ima: added policy support for 'security.ima' type

The 'security.ima' extended attribute may contain either the file data's
hash or a digital signature.  This patch adds support for requiring a
specific extended attribute type.  It extends the IMA policy with a new
keyword 'appraise_type=imasig'.  (Default is hash.)

Changelog v2:
- Fixed Documentation/ABI/testing/ima_policy option syntax
Changelog v1:
- Differentiate between 'required' vs. 'actual' extended attribute

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Kasatkin 2012-06-08 13:58:49 +03:00 committed by Mimi Zohar
parent a175b8bb29
commit 0e5a247cb3
5 changed files with 28 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -18,10 +18,11 @@ Description:
rule format: action [condition ...]
action: measure | dont_measure | appraise | dont_appraise | audit
condition:= base | lsm
condition:= base | lsm [option]
base: [[func=] [mask=] [fsmagic=] [uid=] [fowner]]
lsm: [[subj_user=] [subj_role=] [subj_type=]
[obj_user=] [obj_role=] [obj_type=]]
option: [[appraise_type=]]
base: func:= [BPRM_CHECK][MMAP_CHECK][FILE_CHECK][MODULE_CHECK]
mask:= [MAY_READ] [MAY_WRITE] [MAY_APPEND] [MAY_EXEC]
@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ Description:
uid:= decimal value
fowner:=decimal value
lsm: are LSM specific
option: appraise_type:= [imasig]
default policy:
# PROC_SUPER_MAGIC

View File

@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
switch (xattr_value->type) {
case IMA_XATTR_DIGEST:
if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) {
cause = "IMA signature required";
status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
break;
}
rc = memcmp(xattr_value->digest, iint->ima_xattr.digest,
IMA_DIGEST_SIZE);
if (rc) {

View File

@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
* (IMA_MEASURE, IMA_MEASURED, IMA_APPRAISE, IMA_APPRAISED,
* IMA_AUDIT, IMA_AUDITED) */
iint->flags |= action;
action &= IMA_DO_MASK;
action &= ~((iint->flags & IMA_DONE_MASK) >> 1);
/* Nothing to do, just return existing appraised status */

View File

@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, enum ima_hooks func, int mask,
if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, func, mask))
continue;
action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;
action |= entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK;
if (entry->action & IMA_DO_MASK)
actmask &= ~(entry->action | entry->action << 1);
@ -318,7 +320,8 @@ enum {
Opt_audit,
Opt_obj_user, Opt_obj_role, Opt_obj_type,
Opt_subj_user, Opt_subj_role, Opt_subj_type,
Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic, Opt_uid, Opt_fowner
Opt_func, Opt_mask, Opt_fsmagic, Opt_uid, Opt_fowner,
Opt_appraise_type
};
static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
@ -338,6 +341,7 @@ static match_table_t policy_tokens = {
{Opt_fsmagic, "fsmagic=%s"},
{Opt_uid, "uid=%s"},
{Opt_fowner, "fowner=%s"},
{Opt_appraise_type, "appraise_type=%s"},
{Opt_err, NULL}
};
@ -560,6 +564,18 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
LSM_SUBJ_TYPE,
AUDIT_SUBJ_TYPE);
break;
case Opt_appraise_type:
if (entry->action != APPRAISE) {
result = -EINVAL;
break;
}
ima_log_string(ab, "appraise_type", args[0].from);
if ((strcmp(args[0].from, "imasig")) == 0)
entry->flags |= IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED;
else
result = -EINVAL;
break;
case Opt_err:
ima_log_string(ab, "UNKNOWN", p);
result = -EINVAL;

View File

@ -26,7 +26,9 @@
#define IMA_AUDITED 0x0080
/* iint cache flags */
#define IMA_ACTION_FLAGS 0xff00
#define IMA_DIGSIG 0x0100
#define IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED 0x0200
#define IMA_DO_MASK (IMA_MEASURE | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_AUDIT)
#define IMA_DONE_MASK (IMA_MEASURED | IMA_APPRAISED | IMA_AUDITED \