OpenE2K
/
linux
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
linux/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h

54 lines
1.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Disintegrate asm/system.h for S390 Disintegrate asm/system.h for S390. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
2012-03-28 19:30:02 +02:00
/*
* Copyright IBM Corp. 1999, 2009
*
* Author(s): Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
*/
#ifndef __ASM_BARRIER_H
#define __ASM_BARRIER_H
/*
* Force strict CPU ordering.
* And yes, this is required on UP too when we're talking
* to devices.
*/
s390/barrier: make use of fast-bcr facility If the kernel gets compiled for at least z196, make use of the fast-BCR facility. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-05-14 12:41:54 +02:00
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MARCH_Z196_FEATURES
s390/barrier: convert mb() to define again Some of the now available common code drivers only compile if mb() is a define. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2013-01-30 13:56:14 +01:00
/* Fast-BCR without checkpoint synchronization */
s390/spinlock: optimize spin_unlock code Use a memory barrier + store sequence instead of a load + compare and swap sequence to unlock a spinlock and an rw lock. For the spinlock case this saves us two memory reads and a not needed cpu serialization after the compare and swap instruction stored the new value. The kernel size (performance_defconfig) gets reduced by ~14k. Average execution time of a tight inlined spin_unlock loop drops from 5.8ns to 0.7ns on a zEC12 machine. An artificial stress test case where several counters are protected with a single spinlock and which are only incremented while holding the spinlock shows ~30% improvement on a 4 cpu machine. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2014-09-08 08:20:43 +02:00
#define __ASM_BARRIER "bcr 14,0\n"
s390/barrier: make use of fast-bcr facility If the kernel gets compiled for at least z196, make use of the fast-BCR facility. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-05-14 12:41:54 +02:00
#else
s390/spinlock: optimize spin_unlock code Use a memory barrier + store sequence instead of a load + compare and swap sequence to unlock a spinlock and an rw lock. For the spinlock case this saves us two memory reads and a not needed cpu serialization after the compare and swap instruction stored the new value. The kernel size (performance_defconfig) gets reduced by ~14k. Average execution time of a tight inlined spin_unlock loop drops from 5.8ns to 0.7ns on a zEC12 machine. An artificial stress test case where several counters are protected with a single spinlock and which are only incremented while holding the spinlock shows ~30% improvement on a 4 cpu machine. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2014-09-08 08:20:43 +02:00
#define __ASM_BARRIER "bcr 15,0\n"
s390/barrier: make use of fast-bcr facility If the kernel gets compiled for at least z196, make use of the fast-BCR facility. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-05-14 12:41:54 +02:00
#endif
s390/barrier: cleanup barrier functions s390 really has no eieio instruction, so get rid of the implied ppc semantics and in addition change mb() into a function. Also remove SYNC_OTHER_CORES() since it is unused. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-05-14 12:40:43 +02:00
s390/spinlock: optimize spin_unlock code Use a memory barrier + store sequence instead of a load + compare and swap sequence to unlock a spinlock and an rw lock. For the spinlock case this saves us two memory reads and a not needed cpu serialization after the compare and swap instruction stored the new value. The kernel size (performance_defconfig) gets reduced by ~14k. Average execution time of a tight inlined spin_unlock loop drops from 5.8ns to 0.7ns on a zEC12 machine. An artificial stress test case where several counters are protected with a single spinlock and which are only incremented while holding the spinlock shows ~30% improvement on a 4 cpu machine. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2014-09-08 08:20:43 +02:00
#define mb() do { asm volatile(__ASM_BARRIER : : : "memory"); } while (0)
s390/barrier: avoid serialization in [smp_]rmb and [smp_]wmb The principles of operation says: The storage-operand fetch references of one instruction occur after those of all preceding instructions and before those of subsequent instructions, as observed by other CPUs and by channel programs. [...] The CPU may fetch the operands of instructions before the instructions are executed. [...] The CPU may delay placing results in storage. [...] the results of one instruction are placed in storage after the results of all preceding instructions have been placed in storage and before any results of the succeeding instructions are stored, as observed by other CPUs and by the channel subsystem. which boils down to: - reads are in order - writes are in order - reads can happen earlier - writes can happen later By definition (see memory-barrier.txt) read barriers orders reads vs reads and write barriers orders writes agains writes. but neither of these orders reads vs. writes. That means we can implement smp_wmb,smp_rmb,wmb and rmb as simple compiler barriers. To avoid reviewing all driver code for correct barrier usage we keep dma_[rw]mb as serialization for now. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2015-09-11 16:32:24 +02:00
#define rmb() barrier()
#define wmb() barrier()
#define dma_rmb() mb()
#define dma_wmb() mb()
s390: define __smp_xxx This defines __smp_xxx barriers for s390, for use by virtualization. Some smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h Note: smp_mb, smp_rmb and smp_wmb are defined as full barriers unconditionally on this architecture. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2015-12-27 14:04:42 +01:00
#define __smp_mb() mb()
#define __smp_rmb() rmb()
#define __smp_wmb() wmb()
#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release() A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much cheaper ways to handle these situations, but the Linux kernel currently has no portable way to make use of them. This commit therefore supplies smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() to remedy this situation. The new smp_load_acquire() primitive orders the specified load against any subsequent reads or writes, while the new smp_store_release() primitive orders the specifed store against any prior reads or writes. These primitives allow array-based circular FIFOs to be implemented without an smp_mb(), and also allow a theoretical hole in rcu_assign_pointer() to be closed at no additional expense on most architectures. In addition, the RCU experience transitioning from explicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and smp_wmb() to rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer(), respectively resulted in substantial improvements in readability. It therefore seems likely that replacing other explicit barriers with smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() will provide similar benefits. It appears that roughly half of the explicit barriers in core kernel code might be so replaced. [Changelog by PaulMck] Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK@il.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131213150640.908486364@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-06 14:57:36 +01:00
do { \
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
barrier(); \
