linux/arch/arm64/mm/context.c

263 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Based on arch/arm/mm/context.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2002-2003 Deep Blue Solutions Ltd, all rights reserved.
* Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
#include <asm/smp.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
static u32 asid_bits;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cpu_asid_lock);
static atomic64_t asid_generation;
static unsigned long *asid_map;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic64_t, active_asids);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, reserved_asids);
static cpumask_t tlb_flush_pending;
#define ASID_MASK (~GENMASK(asid_bits - 1, 0))
#define ASID_FIRST_VERSION (1UL << asid_bits)
#define NUM_USER_ASIDS ASID_FIRST_VERSION
/* Get the ASIDBits supported by the current CPU */
static u32 get_cpu_asid_bits(void)
{
u32 asid;
int fld = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(read_cpuid(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1),
ID_AA64MMFR0_ASID_SHIFT);
switch (fld) {
default:
pr_warn("CPU%d: Unknown ASID size (%d); assuming 8-bit\n",
smp_processor_id(), fld);
/* Fallthrough */
case 0:
asid = 8;
break;
case 2:
asid = 16;
}
return asid;
}
/* Check if the current cpu's ASIDBits is compatible with asid_bits */
void verify_cpu_asid_bits(void)
{
u32 asid = get_cpu_asid_bits();
if (asid < asid_bits) {
/*
* We cannot decrease the ASID size at runtime, so panic if we support
* fewer ASID bits than the boot CPU.
*/
pr_crit("CPU%d: smaller ASID size(%u) than boot CPU (%u)\n",
smp_processor_id(), asid, asid_bits);
cpu_panic_kernel();
}
}
arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 The Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU may allocate TLB entries using an incorrect ASID when TTBRx_EL1 is being updated. When the erratum is triggered, page table entries using the new translation table base address (BADDR) will be allocated into the TLB using the old ASID. All circumstances leading to the incorrect ASID being cached in the TLB arise when software writes TTBRx_EL1[ASID] and TTBRx_EL1[BADDR], a memory operation is in the process of performing a translation using the specific TTBRx_EL1 being written, and the memory operation uses a translation table descriptor designated as non-global. EL2 and EL3 code changing the EL1&0 ASID is not subject to this erratum because hardware is prohibited from performing translations from an out-of-context translation regime. Consider the following pseudo code. write new BADDR and ASID values to TTBRx_EL1 Replacing the above sequence with the one below will ensure that no TLB entries with an incorrect ASID are used by software. write reserved value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[BADDR] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB When the above sequence is used, page table entries using the new BADDR value may still be incorrectly allocated into the TLB using the reserved ASID. Yet this will not reduce functionality, since TLB entries incorrectly tagged with the reserved ASID will never be hit by a later instruction. Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-02-08 21:08:37 +01:00
static void set_reserved_asid_bits(void)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_FALKOR_ERRATUM_1003) &&
cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_QCOM_FALKOR_E1003))
__set_bit(FALKOR_RESERVED_ASID, asid_map);
}
static void flush_context(unsigned int cpu)
{
int i;
u64 asid;
/* Update the list of reserved ASIDs and the ASID bitmap. */
bitmap_clear(asid_map, 0, NUM_USER_ASIDS);
arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 The Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU may allocate TLB entries using an incorrect ASID when TTBRx_EL1 is being updated. When the erratum is triggered, page table entries using the new translation table base address (BADDR) will be allocated into the TLB using the old ASID. All circumstances leading to the incorrect ASID being cached in the TLB arise when software writes TTBRx_EL1[ASID] and TTBRx_EL1[BADDR], a memory operation is in the process of performing a translation using the specific TTBRx_EL1 being written, and the memory operation uses a translation table descriptor designated as non-global. EL2 and EL3 code changing the EL1&0 ASID is not subject to this erratum because hardware is prohibited from performing translations from an out-of-context translation regime. Consider the following pseudo code. write new BADDR and ASID values to TTBRx_EL1 Replacing the above sequence with the one below will ensure that no TLB entries with an incorrect ASID are used by software. write reserved value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[BADDR] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB When the above sequence is used, page table entries using the new BADDR value may still be incorrectly allocated into the TLB using the reserved ASID. Yet this will not reduce functionality, since TLB entries incorrectly tagged with the reserved ASID will never be hit by a later instruction. Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-02-08 21:08:37 +01:00
set_reserved_asid_bits();
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
asid = atomic64_xchg_relaxed(&per_cpu(active_asids, i), 0);
/*
* If this CPU has already been through a
* rollover, but hasn't run another task in
* the meantime, we must preserve its reserved
* ASID, as this is the only trace we have of
* the process it is still running.
*/
if (asid == 0)
asid = per_cpu(reserved_asids, i);
__set_bit(asid & ~ASID_MASK, asid_map);
per_cpu(reserved_asids, i) = asid;
}
/*
* Queue a TLB invalidation for each CPU to perform on next
* context-switch
*/
cpumask_setall(&tlb_flush_pending);
}
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
static bool check_update_reserved_asid(u64 asid, u64 newasid)
{
int cpu;
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
bool hit = false;
/*
* Iterate over the set of reserved ASIDs looking for a match.
* If we find one, then we can update our mm to use newasid
* (i.e. the same ASID in the current generation) but we can't
* exit the loop early, since we need to ensure that all copies
* of the old ASID are updated to reflect the mm. Failure to do
* so could result in us missing the reserved ASID in a future
* generation.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
if (per_cpu(reserved_asids, cpu) == asid) {
hit = true;
per_cpu(reserved_asids, cpu) = newasid;
}
}
return hit;
}
static u64 new_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
{
static u32 cur_idx = 1;
u64 asid = atomic64_read(&mm->context.id);
u64 generation = atomic64_read(&asid_generation);
if (asid != 0) {
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
u64 newasid = generation | (asid & ~ASID_MASK);
/*
* If our current ASID was active during a rollover, we
* can continue to use it and this was just a false alarm.
*/
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
if (check_update_reserved_asid(asid, newasid))
return newasid;
/*
* We had a valid ASID in a previous life, so try to re-use
* it if possible.
*/
asid &= ~ASID_MASK;
if (!__test_and_set_bit(asid, asid_map))
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
return newasid;
}
/*
* Allocate a free ASID. If we can't find one, take a note of the
* currently active ASIDs and mark the TLBs as requiring flushes.
* We always count from ASID #1, as we use ASID #0 when setting a
* reserved TTBR0 for the init_mm.
*/
asid = find_next_zero_bit(asid_map, NUM_USER_ASIDS, cur_idx);
if (asid != NUM_USER_ASIDS)
goto set_asid;
/* We're out of ASIDs, so increment the global generation count */
generation = atomic64_add_return_relaxed(ASID_FIRST_VERSION,
&asid_generation);
flush_context(cpu);
/* We have more ASIDs than CPUs, so this will always succeed */
asid = find_next_zero_bit(asid_map, NUM_USER_ASIDS, 1);
set_asid:
__set_bit(asid, asid_map);
cur_idx = asid;
arm64: mm: keep reserved ASIDs in sync with mm after multiple rollovers Under some unusual context-switching patterns, it is possible to end up with multiple threads from the same mm running concurrently with different ASIDs: 1. CPU x schedules task t with mm p containing ASID a and generation g This task doesn't block and the CPU doesn't context switch. So: * per_cpu(active_asid, x) = {g,a} * p->context.id = {g,a} 2. Some other CPU generates an ASID rollover. The global generation is now (g + 1). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a} 3. CPU y schedules task t', which shares mm p with t. The generation mismatches, so we take the slowpath and hit the reserved ASID from CPU x. p is then updated so that p->context.id = {g + 1,a} 4. CPU y schedules some other task u, which has an mm != p. 5. Some other CPU generates *another* CPU rollover. The global generation is now (g + 2). CPU x is still running t, with no context switch and so per_cpu(reserved_asid, x) = {g,a}. 6. CPU y once again schedules task t', but now *fails* to hit the reserved ASID from CPU x because of the generation mismatch. This results in a new ASID being allocated, despite the fact that t is still running on CPU x with the same mm. Consequently, TLBIs (e.g. as a result of CoW) will not be synchronised between the two threads. This patch fixes the problem by updating all of the matching reserved ASIDs when we hit on the slowpath (i.e. in step 3 above). This keeps the reserved ASIDs in-sync with the mm and avoids the problem. Reported-by: Tony Thompson <anthony.thompson@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2015-11-26 14:49:39 +01:00
return asid | generation;
}
void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned long flags;
u64 asid;
asid = atomic64_read(&mm->context.id);
/*
* The memory ordering here is subtle.
* If our ASID matches the current generation, then we update
* our active_asids entry with a relaxed xchg. Racing with a
* concurrent rollover means that either:
*
* - We get a zero back from the xchg and end up waiting on the
* lock. Taking the lock synchronises with the rollover and so
* we are forced to see the updated generation.
*
* - We get a valid ASID back from the xchg, which means the
* relaxed xchg in flush_context will treat us as reserved
* because atomic RmWs are totally ordered for a given location.
*/
if (!((asid ^ atomic64_read(&asid_generation)) >> asid_bits)
&& atomic64_xchg_relaxed(&per_cpu(active_asids, cpu), asid))
goto switch_mm_fastpath;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
/* Check that our ASID belongs to the current generation. */
asid = atomic64_read(&mm->context.id);
if ((asid ^ atomic64_read(&asid_generation)) >> asid_bits) {
asid = new_context(mm, cpu);
atomic64_set(&mm->context.id, asid);
}
if (cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &tlb_flush_pending))
local_flush_tlb_all();
atomic64_set(&per_cpu(active_asids, cpu), asid);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_asid_lock, flags);
switch_mm_fastpath:
/*
* Defer TTBR0_EL1 setting for user threads to uaccess_enable() when
* emulating PAN.
*/
if (!system_uses_ttbr0_pan())
cpu_switch_mm(mm->pgd, mm);
}
static int asids_init(void)
{
asid_bits = get_cpu_asid_bits();
/*
* Expect allocation after rollover to fail if we don't have at least
* one more ASID than CPUs. ASID #0 is reserved for init_mm.
*/
WARN_ON(NUM_USER_ASIDS - 1 <= num_possible_cpus());
atomic64_set(&asid_generation, ASID_FIRST_VERSION);
asid_map = kzalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(NUM_USER_ASIDS) * sizeof(*asid_map),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!asid_map)
panic("Failed to allocate bitmap for %lu ASIDs\n",
NUM_USER_ASIDS);
arm64: Work around Falkor erratum 1003 The Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Falkor v1 CPU may allocate TLB entries using an incorrect ASID when TTBRx_EL1 is being updated. When the erratum is triggered, page table entries using the new translation table base address (BADDR) will be allocated into the TLB using the old ASID. All circumstances leading to the incorrect ASID being cached in the TLB arise when software writes TTBRx_EL1[ASID] and TTBRx_EL1[BADDR], a memory operation is in the process of performing a translation using the specific TTBRx_EL1 being written, and the memory operation uses a translation table descriptor designated as non-global. EL2 and EL3 code changing the EL1&0 ASID is not subject to this erratum because hardware is prohibited from performing translations from an out-of-context translation regime. Consider the following pseudo code. write new BADDR and ASID values to TTBRx_EL1 Replacing the above sequence with the one below will ensure that no TLB entries with an incorrect ASID are used by software. write reserved value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[BADDR] ISB write new value to TTBRx_EL1[ASID] ISB When the above sequence is used, page table entries using the new BADDR value may still be incorrectly allocated into the TLB using the reserved ASID. Yet this will not reduce functionality, since TLB entries incorrectly tagged with the reserved ASID will never be hit by a later instruction. Based on work by Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2017-02-08 21:08:37 +01:00
set_reserved_asid_bits();
pr_info("ASID allocator initialised with %lu entries\n", NUM_USER_ASIDS);
return 0;
}
early_initcall(asids_init);