BOOTROM_SIZE)
panic("The address for the BootROM is incorrect");
}
struct smp_operations armada_xp_smp_ops __initdata = {
.smp_init_cpus = armada_xp_smp_init_cpus,
.smp_prepare_cpus = armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus,
.smp_secondary_init = armada_xp_secondary_init,
.smp_boot_secondary = armada_xp_boot_secondary,
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
.cpu_die = armada_xp_cpu_die,
#endif
};