locking, arch: use WRITE_ONCE()/READ_ONCE() in smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() Replace ACCESS_ONCE() macro in smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire() with WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE() on x86, arm, arm64, ia64, metag, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc and asm-generic since ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE() were introduced in the following commits: 230fa253df63 ("kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE") 43239cbe79fc ("kernel: Change ASSIGN_ONCE(val, x) to WRITE_ONCE(x, val)") Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438528264-714-1-git-send-email-andreyknvl@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-08-02 17:11:04 +02:00
WRITE_ONCE(*p, v); \
arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release() A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much cheaper ways to handle these situations, but the Linux kernel currently has no portable way to make use of them. This commit therefore supplies smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() to remedy this situation. The new smp_load_acquire() primitive orders the specified load against any subsequent reads or writes, while the new smp_store_release() primitive orders the specifed store against any prior reads or writes. These primitives allow array-based circular FIFOs to be implemented without an smp_mb(), and also allow a theoretical hole in rcu_assign_pointer() to be closed at no additional expense on most architectures. In addition, the RCU experience transitioning from explicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and smp_wmb() to rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer(), respectively resulted in substantial improvements in readability. It therefore seems likely that replacing other explicit barriers with smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() will provide similar benefits. It appears that roughly half of the explicit barriers in core kernel code might be so replaced. [Changelog by PaulMck] Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK@il.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131213150640.908486364@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-06 14:57:36 +01:00
} while (0)
s390: define __smp_xxx This defines __smp_xxx barriers for s390, for use by virtualization. Some smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h Note: smp_mb, smp_rmb and smp_wmb are defined as full barriers unconditionally on this architecture. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2015-12-27 14:04:42 +01:00
#define __smp_load_acquire(p) \
arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release() A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much cheaper ways to handle these situations, but the Linux kernel currently has no portable way to make use of them. This commit therefore supplies smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() to remedy this situation. The new smp_load_acquire() primitive orders the specified load against any subsequent reads or writes, while the new smp_store_release() primitive orders the specifed store against any prior reads or writes. These primitives allow array-based circular FIFOs to be implemented without an smp_mb(), and also allow a theoretical hole in rcu_assign_pointer() to be closed at no additional expense on most architectures. In addition, the RCU experience transitioning from explicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and smp_wmb() to rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer(), respectively resulted in substantial improvements in readability. It therefore seems likely that replacing other explicit barriers with smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() will provide similar benefits. It appears that roughly half of the explicit barriers in core kernel code might be so replaced. [Changelog by PaulMck] Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK@il.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131213150640.908486364@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-06 14:57:36 +01:00
({ \
locking, arch: use WRITE_ONCE()/READ_ONCE() in smp_store_release()/smp_load_acquire() Replace ACCESS_ONCE() macro in smp_store_release() and smp_load_acquire() with WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE() on x86, arm, arm64, ia64, metag, mips, powerpc, s390, sparc and asm-generic since ACCESS_ONCE() does not work reliably on non-scalar types. WRITE_ONCE() and READ_ONCE() were introduced in the following commits: 230fa253df63 ("kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE") 43239cbe79fc ("kernel: Change ASSIGN_ONCE(val, x) to WRITE_ONCE(x, val)") Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438528264-714-1-git-send-email-andreyknvl@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2015-08-02 17:11:04 +02:00
typeof(*p) ___p1 = READ_ONCE(*p); \
arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release() A number of situations currently require the heavyweight smp_mb(), even though there is no need to order prior stores against later loads. Many architectures have much cheaper ways to handle these situations, but the Linux kernel currently has no portable way to make use of them. This commit therefore supplies smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() to remedy this situation. The new smp_load_acquire() primitive orders the specified load against any subsequent reads or writes, while the new smp_store_release() primitive orders the specifed store against any prior reads or writes. These primitives allow array-based circular FIFOs to be implemented without an smp_mb(), and also allow a theoretical hole in rcu_assign_pointer() to be closed at no additional expense on most architectures. In addition, the RCU experience transitioning from explicit smp_read_barrier_depends() and smp_wmb() to rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer(), respectively resulted in substantial improvements in readability. It therefore seems likely that replacing other explicit barriers with smp_load_acquire() and smp_store_release() will provide similar benefits. It appears that roughly half of the explicit barriers in core kernel code might be so replaced. [Changelog by PaulMck] Reviewed-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Cc: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Victor Kaplansky <VICTORK@il.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131213150640.908486364@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-06 14:57:36 +01:00
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
barrier(); \
___p1; \
})
s390: more efficient smp barriers As per: lkml.kernel.org/r/20150921112252.3c2937e1@mschwide atomics imply a barrier on s390, so s390 should change smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic to barrier() instead of smp_mb() and hence should not use the generic versions. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2016-01-10 12:19:38 +01:00
#define __smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier()
#define __smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier()
s390: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h On s390 read_barrier_depends, smp_read_barrier_depends smp_store_mb(), smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic match the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in asm-generic/barrier.h instead. This is in preparation to refactoring this code area. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2015-12-21 08:22:18 +01:00
#include <asm-generic/barrier.h>
Disintegrate asm/system.h for S390 Disintegrate asm/system.h for S390. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
2012-03-28 19:30:02 +02:00
#endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */