From 057f3fadb347e9c51b07e1b277bbdda79f976768 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:24:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix sched_domain iterations vs. RCU Vladis Kletnieks reported a new RCU debug warning in the scheduler. Since commit dce840a08702b ("sched: Dynamically allocate sched_domain/ sched_group data-structures") the sched_domain trees are protected by RCU instead of RCU-sched. This means that we need to include rcu_read_lock() protection when we iterate them since disabling preemption doesn't suffice anymore. Reported-by: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302882741.2388.241.camel@twins Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 0cfe0310ed5d..27d3e73a2af6 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -1208,11 +1208,17 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void) int i; struct sched_domain *sd; + rcu_read_lock(); for_each_domain(cpu, sd) { - for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) - if (!idle_cpu(i)) - return i; + for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) { + if (!idle_cpu(i)) { + cpu = i; + goto unlock; + } + } } +unlock: + rcu_read_unlock(); return cpu; } /* @@ -2415,12 +2421,14 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) struct sched_domain *sd; schedstat_inc(p, se.statistics.nr_wakeups_remote); + rcu_read_lock(); for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) { if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd))) { schedstat_inc(sd, ttwu_wake_remote); break; } } + rcu_read_unlock(); } #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */